Nancy Wilson2 said:Thank God most people don't actually follow those "spiritual" teachings—if they did, there wouldn't be anyone left on this planet.
This is where things actually start getting interesting. All those spiritual teachings handed down by supposedly "enlightened" figures—well, they ultimately originate from the spirit itself. It stands to reason that the spirit shaped this world to align with the human experience. From what I can gather, it seems to have been part of the grand design for us to form deep emotional bonds; everything in existence points toward this being a fundamental, natural necessity—something clearly visible in the wild and among the animal kingdom. Furthermore, if one looks at the ancient Upanishads—which served as the foundational bedrock for most of the spiritual philosophies currently trending in America—the universe and nature are essentially synonymous with God.
And now, even the spiritualists are pushing back against this—it’s truly bizarre. It’s as if God is acting in direct opposition to Himself, working against His own design in an attempt to dismantle exactly what He intended to create.
Emotional attachment remains one of the fundamental pillars of human love—it manifests within the bond between parent and child, among friends, and between romantic partners alike. It is, by all accounts, entirely natural. While certain animals exhibit similar traits, they don't all possess this specific depth—as I mentioned before. From a theological perspective, one might ask why this exists in the first place; if it is indeed the intention of God, then there is a glaring contradiction to address. This capacity for connection inevitably brings with it immense suffering, heartache, and a myriad of complex problems—which suggests it doesn't quite stem from a source that is purely composed of love and goodness. Something simply doesn't align. Of course, everything I have just laid out is merely me airing my own thoughts—it doesn't necessarily bear much direct relevance to the core topic at hand.
The fundamental point here is that bonding is a biological imperative—it’s entirely natural. Without that instinctual connection, life as we know it wouldn't even exist; and even if it did, parents wouldn't feel that innate drive to protect their offspring. There is actual scientific precedent for this, too—studies have shown that when you artificially suppress oxytocin levels in parents, that protective instinct vanishes, often resulting in them becoming aggressive toward their own young.
While certain inclinations may be innate, an individual still maintains the agency to decide whether or not to engage with them—provided they have the willpower. Of course, that choice is often a fragile thing, given that our neurological wiring is essentially hardcoded to respond to these stimuli. We aren't entirely helpless, however, when pitted against those relentless evolutionary pressures and primal instincts.
Exactly. That’s what I'm saying. It's right there in plain sight, especially with that part in bold. I don't think anyone ever claimed it wasn't natural, either. I mean, obviously, it is. 🙂 I guess some souls have just already been through all of this before. You know, after going through a few different lives, they finally start to realize that maybe it’s actually time to rise above all these earthly attachments. They begin to see that even though being connected to everyone and everything brings a certain kind of happiness, it’s really just temporary. I mean, at the end of the day, you're always facing sickness, death, and—don't even get me started on the daily grind—all those constant stressors and worries that just drain you. Eventually, there comes this moment where it just clicks, and you feel this intense need to pull away from all that heavy heartache.
I was just sitting here wondering, how does that one psalm by John the Apostle go again? I think it was him who wrote it, if I'm remembering correctly.
I was thinking about this bit from the Bible earlier, and it’s honestly such a heavy concept when you really sit with it. It basically says we shouldn't get too caught up in chasing after everything this world has to offer. I guess the idea is that if someone is totally obsessed with worldly stuff, there isn't really any room left for the love of God. It’s kind of like how everything material—you know, those physical cravings, the constant desire for more things, or just that overwhelming pride in what we own and who we are—doesn't actually come from God, but from the world itself. Everything around us is so temporary; trends fade, stuff breaks, and eventually, all those worldly desires just pass away. But, if I'm reading this right, the people who focus on doing what God wants? They’re the ones who actually last forever. It’s a pretty deep way to look at life, I suppose.
My bad if I got any of the Psalm a little bit wrong, but I just memorized it once a while back, so I’m really hoping I remembered it correctly and stayed true to the actual wording. 🙂