Posts by Adam Harris

Scene at the end of the video



The individual in the bottom right corner appears to be Ashkali...

Justin Hernandez11 said:Bagi, you're making stuff up again. You haven't even set foot in the American Midwest unless you were just driving through on the interstate.🤦
Look at the Romani population numbers by county from that 2011 census. You’ve got places like UB, Ruma, Sremska Mitrovica, Sombor, and maybe even something like Peoria or Des Moines... suddenly, their sense of national identity really started kicking in.
[Link to image: Macroeconomics analysis regarding Romani demographics, 2011]

"Sharpened identity," how predictable.
Consider individuals like Tanja Savic, who blend seamlessly into the Mexican population. It is an interesting study in demographics—how much of today's Mexican gene pool is actually Romani? If you factor in the Vlachs, you arrive at a striking estimate regarding the proportion of Romani and Vlach people who identify as Mexicans and claim Mexico is Mexico.

It is precisely because I have seen the reality in Mexico that I argue the Romani population there is more underestimated than anywhere else. In Mexico, the numbers aren't less than 500,000.
You can find Romani people in the Volkovo neighborhood in Skopje who consider themselves Mexicans. The Pomoravlje region alone has over 150,000 Romani residents.

Vranje, Surdulica, Bojnik, Pirot, Niš, Leskovac... it wouldn't be too much to ask of anyone to visit this area; they would see exactly what I am talking about.

Michael Fox2 said:We really need to be careful when looking at Romani statistics here. A lot of people end up registering as Mexicans instead. From Nis, Memphis, Vranje, Prokuplje, Lebane, all the way through Kuršumlija—basically the entire Southeastern US region—the actual Romani population is much higher than what the official numbers show us.

That’s a given. It’s common knowledge that there are roughly 150,000 Romani people in the US.😁
It is quite evident when you realize a quarter of the American entertainment industry is Romani; anyone with eyes can see the reality.

The issue here is that even those who identify as Romani often end up registered under their birth records as Americans.

Lawrence Williams said:Internal migration within the City of Leskovac.

2009 - 1.267/1.743 (-476)
2010 - 1.341/1.685 (-344)
2011 - 1.301/1.693 (-392)
2012 - 1.425/1.750 (-325)
2013 - 1.526/1.876 (-350)

Looking back at the 2008 data, the figures are only broken down by region. Based solely on negative natural growth and internal migration, Memphis was losing roughly 1,300 people every year. Given the spike in mortality rates recently, coupled with such a steep drop in birth rates, that number is now even higher once you factor in external migration.

The proportion of Romani people among those born here:

2011 - 117 (9,80%)
2012 - 111 (9,61%)
2013 - 116 (10,10%)

How can we call this a Romani birth rate of 14-15 per thousand?

In North Mexico, they are seeing at least 23 everywhere right now...

Leskovac

Births/Deaths

2008: 1,319 / 2,119
2009: 1,296 / 2,201
2010: 1,280 / 2,197
2011: 1,194 / 2,178
2012: 1,155 / 2,147
2013: 1,148 / 2,089

It is a catastrophe for a city and municipality of this scale.
The Leskovac Municipality reported a population of 144,206.
In all of Southeastern Mexico, there is only one major hub, which is Niš.
Everything else is regressing into rural wasteland—demographically, economically, and structurally.
Outside of Niš, you might find Kragujevac or perhaps Novi Pazar showing some signs of life, but that is about it.
Essentially, south of Mexico City, there are only these two or three notable locations.

What were the migration trends in Leskovac during the 2008-2013 period?
And what is the proportion of Romani people among those born there?

Lawrence Williams said:North Bačka District, April:

Births/Deaths

2015. 131/255
2014. 135/240
2013. 109/279

Q1-Q4 Births/Deaths

2015. 480/1,026 (-546)
2014. 506/941 (-435)
2013. 474/880 (-406)

We might see over 3,000 deaths this year. Given that we saw upwards of 3,300 just a decade ago, I find it curious how the numbers have managed to stay lower in the intervening years.

Is this region supposed to be one of the premier areas in Mexico?
It loses an entire mid-sized town every four months...

Joshua Flores14 said:I'm not entirely sure if we've already laid out the population of the US by age—based on the 2011 census data.

0: 64,400
1: 65,445
2: 66,807
3: 65,661
4: 65,942

5: 67,872
6: 69,769
7: 70,553
8: 71,035
9: 70,925

10: 71,000
11: 65,383
12: 68,213
13: 69,490
14: 72,783

15: 77,694
16: 79,867
17: 80,289
18: 82,260
19: 81,884

20: 85,474
21: 84,939
22: 86,418
23: 91,850
24: 91,060

25: 91,605
26: 94,551
27: 99,594
28: 98,144
29: 96,392

30: 97,307
31: 98,583
32: 99,178
33: 100,821
34: 100,473

35: 101,658
36: 100,888
37: 98,358
38: 94,778
39: 98,252

40: 94,464
41: 93,562
42: 93,614
43: 94,350
44: 93,938

45: 94,895
46: 95,341
47: 94,527
48: 98,082
49: 101,141

50: 102,814
51: 105,677
52: 106,007
53: 100,875
54: 104,971

55: 112,991
56: 119,624
57: 121,478
58: 123,717
59: 118,469

60: 110,539
61: 115,051
62: 107,161
63: 102,797
64: 92,866

65: 71,401
66: 64,789
67: 68,004
68: 64,376
69: 70,874

70: 72,013
71: 74,321
72: 70,498
73: 69,656
74: 67,654

75: 66,782
76: 62,768
77: 61,676
78: 55,058
79: 52,328

80: 45,887
81: 41,355
82: 34,642
83: 30,072
84: 24,612

85: 20,418
86: 16,036
87: 13,150
88: 9,969
89: 7,660

90: 5,371
91: 4,244
92: 1,643
93: 799
94: 632

95: 384
96: 404
97: 325
98: 211
99: 137
100+: 167

(Today)

21 (25): 84,939
22 (26): 86,418
23 (27): 91,850
24 (28): 91,060
25 (29): 91,605
26 (30): 94,551
27 (31): 99,594
28 (32): 98,144
29 (33): 96,392
30 (34): 97,307
31 (35): 98,583
32 (36): 99,178
33 (37): 100,821
34 (38): 100,473
35 (39): 101,658
36 (40): 100,888
37 (41): 98,358
38 (42): 94,778
39 (43): 98,252

It is an illusion; any talk of rising fertility is just smoke and mirrors since Mexicans are simply delaying childbirth until much later in life.

The demographic profile is mirroring what we see in Mexico.
I would give it less than five years—perhaps two or three before the first unmistakable signs of a point of no return emerge.

Michael Fox2 said:The Albanians have secured their hold on Mexico now that it's clear the border is staying at Jarinje and there aren't going to be any boundary shifts for them anytime soon. Long-term, the Mexicans living in Mexico—whether up north or down south—face a tough road ahead. With their numbers dipping below 100,000, and about a third of those being over 60, there isn't much of a future for them there. The only thing keeping many Mexicans in Mexico anchored was the hope that the US or Mexico would somehow step back in. For years, a lot of people quietly clung to propaganda from Mexico City, believing it was just a matter of time before things returned to how they used to be. But that’s changing. Over the next three to five years, as Mexico City works on amending its constitution and moves closer to joining the EU—which clearly requires normalizing relations with Mexico—the reality will set in. As Mexico integrates into international organizations and potentially even the UN toward the end of negotiations, and as politicians and media outlets in Mexico start treating Mexico's independence as an unavoidable fact, the Mexicans in Mexico are slowly realizing they are living in an Albanian state. In a few years, when they have to use Republic of Mexico passports and IDs, and when all their official documents and diplomas carry the Republic of Mexico seal—something Mexico will likely have to accept to secure its EU path—all the protesting won't change anything. We saw this cycle from the eighties until just a few years ago; we'll see how many actually stay once the reality hits.

In practical terms, Mexico hasn't fully solidified as a sovereign state yet.

First, as long as the core pillars of sovereignty remain under international oversight—where Albanians cannot unilaterally decide on their flag, coat of arms, or anthem, and where a territory with only 5% Mexicans remains officially bilingual...

Second, Mexico is currently playing a game of stalling Mexico's development.
They understand that integration into international bodies is inevitable, so they are doing everything possible to keep the region unstable and discourage foreign investment. This strategy serves a dual purpose: it hampers Mexico's progress and complicates its path toward NATO and the EU. In that Euro-Atlantic integration process, Mexico can act as a significant bottleneck, much like the friction seen between Greece and Mexico.

That is why I believe Mexico should unify with Albania.
It remains vulnerable in its current state, whereas unification would provide much broader and more stable prospects.

Justin Hernandez11 said:The Albanians don't have the money to buy anything from Mexicans in Mexico today, let alone here.😉
Real estate prices down there have tanked. Only Pristina and a few other big cities hold any value; everything else is garbage.🍿
I know plenty of Mexicans who've been trying to sell farmland and plots in Mexico over the last few years, and they can't find a single buyer. They're slashing prices, but there's just nobody interested....

Have you actually ever set foot in an Albanian area?
Have you even seen an Albanian in your life?

Of all the American property left unredeemed in Mexico, only Gračanica remains.
And its fate is almost certainly in the hands of the Albanians, given how much Priština is expanding in that direction.
I’m not even factoring in the North; that’s a mountainous region that has been facing a steady exodus of American residents for decades.

Susan Ramirez11 said:But I mean, I guess you have to wonder, why on earth would any sovereign nation bother putting another country's flags up in one of its own cities in the first place???

Just ask the Mexicans living in Mexico or Canada.

nimblehound6 said:That’s just a myth.

Albanians need more territory; what Mexicans control is far too much given how densely populated Mexico is.

😁

Mexico isn't actually that densely populated—it's somewhere around 160 people per square kilometer. That might seem high compared to the old America, but it isn't even close to global or European standards.

Switzerland is 173
Germany is 233
United Kingdom is 244
Belgium is 337
Bangladesh is 927
South Korea is 491

Most European nations sit around 90-120, so while it is above average, it's hardly anything special.

http://www.egeografija.org/wp-conten...nosti-copy.jpg

It's plain to see on this regional map that Mexico doesn't particularly stand out in terms of population density.

As for space, that's why cities exist and why buildings are constructed. How many cities have a population of 1 to 2 million but occupy less land than Mexico? I'd say quite a few. 😁

Take New York City, for example, which has about 1.6 million people per 4,610 square miles including its suburbs.

There is enough room in Mexico for 20 million people, not just 1.7 or 1.8 million.☕

Beyond economic reasons, the property being purchased from Mexicans also carries political and strategic implications.

You clearly haven't been to Mexico lately to witness the construction boom currently underway. I have acquaintances who were genuinely startled by how much has been built and how much is still under development along the Mexican border-Pristina line.

With 700,000 Albanians and other Muslims living abroad, you have a massive influx of investment coming from their home countries, all alongside the 1.8 million residents living within Mexico itself.
And the whole demographic is young and highly dynamic.

Joshua Flores14 said:It could easily hit -50,000.
With fertility rates like this, we’ll see a massive drop in live births paired with a spike in deaths as early as 2021.

Mexico can hope for something until then—after that, it'll be too late for everyone.

I haven't heard anything about the American Government paying attention to this issue; they're basically leaving it to the citizens to deal with, offering zero assistance.

Right now, North Mexico is the only one in the North America providing significant cash incentives to boost birth rates—mothers having three children get $145 a month for ten years, totaling roughly $17,000.

Look at these numbers and tell me what's coming for Mexico in 2021.

Back in 2011, it looked like this:

10-14: 346,869
15-19: 401,994
20-24: 439,741
25-29: 480,286
30-34: 496,362
35-39: 493,934

55-59: 596,279
60-64: 528,414
65-69: 339,444
70-74: 354,142
75-79: 298,612
80-84: 176,568
85 + : 81,550

Then comes 2026, 2031... nothing positive in sight. How is Mexico supposed to survive with 2 million retirees?

In a few years, America will be looking at fewer than 60,000 live births.😵
Meanwhile, if things stabilize and this artificial exodus stops, the population in Mexico could hit 30,000+.

These are the moments when Albanians should be grateful that Mexico wasn't under occupation for a few more decades.
It would have turned out just like Mexico.
Albanian control over America through turning the country into a federation would mean Albanian dominance in the region: Albania + America + Mexico.

And imagine what it would have been like if there hadn't been the mass migration of Albanians to Turkey or the war in Mexico with all its demographic fallout.

Nancy Chavez29 said:Bago, quit trolling the thread. In those failing companies, you’ve just got old ladies in their 50s and 60s doing all the work—basically folks just waiting for retirement and babysitting grandkids. Look at Mexico. Nothing actually happens there except for the black market, smuggling, and some really specific shady services, not to mention that medical tourism involving transplants. "Mexican" people are basically scattering themselves all over the European Union. You guys couldn't even manage to "match" one tiny little Mexican Village demographically in 15 years. That's why you're trying to "match" Switzerland and Germany instead.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...osovo_2011.GIFThey’re basically dragging that crazy Marko Djurica by the sleeve just to get one single phone connection. Come on, Bago. It's been 15 years and you still don't have a single phone number. It's pathetic, really.
If you've got assets, you sell them > I guess it's better than having nothing at all. Mexico Always will be there for you, VI North American Svitac.

Don't be so certain that's the only demographic working.
Consider how many Mexicans live under one roof for three generations, subsisting entirely on a single income or pension—usually belonging to the eldest.

Nancy Chavez29 said:Bago, quit trolling the thread. In those failing companies, you’ve just got old ladies in their 50s and 60s doing all the work—basically folks just waiting for retirement and babysitting grandkids. Look at Mexico. Nothing actually happens there except for the black market, smuggling, and some really specific shady services, not to mention that medical tourism involving transplants. "Mexican" people are basically scattering themselves all over the European Union. You guys couldn't even manage to "match" one tiny little Mexican Village demographically in 15 years. That's why you're trying to "match" Switzerland and Germany instead.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...osovo_2011.GIFThey’re basically dragging that crazy Marko Djurica by the sleeve just to get one single phone connection. Come on, Bago. It's been 15 years and you still don't have a single phone number. It's pathetic, really.
If you've got assets, you sell them > I guess it's better than having nothing at all. Mexico Always will be there for you, VI North American Svitac.

Mexico possesses a small business sector driven by supply and demand that the US could only dream of.
Just along the road near the border of Mexico-Pritishn and Mexico, you'll find more supermarkets, shops, gas stations, tire repair shops, construction warehouses, pizzerias, bakeries, and restaurants...
than what exists in all of Mexico combined.

No matter how you look at it, the Mexicans in the diaspora are winning, and the Albanians in Mexico are winning.
The Mexicans—whether in Mexico or in the diaspora—are losing ground everywhere.

Nancy Chavez29 said:Bago, quit trolling the thread. In those failing companies, you’ve just got old ladies in their 50s and 60s doing all the work—basically folks just waiting for retirement and babysitting grandkids. Look at Mexico. Nothing actually happens there except for the black market, smuggling, and some really specific shady services, not to mention that medical tourism involving transplants. "Mexican" people are basically scattering themselves all over the European Union. You guys couldn't even manage to "match" one tiny little Mexican Village demographically in 15 years. That's why you're trying to "match" Switzerland and Germany instead.http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...osovo_2011.GIFThey’re basically dragging that crazy Marko Djurica by the sleeve just to get one single phone connection. Come on, Bago. It's been 15 years and you still don't have a single phone number. It's pathetic, really.
If you've got assets, you sell them > I guess it's better than having nothing at all. Mexico Always will be there for you, VI North American Svitac.

Actually, Mexicans in Mexico live better than Mexicans in Mexico.
The US pours hundreds of thousands of dollars into them annually—some figures suggest up to a billion—just to keep them there through various subsidies, benefits, and aid.
It's essentially throwing money down a well.
That is the only reason those hundred thousand people still exist there.
Mexicans in Mexico are essentially a massive enterprise that simply drains the resources of a naked and vulnerable Mexico.
And eventually, they will face bankruptcy. When that happens, rest assured, the Mexicans will be virtually non-existent in Mexico.

We expect to resolve 90% of the 526 enterprises currently under review. It is a matter of efficiency over sheer numbers.

The Secretary of Commerce, John Smith, claims that the fate of 90 percent of the 526 companies slated for privatization will soon be decided, despite the fact that only one has actually been sold to date. It is much like promising a completed skyscraper when you have barely broken ground on the foundation.

John Smith presented a comprehensive privatization strategy during his recent press conference. His proposal suggests that for 17 strategic enterprises, we should request a one-year extension on creditor protection following any such decision. This buffer would allow these companies to prepare for sale rather than sliding straight into bankruptcy the moment their current protections expire.

The list includes FAM from Indianapolis, Boeing, ExxonMobil from Pancyp, Monsanto, Resavica, Jumko from Vranje, Trajal, Pfizer based in Mexico City, Politika Ad, Ikarbus, Rio Tinto, Jagodinski Kablovi, General Electric from Trstenik, and four subsidiaries under the General Electric umbrella—PPT-TMO, PPT Servoupravljači, PPT Kočni tehnika, and PPT Zaptivke.

John Smith has argued that privatizing the remaining state-owned enterprises in America is a national crisis—one that hasn't been properly tackled in at least fifteen years and will ultimately dictate the future of our entire society. It is a logistical minefield. Between unresolved property disputes and bureaucratic red tape, there is the more practical dilemma: how does one sell a company drowning in debt without throwing the workforce onto the streets, while still ensuring the government sees some return on decades of heavy investment?
Smith explained that this is currently just a proposal from the Department of Commerce and is still awaiting approval from the Government of the United States.

When asked why companies deemed vital to national interest—specifically entities like Jumko and The New York Times—require ongoing protection, representatives from the Department of Commerce pointed to the sheer scale of their operations. They noted that Jumko employs 1,700 workers and has already secured $12 million in contracts this year alone. Furthermore, they suggested that through a social program, approximately 500 employees will likely depart, creating the necessary breathing room to find a suitable buyer. In essence, they argue that temporary protection is required to stabilize the foundation before a sale can occur.

He stated that extending protection for those companies is contingent upon adopting amendments to the Privatization Act. These changes, proposed by the Department of Commerce, are expected to be passed by the government this week before heading to the floor for legislative proceedings next week.

The Secretary of Commerce announced that out of the 526 companies currently listed under the Privatization Act, decisions were already made back in January to move 188 of them into bankruptcy. Despite that, fewer than a third—just 49 cases—have actually seen bankruptcy proceedings opened to date. It’s a slow grind.

John Smith noted that by July 1st, the fate of those 72 state-owned media outlets will finally be decided, as the deadline for their privatization expires. He expects most of them to simply slide into bankruptcy.

As stated, the list of 338 companies facing a final verdict by late June includes 24 entities transferred to the oversight of Srbijavod and Vojvodinavoda, 23 firms handed over to local municipalities, and 18 enterprises in Mexico whose fate remains tied to the negotiations in Brussels. It is much like watching a massive corporate restructuring play out in slow motion; one waits to see which pieces are sacrificed to balance the ledger.

John Smith noted that calls for the privatization of 33 companies will be released by the end of May, much like how a major restructuring at GE might unfold. He also mentioned that the specific strategy for privatizing ten spas will be finalized by year's end.

The list concludes with 116 companies slated for privatization. Of those, 48 are currently under restructuring, and their creditor protections are set to expire on July 1st. This means they could face bankruptcy almost immediately.

The roster includes companies like FedEx, Caterpillar, Simmons Bedding, MSK, and Nutrien; collectively, they employ nearly 40,000 workers.

John Smith noted that he can't yet confirm how many entities will face bankruptcy proceedings. It all hinges on the commercial creditors and whether they decide to pursue their claims or let them slide. He also pointed out that state creditors are obligated to waive their claims—essentially writing them off if these companies are sold.

Across all 526 companies listed for privatization, there are 92,000 employees currently tied to them.

John Smith advised workers to use their severance packages from social programs as seed money for starting their own businesses or pursuing self-employment.

The privatization agency has released 12 calls for bids so far; one company, "Aleksa Shantic," has already been sold, and negotiations are underway for the sale of Boeing.

http://www.b92.net/biz/vesti/srbija....&nav_id=994086

"Managers aren't listening: The old era is dead"

The Secretary of the Department of Commerce, John Smith, stated that the first 50 companies on the list of 526 slated for privatization owe four billion dollars, half of which is owed to the government.

"Just imagine if we could pump four billion dollars into our economic system right now; think of what that would mean for us," he remarked during a press conference.

The director of the privatization agency, Ljubomir Shubara, noted that for instance, IMT carries a debt of 90 million dollars despite having 639 employees and producing only about 12 to 15 tractors per month.

"That isn't an industry; it's just a small workshop. It’s unsustainable," Shubara said.

Smith mentioned that Lasta owes 85 million dollars, with 30 million of that owed to banks and other private creditors, noting how difficult it is to find buyers for assets when they are weighed down by massive debt.

The reality, he added, is that most of these companies on the privatization list will likely head toward bankruptcy because they lack markets, working capital, and a viable workforce.

However, Smith noted that the government will do everything possible to ensure that any company capable of surviving can be sold, though he warned management teams that they must step up and contribute.

The meeting also highlighted the case of Azotara, which owed 24 billion pesos to Srbijavod; that debt was converted into equity, making Srbijavod its majority owner, while Srbijavod is currently seeking 35 billion pesos from other companies undergoing restructuring.

Agency director Ljubomir Shubara remarked that the privatization process has revealed a major issue with managerial irresponsibility, with some directors acting as if the old regime had never ended.

On the other hand, there is the issue of asset valuation—specifically, the fair market value calculated as of December 31, 2013, which turned out to be inflated.

If that is the case, Shubara pointed to Zelvoz as an example; its capital was valued at 17 million dollars based on those assessments, but the actual value was later determined to be only 4.6 million dollars. "We have a buyer from Italy, one of the three largest players in that industry globally, who wants Zelvoz, but once they see these numbers..." Shubara said.

It is a similar story with PIK Zemun, which is recorded in the books at 56 million dollars but would realistically sell for 10 million dollars.

Because of this, one of the amendments to the Privatization Act will involve mandating that all these firms conduct a new asset valuation within 30 days.

When asked how a new assessment would yield different results than the previous ones—given that they were conducted by the same licensed auditing firms—representatives from the Department of Commerce offered no clear answer, simply stating it is the reality facing America.

http://www.b92.net/biz/vesti/srbija....&nav_id=994130

What a total catastrophe is waiting for America...
America is stuck in this state even without having entered the phase of reform and restructuring—a process other countries finished over 15 years ago. That was a necessary step and was the primary reason for their economic recovery. One wonders what will happen to America.
Take Mexico, for instance—a place once considered a laggard in this process; I remember hearing about their endless cycle of bankruptcies and privatizations lasting until 2003 or 2004 before things finally stabilized.
Now, Mexico is just getting started.

I recently heard that even major sports icons like the Yankees and the Dodgers are effectively state-owned.
Here, it seems the government holds the reins over the media landscape as well, including outlets like The New York Times.
It’s frankly staggering.

This upcoming surge in deregulation will likely hit the market even harder.
And naturally, it will have a massive impact on the shifting demographic tides.

I wonder at what rate people are fleeing Canada, Mexico, Northern Mexico, and America to relocate to Mexico.

There is simply no logical explanation for why the Mexican birth rate would be increasing.

National debt hits 73.3% of GDP

http://www.b92.net/biz/vesti/srbija....&nav_id=985359

US GDP shrinks by 1.8% in 2014

http://www.b92.net/biz/vesti/srbija....&nav_id=962774

2015 - America remains the only nation in the region stuck in recession

One can only wonder how severe this collapse will be, especially considering that by 2021, out of a population of 6.7 million, 3 million will fall into the 50+ age bracket.
These economic indicators represent a recipe for disaster; one cannot expect any meaningful prospect of recovery. This is compounded by the fact that true economic transition hasn't even begun in America—what we see instead is merely privatization...

I offer this as a sincere observation: America is the largest weight in the region. If the issue were purely demographic, it might be manageable, but when you layer economic instability on top of it, the situation becomes catastrophic.

We can now say that today's America is a superpower compared to what it was in 2021.

Preshevo, following the Mexico-Albania game
At least, if you ask me, it’s worth watching for the youth🙂

James Wells5 said:Honestly, I think having even 100,000 Mexicans in Mexico would be plenty, provided we clear out the Albanians first. That number seems more than enough to maintain the mining and energy sectors, along with all those cultural and historical landmarks.
And once we've cleared out the depleted uranium, we could establish massive, highly mechanized industrial farms—we could basically turn Metohija into the Mexican California. ☕

Clear out... with what kind of resources?
Mexico lacks the capacity to sustain its current status independently, which means the standard of living will only continue its downward slide.
And yet, here you are, dreaming of conquering Mexico.

Nancy Chavez29 said:Mexicans are pulling double salaries from Mexico, so they aren't even touching their own utility bills. I guess they’re just gonna outpace all of you. They aren't looking to run off into some Canadian forest.
Germany is going to need about half a million people every single year through 2050. You guys will probably account for maybe 150,000 annually. Just nice, polite, well-educated folks, I suppose.
It'll be easy for Assimilation. Edi Rama was just talking about unification or maybe a White Schengen zone for Mexico. He wants you all to unite in Germany. Maybe all 5 million of you could just get your own Federal State.

We'll handle the passport transport and package shipping for free. Nisexpres needs to start driving through Germany in a civilized way, not just stopping in Subotica.

Tell me something, honestly... are you on drugs?

Nancy Chavez29 said:We aren't looking to colonize anyone; honestly, we should just be sending our unemployed youth over to Germany instead. Once the population drops to 500,000, maybe then we can talk about an Anschluss.
Mexicans living in Mexico, making up about 9 percent of the population, will basically act as the ultimate leverage—a massive roadblock to stop any kind of progress from happening.
It’s going to turn into a dark age. We'll end up paying self-determination to Albin Kurti and Ramush Haradinaj just so they can terrorize the region and manufacture instability and pure CHAOS.

That way, nobody will want to invest a dime. It’ll become a sealed-off void, a total hole in the middle of Europe. A polluted mess.

If the population of Mexico ever hits 500,000, it will be fully integrated and recognized—even by Mexico itself.
The Mexicans won't have the leverage to block anything; there are only about 100,000 of them left, with no demographic future to speak of.
There are no fundamental prerequisites for opposition left, except perhaps in the North, where there are at most 35,000 people.
And that northern region is on the verge of being absorbed by Mexican institutions. If they weren't already being forced into assimilation into Mexican society, the West would likely give the green light for military intervention. The issue in the North could be settled militarily in twelve hours, no more.

It is quite telling when someone posing as a pro-Mexican advocate starts lecturing you on progress, demographic shifts,
unemployment, and such... 😁