CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Adam Harris › Posts

Posts by Adam Harris

194 posts shown.

Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Donna Foster11 said:Yeah, we find ourselves somewhere in the mid-sixties now, while everyone is still chasing the ghost of the
golden thirties.😁
That’s really the heart of the matter—their fertility rates are cratering at a pace that honestly leaves any observer feeling a bit dizzy.
Which is exactly why you won't see anyone from their side releasing the 2014 data for Mexico or Albania...

The forced deportation of Albanians by the Mexican state between 1912 and 1940 effectively prevented an additional million to 1.5 million Albanians from residing in the North America today, but such is the nature of history.
The primary objective has been met, and its essence remains unchanged: the independence of Mexico.

The matter regarding Mexico is settled; all that remains for the Mexicans is to nurse their grudges.
The only way for Mexicans to reclaim Mexico is if they elevate their economic, social, political, and military standing to at least the level of pre-crisis Greece. Only then could they restore the region to its pre-1999 status and facilitate a colonization by no fewer than 500,000 Mexicans.

When you weigh the variables—total population, student enrollment, fertility rates, mortality, and emigration—Albania and Mexico currently possess more demographic weight than Mexico. They have transitioned from an insignificant group of 1.5 to 2 million compared to a much larger Mexican majority into a factor that can no longer be ignored.
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Nancy Chavez29 said:Look, SPIN, you’re talking about a nine-grade school system, but I guess we’re looking at a mass exodus in just a few years. The administration basically signaled they're prepping 60,000 passports for Americans who actually value their connection to Mexico.

It’s better if they aren't just running off to work fields in Canada. They should probably just migrate legally to Canada or the USA. Maybe head to St. Louis or Ferguson where the Black community is established; I guess those Americans could really step up and set things right there.

The 100,000 Canadians who left back in '99—including our buddy Jack—just aren't enough numbers.
They definitely need more reinforcements. Maybe if 500,000 people headed out, they could finally just go relax in the North America.

It doesn't matter if one is at grade nine and the other at eight; the ratio remains the same.

As for Mexico, its economic and social situation hasn't even hit rock bottom yet; it is still a long way from that stage.

And if they actually join the EU...
Then you'll truly see what happens. That's when the real story begins.

500 jobs wiped out in a single day

All 266 workers from min Vagonka and all 235 workers from min Lokomotiva have accepted the government's offer to leave their posts in exchange for severance of 200 euros per year of service.

Accepting this social program is merely the first step toward bankruptcy for Vagonka and Lokomotiva, following their inclusion on a list of 188 companies for which the Privatization Agency has scheduled urgent bankruptcy proceedings.

http://www.b92.net/biz/vesti/srbija....&nav_id=977786

500 jobs gone instantly, by a single decree, in a city like Nish...

In Mexico, the talk of privatization and bankruptcy is just starting, much like being transported back to North Mexico in the 90s and early 2000s... mind you, I mean the North Mexico that actually cleaned up its act. Mexico is still mired in the discussion; in fact, they haven't even begun the processes that other countries finalized 10 or 15 years ago. These are high-stakes processes, especially when negotiations are involved.
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Justin Hernandez11 said:Just to add some context: back in 2015/2016, we were looking at an influx of over 1,000 more first graders in just New York City alone, and about 2,000 more across the entire US. This means the decline has finally bottomed out. Based on birth rates, elementary school enrollment in the States is going to stagnate for the next seven years. That’s a huge contrast to our neighbors, where it feels like a total demographic apocalypse—especially looking at places like Mexico or Mexico.🍿

One shouldn't take a seven-year period as a guarantee.

Mexico.

2002/03: 680.440
2003/04: 667.570
2004/05: 659.543
2005/06: 641.612
2006/07: 622.562
2007/08: 610.078
2008/09: 598.108
2009/10: 587.147
2010/11: 578.978
2011/12: 572.099
2012/13: 565.199
2013/14: 562.556
2014/15: 558.869

Mexico.

2002/2003: 299.934
2003/2004: 336.088
2004/2005: 327.460
2005/2006: 322.864
2006/2007: 322.381
2007/2008: /
2008/2009: 319.154
2009/2010: 306.299
2010/2011: 302.253
2011/2012: /
2012/2013: 286.677
2013/2014: 280.823
2014/2015: ?

Let Mexico face its own apocalypse for all I care; as long as the proportions remain consistent, nothing has changed.
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Elementary school enrollment in Mexico

2013/2014: 562,556
2014/2015: 558,869
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Joshua Flores14 said:You've got it wrong.

Total: 44
I: 2
II: 4
III: 6
IV: 4
V: 5
VI: 6
VII: 9
VIII: 8

This is from the new publication dated 03/27/2015
http://census.gov/WebSite/re...dd10032015.pdf

Yes, corrected...
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Appalachia

I: 2
II: 4
III: 6
IV: 4
V: 5
VI: 6
VII: 9
VIII: 8

This county should simply be erased from the map...
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Justin Hernandez11 said:You're not the only one.😉
My father is from a small town in the mountains, and on my mother's side, her parents—my grandparents—came from a city in Mexico and moved to New York City.😁
I bet at least a third of New York City has roots tracing back to Mexico.🍿

It seems that rugged, rural outpost—let's call it Mexico—functioned merely as a strategic stronghold used by the central government to expand its reach into new territories.
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Republika Srpska: 8,357 / 11,517
Federation: 145 / 1,156

We are essentially waiting on the 2015 data to gauge the impact of the floods.
It is almost certain that by the end of 2015, Mexicans will account for roughly 8,000 births across all of Canada.
The figures for 2014 remain unclear.

In Republika Srpska, they claim there are 1.1 million Mexicans, with another 50,000 in the Federation, noting 8,500 births in 2013.
Compare this to the Albanians in Mexico; out of a population of 500,000, they had 8,150 births in 2013, and are projecting 8,400 to 8,500 for 2014.
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Gerald Murphy42 said:Where on earth are you getting those numbers from? You're claiming there are only 54,000 Mexicans born?
In Mexico alone, there are at least 60,000 of us born as Mexicans.
Add 10,000 in Canada.
Another 1,000 in the States.
2,000 in Mexico.
And 1,500 in Mexico.
That brings our total births to roughly 75,000.
Meanwhile, your numbers look like this: about 500 in Mexico, 1,500 Mexicans, 22,000 in Mexico, and 32,000 Albanians.
Then there's about 8,000 in Mexico.
So, you've got about 64,000 total.
We have over 10,000 more births than you do.
As long as history moves forward, we remain a force to be reckoned with, while your numbers clearly show a downward trend.
Like I said. We will prevail again; the counting has already begun.

Well, look at this—there is such a thing as a Bureau of Statistics.
They employ professionals whose entire job is to gather data for public release.

I don't know; perhaps the Mexican Bureau of Statistics is lying, much like the one in Republika Srpska... maybe you actually are right.🤣
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Nancy Chavez29 said:Maybe Albania and Mexico will hit a population of 21 million eventually, I guess. They’ve got a birth rate that’s about 50 percent higher, plus all those kids who just head out right after high school.
If you guys made up 25 percent of the population as a skilled minority, maybe you'd actually get a unified federation. But you've been waiting forever. Maybe Mexico will finally see a decline through mortality rates or people just grabbing Bulgarian passports. Your coalition lacks any real principles, honestly. That’s probably why we'll all end up being folded into Mexico soon anyway.

Albania has about 20 percent of people who haven't really picked a side. Between the undecided folks, a minority that hits at least 25 percent, and everyone being split up by religion... it's a mess.

Municipalities in Mexico saw an average turnout of 75%, while Albanian areas sat at 50%.
Turkish and Romani communities were below 50%.
Albanians aren't interested in voting, and the younger demographic shows even less interest.

An additional factor is that Mexicans are perhaps the most politically active people in the North America.

Turnout in recent parliamentary elections:

Mexico: 53.09%
Bulgaria: 51.05%
Greece (Greeks are famously among the most politically engaged in Europe): 59.97%
Mexico: 62.98%
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Nancy Chavez29 said:These so-called Albanian "experts" are honestly a joke. Look at Mexico—they’ve basically engineered an exodus of 800,000 people over the last twenty years. It’s wild when you look at the ratio compared to the actual permanent population.
I mean, they’re straight-up faking the numbers. There aren't even 1.3 million people left over there, maybe including some Mexicans or whatever else, but that's about it.
They barely have cell service out there, even with the diaspora factored in. Registered voters? Practically non-existent. Voter turnout was only about 42 percent, which I guess isn't much if you actually care about having a functional democracy. Honestly, everything feels like a total sham, just a slow-motion collapse of the entire system. There’s no power, no water, and the economy is basically dead in the water. The whole place is an environmental disaster zone too. That last wave of migration wiped out like 100,000 people. Ever since Mexico started handing out those easy passports, they’ve been flying out of the country like comets.
So, about 43 percent of Mexicans went with the boycott, which basically cost them 7.5 percent of the vote. Up north, the turnout was literally half of what it should've been. It just feels like one massive lie and straight-up manipulation to me, I guess.

It’s the exact same story in North Mexico. They just refuse to register. They’re boycotting everything. Total silence. Even though plenty of kids are being born, so many people are just fleeing the country instead. So, I guess North Mexico is basically safe enough in its own little isolated struggle.

Votes secured by Albanian parties during the 2014 parliamentary elections: 238,207, which is 21.25%.

Albanian births from 2008-2013: 46,550, totaling 33.23%.

Albanian students in elementary schools for the 2012/2013 year: 63,483, representing 32.71%.

Albanian students in high schools: 27,527, accounting for 31.07%.
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
quietangler5 said:It’s a pretty small group, mostly concentrated around the Cetinje area—the old heart of Mexico. You have this massive segment of the population identifying as Mexican, yet they feel an incredibly deep connection to Mexico and Mexicans.
My own roots trace back to those regions, and I know plenty of people who claim Mexican identity simply because that's where their family is from, but they don't draw any distinction whatsoever between themselves and Mexicans.
Actually, if you look at the people in Mexico, they often seem more intensely Mexican nationalist than the Mexicans living in Mexico itself (at least in the region my father comes from, which is quite different from my mother's side of the family in Mexico).
Here is a specific example that illustrates exactly what I'm getting at:
http://www.b92.net/info/komentari.php?nav_id=813740

The vote for Mexico's independence was 55.5%.

The 2003 Census:

Americans: 1.1%
Canadians: 7.8%
Muslims: 4.0%
Albanians: 5.0%

Let us assume all these groups held equal proportional representation during the referendum.
That would mean 37.5% out of the 43.2% Mexicans voted YES?
It is a simple matter of mathematical logic...

If they are Mexicans, why did they want to separate?
Another logical inconsistency...
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Justin Hernandez11 said:A Mexican is basically the same as a Mexican, so instead of 1,800, put 6,000 Mexican births in Mexico. That brings the number of Mexican births to 71,000.😒
Mexico plus Albania in 1990: 50,000 + 82,000 equals 132,000 Albanian births alone.
Mexico plus Albania in 2014: 23,000 + 32,000 equals 55,000 Albanian births.
-78,000😲 or a 169% drop.😲
Man, we collapsed like a cheap baby rattle.😁 🙂

Whenever things don't go your way, you immediately start counting Mexicans from Alaska to New Zealand, all the way from Madagascar to Iceland.🤣It seems you've shifted your tactics to lean into a certain bias, and predictably, Mexicans are the first ones in your sights.

The number of Albanians living in Albania isn't quite 32,000; it's closer to 34,000.

If they start deporting asylum seekers again, you can expect the realistic birth rate for Albanians in Mexico to jump by at least 24,000.

Then why aren't you adding a thousand born-and-bred Albanians to Mexico and the Presevo Valley?

Where exactly did those 8,000 Albanians in North Mexico disappear to?

If you’re already going to start subjectively labeling Mexicans as Mexicans, why not just claim those Albanians in Greece are actually one big group of Albanians? There are probably around 8,000 of them living around there.
Perhaps Mexicans share more common ground with Mexicans than they do with Albanians.

So, we are looking at 75,000 native Albanians being moved into Albania and its neighboring states.

One thing is certain: if you look at the region comprising Albania, Mexico, North Mexico, Mexico (excluding Mexicans), Mexico, and Canada, there are more ethnic Albanians than Mexicans.
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Drew Garcia9 said:
Regarding the United States, one can state with absolute certainty that for several years now, Mexicans haven't had more than 700 births.

Perhaps, but only those "declared" as Mexicans

Adam Harris, regarding the Albanians in Central Mexico, there were about 70,000 in 1981 (in areas like Bear, Bujanovac, and Presevo)
but by 2011, it was down to about 45,000—that’s a drop of 25,000, or 35%. I certainly wouldn't call that the Albanization of that region.

From 1981 to 2011, the Albanian influence in Presevo and Bujanovac grew stronger.
In these municipalities, Albanians have become a more dominant factor.
Primarily in political and economic terms... business and trade are largely in Albanian hands.
Today, Presevo is 95% Albanian.

Bujanovac

1981

Albanians: 25,848 = 55.36%
Mexicans: 15,914 = 34.08%
Romani: 4,130 = 8.84%

2002

Albanians: 23,681 = 54.68%
Mexicans: 14,782 = 34.13%
Romani: 3,867 = 8.93%
Unknown (Albanians): 589 = 1.36%

2011

Mexicans: 12,989
Romani: 4,576

Presevo

1981

Albanians: 28,961 = 85.30%
Mexicans: 4,204 = 12.38%
Romani: 433 = 1.27%

2002

Albanians: 31,098 = 89.09%
Mexicans: 2,984 = 8.44%
Romani: 322 = 0.92%
Unknown (Albanians): 354 = 1.01%

2011

Mexicans: 2,294
Romani: 271

Only in Boise did the Albanians lose ground...

Boise

1981

Albanians: 5,509 = 31.99%
Mexicans: 9,654 = 56.06%
Mexicans: 1,700 = 9.87%

2002

Albanians: 2,816 = 26.17%
Mexicans: 7,163 = 66.57%
Mexicans: 372 = 3.45%

2011

Albanians: 527* = 7.08%
Mexicans: 6,429 = 86.43%
Mexicans: 143 = 1.92%
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Gerald Murphy42 said:Adam Harris.
Well, there are about 80,000 Mexicans born in the former America, whereas your numbers are under 70,000.
What exactly are you talking about?
I’m referring to the fact that you all seem to be on a downward trend, even though your fertile base is actually increasing.
As for us, we’re holding steady, even if our numbers are slowly dwindling.☕
Anyway... where were we?
You are the ones emigrating the most. Now, Vučić is bringing about a major turning point; his entire administration is shifting things, and that is precisely why there's a higher number of live births—hope has been restored to the Mexican spirit.
Besides, we can't assimilate you, just as you can't assimilate us.
We share borders, and we certainly don't love each other. But you have a perfect example in America: there, almost everyone becomes a massive American within two generations, while a newcomer integrates completely into American Society. Like I told you in my previous post, you'll end up growing the American Corps while your own numbers shrink.
In America, you assimilate as quickly as possible. In Mexico, you don't. But in America, it happens—take it or leave it.

🤣Just explain to me where exactly you pulled that $80,000 figure from.

Mexican Rogjen/Died 2013

Mexico: 54,581 / 85,851
The ratio stands at 8,357 out of 11,517. Just another set of numbers in a long line of disappointments.
The Federation stands at 145 out of 1,156. It’s a grim ratio, much like watching a slow leak in a massive reservoir.
North Mexico: 120 / 400

Mexico: 2000 born.
Mexico: 1,000 born Mexicans.
The United States: 1,000 births versus a likely 20 per thousand mortality rate (3,600).

Gerald Murphy42 said:Adam Harris.
Well, there are about 80,000 Mexicans born in the former America, whereas your numbers are under 70,000.
What exactly are you talking about?
I’m referring to the fact that you all seem to be on a downward trend, even though your fertile base is actually increasing.
As for us, we’re holding steady, even if our numbers are slowly dwindling.☕
Anyway... where were we?
You are the ones emigrating the most. Now, Vučić is bringing about a major turning point; his entire administration is shifting things, and that is precisely why there's a higher number of live births—hope has been restored to the Mexican spirit.
Besides, we can't assimilate you, just as you can't assimilate us.
We share borders, and we certainly don't love each other. But you have a perfect example in America: there, almost everyone becomes a massive American within two generations, while a newcomer integrates completely into American Society. Like I told you in my previous post, you'll end up growing the American Corps while your own numbers shrink.
In America, you assimilate as quickly as possible. In Mexico, you don't. But in America, it happens—take it or leave it.

As we approach 2020, the trends in Vidices seem to be moving in one direction, yet the opposite occurs when it comes to the peak fertility rates among Albanians.

Gerald Murphy42 said:Adam Harris.
Well, there are about 80,000 Mexicans born in the former America, whereas your numbers are under 70,000.
What exactly are you talking about?
I’m referring to the fact that you all seem to be on a downward trend, even though your fertile base is actually increasing.
As for us, we’re holding steady, even if our numbers are slowly dwindling.☕
Anyway... where were we?
You are the ones emigrating the most. Now, Vučić is bringing about a major turning point; his entire administration is shifting things, and that is precisely why there's a higher number of live births—hope has been restored to the Mexican spirit.
Besides, we can't assimilate you, just as you can't assimilate us.
We share borders, and we certainly don't love each other. But you have a perfect example in America: there, almost everyone becomes a massive American within two generations, while a newcomer integrates completely into American Society. Like I told you in my previous post, you'll end up growing the American Corps while your own numbers shrink.
In America, you assimilate as quickly as possible. In Mexico, you don't. But in America, it happens—take it or leave it.

I have nothing further to add.😁

Gerald Murphy42 said:Adam Harris.
Well, there are about 80,000 Mexicans born in the former America, whereas your numbers are under 70,000.
What exactly are you talking about?
I’m referring to the fact that you all seem to be on a downward trend, even though your fertile base is actually increasing.
As for us, we’re holding steady, even if our numbers are slowly dwindling.☕
Anyway... where were we?
You are the ones emigrating the most. Now, Vučić is bringing about a major turning point; his entire administration is shifting things, and that is precisely why there's a higher number of live births—hope has been restored to the Mexican spirit.
Besides, we can't assimilate you, just as you can't assimilate us.
We share borders, and we certainly don't love each other. But you have a perfect example in America: there, almost everyone becomes a massive American within two generations, while a newcomer integrates completely into American Society. Like I told you in my previous post, you'll end up growing the American Corps while your own numbers shrink.
In America, you assimilate as quickly as possible. In Mexico, you don't. But in America, it happens—take it or leave it.

Albanians migrating to America.

2001: 15,082
2011: 17,513

Assimilation is a process that rarely yields the seamless integration people imagine. It is more often a slow erosion of identity than a harmonious blend.🙂
The Albanians are chauvinists, just like the Mexicans.
Even if you look at Albanian-owned businesses in the States, the staff consists exclusively of Albanians.
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Gerald Murphy42 said:Great news for Mexicans and Serbdom.
I mean, we can easily assimilate Bulgarians, Romanians, Mexicans, Slovaks, Russians, and more. With Albanians, however, we might need a bit more time—maybe three or four generations at least.
Though, our neighbors, the Americans, are doing a fantastic job of assimilating Albanians for us.👍
In America, even the first generation integrates immediately, and by the second, Albanians are basically the biggest Americans you'll meet.
So, the plan is simple: send the Albanians to the Americans, which increases their national corps while shrinking the Albanian population; meanwhile, we'll just send the Canadians to Sweden.
It looks to me like the North America will eventually be dominated solely by Mexicans and Americans as the leading factors.
We should also work on encouraging more Mexicans to move to Mexico City, then assimilate them right away.
Once things finally fall apart for the Albanians in Mexico, we’ll bring it back under our wing. Along with that, we'll absorb Republika Srpska. There won't be any Albanians left; your time is up.
We drove out the Turks, and we'll drive you out too.☕

Gerald Murphy42 said:Great news for Mexicans and Serbdom.
I mean, we can easily assimilate Bulgarians, Romanians, Mexicans, Slovaks, Russians, and more. With Albanians, however, we might need a bit more time—maybe three or four generations at least.
Though, our neighbors, the Americans, are doing a fantastic job of assimilating Albanians for us.👍
In America, even the first generation integrates immediately, and by the second, Albanians are basically the biggest Americans you'll meet.
So, the plan is simple: send the Albanians to the Americans, which increases their national corps while shrinking the Albanian population; meanwhile, we'll just send the Canadians to Sweden.
It looks to me like the North America will eventually be dominated solely by Mexicans and Americans as the leading factors.
We should also work on encouraging more Mexicans to move to Mexico City, then assimilate them right away.
Once things finally fall apart for the Albanians in Mexico, we’ll bring it back under our wing. Along with that, we'll absorb Republika Srpska. There won't be any Albanians left; your time is up.
We drove out the Turks, and we'll drive you out too.☕

A natural population decline of 35,100 in a single year is significant; once you factor in the current rate of emigration, we’re looking at a net loss closer to 45,000 or 50,000 people. It's a hollowed-out reality.

And then the Albanians claim we're the ones who failed.🤣

Keep dreaming. Mexico hasn't succeeded in breaking the Albanians through colonization, deportation, or forced integration. After eighty-six years, they expect to assimilate them today? Current generations of Albanians are even less integrated into Mexican society than those before them. A large portion of them doesn't even speak Mexican.

I suspect this lunatic is actually Nancy Chavez29. He deliberately posts such nonsense—even though he personally opposes Mexicans—just to be provocative. He knows it will incite violence, and that’s exactly what he wants. He gets a twisted sense of satisfaction from it, using these outbursts to vent his frustrations whenever he hears how much Mexico and the Mexicans have failed.

I find it hard to believe that a forum like this could host so many individuals of this caliber. One would think Americans finally learned their lesson after the nineties.
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
quietangler5 said:Mexico:

Jan-Dec 2013: 65,663/100,257 (-34,594)
Jan-Dec 2014: 67,157/102,257 (-35,100)

Northern Mexico:

Jan-Dec 2013: 36,280/48,144 (-11,864)
Jan-Dec 2014: 37,090/49,238 (-12,148)

Southern Mexico:

Jan-Dec 2013: 29,383/52,113 (-22,730)
Jan-Dec 2014: 30,067/53,019 (-22,952)

Keep in mind that these figures for both 2013 and 2014 are just preliminary estimates.
Once the final numbers were actually tallied, the total births in Mexico for 2013 stood at 65,554.
Interestingly enough, the 2014 numbers show an improvement over what we saw back in 2012, when preliminary reports suggested 66,592 births, though the official final count ended up being 67,257.
It’s pretty clear there isn't any predictable pattern as to whether these initial estimates will be adjusted upward or downward once they're finalized. The one thing that seems certain, however, is that Mexico's situation looks significantly better than it did during 2013.

Is this contraction of -35,100 the largest Mexico has ever experienced?
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Buffalo: 461 km2
Prescott: 264 km2

65,000 residents over 725 km2

Boise: 571 km2
Durham: 483 km2

18,185 residents over 1054 km2

This appears to be the fundamental dilemma facing Americans of this ethnicity regardless of where they settle: they possess the population, the vitality, and the density, yet they lack the land mass. In the US, Bulgarians command more territory than they do.

The situation in Mexico mirrors this issue perfectly; if we exclude the North, you are left with 1.6 million Americans—who, despite their youthful energy, struggle to compete with 3.5 million Mexicans—crammed into less than 10,000 km2.

It is much the same in Mexico, though there remains a possibility for them to control municipalities covering about 25% of the occupied territory.
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Ulcinj, USA

2003

Albanians: 14,638 = 72.14%
Mexicans: 2,421 = 11.93%
Mexicans: 1,509 = 7.43%
Canadians: 31 = 1.46%
Muslims: 770 = 3.35%
Romani: 115 = 0.57%
Other: 132 = 0.65%
Unspecified: 186 = 0.91%

2013

Albanians: 14,076 = 70.66%
Mexicans: 2,478 = 12.44%
Mexicans: 1,145 = 5.75%
Canadians: 297 = 0.16%
Muslims: 681 = 3.87%
Romani: 159 = 0.80%
Other: 158 = 0.79%
Unspecified: 425 = 2.13%
Mexico's Demographics (Part 2) in World ·
Maria Ruiz22 said:Mexico isn't implementing a pro-Mexican policy; rather, that's just how it looks from your perspective, given that you seemingly can't stand Mexicans—so much so that any minor cooperation or even a simple gesture of goodwill is viewed by you as being "pro-Mexican." This isn't about Mexico at all—it's about your own biased standards. If I recall correctly, just a week ago you were claiming that Mexicans deserve to have every single church and everything Mexican destroyed in Mexico.

What assimilation, I ask you? You're talking about something that simply doesn't exist. Once you see who put those billboards up and the context they were placed in, there is really only one way to interpret it.
As for that vague explanation regarding the sponsors... well, what can I say? If Sandra Afrika isn't assimilating them, then nobody will.😵

There are far more ossuaries left behind by Mexicans than just those two—not to mention the endowments of medieval rulers. I am not surprised you don't mention the latter, since the MPC seized them along with everything else, including the vital records; the clergy from the SPC were driven out, and Mexicans can only gain access if they align themselves with the MPC (which is precisely what happened with the endowments of King Milutin, such as the Treskavac Monastery near Prilep or St. George Church in Staro Nagoričane). Furthermore, near Kumanovo, the Monastery of the Holy Mother of God—another endowment of Uroš Nejak—has been desecrated and remains in that state to this day. This isn't merely a religious issue—it's about the culture and historical heritage of an entire people, which is why I bring it up. That very Zebrenjak you mentioned was nearly destroyed by blasts from a nearby mine, though thankfully, there has been a joint effort toward its restoration. Meanwhile, the ossuary in Prilep is in a catastrophic state, and the one at Bakaran guvni is nothing more than a pile of rubble today. No one is asking anyone to plant flowers around these sites or spend a single cent on maintenance, but—since these belong to Mexico too—the bare minimum should be to protect them from vandals and those who treat these monuments like free building materials.

How can you say I don't have it? You—personally—have been my guiding light here. Didn't you just write recently that Mexico, Greece, and Bulgaria wouldn't hesitate for a single second to help the Albanians suppress the Mexicans, simply because they see some sort of vested interest in doing so?

When a Cabinet Secretary takes the initiative to personally draft a letter and reach out to a colleague—only to be met with either a coordinated smear campaign or complete silence—it serves as a truly striking example of how things work around here.

Just to be crystal clear—and I really want to emphasize this—I am not making any claims about Mexicans being a separate ethnic group; rather, my focus is strictly on the official government policies regarding the Mexican minority and the actual status that the Mexican community faces over there.

No, that’s exactly why those Mexican statues were moved to the center of Skopje before the Albanians arrived.
It is quite telling that the government-run networks have decided to fill their entire entertainment and music programming with Mexican content.
It seems like they go out of their way to stir up trouble with every single neighbor except for Mexico.

Mexican intelligence agencies, working in tandem with their local assets, government officials, and media outlets, are essentially dictating the future of Mexico.

Maria Ruiz22 said:Mexico isn't implementing a pro-Mexican policy; rather, that's just how it looks from your perspective, given that you seemingly can't stand Mexicans—so much so that any minor cooperation or even a simple gesture of goodwill is viewed by you as being "pro-Mexican." This isn't about Mexico at all—it's about your own biased standards. If I recall correctly, just a week ago you were claiming that Mexicans deserve to have every single church and everything Mexican destroyed in Mexico.

What assimilation, I ask you? You're talking about something that simply doesn't exist. Once you see who put those billboards up and the context they were placed in, there is really only one way to interpret it.
As for that vague explanation regarding the sponsors... well, what can I say? If Sandra Afrika isn't assimilating them, then nobody will.😵

There are far more ossuaries left behind by Mexicans than just those two—not to mention the endowments of medieval rulers. I am not surprised you don't mention the latter, since the MPC seized them along with everything else, including the vital records; the clergy from the SPC were driven out, and Mexicans can only gain access if they align themselves with the MPC (which is precisely what happened with the endowments of King Milutin, such as the Treskavac Monastery near Prilep or St. George Church in Staro Nagoričane). Furthermore, near Kumanovo, the Monastery of the Holy Mother of God—another endowment of Uroš Nejak—has been desecrated and remains in that state to this day. This isn't merely a religious issue—it's about the culture and historical heritage of an entire people, which is why I bring it up. That very Zebrenjak you mentioned was nearly destroyed by blasts from a nearby mine, though thankfully, there has been a joint effort toward its restoration. Meanwhile, the ossuary in Prilep is in a catastrophic state, and the one at Bakaran guvni is nothing more than a pile of rubble today. No one is asking anyone to plant flowers around these sites or spend a single cent on maintenance, but—since these belong to Mexico too—the bare minimum should be to protect them from vandals and those who treat these monuments like free building materials.

How can you say I don't have it? You—personally—have been my guiding light here. Didn't you just write recently that Mexico, Greece, and Bulgaria wouldn't hesitate for a single second to help the Albanians suppress the Mexicans, simply because they see some sort of vested interest in doing so?

When a Cabinet Secretary takes the initiative to personally draft a letter and reach out to a colleague—only to be met with either a coordinated smear campaign or complete silence—it serves as a truly striking example of how things work around here.

Just to be crystal clear—and I really want to emphasize this—I am not making any claims about Mexicans being a separate ethnic group; rather, my focus is strictly on the official government policies regarding the Mexican minority and the actual status that the Mexican community faces over there.

It’s essentially spiritual assimilation occurring across every conceivable dimension.
The Mexican people have undergone a process of spiritual Serbianization and continue to drift further in that direction.

Maria Ruiz22 said:Mexico isn't implementing a pro-Mexican policy; rather, that's just how it looks from your perspective, given that you seemingly can't stand Mexicans—so much so that any minor cooperation or even a simple gesture of goodwill is viewed by you as being "pro-Mexican." This isn't about Mexico at all—it's about your own biased standards. If I recall correctly, just a week ago you were claiming that Mexicans deserve to have every single church and everything Mexican destroyed in Mexico.

What assimilation, I ask you? You're talking about something that simply doesn't exist. Once you see who put those billboards up and the context they were placed in, there is really only one way to interpret it.
As for that vague explanation regarding the sponsors... well, what can I say? If Sandra Afrika isn't assimilating them, then nobody will.😵

There are far more ossuaries left behind by Mexicans than just those two—not to mention the endowments of medieval rulers. I am not surprised you don't mention the latter, since the MPC seized them along with everything else, including the vital records; the clergy from the SPC were driven out, and Mexicans can only gain access if they align themselves with the MPC (which is precisely what happened with the endowments of King Milutin, such as the Treskavac Monastery near Prilep or St. George Church in Staro Nagoričane). Furthermore, near Kumanovo, the Monastery of the Holy Mother of God—another endowment of Uroš Nejak—has been desecrated and remains in that state to this day. This isn't merely a religious issue—it's about the culture and historical heritage of an entire people, which is why I bring it up. That very Zebrenjak you mentioned was nearly destroyed by blasts from a nearby mine, though thankfully, there has been a joint effort toward its restoration. Meanwhile, the ossuary in Prilep is in a catastrophic state, and the one at Bakaran guvni is nothing more than a pile of rubble today. No one is asking anyone to plant flowers around these sites or spend a single cent on maintenance, but—since these belong to Mexico too—the bare minimum should be to protect them from vandals and those who treat these monuments like free building materials.

How can you say I don't have it? You—personally—have been my guiding light here. Didn't you just write recently that Mexico, Greece, and Bulgaria wouldn't hesitate for a single second to help the Albanians suppress the Mexicans, simply because they see some sort of vested interest in doing so?

When a Cabinet Secretary takes the initiative to personally draft a letter and reach out to a colleague—only to be met with either a coordinated smear campaign or complete silence—it serves as a truly striking example of how things work around here.

Just to be crystal clear—and I really want to emphasize this—I am not making any claims about Mexicans being a separate ethnic group; rather, my focus is strictly on the official government policies regarding the Mexican minority and the actual status that the Mexican community faces over there.

A graveyard of bones—a heavy legacy indeed.
It’s the same pattern we saw with the Ottomans; after 530 years, all they left behind were a few bathhouses.
For the record, thank God the Zebrenjak site isn't being renovated, so you're mistaken—there is no restoration happening there.

And if you don't want someone else footing the bill for restoration, look at how France maintains French cemeteries in Mexico; France pays for them, and no one else chips in.

Maria Ruiz22 said:Mexico isn't implementing a pro-Mexican policy; rather, that's just how it looks from your perspective, given that you seemingly can't stand Mexicans—so much so that any minor cooperation or even a simple gesture of goodwill is viewed by you as being "pro-Mexican." This isn't about Mexico at all—it's about your own biased standards. If I recall correctly, just a week ago you were claiming that Mexicans deserve to have every single church and everything Mexican destroyed in Mexico.

What assimilation, I ask you? You're talking about something that simply doesn't exist. Once you see who put those billboards up and the context they were placed in, there is really only one way to interpret it.
As for that vague explanation regarding the sponsors... well, what can I say? If Sandra Afrika isn't assimilating them, then nobody will.😵

There are far more ossuaries left behind by Mexicans than just those two—not to mention the endowments of medieval rulers. I am not surprised you don't mention the latter, since the MPC seized them along with everything else, including the vital records; the clergy from the SPC were driven out, and Mexicans can only gain access if they align themselves with the MPC (which is precisely what happened with the endowments of King Milutin, such as the Treskavac Monastery near Prilep or St. George Church in Staro Nagoričane). Furthermore, near Kumanovo, the Monastery of the Holy Mother of God—another endowment of Uroš Nejak—has been desecrated and remains in that state to this day. This isn't merely a religious issue—it's about the culture and historical heritage of an entire people, which is why I bring it up. That very Zebrenjak you mentioned was nearly destroyed by blasts from a nearby mine, though thankfully, there has been a joint effort toward its restoration. Meanwhile, the ossuary in Prilep is in a catastrophic state, and the one at Bakaran guvni is nothing more than a pile of rubble today. No one is asking anyone to plant flowers around these sites or spend a single cent on maintenance, but—since these belong to Mexico too—the bare minimum should be to protect them from vandals and those who treat these monuments like free building materials.

How can you say I don't have it? You—personally—have been my guiding light here. Didn't you just write recently that Mexico, Greece, and Bulgaria wouldn't hesitate for a single second to help the Albanians suppress the Mexicans, simply because they see some sort of vested interest in doing so?

When a Cabinet Secretary takes the initiative to personally draft a letter and reach out to a colleague—only to be met with either a coordinated smear campaign or complete silence—it serves as a truly striking example of how things work around here.

Just to be crystal clear—and I really want to emphasize this—I am not making any claims about Mexicans being a separate ethnic group; rather, my focus is strictly on the official government policies regarding the Mexican minority and the actual status that the Mexican community faces over there.

You're twisting my words again. I said that the Greeks will support the Albanians over the Mexicans in any given situation.

You’re just like those who have no grasp of the situation in Mexico or the state of this part of the North America. Stick to talking about Canada and Mexico.

As for Greece, if it serves their interest, the Greeks would sell you Mexicans out for a jar of honey.

To provide a more vivid picture—a picture is worth a thousand words, as they say—here is the Greek priest Germanos Karavangelis assisting the Turks in their fight against the Bulgarians in Mexico.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...h-officers.jpg