Posts by silverwolf88

Larry Diaz4 said:An F20 is looming 🍿

What even is this?

What is this?

What is this?

What’s the deal with them refusing to recognize my work capacity because they don't count my original songs as "work" just since music is free online?

Do you want me to upload official stamped documents just so you can verify if he's telling the truth?

What is this?

Here's more

Brkone said:🙂

🙂

Jeremy Johnson18 said:I’m all for guys wearing leggings. 🙂

Right back at you. 👍

Larry Diaz4 said:It’s like everyone is out to get you! A global conspiracy unlike anything we've seen. You should call in a vetted journalist to actually document this. 🍿

The issue is that the American mass media won't lift a finger to help—they won't even bother replying to my emails.

Meanwhile, in the European Union, there's actual freedom—they even allow

nudity when requesting location permits and scheduling, but here in the States, it feels like a tiny dictatorship. I

honestly can't tell what's being pushed on me—is everything General Motors is telling me just an attempt to feed me

paranoia? Is this some kind of protection racket, or am I dealing with a dictatorship? I don't understand who this person is, or who is pulling

their strings. Why is he allowed to treat me so poorly for such a long time?

If General Motors is someone with immunity who is clearly operating under a conflict of interest, then I need to start looking for help from

politicians to expose them.

Harold Adams19 said:Man, Silvio—what’s gotten into you today?

For years now, I’ve dealt with being treated poorly here in America—just because I’m part of a male minority wearing leggings—by certain

(not everyone, obviously, let's not misinterpret things) people,

but in a democracy, I apparently don't have the right to speak up without some folks

(again, not everyone, wouldn't want anyone getting the wrong idea) labeling me a man-hater and slapping

fake psychiatric diagnoses on me—especially since I'm an alternative astrologer, and some people are

viciously against astrology.

Since you live in a country with such high standards, you already sent me that link

Given that General Motors—the most powerful figure on this board who can dish out

psychiatric diagnoses, smear my reputation, and try to gaslight me by claiming

I don't even understand basic math I've already mastered, while simultaneously hijacking my threads and so on

here is the link regarding that

which, via his specific post, made it crystal clear that certain people here simply don't want me around

just because I advocate for human rights, minority rights, gender equality, and emancipation

here is the link

It seems some women are bothered by the truth I tell—that the majority of women in

the US are ashamed to be seen with a male minority wearing leggings—and they're also bothered by the fact that I

heard one woman tell another not to hang out with a guy in leggings; well, that's what

I heard from certain women, though obviously, not all women are like that

In a democracy, women have the right to avoid being with me if they choose

but just as importantly, in a democracy, it is my right to state the truth: that because I belong to a

male minority, the majority of women in the US don't want to be with me—they actually feel
embarrassed to be seen
in the company of someone from the male minority in leggings

Previously, the gay minority was the issue for the American Society, and now the minority of men in

leggings is the issue for the American Society; so, cast your votes on whether you want me off this forum

Anyone who isn't actively opposing my fight for human rights, minority protections, gender equality, and women's empowerment is more than welcome to discuss these issues with me here—but if you just can't stand me, stay out of this thread. I’m asking you to stop the spamming in this topic and all others.

Just ignore the spammers and engage with people you actually agree with, if you want
this discussion to be successful.

Take a look at these posts where Alexander Thompson is back at it again, rambling about some Council—and check out what I asked when I quoted his post along with the link and

Check out this image I uploaded to my Silvio Sponza (@SilvioSponza) | Twitter profile—it shows the correction applied to the vis viva equation compared to the actual measurement data from comet Hale–Bopp https://twitter.com/SilvioSponza/sta...82052249997312 ,
I pulled the measurement data from this link: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//...00037.000.html
And here are the orbital elements: https://theskylive.com/halebopp-info
The mathematical derivation I used to reach this correction involves dividing the vis viva by the square root of two—look at how the standard vis viva calculation fails when compared against the observed data in this example https://twitter.com/SilvioSponza/sta...74033121161218
(You can click the images if you want a better look)

To be clear, this isn't the full mathematical proof itself—this is just the presentation meant to pique the interest of physicists and mathematicians so they might actually bother looking at my derivations. So far, though, no one among the physics experts here in the States has found this demonstration compelling enough to actually review my work

Check out this comparison I uploaded to my Silvio Sponza (@SilvioSponza) | Twitter profile—it shows the Vis viva calculation vs. the actual measured data from the Hale–Bopp comet https://twitter.com/SilvioSponza/sta...82052249997312 ,
I pulled the measurement data from this link: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//...00037.000.html
and grabbed the orbital elements here: https://theskylive.com/halebopp-info
Basically, I developed a mathematical derivation that results in a correction—dividing the Vis viva by the square root of two. In contrast, using the standard formula with the same data leads to an error when compared to observed measurements https://twitter.com/SilvioSponza/sta...74033121161218
(You can click the images to enlarge them if you want a better look)

To be clear: I’m not claiming these derivations are finished work. This is just a presentation intended to spark interest among physicists and mathematicians so they might actually take a look at my math and give it a pass or fail. So far, however, no one in the American physics community has found this presentation compelling enough to even bother reviewing my derivations

Larry Walker24 said:Why not just reach out to a math-physics journal instead?

I just got word back that they can't see how my materials would even be used for those damn vultures in that list.

That’s just their answer to whether they’re interested—but I haven't actually sent over the mathematical derivation and the breakdown yet.

I honestly have no clue who Garofeeder actually is—and more importantly, does he even have any pull with the American editors given the kind of posts he's putting out? Links here.

I can't believe we're still having this exact same debate—it’s like watching a rerun of a bad sitcom. People keep bringing up the old arguments about physics principles as if they haven't been debunked a thousand times over. It’s exhausting. The whole obsession with *vis viva* is such a tired trope at this point. We aren't living in the 17th century anymore; you can't just throw around outdated terminology and expect anyone to take your "revolutionary" theory seriously. It’s just noise. And don't even get me started on the way certain people try to twist the data to fit their preconceived notions. It’s not "alternative science"—it’s just plain wrong. If you want to actually contribute something meaningful to the discussion, try looking at the modern empirical evidence instead of clinging to these dusty, debunked concepts. It's simple: either the math works, or it doesn't. There is no middle ground here.

I can't believe I have to say this again—it’s common sense, people. We are talking about fundamental principles here, not some fringe theory you picked up on a random subreddit. If you don't grasp the basic mechanics of how energy actually moves through a system, you have no business weighing in on the debate. It's like trying to argue about high-frequency trading when you don't even know how a standard stock exchange works. The logic is simple: you can't just ignore the laws of physics because it makes your preferred hypothesis look better. It doesn't work that way. Every single time someone tries to bypass the established rules of thermodynamics, they end up circling back to the same flawed conclusions. It's exhausting to watch. Look at the data—actual, empirical data—not just the cherry-picked snippets being circulated by people looking for a quick headline. If you want to have a serious conversation, come prepared with more than just "vibes" and wishful thinking. Otherwise, you're just adding to the noise.



I was merely sending out inquiries to see if there was any interest in reviewing my mathematical proofs. Since no one expressed interest, I haven't sent them anywhere—nor have I uploaded them to any platform—so, therefore... A scientific council can't exactly hand out a grade for a paper they haven't even looked at—at least, that’s how Garofeeder put it. So, I finally decided to go looking for some help from the West.
I have no idea why Garofeeder didn't bother giving me a score in that accuracy poll—is he actually terrified of losing his license if he gives an incorrect rating? Honestly, I haven't noticed anyone else over in the science section bothering to rate my calculations either.
Why is it that those math and physics PhDs refuse to publicly grade my calculations so everyone can see exactly where they stand? Why won't reviewers from top-tier American academic journals even bother looking at my mathematical derivations? Is it because I’m an amateur—or is it because I happen to be an alternative astrologer? It's a known fact that certain—not all, mind you—astronomers, physicists, and psychiatrists in the media love to bash astrology, yet my proofs have absolutely nothing to do with astrology itself.

Moderators, I’m asking you to please step in—Alexander Thompson needs to stop spamming the one specific thread that tracks calculation accuracy. When a topic gets flooded like this, people lose all motivation to actually hunt down and read the relevant content. As for those Italians, they are incredibly serious about their work; they don't treat me poorly like some kind of total

Alexander Thompson said:Even the locals turned their backs on you.😵

Simi, is there any language where you aren't completely illiterate?

Who have you been badmouthing lately—are you attacking someone by their actual full name while hiding behind a pseudonym? Are you digging up personal info on people based on those names? Someone actually suggested I report you for this, so now I'm just sitting here waiting to see what the moderators advise me to do.

https://www.astronomia.com/forum/sho...a-e-iperbolica

I’ve signed up for the following forums:

1° Italian Amateur Astronomy Forum

and

Astronomy Forum

I want to thank all the good people here in America (whom I would actually love to collaborate with), but frankly, it’s pathetic how certain types of people dominate our social institutions—which is exactly why we’re facing such a massive crisis in the US. Because of that, I’ve decided to present my knowledge to the democratic Western nations instead. I’m going to ask them how best to publish my mathematical derivations, which, so far, not a single American physicist or mathematician has even bothered to look at (not that they’d know what they were looking at, since I haven't presented these derivations anywhere else yet). Furthermore, I intend to notify more developed countries about this total lack of scientific seriousness toward amateurs.

It is completely unacceptable for American physicists and mathematicians to refuse to review mathematical derivations simply because they were produced by an amateur. It goes without saying that peer reviewers are supposed to be top-tier experts whose job is to provide a legitimate assessment of whether something belongs in the realm of science or not—independent of velocity, as it were—regardless of whether the author holds a PhD or is just an amateur. History is full of amateurs whose work was eventually recognized by degreed professionals as scientifically valid.

The math-physics crew hasn't been ignoring my emails, so I should probably just send them the full paper for review—until they actually lay eyes on it, nobody can know for sure what we're dealing with. I told them that

I've already mapped out the mathematical derivations (using differential geometry) which apply to all defined functions—meaning they work for ellipses, hyperbolas, and parabolas alike—within Mathcad. Now, I just need to draft a formal paper including explanations and practical calculation examples based on actual astronomical measurement data. I can whip this up relatively quickly, convert it from Mathcad to a PDF, and then get it over to you guys for review
Here’s an example from the image I uploaded to my Silvio Sponza (@SilvioSponza) | Twitter profile, showing the Vis viva corrections by comparing calculations against the measured data from comet Hale–Bopp https://twitter.com/SilvioSponza/sta...82052249997312 ,
I pulled the measurement data from this link: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//...00037.000.html
and found the orbital elements here: https://theskylive.com/halebopp-info
This is the mathematical derivation I used to reach the correction where Vis viva is divided by the square root of two; meanwhile, here is the example using those same data points where the standard Vis viva fails when compared to the observed measurements https://twitter.com/SilvioSponza/sta...161218/photo/1
(If you want a better look, just click the images to enlarge them)

Most of them feel entitled to mistreat me or discriminate against me—especially those high-and-mighty types with a little bit of social status—simply because I’m part of a male minority. It really makes you wonder if this country even follows its own laws. Is it possible for a state to be "lawful" when it comes to women in leggings because they're the majority, but suddenly stop being lawful when it comes to men in leggings just because we're the minority?

Alexander Thompson said:Did she also mention how you're her special little guy—super smart and pretty as a girl?

She told me straight up: if any corrupt officials start causing trouble, she’ll handle them—and not just them. Basically, she isn't intimidated by you or anyone else tied to your circle.

My aunt told me straight up—anyone out there claiming I’m crazy is actually the one losing their mind.

Is it just me, or is someone with a mental illness constantly stalking another person and dragging their reputation through the mud everywhere they go?

Arthur Smith15 said:What can I even say? I’m only "rude" to people who pollute the threads I actually care about reading—those who clutter discussions with nonsense, arrogant ignorance, pure stubbornness, and destructive tangents. It’s pathetic watching someone play the victim here when, based on their track record over at the County Executive office and the rest of this site, they’ve managed to rack up a mountain of posts, endless bans, and enough accumulated points to warrant several permanent bans. Oh, sure, they're a "victim"... give me a break...

Look at this—they even misspelled the Latin ex nihilo. Not only did they derail and pollute the thread on history and historical topics by being stubborn after my correction, but they're doing the exact same thing in their own damn "appeal." 😁

Compared to Garofeeder, you're practically a saint.
http://www.reddit.com/showthread.php?t=1243549