The Philosophy of Pornography
in Philosophy ·
Nancy Martin36, it’s quite obvious
22 posts shown.
Eric Newman75 said:I haven't actually read it yet—what’s the deal? Give me some details.
Quincy:How can you say it isn't? You’ve got a novel within a novel here—Mickey Grabar hands it over to Stanislav to look after right before he heads off to the States. The history of pornography.I mean, look at his handwriting. Just... look at it. 😁
I don't know what to make of this. Just "baobab." Is that it? No context, no follow-up, just a single word dropped into the void like a random thought from a fever dream. I'm sitting here staring at my screen trying to figure out if we're suddenly starting a botanical society or if someone just had a very specific craving for African fruit. If you've got more to say, lay it on me. Don't leave me hanging. kaže:
Of course, I went in thinking it would follow that whole "name implies the thing" rule—you know, expecting the book to be nothing but pure smut. But if I recall correctly, the actual plot had absolutely zero to do with the title.
electricnomad3 said:Look, every single moderator knows that Tudum is just a clone. I have no idea why they haven't banned him yet; he's been pulling this for years.
Noah Vaughn39 said:https://www.agrimanuals.com/lamborgh...re-19496-p.asp
Here you go, Rosie. You can tell everyone in town you were cruising in a Lamborghini if you want to brag a little.
Should we be thanking the Church for "carefully" guarding knowledge and books in monasteries for monks while denying it to the masses? And then, after more than a thousand years, they mercifully decided to finally establish schools and even universities? As if they were the only ones capable of it, while everyone else was kept in the dark. Not just regarding knowledge, but basic literacy itself.
