Tina Turner
in Music ·
R. I. P.
Another musical legend has left us.
Another musical legend has left us.
Home ›
Michael Roberts › Posts
Posts by Michael Roberts
10 posts shown.
Announcement
in Banned Users Corner ·
I didn't get any heads-up about how long the ban was going to last
Thoughts on Thor: Love and Thunder?
in Movies ·
Wait, so is this movie actually happening without Chris or what?
Nickname change (read first post!)
in Forum Help! ·
Casey Bennett said:Arial works fine.
Just shoot a private message over to rustydrifter10.
Awesome, thanks 😉
Nickname change (read first post!)
in Forum Help! ·
Hey there! Is it possible to change my username to Michael Roberts? I know about that whole thing with capital letters, but apparently, Michael Roberts is already taken. If not, could I go by Donald Trump instead? 😬
Nickname change (read first post!)
in Forum Help! ·
Can I change my username to Michael Roberts
and still have the option to switch back to this one if I ever change my mind?
Michael Roberts is already taken, and you can't reserve your old name. The second you swap over to a new handle, your current one becomes available for anyone else to grab.
and still have the option to switch back to this one if I ever change my mind?
Michael Roberts is already taken, and you can't reserve your old name. The second you swap over to a new handle, your current one becomes available for anyone else to grab.
PDF Sheet Music: Taylor Swift's Greatest Hits
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Hey there! Where are the moderators who actually care about the music side of this forum? This user ivoo20 has been relentlessly attacking everyone on the Taylor Swift threads for days now. Personally, he’s insulted me multiple times, sent me threatening messages, and is basically trying to bully me off the site. I’m asking for some real action here—can we please finally get rid of this harassment?
Playback
in Music ·
Lip-syncing has become such a standard part of the music industry lately. Honestly, most people don't even blink anymore—they barely notice if an artist is actually singing live or just running a track. It used to be that lip-syncing was reserved for those specific pop stars who maybe lacked vocal technique but had massive hits, using it as a way to cash in on live shows without the risk.
We all remember the Milli Vanilli scandal, where it came out they weren't just faking it on stage, but their voices weren't even on the studio recordings either. That really showed how far this deception can go.
Nowadays, it isn't just about mediocre singers. Even superstars who are widely considered some of the best vocalists out there have leaned on playback. Take Beyoncé at Barack Obama’s inauguration—that actually caused quite a stir because nobody expected her to do that. Lately, we've seen artists like Mariah Carey and Leona Lewis doing similar things more often, though I guess almost everyone does it at least once in a while. Even the American music scene isn't immune to this. A recent example was Taylor Swift performing "Nirvana" at Coachella, where she went more than halfway through the song without even opening her mouth!
But if we're talking about the undisputed queen of lip-syncing, it has to be Britney Spears. Fans haven't heard her sing live in years. She manages to tour the entire world effortlessly, and now she has a residency in Las Vegas where people pay a fortune to attend, yet she's still mostly lip-syncing. To make it even funnier, whenever she gets asked in interviews why she doesn't sing live, she insists she always does!
So, I want to hear what you guys think: Is lip-syncing basically cheating the audience, or is it more like a service to protect fans from hearing a subpar version of their favorite song? Is the whole point of a concert to see an artist showcase their raw talent and connect with the crowd, or is it just to hear the song exactly how it sounds on the radio? Do you think it's ever okay to use playback if the choreography is insane, if the singer is sick, or if they compensate with a massive visual show instead? Would you rather spend your hard-earned money on a live set where there's a risk of missed notes and forgotten lyrics, or would you prefer a flawless performance where everything sounds perfect thanks to pre-recorded vocals, even if nothing is actually being sung live?
We all remember the Milli Vanilli scandal, where it came out they weren't just faking it on stage, but their voices weren't even on the studio recordings either. That really showed how far this deception can go.
Nowadays, it isn't just about mediocre singers. Even superstars who are widely considered some of the best vocalists out there have leaned on playback. Take Beyoncé at Barack Obama’s inauguration—that actually caused quite a stir because nobody expected her to do that. Lately, we've seen artists like Mariah Carey and Leona Lewis doing similar things more often, though I guess almost everyone does it at least once in a while. Even the American music scene isn't immune to this. A recent example was Taylor Swift performing "Nirvana" at Coachella, where she went more than halfway through the song without even opening her mouth!
But if we're talking about the undisputed queen of lip-syncing, it has to be Britney Spears. Fans haven't heard her sing live in years. She manages to tour the entire world effortlessly, and now she has a residency in Las Vegas where people pay a fortune to attend, yet she's still mostly lip-syncing. To make it even funnier, whenever she gets asked in interviews why she doesn't sing live, she insists she always does!
So, I want to hear what you guys think: Is lip-syncing basically cheating the audience, or is it more like a service to protect fans from hearing a subpar version of their favorite song? Is the whole point of a concert to see an artist showcase their raw talent and connect with the crowd, or is it just to hear the song exactly how it sounds on the radio? Do you think it's ever okay to use playback if the choreography is insane, if the singer is sick, or if they compensate with a massive visual show instead? Would you rather spend your hard-earned money on a live set where there's a risk of missed notes and forgotten lyrics, or would you prefer a flawless performance where everything sounds perfect thanks to pre-recorded vocals, even if nothing is actually being sung live?