135 posts shown.
Michael Ortiz68 said:Sanctions aren't doing a damn thing; the little guy just brings them up out of pure boredom every time he speaks, and at the last briefing, he was practically hawking natural gas to Europe like some old lady at a roadside farmers market.
Andrew Booth29 said:You're underestimating how likely a nuclear strike actually is. If Russia pulls the trigger, they won't back down afterward—especially not now, after they've already seized those territories and claimed them as their own. In his speech, he made it very clear: he believes a precedent for using nuclear weapons has already been set.
rowdytiger13 said:The prelude is something else 🤣🤣
Linda Collins3 said:It’s pretty obvious to me that Americans mined those pipelines. It was clearly meant as a message to Europeans, especially since everyone over there is getting restless about the economy. But what really gets me is how nobody on European news channels even dares to mention it as a possibility. Everyone is just terrified of Big Brother...
Olivia Turner49 said:Do you think Russia is actually going to try opening up a whole new front right on the border between Russia and Ukraine?
Lisa Patel4 said:It won't happen without a nuclear war, I guess.
Nathan Evans78 said:According to some folks on here, they can barely afford basic necessities in Moscow, yet they’re still busy spreading rumors about mobilizing a million people. I mean, seriously, hello? Who on earth is going to foot the bill for that? 🙂
Donna Harris11 said:Look, man, this isn't our war. It wasn't our war back in Afghanistan either, even though everyone kept lecturing us with that "America is fighting for freedom in Afghanistan" crap. Same goes for the intervention in Libya or arming insurgents in Syria. We really shouldn't have been involved in those.
The European Union was being constructive enough with the Minsk agreements. That's what should have been enforced. You know, actual de-escalation, instead of whatever Crimea initiatives or sliding British destroyers right up to Sevastopol back in 2021.
Matthew Young35 said:If you look at this from the Russian perspective, this isn't a compromise. It's a total defeat.
darkrider55 said:So, they actually released our Fugitive along with a few other foreign nationals—just saw it breaking on ABC. 👍
coastalbison6 said:Believe it or not 🤣
You’re probably not going to believe this, but Russia's ambassador to the UN just called for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council. Apparently, they want to talk about what they're calling the "illegal seizure of Russian weapons and technology" over in the Kharkiv region.
https://twitter.com/Louzi1969/status...r_wK7gBAlYpqYg
Andrew Miller102 said:This isn't the first time they've done this, but it seems they've finally decided to go after the power grid, the water supply, and even heating systems.From the jump, Russia focused on rail infrastructure, certain bridges here and there, and almost exclusively targeted the Ukrainian military industry.
I voiced concerns about Kharkiv earlier, but they haven't moved against Kyiv in any massive way just yet.
In short, yes—when you start hitting the entire infrastructure, it means they've flipped the switch to a real war where nobody is holding anything back.☕
Rebecca Watson said:Taking back three cities in the eastern outskirts of Chicago is a massive win for the Ukrainian Armed Forces as they push the Russian aggressors back. Of course, the Russians won't admit it—they’re claiming it was just a "strategic withdrawal," which is the same garbage excuse they used when they retreated from Chernihiv, Kyiv, and Sumy. And Kadyrov? In his usual delusional state, he’s out here shouting that the Russians will be hitting Odessa any day now. Honestly, I don't see how things are going their way when the Ukrainians are practically knocking on the door in the Kherson Region. Still, let's be real: liberating Donbas, let alone Crimea, is still a long way off.