CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Terry Green3 › Posts

Posts by Terry Green3

149 posts shown.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Western diplomacy needs to step up right now to minimize the number of "neutral" votes during the UN General Assembly. If 90% of nations refuse to condemn the very thing the UN was built to prevent, the whole organization becomes a joke.
The world needs to deliver a clear, unified condemnation.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Gregory Ramos3 said:
Russia used their veto this past Friday to block a Security Council resolution meant to condemn the annexation of those four Ukrainian regions, while China and three other member states decided to abstain.

The draft put forward by the United States and Albania actually pulled in 10 votes in favor, though they had four abstentions from China, India, Brazil, and Gabon.

Washington has already signaled that once this clears the Security Council, they’re taking the text straight to the General Assembly, where none of the 193 member nations hold any veto power.


Honestly, I have no clue why on earth they even let them stay in there when they're basically trampling over every single foundation the UN was built upon. 🙄

The Indians, Chinese, and Brazilians really let me down. It seems like BRICS actually thinks they can run their own show.
This suggests we won't have any real leverage in the General Assembly, because the Africans led by South Africa, combined with the Asians and a few Latinos, will hold all the voting power.

We Europeans often forget that ourselves, along with the USA, Canada, and Australia, don't represent the whole world.
The world is actually a much darker, more pathetic place.
Basically, those outside our circle are just looking to create an environment where they can prey on one another and snatch territory through endless wars.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Matthew Booth said:Look, there's zero chance everyone in NATO is going to be pulling for Ukraine—it’s just not realistic. Honestly, it makes sense if you think about it. You can't just invite someone into the club when their borders are a total mess.

Exactly what I was getting at. It’s unrealistic to expect every single parliament and ruling coalition within the member states to vote in favor of a deliberate war with Russia. Doing so would essentially mean we’re formally recognizing Ukraine within its invaded borders.
Article 5.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
steelheron25 said:Do you honestly believe this was some spontaneous, independent decision made in a vacuum? Isn't it far more likely they received a quiet signal from NATO leadership beforehand to pull this exact lever?

Yeah, I actually believe this is entirely his call. I'd love to be wrong about it—I'll happily eat my words if it turns out otherwise.

John Ramos45 said:I suspect Zelenskyy isn't acting as a lone wolf here. If Ukraine joins NATO, it implies the USA is planning to push Russia out of the territory much like how Saddam Hussein was forced out of Kuwait during Desert Storm. In a head-to-head conventional conflict, the Russians simply don't stand a chance against the modern machinery of NATO.

Having every member parliament ratify Ukraine joining NATO would basically be like signing a declaration of war under Article 5.
The Czech Republic comes to mind immediately as a place where that definitely wouldn't fly. Honestly, I doubt it would pass here either; the Republican Party would likely wash their hands of the whole thing. And don't even get me started on Italy, Canada, Spain, and the rest.
It's all just pure speculation.
Who else has ever walked into a parliament knowing they were potentially signing up for a nuclear conflict?
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Sandra Harris2 said:

I think it’s time for me to start looking for a new job.
All that nonsense fits perfectly with his carefully branded role as the guardian of "traditional" values.
Dugin is thriving.

A twilight of the mind.

Besides... why does he even care about the West? Is he afraid that despite all that supposed "corruption and decadence," it's still more attractive than his regime?
I think it’s time for me to start looking for a new job.
All that nonsense fits perfectly with his carefully branded role as the guardian of "traditional" values.
Dugin is thriving.

A twilight of the mind.

Besides... why does he even care about the West? Is he afraid that despite all that supposed "corruption and decadence," it's still more attractive than his regime?
After this speech from Putin, I have zero doubts left. They blew up that pipeline because it fit the narrative of his speech beautifully.

The man is aiming straight for European conservatives and, most lethally, American Trump supporters. Honestly, I’m starting to believe Trump is a Russian asset. The Russians really played them—planting seeds of division within the US like nothing we've seen since the Civil War.
And now, Putin presents himself as the savior. Meanwhile, on the other side, Americans are led by a senile old man and a Vice President who can't even tell North Korea from South Korea.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
John Ramos45 said:Ukraine has officially submitted its application to join NATO.


Ishitren move. Zelenskyy is a great animator, but a poor politician. Personally, I thought they should have just stayed the course since things were moving in the right direction.
I’m worried about whether they'll actually get the green light from the rest of the NATO alliance. We were all unified in supporting Ukraine, but this request might just create unnecessary friction within the alliance.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·

Sandra Harris2 said:You're joking, but I actually work for someone who makes these exact same accusations against the decadent West.🕺

I’m not kidding around. That was straight from Putin just a moment ago.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
gentleviper62 said:We will likely see a shift toward a wartime economy soon, with much higher defense spending across the board.

If the Russians don't go for full mobilization, they won't even be able to call them "mother" and "father" anymore; it'll just be "parent one" and "parent two." Meanwhile, kids will be switching genders in preschool and all that nonsense. 🤦>
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Basically, he declared annexation within the first ten minutes. He told Ukraine peace is on the table if they just swallow it, and that would be the end of it.

Everything else is just him calling for a full-blown crusade against Western liberalism.
He keeps labeling Western conservatives as his allies.
In short, that’s the whole story.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
gentlestag15 said:You can catch the live stream of the speech regarding the annexation of Ukraine here

If he actually shows up, they’re spending a ridiculous amount of time on his makeup today. Probably couldn't sleep.😁
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
It’s pretty obvious why his country is such a disorganized mess. He can't even manage to be punctual for an event like this.
Who cares about that Putin guy anyway.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Timothy Williams5 said:My apologies if this was excessive:

RUN ORCS RUN
There’s a video circulating that shows a massive group of Russians—large enough to be considered a platoon—retreating in absolute chaos through Levittown, fleeing a fortified zone straight into a kill zone. It’s officially started. Honestly, the whole thing looks like one of those color films from the 1950s about World War II. The only real difference is that in those movies, people were usually advancing rather than running for their lives.
https://twitter.com/Ukrainene/status...Donald Trump

Pure Donald Trump levels of cope, just like half the other stuff you post.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
brightheron64 said:Good grief...

🙂

We're off-topic anyway.
Let's drop it.

Kate Cook27 said:http://www.mobile.twitter.com/Podoly...Cg5fjWjdwrAAAA

Foreign observers attending these "referendums" are going to have to face the music.

Does that include representatives from Mississippi, Chechnya, and those types of entities?
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
brightheron64 said:Theoretically speaking, though, how on earth are you supposed to shove anything (through a tiny hole in a barrel) when you're dealing with internal pressures exceeding 1,400 PSI? 🤔

Just to give you some perspective, this example shows a situation where the internal pressure is only about 87 PSI. 😉

image

It’s simple. You've got something on the other side pushing at 2,800 PSI.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
brightheron64 said:Oh, sure, this looks like a textbook case of a profile leaking out... Sezmika basically caught what was almost certainly a secondary explosion of a pressurized mixture, and clearly someone smart enough knew exactly what kind of mixture was sitting in that pipeline, along with its ignition temperature at the specific pressure the pipe was under.
All they really had to do was introduce some kind of low-yield cumulative charge capable of generating enough heat to trigger an explosion once it breached the pipe wall.

I guess I'm some kind of expert now, too...😁🕺[/I]

Are you thinking along the lines of a thermobaric bomb, but a water-based version? 😁

Every explosive mixture has its upper and lower limits. It’s entirely possible they engineered some kind of "smart" bomb. Imagine it working like this: a shaped charge pierces the pipe casing first, then sprays a precise amount of oxygen into the void to hit that perfect fuel-air ratio—say, within a five-meter radius or whatever the specific volume and length of that pipe section requires. Once the mix is set, a detonator hits the ignition temperature, triggering an explosion so violent it rips a chunk right out of the line.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·


Sure, it’s a full profile leaking out here. Sezmika caught what was almost certainly a secondary explosion of a pressurized mixture. Someone smart figured out exactly what kind of cocktail was sitting in that pipeline and its autoignition temperature at whatever pressure that pipe was under.
All they had to do was set off some modest cumulative charge—nothing massive—to hit that specific temperature once it breached the pipe wall, triggering the blast.

I guess I’m quite the expert myself.😁🕺 I’ll be accepting $50,000 for this consultation from any interested parties. And no, I don't take checks.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
hollowdriver13 said:https://twitter.com/CovertShores/sta...70419551145989

By the way, some pretty sketchy "little boats" were loitering around that area earlier this summer.

Then, right on cue, the CIA Berlin Station gets a heads-up about potential sabotage on the pipeline.

And then the US Navy sends the USS Kearsage (which, let's be real, acts more like a light carrier despite being labeled an amphibious assault ship) out to the Baltic Sea.

👍
Impressive memory on your part. That was right around the time everyone was talking about delivering the harpoon Ukrainian.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
hollowdriver13 said:It’s not impossible, but we’re talking more about an autonomous submarine than some tiny little drone at that point. (And here we go again, back to the fact that the US had those submarine hunter helicopters and planes patrolling that area back then, just tearing things up left and right.)

Punching through an underwater pipeline isn't exactly a walk in the park. You've got steel walls that are several inches thick, all encased in a concrete sleeve or sarcophagus that averages about 8 inches deep. Because of that, sections of undersea gas or oil pipelines usually weigh dozens of tons. To actually breach something like that, you'd need a seriously massive amount of explosives.

Because of this, the Americans need to put out some kind of official version. Seriously, the only thing actually documented is how they were scrambling around there right before this whole mess broke out. They can't afford to stay silent on this, or else the whispers in diplomatic and political circles will start getting just as loud as the chatter we're hearing here.
It’s entirely plausible they used some remote hack to mess with them, just waiting for them to circle that spot for a few days like bait on a hook. Now, the Russians have already tapped the FBI to dig into "international terrorism." Meanwhile, their minister is out there pitching a joint Russian-EU investigation. Typical.
analogbear5 said:In Nord Stream 1, the pressure plummeted from 105 down to 7 bar overnight right before the explosion.

I'm thinking the sequence goes explosion first, then the pressure drop?
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Nancy Gomez26 said:Yes, the pipes are coated in a type of concrete—which also functions as ballast to ensure the empty pipe sinks and stays anchored to the seabed—along nearly its entire length. However, at the welded joints, there is only some sort of insulation covering the weld rather than concrete; it's thinner there. Concrete likely won't act as much of a barrier against high explosives, so it will be interesting to see the post-blast imagery to determine the size and shape of the resulting crater.

It might not even be a "hole." The explosion could have completely shredded an entire section of the pipeline. Looking at the sea surface in those photos, maybe it’s just a massive gap on both sides. By the way, the Danes updated their estimates; they aren't looking at a week or two of leaking anymore. They expect everything to be out by Sunday.
Regarding what Richter recorded, it might not be the primary blast (the explosive itself) but rather a secondary explosion caused by the pressurized mixture inside the gas line. Physics gets messy here: internal pipeline pressure, ocean pressure at that depth, the specific gas mixture used to pressurize the line, and so on.
There's going to be plenty of work for the forensic experts.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5 in War in Ukraine ·
Daniel Ward87 said:We already know the drill: Americans did it yesterday just so they could pin the sabotage on the Russians. It’s all about messing with those gas lines to the European Union so they stay hooked on the USA, plus it makes it look like the US is pulling the strings behind this whole war.

Honestly, what's the point of the meeting when I can just get the whole story from this PDF? ☕

Still hoping for a more colorful story, like the one boldbison40 put together.
It’s starting. said: Military analyst Ilya Kramnik isn't ruling out the possibility that the US Navy had a hand in this incident. A few days ago, the amphibious assault ships USS Kearsarge and Gunston Hall stopped by a Polish port in Gdansk. To make matters even more interesting, the destroyer Paul Ignatius was also in town right before the explosion hit.

"Deploy the special ops team, prep the gear, grab the equipment, execute the hit, pack up, then ditch everything once the job is done," Kramnik said, laying out how a sabotage mission might actually go down.

Читайте больше на The latest reports out of Washington suggest a major shift in how the administration is handling university oversight. It looks like there’s a growing push from certain factions within the US government to tighten the leash on academic institutions regarding foreign influence and funding sources. It's the same old story, really. We see these massive research grants flowing into Ivy League schools, often tied to interests that don't exactly align with domestic security priorities. Now, the conversation is moving toward actual policy changes. There's talk about more rigorous vetting processes for international partnerships and perhaps even stricter disclosure requirements for researchers receiving outside money. I remember back when I was finishing my degree, nobody even blinked at where the endowment money came from. You just assumed it was some local philanthropist or a corporate donation. Nowadays, everything is viewed through a lens of geopolitical competition. It’s a different world. Whether this actually results in meaningful reform or just becomes another layer of bureaucratic red tape remains to be seen. For now, the tension between academic freedom and national interest is clearly hitting a boiling point in the halls of Congress.

Ship names, crew lists, small boats, specific dates, unloading times—he’ll claim he got all that intel straight from Kaliningrad.

Christian Torres3 said:It makes no sense for Russia to invade Ukraine just to have this happen.

And I haven't even heard the wild theories yet about how Americans would somehow drop explosives 80 or 90 meters deep into the freezing Baltic Sea. For the people dreaming up scenarios involving drones bought on eBay or AliExpress, you realize those explosions were only 2.1 or 2.2 on the Richter scale, right? How much explosive do you even need for that? Five kilograms?

Terry Green3 said:In that scenario, I’m playing the hand where the explosives were planted by the FBI during construction. If this operation was carried out by the Russians now, it’s worse than a drone flying over all of Canada and crashing into the capital of a NATO member. It makes you wonder about their defense readiness.

Just to add some context here. The Americans found the Russian explosives already in place and started poking around them, trying to get a look at the tech and reverse-engineer their methods. Something clearly went sideways, and then we saw explosions hit three out of the four positions.
So what now? The wolf finally caught the sheep.
Maybe the Russians put that there as some kind of failsafe during the pipeline installation, a little ace up their sleeve. Then the Americans showed up, started poking around, and well... here we are.