CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › William Hill3 › Posts

Posts by William Hill3

4 posts shown.

Blonde (2022) in Movies ·
Noah Roberts46 said:Why is Marilyn Monroe still such an icon today?

It comes down to the fact that she broke ground by doing things that were virtually unheard of at the time. Think of her as the first genuine sex symbol; she wasn't afraid to be provocative or show skin, which was a total paradigm shift back then. Besides, people who actually knew her used to talk about this incredible charisma and aura she possessed. Sure, some might argue she came off as "cheap" or wasn't the most stunning woman ever, but she brought something fundamentally different to Hollywood. She changed the texture of the industry.

bluerider3 said:I just don't get how he can tear Kennedy down like that in his own fantasy; I don't follow the logic.

Anyone from those social circles who actually crossed paths with JFK claimed he was essentially a crude, misogynistic guy. Based on the documentaries I’ve watched, I’ve walked away with that same impression—he seems to be portrayed in films exactly as they depicted him in real life.

Edward Mitchell83 said:You hit the nail on the head. She was just an average woman, and there were probably a million more beautiful ones walking down any street in America. She didn't grab attention because of her acting prowess, but because she functioned as a mistress to many, including the President of the USA. Her death attracts so much scrutiny because it feels shrouded in mystery rather than being treated like a standard case handled by the authorities.

That isn't quite right. Marilyn wasn't the center of attention because of her looks; it was because she introduced sexuality during an era when sex was still largely taboo. We're talking about a time when "provocative" meant wearing a dress that fell just below the knee. She was wearing hot pants. She was far more exposed than anyone else. She was appearing on screen partially nude. On top of that, she was an outlier compared to other women, which makes sense given her background—she had to evolve into someone entirely different to survive. And that's exactly what she did.

Maria Johnson said:Just finished the movie. Ana de Armas absolutely nailed the role of Marilyn Monroe. The film itself was moving; the two and a half hours just flew by.

Just dropping some thoughts here. 👍
How do you deal with today's social climate? in Psychology ·
Jamie Adams6 said:... which is actually a good thing, right? Because when you mentioned how being "forced" makes it easier to accept people—their flaws and all that baggage they refuse to work on—while society packages it up as "diversity," it briefly sounded like you were suggesting having fewer options is actually the way to go.

It's hard for me to say exactly how one thing is being prioritized over good company without a specific example. Netflix keeps coming up, but I'd be shocked if that’s really the only reason Mary isn't grabbing coffee with the neighbor. Maybe she's just tired of hearing the same old complaints over and over, so Netflix is just a nice way to kill the boredom. No one skips a stimulating hangout or a date just because of some show—at the end of the day, nobody thinks *they* are a boring or exhausting person to talk to, so it's much easier to just blame Netflix.

Someone I know? Yeah, sure. You greet acquaintances—that's why they're called acquaintances! You don't just bow down to someone simply because they're over 50 and call it "respect."

Honestly, that bitterness is exactly what separates kids from adults—it's those little tensions you carry because of responsibilities, money stress, health issues, and all that other stuff that leaves scars on your soul over the years. And let's face it, you're mostly hanging out with adults anyway, so that's all you really notice. I used to see the opposite mostly in American movies or Fanta commercials. Come to think of it, if I were living in a country like America and seeing mostly smiling, optimistic people, that would actually be a sign that they started going overboard with certain substances.

I didn't actually say that; you just simplified and interpreted it that way.

Jamie Adams6 said:... which is actually a good thing, right? Because when you mentioned how being "forced" makes it easier to accept people—their flaws and all that baggage they refuse to work on—while society packages it up as "diversity," it briefly sounded like you were suggesting having fewer options is actually the way to go.

It's hard for me to say exactly how one thing is being prioritized over good company without a specific example. Netflix keeps coming up, but I'd be shocked if that’s really the only reason Mary isn't grabbing coffee with the neighbor. Maybe she's just tired of hearing the same old complaints over and over, so Netflix is just a nice way to kill the boredom. No one skips a stimulating hangout or a date just because of some show—at the end of the day, nobody thinks *they* are a boring or exhausting person to talk to, so it's much easier to just blame Netflix.

Someone I know? Yeah, sure. You greet acquaintances—that's why they're called acquaintances! You don't just bow down to someone simply because they're over 50 and call it "respect."

Honestly, that bitterness is exactly what separates kids from adults—it's those little tensions you carry because of responsibilities, money stress, health issues, and all that other stuff that leaves scars on your soul over the years. And let's face it, you're mostly hanging out with adults anyway, so that's all you really notice. I used to see the opposite mostly in American movies or Fanta commercials. Come to think of it, if I were living in a country like America and seeing mostly smiling, optimistic people, that would actually be a sign that they started going overboard with certain substances.

Most people around me don't really socialize—they spend far more time watching Netflix than they do hanging out. It means most people are choosing other things over social interaction. Essentially, there are plenty of distractions people prefer over a nice get-together.

Or maybe socializing just isn't "pleasant" anymore? If so, I wonder how we got here—how we became so hyper-critical of others while being totally uncritical of ourselves. That’s the crux of it. Nobody fits my criteria, I don't feel like talking to anyone, and I can't stand anybody (except my dog). This implies one of two things: either a) we are overly judgmental toward others (because it's impossible that absolutely no one is worth knowing), or b) we aren't critical enough of ourselves (since it's impossible that we're the only ones who are worthwhile).

Jamie Adams6 said:... which is actually a good thing, right? Because when you mentioned how being "forced" makes it easier to accept people—their flaws and all that baggage they refuse to work on—while society packages it up as "diversity," it briefly sounded like you were suggesting having fewer options is actually the way to go.

It's hard for me to say exactly how one thing is being prioritized over good company without a specific example. Netflix keeps coming up, but I'd be shocked if that’s really the only reason Mary isn't grabbing coffee with the neighbor. Maybe she's just tired of hearing the same old complaints over and over, so Netflix is just a nice way to kill the boredom. No one skips a stimulating hangout or a date just because of some show—at the end of the day, nobody thinks *they* are a boring or exhausting person to talk to, so it's much easier to just blame Netflix.

Someone I know? Yeah, sure. You greet acquaintances—that's why they're called acquaintances! You don't just bow down to someone simply because they're over 50 and call it "respect."

Honestly, that bitterness is exactly what separates kids from adults—it's those little tensions you carry because of responsibilities, money stress, health issues, and all that other stuff that leaves scars on your soul over the years. And let's face it, you're mostly hanging out with adults anyway, so that's all you really notice. I used to see the opposite mostly in American movies or Fanta commercials. Come to think of it, if I were living in a country like America and seeing mostly smiling, optimistic people, that would actually be a sign that they started going overboard with certain substances.

I honestly believe people used to be much more cheerful and positive. That’s just my take, and it's not just me who feels that way. Let's face it—people are literally writing books and scientific papers about this now; it's a genuine sociological question: why is the modern human so unhappy?
And everyone seems to reach the same conclusion, which aligns with my view—the zeitgeist is such that everyone is convinced they are uniquely special, misunderstood, and different from the crowd. When you have millions upon millions of people thinking exactly like that, you end up with a massive pile of grumpy individuals who overestimate themselves, underestimate everyone else, and think they're unique when, in reality, they're all identical. That's why people don't socialize as much. Everyone thinks they're better than everyone else.

People used to take photos of gatherings because they wanted a memory. Nowadays, people take photos just to rack up likes to validate their self-worth, to look good, and to create an illusion of perfection through filters. This creates the impression that everyone is loaded and living an incredible life, that everyone is attractive, and everyone is brilliant (thanks to Google searches)... Then someone who actually believes this looks at their neighbor's photos and wonders why they don't have that much money or why they don't have that great body (in 99% of cases, neither the neighbor nor the person has the money or the body). Furthermore, everything has become "instant." Everything is available at the touch of a button, which is great, but it strips away the charm. You might have once looked forward to a new album or a cassette tape. To a kid today, that means nothing; they stream a song a million times and get bored of it in three days. We've shifted toward quantity over quality in almost everything—from art and journalism to the clothes and shoes we wear. It's mostly just more shit.

Look, I’m 35 years old. I’m not some bitter, jaded person, nor do I hang out with people who act like that. I have a massive pile of responsibilities and an actual life to lead.
How do you deal with today's social climate? in Psychology ·
Quote : dark side
Jamie Adams6 said:Bottom line—it actually seems better when we have zero options. It forces us to practice patience and just deal with flaky friends, partners, services, or apps. But once you've got plenty of choices? That mediocre stuff isn't your only option anymore. We get way more critical, and if things aren't hitting the mark, we just pivot elsewhere. Basically, instead of learning how to accept what doesn't fit, we just "detach" from it entirely.

Let's face it—the only reason this thread even exists is because the OP ended up on a side they never expected to be on. This whole crowd is just the opposite of those young people out there who pair up, keep long-term friendships, and actually live in the same community. Thinking everyone else is miserable and lonely just because they didn't adopt the "idealized" habits pushed here is honestly naive. A lot of people are actually thriving right now simply because their character fits the modern era much better.

Btw, that whole idea of "respecting" elders or feeling obligated to talk to total strangers just because of their age? That's about as outdated as a Henry Ford. You don't owe anyone your time just because you happen to be walking down the same street.

Look, it’s not like you were forced to put up with partners or friends who didn't fit your vibe back in the 70s, 80s, or 90s either. A truly mature, well-adjusted person wouldn't have settled for that kind of nonsense then, and they certainly wouldn't now. Not once.
We have more ways to kill time than ever before, but none of them come close to the actual joy of being around people. You just can't replicate the feeling of hanging out with friends by sitting on the couch watching Netflix; it’s not even a fair comparison. Back in the day, people actually spent time together, which meant they gave relationships a real chance to develop into something meaningful. Nowadays, those deep connections seem much harder to find. Maybe there would be more of them if we actually gave people a shot. I don't see it as "distancing ourselves from things that don't suit us." To me, it looks more like we're distancing ourselves before we even give a relationship a fighting chance. Our standards for what we'll tolerate have climbed to an impossible level—everyone is hunting for perfection in someone else without ever stopping to ask what they actually have to offer in return.

Quote : dark side
Jamie Adams6 As requested by ironrider11:
Let’s be real here: the only reason this thread even exists is because the OP ended up on a side of the argument they never intended to visit. Take that group of people who actually managed to pair up and maintain long-term friendships while living in the same community—they are the perfect counterargument to everything being said here. It’s honestly naive to assume everyone else is miserable or lonely just because they didn't adopt the exact set of habits being idealized in this sub. In fact, a lot of people are actually thriving right now simply because their personalities happen to align better with the current era than with whatever outdated standard is being pushed here.
I find myself in a position that’s the exact polar opposite of what the author described, yet I can say with total certainty that I get where they're coming from.

Quote : dark side
Jamie Adams6 said:Bottom line—it actually seems better when we have zero options. It forces us to practice patience and just deal with flaky friends, partners, services, or apps. But once you've got plenty of choices? That mediocre stuff isn't your only option anymore. We get way more critical, and if things aren't hitting the mark, we just pivot elsewhere. Basically, instead of learning how to accept what doesn't fit, we just "detach" from it entirely.

Let's face it—the only reason this thread even exists is because the OP ended up on a side they never expected to be on. This whole crowd is just the opposite of those young people out there who pair up, keep long-term friendships, and actually live in the same community. Thinking everyone else is miserable and lonely just because they didn't adopt the "idealized" habits pushed here is honestly naive. A lot of people are actually thriving right now simply because their character fits the modern era much better.

Btw, that whole idea of "respecting" elders or feeling obligated to talk to total strangers just because of their age? That's about as outdated as a Henry Ford. You don't owe anyone your time just because you happen to be walking down the same street.

We can’t exactly frame disrespect as "progress," no matter how much people try to spin it that way. It’s especially problematic when you see this blatant disregard for newcomers being thrown in the faces of those who have actually put in the years and earned their stripes. Just because a tradition or a method feels outdated doesn't mean it lacks value or should be tossed out. Take something as simple as manners, for instance. Acknowledging someone you know—especially an elder—isn't just some old-fashioned formality; it's a fundamental sign of basic decency. Failing to do so isn't "disruptive" or "modern"; it's just plain rude. At the end of the day, culture is about choosing behaviors that build respect, while a lack of it is just a downward slide into bad manners.

If you take a look at the general vibe of people lately, the clinical picture is pretty bleak. There’s just less joy, less genuine enthusiasm, and far fewer smiles—you see it every single day just walking down the street in any major US city. Everyone seems to be getting increasingly sour and irritable. To me, that alone is enough evidence to suggest that we are clearly doing something wrong.
How do you deal with today's social climate? in Psychology ·
Jamie Adams6 said:People always romanticize stuff they haven't actually lived through—like those legendary eighties or any other era from back in the day. It’s mostly because their only connection to it is some glorified highlight reel where everything looks perfect. Like, you know how older folks swear Lionel Messi isn't even in the same league as Maradona? Well, they maybe caught him playing three times total, whereas we get to see Messi every single weekend—including all his off days and slumps. Ironically, on YouTube compilations, Maradona never misses a shot, never loses his form, and never struggles. Not him, not Pele, not anyone from that "romanticized" past—that’s literally the whole point of those clips: show the greatness and hide the failures. And then people draw massive conclusions based on that—just like they judge the seventies or eighties based on their parents' lives, movies, or music—as if those eras weren't full of lonely, depressed, or struggling people who weren't just some perfect, inclusive utopia.

The thing is—to feel actual nostalgia, you need time to pass, which means you’ve aged in the process. It’s way more likely that someone is actually longing for their own youth or a second chance at things they missed, rather than the social vibes of a specific decade. Because when you grow old and realize you aren't where you planned to be, that same feeling follows you regardless of the era. In a moment of weakness, you start thinking life would've been better in a different time—one where the circumstances that held you back in the present didn't exist—so you just time-travel in your head to find comfort. Honestly, a lot of them are probably right—maybe things *would* have been easier in those "simpler" times—but it’s not productive, and those kinds of thoughts should stay strictly in the last ten minutes before you fall asleep.

Perfumes lasted longer, music was way more diverse, and soccer was definitely more exciting back then—I'll give you that—but it seems to me that people are basically jerks in every single era.

I have to disagree with you there. I’ve spent a lot of time turning the question from this thread over in my head, wondering if I’ve just become one of those cynical 30-somethings who constantly moans about "the good old days." But that isn't it for me. My life is actually great right now—honestly, I couldn't ask for more. However, there was a specific level of pure, unadulterated joy I could tap into back then that I just haven't been able to replicate. It wasn't about being a kid; it was about the environment. Back then, I could be out on the street with twenty kids kicking a soccer ball around, wearing a shirt covered in melted ice cream and clutching a PB&J sandwich, and feel completely invincible. Or later, singing and dancing the night away with a rowdy crowd at a local dive bar. I felt that rush then, and I don't feel it now, even though my life was objectively harder back then. You might argue it’s just because I was younger, but I don't buy that. The truth is, you don't see that many kids playing outside in the neighborhood anymore, and you certainly don't find those groups of people out at the pub, losing themselves in the moment. Everyone is glued to Netflix or scrolling through a group chat. And let me tell you, no cinematic masterpiece on Netflix or endless scrolling on a chat app is ever going to trigger the same serotonin spike as being surrounded by positive people in a room full of life.

Modern life gives you this incredible opportunity to basically never leave your apartment and interact with almost nobody. It used to be that social contact was practically mandatory. You’d find yourself stuck in a boring afternoon where you were forced to head out and actually mingle with people. That’s when the real stuff happened—those random experiences, the ridiculous jokes, the unplanned parties that end up becoming lifelong memories. Back then, we used those 35mm film canisters to capture the moments we never wanted to forget. Nowadays, we just use our phones to show off how good our bodies look and compete over who can rack up more likes. Honestly, that says everything you need to know about where we're at. In a room full of twenty people, you actually had to make an impression. You had to crack a joke, tell a story, or just be interesting... and everyone else had to step up too. Today? It’s enough to just retreat to a corner and grab your phone.

Back when people actually had to interact face-to-face, social skills and emotional intelligence weren't just buzzwords—they were survival tools. You developed them naturally. Now? It’s like we’ve collectively regressed. Take one woman on this forum, for instance; she’s currently stuck explaining that it is, in fact, abnormal for someone to ghost you and then pop up two hours later claiming they "forgot" about your plans without even a basic apology. In the past, nobody would have even questioned that kind of behavior. It wasn't an option. There used to be guys who might flirt or compliment you, sure, but they understood the unspoken rule: you show a baseline level of respect or demonstrate some actual interest before jumping into anything. There was a process. A standard. Nowadays, you just get someone sliding into your DMs with a random photo of a kite, acting like they've done something. And what exactly is the end goal there? Honestly, if you want to talk about emotional intelligence and social graces, we're looking at a total deficit.

Once you’re actually forced to step out and engage with people, you start accepting them for who they are. You begin to tolerate their quirks and embrace their differences. It’s like, "Ann only checks about 70% of my boxes, but she’s fine, so we hang out because nobody is perfect." Nowadays, everyone seems to have an exhaustive A-to-Z checklist of exactly how their ideal friend should look and act. It’s just a shame that nobody applies that same scrutiny to themselves—no one stops to ask what kind of friend *they* actually bring to the table. In the end, people just wind up hanging out with their dogs, because at least you can patronize a pet and train them to behave exactly how you want.

It seems to me that people have never been more isolated, which inevitably drags down the quality of family dynamics too. There was a time when you actually had genuine friends and a social circle to lean on; you weren't just drifting through life alone. Nowadays, most people have nobody, so they end up latching onto the very first person who crosses their path. They rush into marriages and then act genuinely surprised when the relationship loses its spark almost immediately. An absurd number of people are just pairing up because they’re terrified of being alone, mostly because so few people actually possess the capacity to be comfortable in their own company.
If you ask me, I genuinely miss how things used to be—that different kind of rhythm. Life felt more positive back then, more fun, and people actually knew how to socialize. They practiced those social skills every single day, learning how to set boundaries and respect where others stood. It seems like we developed a much sharper sense of empathy than what’s prevalent today. I lived through enough of that era to remember how the older generation would just hang out on their porches during the summer, laughing together, and how the days would just fly by when I was out with my friends, just constant laughter and nonsense. And it wasn't just me; it was everyone. So, yeah. I remember.

And to finally address the question—how am I adjusting? Honestly, I’ve managed it by building my own little bubble. I fill my time with things I actually enjoy, focusing on my family, my husband whom I love, my kid, and my hobbies. I make sure my day is packed with things that bring me joy. I have a small circle of dear friends I grab a drink with occasionally; these connections are relatively new, so they’ll either grow into something lasting or they won't. Personally, I don't have the time, the energy, or the desire for "instant" relationships. Nowadays, everything is designed for immediate gratification—from food and communication to the very fabric of society. Of course, there are pros and cons to all this convenience, but for me, the era I grew up in had better music, better movies, better parties, and deeper connections. It was a time when people actually expressed their emotions by speaking or writing about how they felt, rather than just sending some animated GIF of a cartoon dog with a heart coming out of its butt.