Republican Party - General Discussion
in Political Scene ·
briskjackal5 said:Yeah
So, the whole backstory here is that the American forestry service started seeing unexpectedly huge profits back during the Democratic Party era (I mean, who would've thought you could actually make a state-owned company run efficiently, right? But hey, apparently you can!).
But then the administration changes, and suddenly contracts get canceled and bonuses go out the window; those old contracts were all based on "performance," the results were fantastic, but now there's this totally irrational drama over paying them out—
The big drama was also about how they supposedly "laid off hundreds of workers."
Maybe we just miss having political cronyism, or maybe we just don't need or want rational management in state companies anymore? I guess. 🤔
Then the Republican Party takes over.
And that’s where the story really starts, around 2016/17.
FORESTRY SHAKEOUT! Out of 16 regional directors, 13 have been replaced, leaving only three Republican loyalists behind.
If you look at the structure of who got fired versus who got hired, it says everything. It’s pretty obvious that before this, there was a crew in place that wasn't just chosen based on party lines.
So, we get to see the Republican "management" style in action by 2018.
STATE COMPANY WITH THE BEST COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT. Profits are shrinking, yet they’ve hired 794 new people, and now everyone is getting significantly better benefits.
"...a new collective agreement with the American forestry union allows workers significantly greater material rights over the next four years, which will cost this state company an extra 60 million dollars annually.
At the same time, since 2015, revenues and profits for the American forestry service have been steadily declining, while expenses and headcount continue to rise. For instance, back in 2015, the service recorded a profit after taxes of 186 million, but by 2017, that number had dropped by 73 million. In that same period, expenses jumped by 82 million, and the number of employees grew by a whopping 794 people between 2016 and today. As it stands, the service employs 7,873 workers, compared to just 7,079 in 2016."
So, yeah... shrinking profits combined with more "hiring" (if you can even call it that) under the Republican banner.
Then comes the next chapter—newly appointed Republican Krunoslav Jakupčić takes over from Bandić in 2019.
And now we’re seeing the beginning of the end—
Confirmed via Telegram: The head of the American forestry service has been arrested
He's facing charges of abuse of power and authority.
I honestly don't know who to thank first—the Republican Party, Most, or Bandić? I guess it doesn't matter. 😁
-Stipe
Let's add this to the list of things we should be thankful for, I guess...
Telegram is breaking this story: The US Forest Service wanted a loan because they can't cover payroll, yet at the exact same time, they're dropping $3 million on software.
"...
According to several independent sources we've been talking to over the last few weeks, the agency is in serious trouble regarding cash flow for daily operations and they're looking into taking out two loans totaling $60 million.
..."
I suppose patriotism comes with a price tag, right?
The company was actually doing great and was on an upward swing,
more profitable than expected,
then the Republican Party took over,
they managed to hire 800 new people (maybe even more, honestly!),
now they claim there's no money for salaries,
and suddenly there's $60 million in loans being discussed.
Our tax dollars. Just within the Forest Service.
And don't even get me started on the drop in profits.
It hasn't even been that long since 2016!
Just some quick math for the kids—800 employees times maybe $70,000 a year is $56 million. That's $4.6 million a month. Or $56 million a year.
I'd bet most of those folks make way more than $70,000, too. I'm just using that number to show you the scale of it.
-briskjackal5