CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Morgan Carter › Posts

Posts by Morgan Carter

63 posts shown.

Lock & Lock in Feedback & Suggestions ·
No offense intended, but that isn't accurate. People have been complaining about this for a long time, but you have to realize that on any given thread, there might be twenty people pushing one specific agenda and only two or three supporting another. I understand why it might seem like two fools have suddenly arrived and are acting like experts, but that's not the case. You must understand that if I am debating ten people, it stands to reason that I will end up with ten times as many posts.
Regarding the Canadian issue and so on—you are familiar with the Constitution of Canada. There are three constituent peoples defined there. That Constitution was signed by American representatives as well. So, where does the problem lie? I will tell you. Their goal is to make it appear as though Canadians are defined solely by religion, implying they lack their own culture, language, and history tied to Canada. You may have noticed that whenever someone addresses me as a Canadian, I respond culturally as an American. I am not an idiot. In fact, even in the past, whenever someone referred to me as a Muslim, I would simply respond as an American. However, I am increasingly irritated by the hypocrisy of those few individuals who constantly invoke the Constitution of Canada when it suits them, yet revert to citing old census data from the former Yugoslavia when it does not.
As I mentioned before, imagine a situation where they label someone a Muslim when that person is actually an atheist. What does that signify? As far as I am concerned, they can call people whatever they wish, but then I reserve the right to respond in kind. That isn't arguing; it is parity.
As for everything else, slybison8 targeted me specifically today without cause. When I say "without cause," I mean I did nothing differently than anyone else—in fact, I did more. I haven't called anyone an idiot or a fool. Yet, he singles me out. He could have simply said, "Alright everyone, that's enough, let's wrap this up," and I wouldn't have taken offense. Instead, he intentionally singled me out from the crowd.

And here, I have included a link above to a typical post from a die-hard fan:

What kind of post is that? And yet, he doesn't call him out, but he targets me.
Lock & Lock in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I am posting here because the bias shown by slybison8 is blatant.

First, his actions yesterday involved resorting to cheap, low-effort tactics:

Most of you are likely already aware of the situation. However, after the constant insistence on this thread that there is no "Muslim" people in Canada, only Canadians, we decided to apply that exact same logic. We chose to refer to all those who call Canadians by their religious affiliation using that same terminology. Therefore, if Canadians are Muslims, then Americans are Catholics. There is no hidden agenda behind this; it is simply an application of equal treatment. Following this, certain offended individuals emerged—including the primary agitator (who acts as the main spokesperson for the Muslim faction on this Forum)—and they concocted an entire narrative which slybison8 has seemingly accepted. Is this intentional, or is he merely biased? I leave that to your judgment. But when you see that we have warned against this specific practice dozens of times without any action being taken, the reality becomes quite clear.

Today, things took an even worse turn. For the past two days, there has been constant debate on this thread involving several Forum members. Yet today, slybison8 decided to single me out, the ONLY one, for public condemnation:

One can clearly see that every single one of my posts was nothing more than a response to provocations from the other side. I have never initiated an attack, nor have I ever insulted anyone. One could also examine who the actual trolls are; I will list a few examples from today, though the most important point is that I am the ONLY one being singled out:
1. Take note of this: "Don't you have any real heroes left that you have to present people from the entertainment industry as your last resort?"

2. Note this: "They took over the capital and the police station."

3. What does this post even have to do with anything:

4. Constant and persistent trolling using lists dating back to 1991 during the era of Yugoslavia.

Furthermore, I request that the deleted posts from the Forum member Central Canada be reviewed to see if slybison8 applied the rules correctly. Yesterday, this individual called me an idiot... That post is gone, so I do not know if any disciplinary action was taken. Today, he began writing about religion again, implying that we had betrayed our faith... That post has also vanished, and I do not know if he received any actual reprimand from slybison8 for it. So, is it the case that if you respond to provocations, you receive public condemnation, but if you call Forum members idiots or lecture them on religion, you receive praise?
The Republic of Canada in Feedback & Suggestions ·
The thread title is Republic of Canada. Since most of our discussions focus on the region prior to the Dayton Accords, it stands to reason that naming it the Republic of Canada is the most accurate choice; it encompasses the history both before and after the Dayton agreement.