4 posts shown.
I don't know if it's just me, but the hour leading up to the official roster announcement is always the most nerve-wracking part of the weekend for me. I'll be sitting there scrolling through various feeds, half-expecting a last-minute injury or a shock tactical change that completely ruins my afternoon plans.
It’s funny how much mental energy we pour into these things. I had a buddy who used to refuse to even look at the team sheets until thirty minutes before kickoff because he didn't want to get his hopes up or get discouraged by a bench decision. I've tried that, but I always end up checking anyway.
There’s just something about that specific moment of tension when the news finally breaks. It changes the whole vibe of the match before the whistle even blows.
Do you guys prefer to see the lineup as soon as it's released, or do you try to avoid it to keep the suspense going?
I’ve tested positive for HPV. I don't have any other issues, though.
The discharge is somewhat yellowish—it's almost loud, if that makes sense. Maybe it just looks that way because I’ve been using white daytime pads lately...
There isn't any itching or burning. The only thing is that I find myself needing to urinate much more frequently than usual.
Does anyone know what might be going on?! 🤷
I am officially lodging a complaint against the moderator, ambermason16!
I want the topic "can marijuana control someone's life" to be properly promoted and examined from an objective standpoint.
Everything I write gets deleted under the guise of being labeled as trolling or similar nonsense, when it is blatantly obvious that the only reason is that we disagree. It seems the moderator feels entitled to hit the delete button just because my opinion differs from theirs.
Furthermore, there is another glaring issue here: it is highly probable that the moderator has a personal connection to the user maher18, because not a single one of that person's posts has been removed to date. Meanwhile, everything I post is scrubbed—including my posts where I present actual facts and arguments. My last post was simply a rebuttal to one of the many absurdities maher18 has been spewing while masquerading as a medical professional—specifically a psychiatrist... and honestly, the level of misinformation this person provides is beyond abnormal. For instance, they claimed that no dealer would ever want cannabis decriminalized because they would have to pay taxes.
If you are going to sit there and write something just to look smart when you clearly have no clue about the subject matter, the least you can do is actually do some research.
Well, I felt compelled to step in and clarify for them what decriminalization actually entails, and then today, I had to explain why a dealer wouldn't be paying any taxes if weed were legalized (using very vivid examples), because I truly cannot wrap my head around how one individual—who I assume is over 30 given their constant claims of being a medical expert, specifically a psychiatrist who treats "kids with holes in their brains," as they put it—can be so profoundly unintelligent. I don't mean to be rude, though that is quite literally the situation here. It is embarrassing to see such nonsense being peddled, let alone the implication that I was publicly voicing these ridiculous ideas back when I was fifteen. Truly shameful.
So, my question and my grievance are this: why does the moderator, ambermason16, take it upon themselves to delete factual statements whenever I present them, yet refuses to delete
the inaccurate and foolish claims made by the user maher18, which are based entirely on a superficial understanding of the subject??????
All I am asking for is a truly objective look at the matter.
Thank you.
Roughly 60-70% of women carry Merck, but since it’s dormant, it won't show up on a Pap smear. It only becomes visible on a Pap test once it actually triggers an infection. Even if you manage to suppress the infection, the virus stays in your system—just inactive. In those cases, getting vaccinated can still be useful to prevent the virus from reactivating. Essentially, the virus can live in your body your entire life without you ever knowing; it only poses a real danger once it activates and causes an actual infection.
Chris Lopez59 said:That post above seems highly questionable.
The effectiveness of the vaccine if you already have the virus is debatable. After all, the purpose of a vaccine is immunization, not treatment; if it were meant to cure, it would be registered as a medication. As for the side effects of taking it, it will take years before any potential deaths or serious complications caused by the vaccine are "proven." But then again, that isn't unusual—every vaccine carries its own set of risks. It really just comes down to how much risk one is willing to accept, especially since with standard monitoring and current treatments, Merck isn't going to kill you or cause serious harm.
It covers the four most common types, but two of those are low-risk. The high-risk types, 16 and 18, account for about 50%, maybe slightly more, of all CIN cases caused by Merck. This means the vaccine is essentially only half as effective as it could be. Given everything mentioned here, it truly makes you wonder if the risk is worth it for anyone.
I agree that the "worth it" part is questionable. However, you really need to read carefully to understand what is actually being communicated here.🙄