Posts by Morgan Rodriguez57

So, here’s yet another direct link between our sex education curriculum and "Planned Parenthood"...

Check out what Amir Hodzic—one of the primary architects behind the sex ed guidelines and the recommended reading lists used back when they were first proposed here in the States—has to say:
http://www.policy.hu/hodzic/policy_papir_hrv.htm

Among other things, he recommends reaching out to:

Locally, one should contact the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services, and on an international level UNICEF, as well as organizations such as the International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network (IPPF EN) and the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS)

It seems pretty obvious from all this that there's a tight connection between the European Union, the Department of Education, the program creators, the authors of the textbooks, and organizations like "Planned Parenthood"... they all think and act on a global scale—and locally too, as we can see right now here in America... it’s all the same ideology, the same methodology, the same propaganda...

So, yeah... deleting my posts and giving me a strike was totally baseless... I'm just asking the admins to please restore my posts and clear those strikes... ☕

Ryan Vaughn7 said:It’s always such a massive joy to get expert advice from someone who’s only posted about twelve times on this board. Really, thanks a million.

Oh, don't mention it—it's always just lovely getting hit with an ad-hominem attack instead of a real point... 🙂

I mean, what can I really do when I keep getting sucked into "politics" and "religion"... those are definitely the most awkward topics to navigate... 🤷

Ryan Vaughn7 said:This thread is absolutely exploding—we’ve hit 2,100 posts in just 15 days. That’s basically 400 posts in the last 24 hours alone... seriously, go grab another coffee on me. Make it a large one.

Just a few little tips from a former moderator:
- don't be afraid to ask for some backup over in the "policy" moderator corner
- when you feel like you're being completely drowned by a tidal wave of new posts, just post a quick note saying "thread temporarily closed for maintenance," lock it down, take a deep breath, exhale, relax, and just focus on editing... once everything is tidied up, just open it back up again...

On the global stage and across the US, you see these specific viewpoints on sexuality being pushed by all sorts of organizations that seem to have the exact same playbook when it comes to sex education... one of the big ones, and definitely one of the most influential, is Planned Parenthood—they work so closely with the European Union on joint projects, and the European Union actually funds them... for years now, the European Union has been putting pressure on America to align its sex education with their specific views, and those views held by these organizations...

I mean, what does Linux have to do with an earthquake, my dear and noble Ryan Vaughn7? 🙂

To put it vividly—it’s like Mate is pouring gasoline onto Jurino's car while it's already engulfed in flames... and then Ryan Vaughn7 wants me to just stand there and marvel at the burning car and wonder why it's burning so long and so intensely, without even letting me mention the gas can or the matches... 🙏 😁

Ryan Vaughn7 tries to hide his own bias by masking it as poor moderation, and honestly, one of the hallmarks of bad moderation is setting boundaries that are way too restrictive during a discussion...

So, I'm just asking for my posts to be restored and for the bans to be lifted... ☕

Ryan Vaughn7 said:I’m not having it. We're talking about sex education in American schools, and Ms. Sanger isn't even listed in the Module 4 curriculum bibliography. This is totally 4. OFF topic—just pure cardboard—and if it keeps happening, it’s just going to loop back on itself again...

Do you want a link?

The European Union—along with all these various organizations working with them—has been leaning on America for years regarding sex education... the internet is honestly flooded with sites like that, you really just have to type in "sex education USA"...

Who can say they maintain special ties with the European Union, the Commission, and the Parliament? Well, "Planned Parenthood," obviously...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interna...ood_Federation

The IPPF or "Planned Parenthood" and the EU have been working closely together for years, basically sharing the same agenda when it comes to sexual issues... the EU provides massive financial backing to the IPPF...

http://www.europeandignitywatch.org/...ll_version.pdf

The main hand squeezing America on the sex education front is the EU, and one of the fingers is the IPPF or "Planned Parenthood"...

And there you have it—the connection between America and the rest of the world... ☕

---

That's why Ryan Vaughn7's reasons for deleting posts and handing out warnings were pretty unfounded... which is why I'm asking for the posts to be restored and the warnings to be rescinded...

neonwalker95 said:I honestly think you need to be reined in because of all this constant spamming and repeating. Everyone's already seen those links of yours, yet you just keep posting them over and over again. Why don't you just drop a movie recommendation from Scandinavia instead? It won't take long enough

And here we go again with the old spam accusations... totally untrue, obviously...

It’s just that they can't handle actual arguments—lying to turn me into some kind of troll or spammer isn't exactly new territory for them either...

Anyone who actually wants to check can compare my links to the ones already in the thread, and they'll see I've only shared them once and only once... ☕

---

That’s just how it works when dealing with the "old school" crowd—but when the "progressive" types like Ryan Vaughn7 start trolling and spamming, well, then anything goes, I guess...

As for Ryan Vaughn7, I've reported one of his trolling posts a few times now and absolutely nobody has reacted... even though he's a moderator, for this specific post, he really deserves a warning card:

Honestly, trying to have a sane, logical debate when Ryan Vaughn7 is calling the shots on the politics here is basically impossible... 🙄

Back during that discussion about "sexuality information and education," I shared some links regarding:

- Margaret Sanger—the founder of Planned Parenthood—and her specific viewpoints...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEja-1emRic
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=in7IUzjN3pY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S3U3NcCD1lg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZdwpjArFjg

- The organization itself, Planned Parenthood, and how much they get involved in sexuality information and education right here in America:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsfIVCotQn8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9aNWNznxHw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7xEc7CFbYw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWMsalghCKo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2RWVLQx98Yk

- That 1969 Planned Parenthood memorandum and their whole agenda for population reduction...

http://www.toomanyaborted.com/wp-con...Jaffe-Memo.pdf

Which, among other things, explicitly states:

Restructure family:

a) Postpone or avoid marriage
b) Alter image of ideal family size

Social welfare policies
Encourage increased homosexuality
Educate for family limitation
Fertility control agents in water supply
Social welfare policies

---

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_Parenthood

So, you have this one organization performing abortions, getting state support to handle sexuality information and education, pushing for population reduction, and advocating for more homosexuality...

It’s all there, documented in black and white...

But Ryan Vaughn7 just won't let me post any of this in the "sexuality information and education" thread... 🙄

I'm really hoping the forum mods can step in and deal with Ryan Vaughn7 and his tendency to censor everything... ☕

Jose White23 said:Oh, so you'd just rather play the victim, huh?

Maybe try putting some actual effort into your posts instead... if that's possible...

If that’s how you handled moderation before, I wouldn't trust you to moderate a drawing of a sheep on a napkin... honestly...

I just don't have the energy for moderating anymore... twice (politics, the local election)... that was plenty for me... as for my moderating skills, I'll let everyone else be the judge of that...

Daniel Ward87, I'm with you—just shut it down! 👍

Hey there, buddy—honestly, what can I say? You’re the moderator now, so go ahead, dive right in, knock yourself out... 😉

So, basically... what you're saying is my posts generally deserve to be penalized? Come on, walk me through it—what exactly am I doing wrong here? 🙂

Daniel Ward87 said:I was just thinking about how things have been lately—it’s all been moving so fast—but I wanted to jump back in here for a second... everything feels like it's shifting, doesn't it? Anyway, I was looking over some of the points mentioned earlier, and it really makes you wonder where we're headed... just a thought...Morgan Rodriguez57, they basically stripped away that 50-point card—it’s gone—and all they left behind was this little thing just to troll people... honestly...

I honestly feel like you should’ve realized by now that conspiracy theories just don't really fly here in the Politics section—plus, your arguments aren't exactly hitting the mark... To be blunt, this whole idea about society being indoctrinated by the LGBTQ+ community feels more like something you'd find in some fringe, underground newsletter than anything substantial...

When it comes to the whole discussion around pedophiles versus homosexuals, there’s honestly such a massive distinction between those two groups that they really shouldn't be lumped together—so please, I'm asking you, let's not go down that road...

What you're saying there feels more like a personal opinion than an actual argument—it sounds like a political stance... or maybe just a bit of a misunderstanding of how things work... anyway...

If this forum starts heading down a path where it only represents one specific political line and shuts down everything else—well, then we’re really looking at censorship... in that case, we wouldn't be talking about a democratic space anymore, but rather an ideologically driven forum...

Well, in this particular situation, we’ve actually got plenty of solid arguments and evidence backed by reputable institutions, various authors, and even the very people who designed the strategies used by LGBTQ+ advocacy groups over the last two decades—but apparently, none of that carries any weight on this forum... it just gets dismissed as trolling...

Just something to chew on... do we really want to be a genuine democratic forum, or are we just turning into a megaphone for whatever the current ideology happens to be... maybe it's worth thinking about...

Christian Torres3 said:Yeah, true—just like how about three years ago you predicted we'd see massive persecutions of Catholics across Europe.

If I were Catholic, I’d nominate you for the priesthood right this second. Seriously...

Well, what can I say, I missed my cue... 🙂

I honestly thought the bus ride from New York to Chicago to Denver to LA would be over by now, but nope... it barely made it past Denver...

We’ve reached that stage where they're trying to strip faith out of every single part of life—and next up is labeling Christianity as hate speech... it's pretty obvious at this point...

This would have happened already if it weren't for the Muslims... I mean, how could they declare Christianity hate speech? What about Islam? Those folks aren't nearly as mild-mannered as Christians—they aren't exactly the type to just turn the other cheek...

Instead, those anti-theists will probably cook up some new scheme... they haven't come this far just to quit halfway through the journey... 😉

Honestly, I’m still just as much of a deviant as ever—nothing has really changed on that front... 😉 😍

ironseal10 said:...

Why can't we just let him express how he feels instead of judging him for it? Wouldn't it be better to actually hear his thoughts rather than picking up a metaphorical weapon and going after a bunch of innocent people? He isn't suggesting any kind of intolerance—quite the opposite, really—he’s just voicing everything that frustrates so many of us, and honestly, I tip my hat to him for having the guts to say what's on his mind... I think he actually shows more tolerance toward diversity than you and Morgan Rodriguez57 combined.
Kudos to the forum staff for putting such a sensitive topic on a board filled with people who feel things just as deeply as he does. If they had posted Morgan Rodriguez57 and you instead, we all know exactly where this would have ended up...
Susan Price30, I've known you for years, and I've known Morgan Rodriguez57 just as long. I can't even quote you guys anymore—you both just get so tiresome... Honestly, without sugarcoating it, you're both driving me up the wall. It's not even that ego isn't being friendly, it's just expressing an opinion that, at least for me, hits close to home... unlike you and Morgan Rodriguez57, who seem intent on sterilizing this whole forum until it turns into some bland, papal echo chamber. I don't really care how you perceive one particular moderator or what feelings you hold against him... What matters to me is what a moderator thinks and how they choose to express those thoughts.
In this specific instance, if you ask me, ego is just speaking for a lot of people—not everyone, obviously... And I don't see why you and Morgan Rodriguez57 are so determined to strip away his right to speak his mind at any cost?

So someone else's thoughts and feelings are somehow more valuable than anyone else's?... If Morgan Rodriguez57 expressed similar sentiments, he'd be banned in a heartbeat... and when Morgan Rodriguez57 presents actual facts and evidence, his posts get wiped and he gets slapped with a fifty-dollar fine...

Man, I knew it... I was right all along, wasn't I? You guys practically admit it—you're just a few steps away from grabbing guns yourselves... 😲 🙏

You don't get it at all... Morgan Rodriguez57 basically proved, through this whole situation, exactly how Ljes views the forum and its democratic nature... Believe it or not... I could handle all sorts of complaints, but censorship and bans? Never...☕

thanks so much... 🙂

hmmmmmmm... anybody out there?

Who knows, maybe we're all just getting a little more fed up lately—I can only hope I actually live long enough to see things finally settle down a bit...

honestly, this feels like it's bordering on a threat to me...

I see the admins are staying pretty active over on the PDF boards lately—which is great, really!—so I’m just going to put this out there and ask them to take a look at my situation... hopefully we can get it sorted out soon...

Well, since Ryan Vaughn7 basically nuked the whole "sex education" thread out of existence—just wiped the slate clean—there’s really no point in waiting for my old posts to crawl back into view... I'm just looking to have that 50-point penalty removed from my profile. It was slapped on me for trolling (which is totally untrue), for reposting content (also not true, since I clearly showed they were different posts...), and for expressing a personal opinion—which is kind of wild if you think about it, how dare I... I just presented facts backed by actual sources and suggested we should be careful about involving LGBTQ+ advocacy groups in sexual education curricula... and apparently, that's a crime now? ... ☕

Ryan Vaughn7, come on now—don't be like that. These posts aren't even close to being the same thing; they’re totally different topics... maybe you didn't really dive in deep enough or just skimmed through them too quickly? 🙂

To everyone else out there—the first post is basically just a variation of the opening post in this thread, but the second one? I literally quoted that word-for-word right here... it should be obvious to anyone looking that they aren't the same... unless, of course, our highly esteemed and noble moderator disagrees... 😉

Ryan Vaughn7 said:Let’s clear this up once and for all. You didn't get flagged because of book links—it was actually about your interpretations, those comments, and trying to bring back deleted posts. Honestly, I think I’m done trying to spin this situation...

You had your chance, and now we're done... though I am curious to see what the mods have to say about all this... ☕

Besides, you're totally misrepresenting things by saying I brought back a post... the one I actually quoted was from a different PDF entirely... 😉

Give me just a second to dig it up... 🙂

Found it:

I really hope you'll stop making these baseless accusations against me... ☕

So, what about the admins?