Posts by Sam Brown20

It’s honestly disgusting. They could have easily smoothed things over at the local Starbucks while they were at it, especially since the cashier there was already practically working for the sunglasses vendor from the $6.75 pier
.

What on earth is she talking about with those growths above her right thigh? 🤮

The British will probably have their own take on this. I actually did a quick Google search on him right before you posted, and honestly? I'm a fan. It’s a relief to see my gut feeling backed up by some actual data 👍

Does anyone have a solid recommendation for a cafe in downtown Chicago where I can actually catch a game? Somewhere in the Loop or maybe near the West Loop. I'm looking for a laid-back vibe—nothing too fancy or pretentious, just a place where you don't feel out of place if you aren't dressed up for a gala.
I wouldn't mind somewhere near United Center, either.

Joseph Clark37 said:Congrats to Norway!👋

As long as gobčev keeps rambling about how God will never let them reach the finals... and honestly, those casual fans who only tune into handball during the championship rounds once a year—who, frankly, couldn't care less about what's actually happening in American handball or sports in general—well, they can just deal with it. 🙂

Signature

What does the police department have to do with an appeal ruling? 🤷

Look, this is about justice. And let’s be clear: there is an answer for every single one of these violations. I don't feel like typing out a manifesto on my phone right now, but honestly, it's a mistake to think we shouldn't be complaining. It's just a matter of time before this all plays out in the District Court.

Look, we've already touched on this, but this whole fan law is a mess because it tramples over three fundamental rights. First off, you can't be punished twice for the exact same thing. Then there's the issue of retroactive laws—they’re passing legislation now to punish stuff that happened before the law even existed, which is just wrong. And third, they're handing out penalties after the rehabilitation period has already lapsed. It’s a total circus.

From what I gather, the District Court keeps tossing these claims out without a second thought. I haven't heard if anyone has taken a fight to the Supreme Court yet, but honestly? I bet this would get shredded if it ever made its way to a European court.

Jacob Newman74 said:They’ll just complain and then the ban will end up gathering dust in a drawer. A few more of our kids ended up getting hit with them at the end of this season. 🙄

Wait, did they actually get banned, or was it just an appeal? Because from what I know, appeals don't hold much water when it comes to this stuff.

It’s all complete nonsense. It isn't that the officer was being too aggressive—it's that he was being downright weak, and honestly, probably just because he was facing some lady in her sixties.

Go ahead, kiss the devil... because now they’re finally facing the music. They finally got what was coming to them. ☕

Everyone is so wound up. Thursday is still a long way off.

Look, acting as the official representative for the union of clubs within the Skylight league, I’m officially calling for a full-scale boycott of the competition. We aren't playing ball until they scrap that ridiculous penalty—the three-point deduction and those yellow cards handed out to anyone who dares to post ☕
. Enough is enough.

Morgan Williams said:Do you actually buy the Adam and Eve story? Most believers who have even a basic grasp of science view it as a metaphor. Even the Catholic Church and the Pope have accepted evolution as reality. If you cling to the idea of Adam and Eve being literal, you aren't just ignoring biology—you're basically claiming the Earth is a flat disc 6,000 years old with planets orbiting us. You can't pick and choose which facts to ignore when discussing how genetic mutations turned hominoids into humans.

It just hit me: if Original Sin comes from Adam and Eve, but they couldn't have existed as described in the Bible, then the whole concept of Original Sin becomes a joke.

No, I don't, but I remember seeing that specific atheist argument somewhere once, and it triggered this thought, which is why I brought it up.

Matthew Anderson4 said:Nobody.
just looking at the picture that started this mess. modern Christianity and what it was 1,900 years ago both fail right out of the gate by treating God like a person. honestly, it doesn't matter if people today are less spiritual than they used to be—it's all basically at a playground level of understanding anyway.
saying Christianity doesn't view God as a person is just ridiculous.

It's foolish to lump modern Christianity together with how things were 1,900 years ago—you know, during the Crusades or the Inquisition. It's like saying you wouldn't call modern-day Germany primitive just because sixty years ago they were still clinging to some pretty backward ideas. Look, I believe plenty of Christians still picture God as some old man floating on a cloud, but honestly, that's more a matter of education, and frankly, it's irrelevant when even the "intellectuals" struggle to wrap their heads around it. Just because you can't grasp something doesn't mean you have to reject it. You accept it in its simplest form and then spend the rest of your life trying to figure out the incomprehensible parts at the beginning.

Matthew Anderson4 said:Thinking of God as some kind of person is basically ten-year-old logic. Yesterday, today, tomorrow... it just doesn't work like that. My bad.

I’m with you on that, but let’s be real—nobody was actually implying that. Not even mainstream Christianity.

Walter Grant5 said:Isn't it a bit too much of a leap to assume we're just talking about some low-level, earthly concept of God?

Look, I’m defending the Christian concept of God, plain and simple. But honestly? That question feels just as pointless to me as asking why God allows suffering to exist in the first place, or how on earth we all supposedly descended from just two people, Adam and Eve.

Walter Grant5 said:

said it all

What exactly was "said"? That the modern man's grasp on the divine is about as profound as a ten-year-old's understanding of existence?