194 posts shown.
James Taylor3 said:No way they’d play at those low odds. Total joke.
Without any adjustments, it’s 2.09, but look—it’s sitting at 2.28 on DraftKings, and honestly, even that feels too low.
They’re basically just betting on the Barca overs, like a 1.30 for over 2.5.
Bryan Adams6 said:I was thinking more along the lines of a 3+ 🙂 I didn't specify
Zeman’s squads always struggle with defense. 🙂
Eddie Howe should be able to pick Aston Villa apart just as easily; there's no reason Benfica shouldn't cruise through. ☕
hollowwalker10 said:Hafnarfjordur-KR Reykjavik 1@ 2.00ss
It's an Icelandic derby—that explains the odds—but looking strictly at their recent form, I think it should go down easy.
George Barnes25 said:Look, I wasn't arguing about rules; I was just repeating a request. (There isn't even a rule against it)
So, basically, I'm not allowed to comment on someone's post if I think it's bad? I didn't cite any specific rules, just a request, which ended up getting my post deleted. If we can't comment on each other's stuff, this forum is going nowhere fast.
My whole point was just asking him to follow the request, just like everyone else who started typing (I think he was actually explaining his reasoning for those picks too, and I was just following along).
And y'all made such a huge deal out of nothing.
It’s like: the Agent posts the picks, I quote the request, he explains the picks, and then boom—my posts get wiped.
I'd really appreciate it if you wouldn't post snippets of private messages. According to the forum rules, that's strictly forbidden.
It's not just one example, obviously. But it would be pointless to go hunting through the sub-forums right now to find more. I'm sure plenty of other users would jump in with examples of how bad the moderation has been lately. (Like feralotter2, Mars, Noname, etc.)
And look at this:
Joshua Garcia8 is back to being a Moderator, not just a regular user.
vs.
George Barnes25 said:Look, I wasn't arguing about rules; I was just repeating a request. (There isn't even a rule against it)
So, basically, I'm not allowed to comment on someone's post if I think it's bad? I didn't cite any specific rules, just a request, which ended up getting my post deleted. If we can't comment on each other's stuff, this forum is going nowhere fast.
My whole point was just asking him to follow the request, just like everyone else who started typing (I think he was actually explaining his reasoning for those picks too, and I was just following along).
And y'all made such a huge deal out of nothing.
It’s like: the Agent posts the picks, I quote the request, he explains the picks, and then boom—my posts get wiped.
I'd really appreciate it if you wouldn't post snippets of private messages. According to the forum rules, that's strictly forbidden.
It's not just one example, obviously. But it would be pointless to go hunting through the sub-forums right now to find more. I'm sure plenty of other users would jump in with examples of how bad the moderation has been lately. (Like feralotter2, Mars, Noname, etc.)
And look at this:
Joshua Garcia8 is back to being a Moderator, not just a regular user.
vs.
George Barnes25 said:🤦
You're practically baiting me to make a clone just so I can drop some picks in the chat! I'm dying to see if you’re just going to act like a regular forum user or if you're actually stepping up as a Moderator. 🙂
Don't worry, I won't! 😉
I honestly don't even know if there's any point in trying to argue with you...
Come on, let's go!
Look, you’re a Moderator now, not just some regular user who occasionally steps up. You can't just flip a switch between being a casual poster and being in charge whenever it suits you. It’s like a referee in an NBA game—you don't just blow the whistle when you feel like it and then go back to watching the game like everyone else. If you have the title, own it. Keep this sub clean and maintain order consistently, not just when the mood strikes. Do the job right, all the time.
Look, what I told you about that cop still stands. Whether you like it or not, that’s just the hand you've been dealt.
Look, you know damn well who Zoom was aiming at. It wasn't some ghost or someone who doesn't exist. He was taking a shot at everyone claiming there were cliques involved—basically anyone siding with the crowd that’s unhappy with the Moderator. He got handed a red card regardless of what that specific post said. And get this: my post got edited (I was actually talking about the comment written right underneath it when I mentioned a "warning"), but his? His stayed exactly the same. That's just one example of how things are working around here.
Anyway, this is what shows up under my post after I've made the edits:
George Barnes25, please watch your language from here on out.
Last edit of the Mediterranean Sea: June 26, 2012, at 8:16 PM. Reason: Deleting an annoying comment.
(And now I'm paying close attention to the vocabulary:)
😉 )
I honestly think Zoom should’ve been way more careful with their wording here. Especially since he’s basically taking a subtle swipe at the Moderator after getting hit with that warning.
I didn't get a strike, and neither did Zoom. My post is just being edited and commented on while his stays live. Honestly, it’d be better if we both got flagged—keep things fair for everyone, regardless of which side they're on. 😬 )
You weren't even around between the First Post and the fourth one!
The conversation went like this.
First Post
Second Post
Eric Fox7 here: It’s because the thread is in the wrong section. We don't jump in to comment on posts that break the rules—we just report them. (It’s all laid out right at the bottom of the post.)
Third Post!
So then you just jump in like, "Oh, I'm practically part of the moderation team and the inner circle," blah, blah, blah!
Fourth Post
My posts keep getting deleted and I’m picking up warnings just because I’m commenting on the Moderator!
So, I either got flagged because of that coffee comment or because I compared you to Joe the cop. Look, if that’s why I got a warning, fine by me! But honestly, he basically baited me with that skinny little argument of yours: "I'm a forum regular first."
So if "contacting the Moderator" just means me asking where my thread went—since that was the only one they nuked—or me saying I don't agree with Eric Fox7, even though he had the last word, then what? 🤷 Look, basically, I don't see eye to eye with him on this one, but hey, I respect his call. So, I just dropped it. Period.
Here we go again:
Make up your mind! First I didn't get it because of the fourth point, then suddenly I did. And looking at the thread above, there’s zero moderator interference in posts two and three—unless you’ve suddenly developed a unique opinion on that. (So, what is it? Are you saying my post is missing, that I'm interfering with the Moderator, or are we going back over why I disagree with Eric Fox7 while still respecting his take?)
Here we go again: Look, I didn't start this thread just to whine about getting a penalty, and I'm definitely not looking for sympathy or asking for it to be wiped from my record. But when you start pushing my buttons like that, I've gotta say something back!
So, the header for this subforum says: "Your feedback, ideas, complaints, and comments. How can we make this Forum better and more polite?"
I started this thread because I want to help make this forum—specifically the betting subforum—actually better. This isn't the first time people have complained about how you and Eric Fox7 handle moderation. Look, I get it. It’s not exactly easy dealing with all the trolls who just show up to stir the pot, but it’s also not right when it feels like certain people get treated with kid gloves while others don't.
Can someone else weigh in here? And please, let's not have Tominator chime in, since this hits a bit close to home for him too.
Edit:
After digging through this a bit deeper, just one more thing:
Quote:
Tominator says:
Since the post was in the wrong spot. You don't comment on posts that break the rules; you just report them.
(I can't quote him directly because the post was deleted, so I'm just typing what it said)
Then Joshua Garcia8 says:
So, my post got nuked because apparently I commented on a post that "breaks the rules"—except there isn't even a rule to break, it's just a request! The bottom line is: it was deleted because it was a repeated request (your words), not because I was arguing with the Moderator or quoting rules or whatever.
The whole mess really started because they deleted that one post. That’s what triggered the second, third, and fourth posts.
🤷
and go ahead and chime in on this one too
George Barnes25 said:It’s basically like this:
1. Look, the Agent repeated something he was already warned about. You responded just like any other user would (which isn't a crime!), but here’s the kicker: would you have answered that way if it wasn't the Agent? If it were someone the mods don't get along with, or someone who’s always causing trouble? Probably not. Not trying to be biased, but let's be real. Like when feralotter2 showed up 😬
.
2. As for that edited post—I know what happened (it used to say some vulgar crap), but honestly, that’s beside the point. The issue is that once again, the moderators didn't step in against someone they're friendly with. That's just the vibe you get from reading this subforum. Let me quote it for you.
So, there's profanity aimed at someone just because they don't share the same opinion as this user (and by chance, this user happens to agree with the moderators). That's just one example. Both he and I should've been flagged, but instead, my word was deleted and I got a warning/comment, while he got nothing.
Or maybe you read that purely as a fellow user 🤷
.
3. I'm not whining about the red card itself, but since you brought it up...
Luckily, my memory is pretty sharp, so I’d love for you to tell me which part of my following "interference" with the moderation was actually an issue.
First Post:
"Hey guys, please don't bypass the subforum rules via DMs. DMs aren't meant for posting picks/tickets, and it looks like some people are doing exactly that."
And then my comment: "who cares."
Basically, I was just repeating a request. I wasn't criticizing anyone or anything. So, if the ☕ Reason I got a red card was 🤷
Second Post: I asked why my previous post (the one mentioned above) was deleted.
Third Post: I told Eric Fox7: I don't think you needed to delete the post because of that, but you're the boss.
Fourth Post: This is where I compared you to a cop. Plus, I wasn't commenting on the moderation; I was quoting a "warning." If you interpreted my comment on my own post as attacking the moderation, that’s on you. Again, I wasn't critiquing the mods; I was just repeating something you wrote that helps improve the quality of this forum.
I am commenting on the moderation right here, in the section meant for it. So, regarding that first post, the only thing that could possibly be problematic would be ☕ at ☕
.
If I accidentally missed something and that's why I got the red card, I truly apologize (please just point out what it was so I can see), but as far as my memory serves, that's all there was.
If I got flagged for any of the stuff I listed above, I'd really appreciate an explanation.
4. If repeating something you guys said—without directly or indirectly attacking the moderation—helps make the forum better, I don't see the problem. Since I was just echoing your request, the Agent explained things, and it's likely more people followed the picks because of it than if we had just left it alone. If I had just reported the post, would he have even explained the picks? We agreed the goal is to make the forum work better.
George Barnes25 said:It’s basically like this:
1. Look, the Agent repeated something he was already warned about. You responded just like any other user would (which isn't a crime!), but here’s the kicker: would you have answered that way if it wasn't the Agent? If it were someone the mods don't get along with, or someone who’s always causing trouble? Probably not. Not trying to be biased, but let's be real. Like when feralotter2 showed up 😬
.
2. As for that edited post—I know what happened (it used to say some vulgar crap), but honestly, that’s beside the point. The issue is that once again, the moderators didn't step in against someone they're friendly with. That's just the vibe you get from reading this subforum. Let me quote it for you.
So, there's profanity aimed at someone just because they don't share the same opinion as this user (and by chance, this user happens to agree with the moderators). That's just one example. Both he and I should've been flagged, but instead, my word was deleted and I got a warning/comment, while he got nothing.
Or maybe you read that purely as a fellow user 🤷
.
3. I'm not whining about the red card itself, but since you brought it up...
Luckily, my memory is pretty sharp, so I’d love for you to tell me which part of my following "interference" with the moderation was actually an issue.
First Post:
"Hey guys, please don't bypass the subforum rules via DMs. DMs aren't meant for posting picks/tickets, and it looks like some people are doing exactly that."
And then my comment: "who cares."
Basically, I was just repeating a request. I wasn't criticizing anyone or anything. So, if the ☕ Reason I got a red card was 🤷
Second Post: I asked why my previous post (the one mentioned above) was deleted.
Third Post: I told Eric Fox7: I don't think you needed to delete the post because of that, but you're the boss.
Fourth Post: This is where I compared you to a cop. Plus, I wasn't commenting on the moderation; I was quoting a "warning." If you interpreted my comment on my own post as attacking the moderation, that’s on you. Again, I wasn't critiquing the mods; I was just repeating something you wrote that helps improve the quality of this forum.
I am commenting on the moderation right here, in the section meant for it. So, regarding that first post, the only thing that could possibly be problematic would be ☕ at ☕
.
If I accidentally missed something and that's why I got the red card, I truly apologize (please just point out what it was so I can see), but as far as my memory serves, that's all there was.
If I got flagged for any of the stuff I listed above, I'd really appreciate an explanation.
4. If repeating something you guys said—without directly or indirectly attacking the moderation—helps make the forum better, I don't see the problem. Since I was just echoing your request, the Agent explained things, and it's likely more people followed the picks because of it than if we had just left it alone. If I had just reported the post, would he have even explained the picks? We agreed the goal is to make the forum work better.
George Barnes25 said:It’s basically like this:
1. Look, the Agent repeated something he was already warned about. You responded just like any other user would (which isn't a crime!), but here’s the kicker: would you have answered that way if it wasn't the Agent? If it were someone the mods don't get along with, or someone who’s always causing trouble? Probably not. Not trying to be biased, but let's be real. Like when feralotter2 showed up 😬
.
2. As for that edited post—I know what happened (it used to say some vulgar crap), but honestly, that’s beside the point. The issue is that once again, the moderators didn't step in against someone they're friendly with. That's just the vibe you get from reading this subforum. Let me quote it for you.
So, there's profanity aimed at someone just because they don't share the same opinion as this user (and by chance, this user happens to agree with the moderators). That's just one example. Both he and I should've been flagged, but instead, my word was deleted and I got a warning/comment, while he got nothing.
Or maybe you read that purely as a fellow user 🤷
.
3. I'm not whining about the red card itself, but since you brought it up...
Luckily, my memory is pretty sharp, so I’d love for you to tell me which part of my following "interference" with the moderation was actually an issue.
First Post:
"Hey guys, please don't bypass the subforum rules via DMs. DMs aren't meant for posting picks/tickets, and it looks like some people are doing exactly that."
And then my comment: "who cares."
Basically, I was just repeating a request. I wasn't criticizing anyone or anything. So, if the ☕ Reason I got a red card was 🤷
Second Post: I asked why my previous post (the one mentioned above) was deleted.
Third Post: I told Eric Fox7: I don't think you needed to delete the post because of that, but you're the boss.
Fourth Post: This is where I compared you to a cop. Plus, I wasn't commenting on the moderation; I was quoting a "warning." If you interpreted my comment on my own post as attacking the moderation, that’s on you. Again, I wasn't critiquing the mods; I was just repeating something you wrote that helps improve the quality of this forum.
I am commenting on the moderation right here, in the section meant for it. So, regarding that first post, the only thing that could possibly be problematic would be ☕ at ☕
.
If I accidentally missed something and that's why I got the red card, I truly apologize (please just point out what it was so I can see), but as far as my memory serves, that's all there was.
If I got flagged for any of the stuff I listed above, I'd really appreciate an explanation.
4. If repeating something you guys said—without directly or indirectly attacking the moderation—helps make the forum better, I don't see the problem. Since I was just echoing your request, the Agent explained things, and it's likely more people followed the picks because of it than if we had just left it alone. If I had just reported the post, would he have even explained the picks? We agreed the goal is to make the forum work better.
George Barnes25 said:It’s basically like this:
1. Look, the Agent repeated something he was already warned about. You responded just like any other user would (which isn't a crime!), but here’s the kicker: would you have answered that way if it wasn't the Agent? If it were someone the mods don't get along with, or someone who’s always causing trouble? Probably not. Not trying to be biased, but let's be real. Like when feralotter2 showed up 😬
.
2. As for that edited post—I know what happened (it used to say some vulgar crap), but honestly, that’s beside the point. The issue is that once again, the moderators didn't step in against someone they're friendly with. That's just the vibe you get from reading this subforum. Let me quote it for you.
So, there's profanity aimed at someone just because they don't share the same opinion as this user (and by chance, this user happens to agree with the moderators). That's just one example. Both he and I should've been flagged, but instead, my word was deleted and I got a warning/comment, while he got nothing.
Or maybe you read that purely as a fellow user 🤷
.
3. I'm not whining about the red card itself, but since you brought it up...
Luckily, my memory is pretty sharp, so I’d love for you to tell me which part of my following "interference" with the moderation was actually an issue.
First Post:
"Hey guys, please don't bypass the subforum rules via DMs. DMs aren't meant for posting picks/tickets, and it looks like some people are doing exactly that."
And then my comment: "who cares."
Basically, I was just repeating a request. I wasn't criticizing anyone or anything. So, if the ☕ Reason I got a red card was 🤷
Second Post: I asked why my previous post (the one mentioned above) was deleted.
Third Post: I told Eric Fox7: I don't think you needed to delete the post because of that, but you're the boss.
Fourth Post: This is where I compared you to a cop. Plus, I wasn't commenting on the moderation; I was quoting a "warning." If you interpreted my comment on my own post as attacking the moderation, that’s on you. Again, I wasn't critiquing the mods; I was just repeating something you wrote that helps improve the quality of this forum.
I am commenting on the moderation right here, in the section meant for it. So, regarding that first post, the only thing that could possibly be problematic would be ☕ at ☕
.
If I accidentally missed something and that's why I got the red card, I truly apologize (please just point out what it was so I can see), but as far as my memory serves, that's all there was.
If I got flagged for any of the stuff I listed above, I'd really appreciate an explanation.
4. If repeating something you guys said—without directly or indirectly attacking the moderation—helps make the forum better, I don't see the problem. Since I was just echoing your request, the Agent explained things, and it's likely more people followed the picks because of it than if we had just left it alone. If I had just reported the post, would he have even explained the picks? We agreed the goal is to make the forum work better.
George Barnes25 said:It’s basically like this:
1. Look, the Agent repeated something he was already warned about. You responded just like any other user would (which isn't a crime!), but here’s the kicker: would you have answered that way if it wasn't the Agent? If it were someone the mods don't get along with, or someone who’s always causing trouble? Probably not. Not trying to be biased, but let's be real. Like when feralotter2 showed up 😬
.
2. As for that edited post—I know what happened (it used to say some vulgar crap), but honestly, that’s beside the point. The issue is that once again, the moderators didn't step in against someone they're friendly with. That's just the vibe you get from reading this subforum. Let me quote it for you.
So, there's profanity aimed at someone just because they don't share the same opinion as this user (and by chance, this user happens to agree with the moderators). That's just one example. Both he and I should've been flagged, but instead, my word was deleted and I got a warning/comment, while he got nothing.
Or maybe you read that purely as a fellow user 🤷
.
3. I'm not whining about the red card itself, but since you brought it up...
Luckily, my memory is pretty sharp, so I’d love for you to tell me which part of my following "interference" with the moderation was actually an issue.
First Post:
"Hey guys, please don't bypass the subforum rules via DMs. DMs aren't meant for posting picks/tickets, and it looks like some people are doing exactly that."
And then my comment: "who cares."
Basically, I was just repeating a request. I wasn't criticizing anyone or anything. So, if the ☕ Reason I got a red card was 🤷
Second Post: I asked why my previous post (the one mentioned above) was deleted.
Third Post: I told Eric Fox7: I don't think you needed to delete the post because of that, but you're the boss.
Fourth Post: This is where I compared you to a cop. Plus, I wasn't commenting on the moderation; I was quoting a "warning." If you interpreted my comment on my own post as attacking the moderation, that’s on you. Again, I wasn't critiquing the mods; I was just repeating something you wrote that helps improve the quality of this forum.
I am commenting on the moderation right here, in the section meant for it. So, regarding that first post, the only thing that could possibly be problematic would be ☕ at ☕
.
If I accidentally missed something and that's why I got the red card, I truly apologize (please just point out what it was so I can see), but as far as my memory serves, that's all there was.
If I got flagged for any of the stuff I listed above, I'd really appreciate an explanation.
4. If repeating something you guys said—without directly or indirectly attacking the moderation—helps make the forum better, I don't see the problem. Since I was just echoing your request, the Agent explained things, and it's likely more people followed the picks because of it than if we had just left it alone. If I had just reported the post, would he have even explained the picks? We agreed the goal is to make the forum work better.
Joshua Garcia8 said:Hey guys, Please. Don't try to bypass the subforum rules via DM. DMs aren't meant for dropping betting slips, but it looks like some people are doing exactly that. I’m looking at you, socis85, GeC666, and euskala—you guys aren't actually posting anything except your picks. Don't go forcing us to make rules for every little thing..
Thanks.
Joshua Garcia8 said:Just so we don't end up with any confusion, misunderstandings, or whatever other nonsense theories start floating around. This request applies to everyone.So, how does that look to you guys? Not just regarding Zoom and the Agent, but also Zalmonik and everyone else mentioned earlier.
Look, I’m asking nicely here—let’s not start imposing rules on the chat.
rustydrifter10 said:I reached out to the folks handling these kinds of issues; I'll let you know as soon as they get back to me.
Nimoy said:It’s a messy situation because under current US Law, participating in gambling with foreign operators is technically prohibited (if you're on US soil, which you are). Even though it isn't being actively enforced—meaning foreign bookies don't have IP blockers for the US, they still take registrations from Americans, MB is allowed here, and plenty of banks still permit withdrawals from MB to any account, not just checking, etc., etc.—the law is there. It's illegal to deposit with foreign bookies, but it isn't being enforced.
So, let’s say you walk into the IRS and tell them, "I made a profit of $17,485 on online bookies and I'd like to pay my taxes on it." I'm not sure how they'd react. They might tell you that anything withdrawn from abroad counts as foreign income and you'll owe tax (which hits about 45% once everything is tallied up). They definitely won't tell you, "Oh, do whatever you want, it's fine, you don't owe anything." So, you either pay the 45% (as foreign income) or they seize it all because you broke the law by betting online with foreign operators.
Then again, there's another side to this: right now, they don't really know what to do with Moneybookers, and generally speaking, foreign income isn't a top priority for the IRS at the moment. Will it be one day? Probably. But currently, they can only "see" those payments if you withdraw them directly to a US bank account (whether it's USD or another currency). If you move it to a savings or checking account, they need specific warrants to track that, and so far, they're only pulling those for massive amounts—like if you pull $15,000 in one go or something similar.
Anyway, I called at least ten tax advisors and various tax offices in different cities to ask around, but they’re incredibly stingy and rigid with information. They insist everything is taxable, while simultaneously, nobody alive seems to know what Moneybookers actually is. For instance, if on Moneybookers you get part of your funds from source X (a fee), another part from source Y (a friend paying you back), and a third part from source Y again... they treat it all the same and they have no clue where the money actually originated.
urbaneagle57 said:Can anyone help me out with this:
Do I need to pay taxes in America if I win money betting online through foreign sites like DraftKings, FanDuel, or Bet365? It seems like our local US bookies just withhold the tax automatically on anything over $10000, but what happens when you're using those international platforms?
Thanks in advance.
Joshua Garcia8 said:Haven't placed a "normal" bet in ages, so I'm just throwing some pocket change at this combo app.
Atl. Mineiro-Santos FC....(07.27. 02:00)..1@1.50
SE Palmeiras-Bahia BA....(07.27. 02:00)..1@1.50
Skonto Riga-Hajduk Split.(07.26. 20:30)..2@2.45
@5.51
Eric Fox7 explained the first one—basically saying Hajduk is trash. As for Palmeiras, I'm looking at the standings. Honestly, 1.50 feels low for Palmeiras since their record isn't anything to write home about. They're sitting at 15th with 10 points, while Bahia is dead last with 8. Palmeiras pulls off a win at home every now and then, and Bahia is just rough... hoping they keep the streak going today.
James Taylor3 said:What does it matter if you used PayPal to deposit or not? 🤷
Just set up a PayPal account and withdraw there. That’s how I always handled my stuff at Summit. Pretty sure other bookies work the same way—makes sense, right?
Larry Turner5 said:Hey everyone,
I deposited into Bwin using my debit card, made some profit, and now I want to cash out. But since I didn't use PayPal to deposit, they won't let me withdraw to PayPal. And honestly, I really don't want to deal with a bank transfer.
Would it work if I just deposited a little bit through PayPal now, placed a few safe bets to mix the funds, and hoped the system sees it all as one big PayPal transaction?
Any other ideas?
Thanks
Steven Palmer3 said:What do you guys think about these Europa League qualifying matchups tomorrow:
Shakhtar Donetsk-FK Sutjeska 1 1.25
Rosenborg-FC Ordabasy 1 1.25
Anzhi Makhachkala-Budapest Honvéd FC 1 1.20
Young Boys-Zimbru Chisinau 1 1.20
Differdange-KAA Gent 2 1.20
So, I'm looking over these five games. They all seem pretty similar—solid teams from decent European leagues (think Ukraine, Norway, Russia, Switzerland, Belgium) facing off against clubs from much weaker leagues (Mexico, Kazakhstan, maybe Canada if we're being generous, Moldova, Luxembourg). Plus, there’s the travel factor for some, like flying from Kazakhstan to Norway or Moldova to Switzerland. It looks promising on paper, assuming these favorites actually give a damn about qualifying. If anyone has any inside info or just a gut feeling on these, let me know. 🙂 I'm torn because I was thinking of putting a decent amount on this, but like, a *lot*.😁
Charles Doyle6 said:I agree, but I bet you just wrote "Russia wins" because they're clearly better, and then when I tried to bet on them, the post vanished..
It’s not all about the data. Sometimes you just have to trust a gut feeling. 😛
granitepilot3 said:Right, okay. I read somewhere that some betting sites send verification codes to your physical address for the first withdrawal. Does BetMGM do that? I’m not actually living at my registered address right now, so just wondering.
So, am I supposed to email a photo of my ID or something?