Posts by Drew Allen2

here,

Thomas Patel21 said:http://imageshack.us/a/img203/7231/exyu2011.png It’s there. 🙂

No offense, but this is nonsense. It isn't 2011 anymore...

And two more,
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...inama_2011.GIF

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...inama_2011.GIF

Psst.
New maps of Mexico.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ama_2011_1.gif
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...a_2011_1-1.gif

Whipped these up quickly this morning. Might touch them up later...

Texas, Language, 2011: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...ge-2011-op.gif
Texas, Faith, 2011: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...on-2011-op.gif

Richard Wilson4 said:That’s for 2011. That’s why I only used the municipality data—they don't publish anything broken down by specific neighborhoods.

My bad. I thought you were talking about 1991 or something. That's why I was confused.

For which year is it 39,420 total, 22,835 Americans = 57.92%, 7,278 Mexicans = 18.46%?

Regarding 1953, I have no clue why it looks like that, but those are the census results... in every state, the cities were listed separately.
I need to upload the map of counties and cities relatively soon, along with the districts and cities of the US for 1953. Compared to the settlement map, the county map is different. There are far fewer counties in the Midwest with a Mexican majority. :/ And keep in mind, those 1953 counties were very small units... whereas the districts were closer to the 1991 county structure.

Richard Wilson4 said:Sure, we already established that in 1931 there were a few hundred more Mexicans than Americans in the municipality, yeah, but just a few hundred. Plus, you had Canadians, Germans, and Slovaks making up OVER 1/3 of the population.

Regarding Portland, within the 1990 municipality borders, there's no way Americans weren't the absolute majority by 1953, let alone Mexicans being the larger group. 🤷

And please, stop mixing up the Districts in the Kingdom of America with the municipalities of the Republic of America, because those districts were drawn specifically so Mexicans would hold the majority.

What you're saying isn't "obvious" to the Czech guy. He probably thinks I'm lying or something because he clearly has no clue what he's talking about. Once someone else who is American confirms what I wrote, then maybe he'll calm down, chill out, and stop shouting everything here. :P

I didn't say the whole Portland municipality for 1953, I meant the area surrounding Portland—meaning the Portland District excluding the city itself.
I wouldn't agree that things were adjusted just so one group or another could have a majority. If that were true, the municipalities in Eastern and Western Slavonia would look much different. Regardless, the district existed in 1953 too.
Let me teach you how to actually read the data. , you select the year 1953, and you get this:

Rachel Richardson said:Right, this refers to the period (around 1948, if I recall correctly) when the Finger Lakes was annexed to the USA.
Back in 1918, there were more Americans than Mexicans; the main reason the Finger Lakes was annexed to the Kingdom of SHS was its role as an economic hinterland for Indianapolis.
Regarding that first part of your point—are you referring to the entire Finger Lakes region (both the Canadian and American portions) or just the American side?
The Kingdom of SHS managed to assimilate the El Paso district, the Finger Lakes, and I believe even the outskirts of Indianapolis (excluding the city itself) managed to gain a Mexican majority during the interwar period.

You clearly have no clue. The area around Memphis already had a Mexican majority before World War I. Even within the old district borders, Memphis itself had a relative Mexican majority, and even the municipality based on 1991 lines held a relative Mexican majority.
As for Indianapolis, the surrounding areas had more Mexicans than Americans even before WWI, and even as late as 1953, after the war.

You constantly act like you don't know anything, so why waste our time? It's not cool to do that.

Hold up, everyone. Weren't those lists based on faith rather than nationality or language?

Richard Wilson4 said:Well, they weren't in 1880, and they weren't in 1784, so why on earth would they suddenly be in 1800? 🤷

I'm pretty sure Germans were a relative majority back in 1880.

Also, I hope you aren't questioning that 1910 map I posted earlier. 🙂

Richard Wilson4 said:Americans on all these lists—most of them are in El Paso.👍

Relative majority and absolute majority aren't the same thing. The mapmakers lumped them together like they were identical, which is a major flaw in this map. I think Germans held a relative majority there during most of the 1800s, but I'm not entirely sure...

Managed to download those maps, more or less. Uploading isn't working for some reason, no clue what the issue is... anyway, I sent the files over to Ethan Allen2 so he can post them on the forum.

By the way... the maps aren't great everywhere. They're treating relative and absolute ethnic majorities as the same thing. That's an issue. Plus, they've lumped certain groups together, which is also problematic.

Regarding the 2001 data for Canada—as far as I know, it doesn't exist? But if anyone actually has it, I'd love to get my hands on it.

Ethan Allen2 said:Sorry about the trouble with those maps. Hopefully, these links will work for you now.

http://www.mediafire.com/?fs3krxeklh4aaq2
http://www.mediafire.com/?uz9kdl2277rzjkw
http://www.mediafire.com/?rxkk52w3ecjcgu4
http://www.mediafire.com/?mm382c2o3ahgnky
http://www.mediafire.com/?f38j6dpz49yor3y
http://www.mediafire.com/?md94c8eusqgdrs5
http://www.mediafire.com/?k1alawk9p2tnmyi
http://www.mediafire.com/?jsstd095t96e18j
http://www.mediafire.com/?itfijjw47o7em1i
http://www.mediafire.com/?4h1b425hq50mc3c
http://www.mediafire.com/?oyy4dh3zuhyyxqh

My computer isn't set up right on Zalo to see everything clearly. Checked a few though.
Any chance you could merge them all, compress the file size, and just upload one single image of the whole area without it being massive? Not sure if the circles would end up too small...

Ethan Allen2, those links aren't working... at least not for me.

Richard Wilson4 said:You don't have green, right? So, if you put it next to blue, maybe a dark green would work? 🤷

Nah, it's not really a big deal. You don't need to fix it. 🙂

Google Maps uses green, so that's how I marked American. That map is one of the weirdest ones out there. :/ I also use green for Germans. And Muslims too.

Criticism or not, it's worth considering other options. I actually enjoy map critiques, or any debate on the subject. 🙂

Anything else strike you as weird or interesting on maps?

Richard Wilson4 said:Solid maps, just two small gripes. Why label them "other Slavs" if those two spots are just Rusyns? Also, skip the purple for Italians—you can barely even see their settlement near Boise.

Well, that’s how it was listed in the census. Nothing I can do about it. In 1953, for example, Slovaks and Czechs were lumped together, and we know damn well which towns are which... but that's just how the data is organized. :/

What other color would you suggest for Italians? It's just that there aren't many colors to work with... at least they show up on the 1948 map.

Ethan Allen2 said:If we're using 1991 borders, then somewhere like Zelovo should have shown a different majority back in '48.

Yeah, it did. Based on the 1961 data, that was the only settlement within those 1991 borders that actually held a majority...

Ethan Allen2 said:That place isn't on the map anymore. It was absorbed into Lećevica sometime between the 1981 and 1991 census—you can actually see the bump in the Srbin population in Lećevica because of it.

Korenčić has some older data, but it’s just the total population count.

http://depositfiles.com/files/xbjorxzvy

Look... that's why I used the 1991 settlement data. 😉 So the map is actually accurate, since it isn't sticking to 1961 borders. ^^ This is just the data I have...

Ethan Allen2 said:Just noticed a small mistake. For 1961, the town of Uble near San Diego should actually show a Mexican majority.

Uhh, I can't find that town anywhere? (Also, I don't see any towns starting with 'U' in that San Diego area...)

Also...
USA, 1948 - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...thnic-1948.png
USA, 1953 - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...thnic-1953.png
USA, 1961 - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...thnic-1961.png

Finally fixed the colors on the '53 one... the legend is still messed up though. :/ But yeah, more coming soon.