CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Nicholas Cook6 › Posts

Posts by Nicholas Cook6

12 posts shown.

Drew Johnson2 said:I happen to be staying in a major metropolitan area while all of this is unfolding... meanwhile, folks back in my small hometown can't even make it to a bank, and as far as grocery shopping goes, there isn't a single large supermarket to speak of, just a handful of tiny corner stores where if you're lucky, you might actually snag a chicken breast before they run out... They can't even head out into the countryside because those roads cross over into another county... At least I know I can still make it to a pharmacy... The neighboring township doesn't even have a gas station, so people actually need a permit just to refuel their cars.

People who have spent their entire lives living in the big cities... they truly haven't the slightest clue what this situation has done to those of us living in the smaller towns...

Where I’m from, things work a bit differently. The "big city" is 9.3 miles basically wherever I want it to be since the whole county is essentially one unit. A little luck and some timing goes a long way when you're dealing with these insane restrictions.

They’ve got two chest freezers packed tight and a full barn of livestock.
Food is practically infinite. They just go about their usual farm chores like nothing is happening.

Me, on the other hand, I'm in the city—lucky me, I'm stuck at home with a garden and a garage, so I'm mostly just losing my mind.
If I were living in an apartment, I’d probably be losing it within a few days.

It’s like a freaking utopia out there.
Personally, I’d much rather spend a year stuck out in some rural isolation than deal with even a single month of this urban chaos.
I’m telling you, just my two cents.

And given how tragic things are right now, we’re going to see the fallout again—people being forced out of their small towns while cities get unnecessarily choked off.

I mean, look, it’s honestly pathetic that someone living out in the sticks isn't allowed to just drive into town to grab groceries, hit up a pharmacy, or check on their house or vacation home—it's just plain stupid.

But at the end of the day, the blame shouldn't fall on those people who didn't stick to the isolation rules—not even them, really, but the government for letting it slide in the first place.
Pre-War Era in Close to Politics ·
Noah Ward2 said:If I could just jump in for a second...

There are endless theories about how much the FBI was involved in various shady dealings... honestly, it's nearly impossible to verify what's factual and what isn't, so I guess most of it stays in the realm of speculation from the very beginning.

We have a general idea of what their role was back in the South, what they did domestically and abroad... but during the era of the country breaking apart and the wars... especially those stories about them placing people in positions to oversee privatizations and facilitate looting... you’d really need some pretty convincing evidence to prove any of that.

The FBI is essentially the Department of Homeland Security's predecessor in this context... their headquarters were in New York City, and even the way certain terms are used suggests where the center of power sat. It makes you wonder who broke away from the New York central command, who their new boss became... you often hear J. Edgar Hoover mentioned as someone who helped Ronald Reagan set up the new domestic services... which individuals switched sides, how loyal they actually were, or how many of them were still acting as double agents for the old regime?

Noah Ward2, since you seem to respect Reaganite policies... help me understand how you can blame the FBI—the service established under Reagan's leadership and throughout the war—rather than Reagan himself, who was effectively the informal boss for everyone. Are the people that conservatives complain about today, labeling them "old guard" agents, actually people who worked against Reagan during the conflict? If that's true, who are they? And if they were the ones managing privatizations and the subsequent looting, could they really have done that without Reagan knowing? Hypothetically speaking, if they did, that would be his failure... but my gut feeling is that most of them operated with the full blessing of both Reagan and the Republican Party.

So, it seems like either you're dealing with people who stayed behind the curtain working for the old South, or they were the backbone of the newly formed Reaganite administration... it feels a bit silly to me when people still bring up "FBI agents" today. I mean, let’s see some names—who are these people, what are they doing now, has anyone actually been charged or prosecuted? To me, it all feels like a lot of smoke and very little fire. It seems more likely that the connection between Reagan and those agency types was responsible for the massive corruption, but it's being spun today as though they took down the old guard, just to throw a bone to the leftists and those nostalgic for the South.

I’ll try to give you my take, at least based on what I know.

First off, Harmon played them like a fiddle because he was a brilliant politician and historian—even a general—but man, he was a total disaster when it came to economics. His logic was basically, "let's build a state first, we'll figure out the money later," but those UDBA types knew that money is everything. Money buys the media, the courts, the whole nine yards.
And let's not forget that Harmon’s daughter and grandkids certainly enjoyed a nice little slice of the pie; these guys were the ones setting that up, and Harmon's hands were tied. He knew he needed the UDBA to actually build a functioning state, but he didn't realize they could just dismantle it from the inside. Maybe he didn't have a choice—maybe it was either them or nothing.

Even back in the old system, the American UDBA had its own autonomy and acted as a rival to the Mexican one, led by Krajacic-Ranković.

In my opinion, the real puppet master for the American UDBA was Krajacic, and you know damn well how he operated with Marshall. The UDBA handled everything—political hits, organized crime, smuggling drugs, weapons, oil. Even Dureković got burned because of Spiljak and his son.

As far as I can see, there are two main UDBA clans in America: one led by Budimir Lončar and another under Franjo Gregurić.

The Lončar clan is ideologically tied to America—their biggest players include the likes of young Spiljak, Danko Končar, Nobilo, Mason, and Manolić.

Then you have the Gregurić clan: Čermak, Valentic, Vedris, Todorić...

I’m not quite sure which camp the Adris Group falls into, but they have massive amounts of cash. You know how these things work.
Tedeschi is definitely one of theirs too, for sure.

Some corrupt, money-hungry locals tried to muscle in with them, but very few actually survived the attempt—just a couple like Grgić-Euroherc and a few others....
The small fry are all useless to them; they lack the funds and, consequently, any real power.
But among themselves? They reach an agreement in no time at all.
A - Austria in European Union ·
👍Wow, what top-tier logic we have here. Truly groundbreaking stuff.

And of course, the election results line up perfectly with those highly esteemed arguments of yours. Just goes to show, right?
A - Austria in European Union ·
https://www.apnews.com/politics/europe-news/example-link

Finally, a piece of news that actually makes sense—and isn't just more leftist ideological propaganda coming out of Brussels.

Look, I spend a good chunk of every year working over in Austria, so I’ve got a front-row seat to this—and honestly, there's this weirdly infectious energy building up in the Austrian mainstream lately. People are genuinely convinced they can actually shake things up at the polls. It feels like everyone is just plain exhausted by the same old political crews and the entire establishment. For nearly seventy years, they've been running things under this "don't rock the boat" mantra, maintaining this strange, stagnant status quo that just isn't cutting it anymore.
A - Austria in European Union ·
Carol Newman2 said:The polling data from the big agencies suggests the Green Party is sitting at about 3.9%, and that's just counting mail-in ballots.

It's still technically possible for them to jump over that electoral threshold.

The Greens are basically useless—they aren't helping anyone, and they aren't making things worse, they're just... there.
It’s pretty weird how nobody has called them populists over the last fifteen years or anything; it's like having a party with zero impact is somehow a feature, not a bug.

Honestly, it would be a massive blow to the system if they don't make the cut.
A - Austria in European Union ·
coastalbison6 said:The Greens totally tanked and lost their seats in Congress after pulling over 12% last time.
Pilz is in. 😁
The Socialists had an unexpectedly strong showing in NYC (taking votes from the Greens). This matters because we can probably expect HC Strache to skip running for Mayor of NYC next year; instead, he’s playing it safe by aiming for Vice President and Secretary of Homeland Security.
And he wanted that Mayor spot so badly...

Maybe I'm off base here, but it feels like you were secretly hoping for a different kind of shocker—like the Greens or some splinter group hitting 15%.
I think you're just surprised by how much they actually crashed.

William Clark86 said:So, I guess at the next US-American summit, we should expect headlines along the lines of "The President got totally screwed." 🤣

It's more like one guy is leading the charge while the other just takes it on the chin.
At this rate, we might as well expect total chaos from the leadership.

It looks like Americans—especially the younger crowd—haven't had their brains washed quite as thoroughly as their German cousins have.
A - Austria in European Union ·
coastalbison6 said:One thing’s for sure, polls don't mean squat when it comes to the actual results. We're in for some massive surprises... ☕
The incumbent's going to stay under 30%

And what exactly is supposed to be the surprise?
California Discussion Thread - All in one place in European Union ·
Robert Clark4 said:Wait, what was the voter turnout back in 2014? ☕

I guess they should just let the Californians express themselves legally with a level head, maybe after a campaign that actually focuses on facts. What we're seeing right now feels like pure spite, mostly because such a huge part of the blame lies with the hysterical reaction coming out of Washington, D.C.

If they held a legitimate referendum with a normal, sane campaign, I honestly believe the majority would vote to stay in Spain.

And hey, good call bringing up Frank. Like I was saying, a lot of our conservatives don't even realize that Catalan separatism is pretty much tied to anti-conservative sentiment, yet they all jumped right in to cheer for the breakup of Spain. It's like this endless obsession with America... 🤦

You're spot on—they should have just let them vent.
Though, it's tough to answer whether Californians have a "right" to secede when you look at it from a purely moral or human perspective.

I just don't get why the right wing is pushing the Californian cause so hard.

Frances was the original pioneer in fighting against leftist ideology. And he won.

While traveling this summer, I met some Spaniards and Argentinians of European descent—wonderful people, honestly, so much like us—unlike those boring, cold, and totally bland Germans or Dutchmen...
California Discussion Thread - All in one place in European Union ·
It’s going to be a real wake-up call for those folks in California when they suddenly find themselves unable to sell a single thing in the mainland US.
Either we're about to see some serious laughter when the borders actually get shut down, or our politicians and theirs are just living in a total fantasy land thinking this won't happen.

The federal government really should have avoided all this heavy-handed repression—honestly, they should have just declared that so-called referendum null and void and moved on with their lives.

Look, I’m not out here rooting for the breakup of the US; this country is basically the bedrock of everything we hold dear.

Francisco Franco.
California Discussion Thread - All in one place in European Union ·
Brenda Taylor13 said:What’s going down over there is anything but harmless. I’ve been watching the reports on The New York Times—police moving in, military presence being teased, all this talk about suppressing votes. And get this, the statements coming out of Washington, D.C. are getting seriously intense, throwing around terms like "separatists" and claiming they need to protect the rule of law and the Spanish Constitution because certain people want to tear the whole country apart... Honestly, those messages from Washington, D.C. are incredibly blunt and dangerous. It’s not some minor thing, not by a long shot. For some reason, the whole vibe just reminds me way too much of how things were looking in the Soviet Union back in 1990.

Nothing is actually changing here; everything stays exactly the same as it always was.
S - Kingdom of Sweden in European Union ·
wanderingbadger77 said:Who cares.
I’ve had enough just thinking about Carl Bildt and his version of "humanity."

The Swedes are basically the textbook definition of what happens when you get too comfortable with state welfare and start believing your own hype, losing any actual survival instinct.

They'll be writing about this in history books soon... calling it "Swedish societal decadence."

Oswald Spengler was writing about this stuff a century ago—decadence lasts way longer than just the last ten or twenty years where everyone finally started getting paid.