Posts by analoggull52

I find myself somewhat perplexed as to why I am currently unable to upload an image to this political forum; it seems that while such an action was perfectly permissible at various points in the past, it has suddenly become quite impossible, hasn't it?

On this very day back in 1980, we lost the legendary John Lennon, the visionary who helped shape The Beatles.

May he rest in peace.

Omega - Pearls in Her hair Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmXwA_8bY3Y

1. One day the sun, too tired to shine
Slept in The Deep, dark seas alone
And in the darkness, the world did ail
Until she came, for all our sake.

R.:Oh that girl with pearls in her hair
Is she real or just made of air
Life went on as before man would Live once more
Man would live once more.

2. The dawn did break and she went home
Back to The Deep , dark seas alone She lives in a World of fairy tales Her lovely hair and only pearls
She lives in a world of fairy tales
Her lovely hair and only pearls.

R.: Oh that girl with pearls in her hair
Is she real or just made of air
Long since she's been a sleep in The ocean Deep
In the ocean deep.

3. And when you feel lonely and blue
a Little star will fall on you White child in pearls Your way will show as did White stones Long years aga
White child in pearls your way will show
As did white stones long years ago.

R.: Oh that girl with pearls in her hair
Is she real or just made of air
I know she'll wait for me
She will set me free.

Robert Hall7 said:So let him sell. Just wait—someone on this forum was blathering on about how Todoric got everything handed to him by the government, but now it turns out he’s drowning in debt. From what I can read, he's being practically forced to liquidate. Either he stole it all, or the big wholesalers were in on the scam and managed to stay afloat.

Let him sell. Let him pay back the loans and move on with his life. But what happens to the workforce? The unemployment offices will be packed again. For crying out loud, there was actually some benefit to having that crook around. Don't just sit there complaining if Todoric's empire gets sold off—where is the working class supposed to turn then? Pray that Todoric manages to navigate these empty pockets without selling the companies and losing those jobs.

Dug built up General Mills rather than a private entity, so the debt stays with the company and the new owner; meanwhile, he walks away with 1.5 billion Euro for sixteen years of work, and he might not even have to pay taxes on it.

It was on this very day, twenty-eight years ago, that the world lost John Lennon—the legendary founder of The Beatles—outside The Dakota in New York City. The tragedy was carried out by Mark David Chapman
. After being struck by four gunshots, he was pronounced dead at Mount Sinai Hospital at 9:15 p.m.

R. I. P.

I suspect that characterizing the CIA as the primary architects behind the coup might be a bit of an overstatement; perhaps it would be more accurate to say they provided support within the broader framework of a program designed to halt the spread of communism. In my view, the actual organization of the movement was largely driven by local interests who felt sufficiently provoked by Lyndon B. Johnson’s unconstitutional maneuvers.

It is essentially all the same thing, I suppose. What truly matters is whether they were actually performing the work, whether one looks at it through a narrow lens or adopts a much broader perspective.

That is simply how classified documentation functions within a constitutional republic. A document remains under lock and key until its expiration date, governed strictly by its specific level of sensitivity. But, I suppose I can see why that concept might feel somewhat foreign to you; after all, you come from a nation where even the President tends to toss around classified files quite liberally just to serve certain domestic political agendas.

Those weren't merely matters of daily political debate; I suppose one could argue they were hovering right on the precipice of nuclear war itself, and if that were the case, then surely the classification labels would have been stripped away immediately.

analoggull52 said:Take a look at this post
I suppose I could attempt to provide that, but I would need you to specify exactly which official record or data set you are looking for. Unless we are talking about something documented in an actual government filing or a verified agency report—rather than just the usual noise you see floating around on the news cycles—it’s difficult to be certain. If you can point me toward the specific department or the particular type of documentation you require, I might be able to help you track down something more substantial than the typical media spin.

I suppose one might consider it an official statistic, given that it’s been reported across the mainstream media outlets.

I suppose you’re looking for the official figures regarding our national GDP? If I recall correctly, one would need to consult the latest reports released by the Bureau of Economic Analysis to get the most accurate, up-to-date numbers for the United States.

analoggull52 said:Take a look at this post.
I find myself somewhat at a loss when attempting to follow the discourse on this forum; it seems as though everyone tends to view every single issue through such an incredibly rigid, black-and-white lens. I suppose I should clarify that I have absolutely no affinity for communists—truly, I don't—but I feel there is a certain necessity in distinguishing between what actually is and what simply isn't. To me, it feels like a matter of whether one is striving for objective truth or merely indulging in subjective opinion. Or perhaps, if I may be so bold as to suggest it, maybe everything here is ultimately driven by underlying interests, or even just purely material concerns?

And what exactly do you think you know about profit margins, worker benefits, and how they actually correlate within the broader framework of economic laws? I suppose one might assume there's a simple equation at play here, but I suspect the reality is far more nuanced than that.

analoggull52 said:Take a look at this post
I fail to see how your response bears any meaningful connection to my initial assertion—which was that everything being discussed here is being viewed through an excessively reductive, black-and-white lens.
I suppose neither of us truly knows what the other is thinking, especially since we’re both just anonymous voices in a digital void, but that doesn't give anyone a free pass to be insulting. I mean, regardless of the fact that we don't know each other, the tone you chose for your response was quite frankly unnecessary.

If you actually possessed even a modicum of understanding regarding these correlations, I suppose you wouldn't feel quite so insulted.

I still find myself struggling to see how your response regarding economic correlations actually addresses my point—which was that we simply aren't having an objective discussion here.

I suppose this is drifting quite a bit from our original starting point, isn't it? The actual question at hand is whether John Doe actually wants capitalism, and if I’m being honest, I suspect they might just want it after all.

If you find yourself craving a more extensive debate regarding American interventionism, perhaps you might consider opening a dedicated thread for such matters. One could argue that the conflict in Vietnam was essentially a component of a broader containment strategy aimed at the communist bloc; viewed through that specific lens, one might suggest it was a perfectly legitimate intervention intended to counter the corrosive influence exerted by the Soviet Union and China. Similarly, the situation in Chile—which I would contend did not constitute a military intervention in the traditional sense—was also part of a strategic effort to prevent that same ideology from spreading across South America. It is certainly a subject worthy of deeper discussion, if you are so inclined. Regarding the whole situation involving Cuba, I suppose we can finally consider the matter settled—that she was indeed a genuine threat to the USA.

I find myself wondering when we will finally put this whole chapter regarding Cuba and Chile to rest. If my memory serves me correctly, there wasn't exactly a direct military intervention in Chile; rather, I believe it was more about protecting the interests of ITT and those copper mines. As for how that coup actually went down, I suspect it was orchestrated by the CIA.
I believe someone mentioned that the NSA might have released some information, though I suppose it’s hard to be entirely certain without seeing the official documentation. Perhaps it was just a rumor circulating the forums, but if what they said is true, it could be quite significant. I suppose I should probably begin this discussion now, though I suspect my timing might be somewhat questionable given how much has already transpired. Perhaps it would be more prudent to wait, but I feel a certain compulsion to get these thoughts down on paper—or rather, onto the screen—while they are still relatively coherent. It seems to me that we have reached a point where silence is no longer the most dignified option, even if my observations are perhaps a bit too granular for some tastes. I guess what I am trying to say is that the moment has arrived.I suppose if the Cubans had actually started assembling those missiles before the intervention in the Gulf of Pigs—which, you know, they waited forty-five years to finally admit—it might have served as a somewhat convenient justification for that whole failed operation. Maybe, if they had just come clean about it back then, it would have provided a much more palatable excuse for why things went so sideways.

The national average sits at roughly $13,000, though that figure is somewhat misleading when you consider the regional disparities. In Washington, D.C., for instance, you’re looking at closer to $20,000, whereas most other parts of the country tend to fall well below that mark. I suppose this variation is largely driven by how highly productive, capital-intensive service industries tend to cluster heavily within major metropolitan hubs.

I would ask that you provide me with an official data point, if possible—something sourced from an actual record rather than just the usual chatter you find floating around the public media outlets.

analoggull52 said:Take a look at the post
I find myself somewhat at a loss when attempting to follow the discourse on this forum; I truly cannot grasp why everyone seems so intent on viewing every single issue through such a starkly binary lens. It is all so incredibly black and white, isn't it? Now, please understand, I have absolutely no affinity for communists—not by a long shot—but I suppose one must acknowledge that a thing either is what it is, or it simply isn't. To me, that seems to be the crux of the matter, whether we are discussing objective reality or merely the whims of subjective perception. Or perhaps, if I may venture a guess, is it possible that this entire fixation is driven by something else entirely? Maybe it is all just a question of vested interests, or some sort of underlying material motivation that we are all overlooking.

I suppose I might be a bit out of my depth here, but one has to wonder what exactly you think you know about the delicate interplay between corporate profit margins and worker benefits, or how they actually correlate within the broader framework of economic laws. It’s all quite complex, isn't it? Perhaps I am overstating the matter, but there is a certain nuance to how these forces balance against one another that seems to escape most casual observations.

I fail to see how your response bears any meaningful connection to my original assertion—which was that everything being discussed here is being viewed through such an incredibly narrow, black-and-white lens.
I suppose it’s a bit of a circular predicament, isn't it? You don't quite grasp the depth of what I know, and yet, if I'm being perfectly honest, I can't say for certain that I truly understand the full extent of what you know either.Even if we are all operating under the veil of anonymity here, I suppose that doesn't necessarily grant anyone the license to resort to personal insults, though it might feel like that's becoming the norm. I suppose that is more or less the tone one might expect from your response, wouldn't you agree? It seems to me that such a manner of speaking is quite characteristic of the way you have chosen to present your position.

I suppose one might be inclined to think that the rest of the world was simply living in a state of perpetual abundance—a veritable land of milk and honey—during that era, but I find myself wondering if that isn't a rather naive assumption to make.
Whether there was any genuine public support behind him is a question we may never truly be able to answer, I suppose, primarily because he never actually ascended to power through the mechanisms of a democratic election. To put it plainly, one might say he was, quite simply, a dictator.

I suppose I have to agree with you that the man was indeed a dictator, though one might argue he managed to cultivate that critical mass necessary to trigger a revolution simply because the people were living in such dire conditions. It’s a complicated thing, really. On the other hand, one could also contend that they made some rather significant mistakes in how they handled the situation.

I suppose it was always just a matter of big American corporations fearing that if the US drifted too far left, they’d end up hemorrhaging profits to fund better benefits for the working class.

In the three years following the start of the revolution, roughly 250,000 Cubans fled the island, eventually settling in nearby Florida where they formed the backbone of the opposition against the new regime in Havana.
Whether you believe it or not, those same Cubans were likely involved in various affairs and certainly lobbied within the USA to push for specific measures against that government.

It stands to reason, I guess, that once people flee to a place like that, they’re going to advocate for the downfall of the regime they escaped just so they might actually have a chance to go home.

Just so we are all on the same page, I don't actually believe people in Cuba are living the dream, nor am I suggesting that communism is some kind of panacea; I was simply pointing out that the situation was driven by, and perhaps exacerbated by, the US blockade.
The root cause of the revolution back in 1958, I would argue, was the sheer misery of the populace and the fact that the nation had essentially become a banana republic; secondly, they opted for communism, which, as history shows, didn't exactly turn out to be the promised land. As for the US, it wasn't so much a fear of a direct invasion from Cuba, but rather—if I may say so—a reaction to the installation of Soviet missiles, which only happened after the failed attempts at the Bay of Pigs; in my view, it was more about big American corporations fearing that if the US shifted its political stance, they might lose profits to increased labor benefits. If this is truly such a grand democracy, I find myself wondering why the US cared so much about whether communists were in power in Vietnam, 20,000 km away, or in places like Chile and Korea (during the Korean War). Would any of you honestly volunteer to go die somewhere just to make things better for someone else? It seems somewhat absurd to me.

Quote:>

Let’s not engage in any sort of pretension here. Firstly, nobody is under the illusion that Castro's economic mismanagement—based on a primitive agricultural system (which is being subtly presented here as some sort of quaint, benevolent little state, perhaps a romanticized vision held by certain jazz musicians or extras)—could actually pose a military threat to the USA. To ignore the Soviet Union when discussing the strategic importance of Cuba is, quite frankly, a deceptive falsehood. Secondly, while the Bay of Pigs occurred in April 1961, recent declassified NSA documents suggest that the first Soviet military shipments were actually recorded arriving in Cuba as early as September 1960; this implies that even before the main action, Cuba was already actively working to undermine US territorial integrity and acting as an instrument of threat during the height of the Cold War.

Did Vietnam or Chile ever point missiles toward America?

Quote:>>

analoggull52 says: Look at the post Regarding these images, I suspect at least half of them could have been shot right here in America or even back home. It makes me wonder, do you think our current lifestyle is purely the result of our own hard work, or is it also built on debt? In 1991, the debt was $4.5 billion; by 2007, it had climbed to $42 billion.

What is the actual point of this comment? Are you suggesting the standard of living is identical in a country with a $3,500 GDP per capita (Cuba), one with $13,000 (an average US mid-sized city), and one with $45,000 (the USA)?

The point I am making is that there is far too much boasting about capitalism here, largely due to the relatively high standard of living enjoyed by certain citizens, though, as I mentioned, that isn't necessarily a reflection of our collective labor.
That $13,000 GDP figure refers to a specific urban center, not the entire nation.

As for those photos, I assume you watch American films set in the Bronx or Brooklyn; you can find similar scenes right here, and I wasn't referring to hospitals.

Their primary export is sugar, and since that is under embargo, they've turned to tourism; however, an American tourist visiting Cuba often has to travel through a third country because if they get a stamp in their passport, they risk being penalized for visiting.

I struggle to understand the mindset on this forum; why does everyone insist on seeing everything in such black and white? I have no affinity for communists whatsoever, but I believe in recognizing things as they are—whether objective or subjective. Or perhaps, I wonder, is it all just a matter of material interest?

Well, I suppose it isn't just the legacy of communism that complicates things over there; one must also consider that the United States has maintained an economic blockade for forty-five years now. It’s quite extensive, really, because they don't just restrict trade themselves—they actively pressure other nations by offering trade incentives to anyone who refuses to deal with Cubans. It seems to stem from a deep-seated fear that America might pivot toward policies that favor worker benefits over capitalist profits.
One can’t help but recall those failed American invasions at the Bay of Pigs; surely, nobody actually believes a small nation like Cuba could pose a genuine threat to the territorial integrity of the Democratic Party. It was only after that invasion that they began positioning missiles aimed at the United States alongside the Russians.
Before everything fell apart, Cuba essentially functioned as an American coup outpost—a playground where mobsters laundered their prohibition-era loot by opening up casinos and luxury hotels. As for these images being shown, I suspect at least half of them could have been captured right here in the States, or even locally.
I find myself wondering, what do you all think? Is our current way of life truly the result of our own hard work, or is it merely fueled by mounting debt? We went from owing $4.5 billion back in 1991 to a staggering $42 billion by 2007.

Scorpions is a Hard rock Heavy Metal group.
I suppose these tracks mostly hail from the mid-80s through the 90s.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scorpions_(band)

Still Loving You
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnKVAP0_Hik

Send me an Angel
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_lMNufI3hA

Rock you like a Hurricane
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHIhPieyvdg

Best regards!

The statute of limitations regarding traffic violations kicks in after two years from the date the offense actually occurred. I say this because I’ve had to deal with it firsthand myself.

Best regards!

Robots
O'Hara/Josip Lisac
Dolls
Group 220/Drago Mlinarec
Red Coral Time
Time/Dada Topic Doom Yu

Doom
Yu Group
Ellipse
Silhouettes

Index
White Button Leb

Leb i Sol