Posts by Lawrence Torres56

Tyler Garcia69 said:How is it that people always "remember" their past as human beings? It’s like, nobody actually recalls being some little creature crawling around in a swamp or flying through the air sucking blood out of other mammals.

I mean, what if we weren't even reptiles, birds, or whatever else before this

Douglas Hall59 said:I have to disagree with you there, Lawrence Torres56. While having certain information would be nice, and experiencing those phenomena that pop up on a spiritual journey can be quite something, since you brought it up, I fail to see what benefit I'd actually get from hyper-focusing on those specific feelings...

Everything I’ve picked up about spirituality so far—the stuff that actually pushes us forward—is rooted in introspection, deep analysis, prayer, meditation, and general spiritual discipline, so I really have to reiterate that I don't see how fixating on those raw emotions would help me, unless I'm mistaken or you possess some deeper insight I lack, but I'm trying to look at things intuitively rather than just through an intellectual lens...

Look, that’s just your take, your perspective, your way of processing things right now,
but can you actually claim that’s the "true" spiritual path? You can't really know for sure; you're just guessing, just like the rest of us... which isn't a bad thing at all, so please don't get me wrong...

For me, if I were in your shoes, the only question that really matters is why those specific feelings and that specific life matter to *you* specifically?... unless you're convinced it's all just some random cosmic coincidence.🤷 But even then, shouldn't you be asking yourself why it hit you so hard in the first place? Why did you see it, or feel it, that intensely? Especially if you're operating under the belief that being attached to things is what stunts your spiritual growth?

Douglas Hall59 said:That is a fascinatingly reasoned perspective. To be honest, I have a friend in my life right now whom I am quite attached to, someone who provides me with significant spiritual guidance and support. Of course, that kind of attachment can act as a tether, hindering spiritual growth. Perhaps that is precisely the alignment and the lesson you are referring to. Given how many of these "maybes" have cropped up lately, I wonder if someone with more experience might have a specific method for deepening and refining intuition, specifically to help us eliminate as many of these "maybes" as possible...🙂

Honestly, if I were you, I’d tell you to maybe dial back on all that talk about what we "need" to grow or whatever, and instead, start paying a little more attention to those deeper, raw emotions you went through—you know, the stuff like love, family ties, being broke, and just the pure struggle of it all. Don't you think focusing too much on the "growth" side of things might actually end up pulling you in the wrong direction?

Douglas Hall59 said:See, I’m telling you, those blurry, hazy shots of that strange setting didn't actually intrigue me nearly as much as the raw sensory details did... it was those specific impressions that unmistakably signaled to me that I was emotionally tethered to that space just as much as to the people in it, especially that little girl who kept "appearing" throughout the sequence. It is incredibly difficult to articulate that particular sensation in a way that allows a reader to truly experience it, or even grasp the gravity of what is happening... which is why, in my view, drawing from one's own lived experience is the only way to exchange any semblance of a coherent thought regarding the situation at hand...

Every single time I close my eyes and conjure up that image of the old stone well sitting right there in the town square—a sight burned so deeply into my memory—I find myself overwhelmed by this sudden, heavy rush of emotion... It brings back all those feelings of warmth and struggle, that sense of shared hardship and deep-rooted family devotion I was trying to express in my last post...

If I could actually manage to deepen my practice through meditation, perhaps I’d gain some real clarity on these... let's call them occurrences... but until then, all I'm left with is this fragmented, emotional echo of past timelines. Regardless, what I experienced was entirely new, and frankly, incredibly bizarre...

Maybe I should give regression a shot... 😉

You definitely can, but honestly, there's a pretty good chance you won't walk away with any more info than what's already rattling around in your head... if I were you, I'd start paying closer attention to those feelings and the people currently in your orbit... that's really the only way you're going to spot the patterns...
At the end of the day, that girl from your past hasn't actually left; she's right there with you now, isn't she? The real question is why, and who she represents in your life today—which basically means the answer lies in whatever you're being forced to face right now, or the lesson you're meant to master in this lifetime... unless, of course, she's just there so you two can finally "celebrate" all those lessons you've been picking up through various lifetimes...🤷

silentsurfer2 said:It’s not "great," it’s just passing. If an average kid puts in average effort, they get a C.
What kind of logic is that? You give an A to the kid who followed every single instruction, then give a B to the kid who forgot to draw the chimney, the kid who used the wrong technique, and the kid who held the paper sideways and drew a sparrow in flight instead of a stork on the roof. You either penalize the kid with the B because they're getting the same grade as someone who was rushing and sloppy, or you bump the kid with the missing chimney to an A, which isn't fair to the student who was actually top-tier.

That mindset starts at home. If nobody tells a kid that mediocre grades mean they'll likely end up in a low-tier high school and eventually settle for a dead-end job, they'll never learn.

I'm worried you didn't quite catch my drift,
if a grade is a C (just okay), then it's only right to tell the kid that, right? You shouldn't be telling them that a C is "excellent"... and if they got a B just because they missed a chimney, you have to explain that to them, because let's face it, half the houses in this neighborhood don't even have chimneys anymore, so why does it even matter to the kid?
You can't just drop grades on a kid without explaining the "why" behind them, because if you do, they'll never actually figure out where they went wrong...

This kind of mindset starts at home, honestly; if nobody points out to a kid that coasting with Cs might land them in a lower-tier high school and lead to, you know, a less competitive career path.

Not necessarily,
our teacher back in first grade used to have this habit of trying to comfort kids who burst into tears over a bad grade... and even today, people still call her out for saying grades aren't important, though of course, she always leaves out the part about how the actual knowledge—which is what those grades represent—is what really matters...
Now, I'm not saying she does it maliciously, but she clearly isn't thinking about the underlying message she's sending in those moments... which she's actually admitted herself.

Sarah Hall53 said:Look, I'll say it—if your kid is basically glued to the couch all day, then you’ve got two choices: either get them moving and actually deal with PE, or just stop stressing about those mediocre gym grades. It's really not that deep.
It’s honestly nothing groundbreaking—just one of those things. You know how it is... I was sitting there thinking about what I actually needed help with, looking for some actual guidance or instructions, and can you believe which subject it turned out to be? It was freaking PE. And we're talking from twenty-five years ago, too. Just... life, I guess.
Other kids were probably sitting there memorizing their multiplication tables or—I don't know—learning about vowel shifts and chemical elements in middle school, while I was wasting hours upon hours on things like the shot put, the star jump, the two-step, the three-step, and the long jump... all just trying to scrape together enough points to hit a passing grade in PE.

But really, being a couch potato doesn't even have anything to do with doing PE homework at home,
I mean, personally, I don't know a single parent who's actually going to let their kid bounce a ball against the wall inside the house, or who has neighbors chill enough to not start screaming at kids for tossing a ball around on the street like we used to... 😁
Plus, kids today are absolutely swamped with way more activities and responsibilities than we ever dealt with, so they don't even have the chance to learn or practice stuff like dribbling a basketball, throwing a ball against a wall, or jumping rope...

Back in my day, subjects like PE, Art, and Music were places where you could pretty much pass just by showing up, putting in some effort, and having your supplies ready. If you wanted an A, you couldn't skip the hurdles, but you didn't get docked points just because you missed a step... and music textbooks were basically nonexistent... etcetera...
But nowadays, while we're constantly hearing all this talk about "reducing the workload" for students, you're still expected to sit there with your kid practicing drills for PE, singing for Music, and sketching for Art at the kitchen table. 😁

frozenrider15 said:Look, a C is a passing grade. That’s literally what it represents. There's a massive difference between being content with "good" and actually striving for "great" or "excellent." A C means you grasped the material. Period. In first grade, a C tells you the kid missed the mark—maybe they didn't follow directions, lost focus, rushed through the work, or left a trail of errors in their wake. It means they need more practice. They need to sharpen their reading comprehension and drill the basics. A C doesn't mean a child is dim-witted or has hit a ceiling. Speaking as a parent, my take is this: those Cs teach a child the value of effort. It shows them they need to buckle down, do the homework, double-check their work before turning it in, stop fooling around during class, and actually listen to instructions.
Sure, some kids might get complacent with Cs and stop pushing themselves. But an attitude toward learning is built over time. I highly doubt a kid who gets a C in first grade is going to throw in the towel by seventh grade just because of that one grade. If you explain the *why* behind a C, they learn to pivot and try harder, especially while they're still young.

It’s not even about being satisfied; it's about the message you're sending... and honestly, I think that bolded part should be explained to the kids directly, rather than telling them how a C is actually a great grade...

Look, I don't know how likely it is that a kid getting Cs in first grade will bail on school in seventh, but I see it all the time—kids who are fed this line end up not studying at all because they genuinely start thinking a C is top-tier. So, I wouldn't be surprised at all if they do end up checking out by seventh grade when things actually get serious and they really need to crack the books.

Joseph Martinez4 said:In our case, they went into way more detail about everything—like, the actual rubric and what they look for. Like, exactly what you need to be able to do or make to hit a certain grade. Honestly, I totally assumed my kids would get straight As in those three subjects—music, art, and PE 🥳—but boy, was I wrong. They've got Bs in PE (and there isn't anything they can't do, or so I thought!), but hey, at least the teacher wrote a nice note next to the grade explaining why it was a B instead of an A.

Which basically means that nowadays, you have to help kids practice and work at home for everything—not just the old-school subjects like English, math, or science, but even PE, art, and music too.😁

shadowcrane91 said:I feel like that trio of art teachers is being way too harsh on this subject. I can't see how they justify it unless the kid is just completely lacking any shred of talent whatsoever...

Actually, maybe I was totally tripping when I called those art instructors a trio

Sent from my iPad using Reddit

Look, let’s be real for a second—that whole "three" thing has absolutely nothing to do with actual talent, okay? Just trust me on that one. I remember back in the day when she was just a kid, she’d sketch something that looked way more like some tiny little sparrow than an actual stork, you know? Maybe she just got so lost in her own little world while drawing that she completely missed the memo that storks are actually supposed to have those long, spindly legs... just kidding! Or am I?
So, I’ve got this friend who is, like, insanely talented at drawing—I mean, the kid’s got serious skills—but man, he really needs to stop wasting his time obsessing over these tiny, trivial details that don't actually matter. He spends forever perfecting some random little thing he thinks is deep or essential, when the actual assignment is asking for something completely different. Honestly? He should probably just stick to buying those pre-made art kits from Target or Michaels for his third and fourth-grade projects instead of burning all that energy. Why go through all that stress when you're missing the entire point of the prompt anyway?

Carol Smith13 said:shadowcrane91, I totally get where you're coming from.
I went through something pretty similar with my oldest daughter recently—though hers was more about physical performance...
She ended up getting a C in PE because she couldn't master the jump rope—she could barely get past three jumps before tripping—and then there was the whole awkward situation where she felt like she was being mocked by the teacher because she was the only kid in the class who couldn't keep up...👎

Tell the little one she needs to tell her teacher that even jumping rope takes serious practice, okay? Like, honestly, if she managed to nail three jumps on her first try, isn't that actually a much bigger win than some kid who can jump ten times after practicing a thousand times already? It’s all about that initial momentum, right?😁

frozenrider15 said:Maybe the teacher *did* tell her. Maybe the kid just forgot or didn't relay the message to Mom. We could sit here debating the mechanics of a C grade until tomorrow for all we care. To me, the real tragedy is seeing first graders shedding tears over grades already. It feels like it’s often the parents doing more crying than the children are actually experiencing any real heartbreak.

I don't know, maybe...
In my experience with the school system here, the teachers are pretty thorough with their explanations, so you can usually tell just by listening to a kid vent when they walk through the door exactly where things went sideways.

If grades didn't exist—if so many life milestones didn't hinge on them—I bet nobody would be shedding tears over them... especially not in first grade.
And the fact that a grade might actually stress a parent out more than the kid isn't even surprising,
because, let's face it, parents are way more aware of the cutthroat reality of the society we live in than little kids are.

As a parent, it honestly drives me crazy when I hear about a teacher or professor trying to convince first graders that a C is actually "great." Then, when those kids actually start believing that a C is perfectly fine, people turn around and complain that the kids aren't working hard enough or studying enough... it's such a loop.

Honestly, what breaks my heart most about this whole situation is how they didn't take the time to actually sit the little one down and explain things nicely—you know, explaining what went "wrong" and why she ended up with a C instead of an A.
If, for instance, she drew someone with legs that were way too short, you could gently point that out so she learns for next time, right? Or if her handwriting was just a bit messy or her math was off... you just guide them through it.

Hey, shadowcrane91, you should really head over to the school and have a real chat with the teacher; maybe ask her to please just show the kid where she messed up next time so she can actually learn from it...

It’s not that we can’t prove reincarnation, it’s just that we absolutely refuse to... because if we actually pulled back the curtain on something like that, the entire foundation of modern society would just collapse like a house of cards, wouldn't it?

I mean, just look at what happened with the father of James Leininger—you know, that kid who spent years piecing together memories of a past life—and how his dad handled it.
"My whole goal in digging into what happened to my son was to find proof that it was all just some massive coincidence. But honestly? As time went on, I felt myself getting closer to something incredibly dangerous. It felt like I was reaching my hand straight into a furnace."

Jamie Lewis said:From the book 'tell you a story' by Jorge Bucay

When I was a kid, I was obsessed with the circus. My favorite part was always the animals. I was particularly drawn to the elephant—which, as I found out later, was also the crowd favorite. During the show, this massive creature would pull off all sorts of tricks with a coin, an incredible display of power and grace from such a giant... But once the performance ended, right before it headed back to its enclosure, the elephant would always be tethered to a tiny little stake driven into the ground, held by a chain attached to just one leg. And I’m talking about a small wooden peg, barely a few inches deep. Even though the chain was thick and heavy-duty, it seemed obvious to me that an animal capable of ripping a whole tree out of the dirt could easily snap that chain and just walk away.
The mystery haunted me.
What was holding him back? Why wouldn't he just run?
Eventually, an adult explained that it was because the elephant had been trained. But I remember thinking, "If he's trained, why bother with the chain?"
I never got a straight answer back then.
It wasn't until a few years ago that I realized someone was smart enough to figure out the truth:

A circus elephant doesn't run because it has been tied to a similar stake since it was a baby.

I’m convinced that as a little calf, the elephant fought with everything he had to break free. But despite all that effort, he failed, simply because back then, the stake was too strong for him to budge.
I can picture him trying day after day, eventually collapsing in exhaustion, until one day—after a lifetime of miserable attempts—he just accepted his helplessness and surrendered to fate.
That massive, powerful elephant we see under the spotlight doesn't run because he truly believes he can't.
The worst part is that he never even stopped to question that memory...
He never, ever tried to test his strength again...
And honestly, that's us. We’re all a bit like that circus elephant: walking through life tethered to hundreds of little stakes that strip away our freedom. We live our lives convinced that we "can't" do certain things, purely because we tried once a long time ago—back when we were kids—and failed. We did exactly what the elephant did, and that failure became etched into our psyche: "I can't, I can't, and I never will"
be able to.
We grow up carrying that self-imposed label, and because of it, we never even bother trying to break the chain.
Whenever we feel those metaphorical shackles rattling, we glance down at that old stake and think:
"I can't, and I never will."
The only way to find out if you actually can is to try again, with everything you've got... With everything you've got!

That's a pretty poetic way to put it... and I'm right there with you, because let's be real, habit is pretty much the only thing keeping people sane in situations like that...🙂

hiddenbear3 said:There simply isn't enough information to draw any real conclusions.

But I suppose there will always be some wise soul out there who claims to know exactly what is going on inside her head.

Actually, we have plenty of data; anything else is just veering into armchair psychoanalysis, which isn't an answer—it's just another excuse.😁

Projective identification... honestly, I’d say it’s probably sitting right at the top of the list of factors that drive someone to fall into that victim mentality in situations like this.
I wouldn't necessarily go as far as saying they're terrified of losing those "high" stimuli, because let's be real—there is way more out there in the actual world that can trigger people like that, and I don't just mean superficial stuff. It might actually be more about the fear of being hit with *too many* of those intense stimuli all at once, especially when they aren't used to dealing with them.🤷

wearyowl29 said:The terrifying thought of being left all alone...

I don't know, man, I honestly don't think it's even about being afraid of being alone in this case—it’s more like she just can't face the idea of actually staying by herself.

rowdytiger13 I'm telling you, it’s like we're all just circling the drain sometimes, isn't it? You look at everything happening around us and you have to wonder if anyone actually has a handle on the steering wheel. It feels like we're constantly hitting these invisible walls, navigating through this thick fog where nothing makes sense anymore. Does anyone else get that feeling? Like, you're trying to make sense of the chaos, but the more you dig, the deeper the rabbit hole goes? It's wild.
You see this all the time with people who have been getting kicked around for years on end, right? It’s like they’ve spent so much time being mistreated or pushed around by life that they just start to internalize it. They eventually begin to identify with their own suffering, almost as if it's become a core part of who they are. Does that even make sense? It's like the trauma becomes their whole identity after enough time passes. So, we really need to talk about this whole "playing the victim" thing, don't we? It’s become such a massive, exhausting trend lately. You see it everywhere—people just constantly casting themselves as the wounded party in every single situation, as if life is some kind of endless tragedy scripted specifically to screw them over. Honestly, isn't it just draining? It’s like they’ve mastered this art of dodging accountability by wrapping themselves in a blanket of self-pity. Instead of saying, "Hey, I messed up," or "Maybe I should have handled that differently," they immediately pivot to how everyone else is out to get them or how unfair the world is being. How many times can you hear the same tired excuses before you just want to roll your eyes into the back of your head? It feels less like genuine suffering and more like a calculated move to gain sympathy or, even worse, to control the narrative. If you’re always the victim, then none of your mistakes are actually your fault, right? That’s the logic, isn't it? It’s a way to shut down any actual conversation or criticism because, heaven forbid, you might upset someone who is "struggling." It’s a total conversational dead end. Does anyone else feel like they're walking on eggshells just to avoid triggering some elaborate drama where they’re somehow the casualty? It’s honestly exhausting to deal with.That’s just who they are, honestly—it’s their whole world, the only reality they’ve ever actually known.
Breaking out of that cycle... man, that is hands down the hardest thing you’ll ever have to do. Seriously, how do you even begin to tackle it when you feel like you're just spinning your wheels in the same mud over and over again? It’s exhausting, isn't it? You think you've finally made some headway, you've turned a corner, and then—bam—you're right back where you started, staring at the same walls, facing the same demons. It feels like you're fighting an uphill battle against your own shadow. Does anyone else feel like they're just running on a treadmill that keeps getting faster while they're getting more tired? It's heavy stuff, truly.

Yeah, I see what you mean.
Man, there was a time when you could actually walk into that house and just keep your mouth shut, you know? Back then, her own people would whisper about her behind her back around the neighborhood, but now? It’s like things have spiraled completely out of control. It feels like everyone is just jumping at every single chance to drag her name through the mud... and honestly, the wildest part of the whole thing is watching her take it. You can see how much it eats at her, seeing her visibly stung by all the trash being thrown her way, yet she just sits there and lets it happen without saying a damn word. Why does she just let them tear her apart like that?
It’s like they’re out there fighting the good fight and taking all this heat just for everyone else's sake, right? Like they aren't even doing it for themselves, but purely for the benefit of the group... isn't that just wild?

I honestly just don't get it—what on earth drives someone to cling to that victim mentality instead of just slamming the door shut and finally cutting off the supply to their own abusers? Is it really worth staying in the line of fire just to play the martyr?

So, through some weird twist of fate, I ended up right in the middle of this mess where it felt like almost everyone in the household had teamed up to gang up on one single woman. Since I see her every day and we’ve known each other for a while, I can tell you for a fact that most of their accusations are total garbage—honestly, she isn't even the villain here; they are. But the thing is, even though she sees right through them, she just won't budge or walk away. When I finally asked her what she was even doing staying in that situation, she just looked at me and said she didn't know, but somehow, there's something deep inside her keeping her anchored there...

I mean, seriously, I just can't wrap my head around what keeps people stuck in such toxic lives or broken relationships. Is it karma, some lingering sense of love, or just pure habit? I don't think it's weakness or some kind of illness in this case...
maybe years of being terrorized just caused her to completely give up on herself? Like, maybe the same way they spent years covering up their abuse, she's now spending all her energy covering up how broken she actually feels.😕

Michelle Nelson4 said:Is there a bit of a misunderstanding here? I clearly stated that the textbook uses the exact same wording for "brushing our teeth" as it does for "going to midnight mass."
The textbook and the author aren't making any distinction between those two things whatsoever. You suggested they were, but you haven't provided any proof for that—whereas I have substantiated my point by quoting the actual text from the book.

Saying "people in the fall..." isn't quite the same thing as saying "(we) in the fall..."

I really wonder why our textbooks push these falsehoods and present this skewed image that we are all believers attending church. I’ll leave that for everyone to ponder, but in my opinion, this isn't an accident; it's intentional. After dealing with twenty-five years of this kind of nonsense from every direction, my tolerance for this blatant disrespect toward my own beliefs has completely run out.

Look, I don't have a comprehension problem, but I'm genuinely confused by yours—since when does a first-grade American reading textbook even include lessons on Christmas and Easter?

And honestly, I don't know what exactly you think you've proven, because a subjective interpretation isn't proof of anything.

Besides, textbooks don't make distinctions for stuff like seasonal farming cycles or prepping wood for winter either... things that, let's face it, not everyone actually does. So I really don't get why we should just strip all that out of the curriculum and punish kids for knowing history just because someone is too embarrassed to admit their ancestors, relatives, or neighbors were religious farmers or ranchers? Is that supposed to be a conspiracy theory now?

And since you're clearly so bothered by mentions of Christmas and Easter, I can only hope that, in keeping with your convictions, you're boycotting all the religious holidays here in the States too.😉

rowdypanther12 said:I was just mentioning the importance of practice.
But you're right; it’s pretty clear we’re operating on totally different wavelengths here.
Anyway, my main priority is making sure my kid grows up without being taught that sex is some kind of sin—regardless of whether they're gay or straight—so they won't be attending religious education classes.
As for the whole debate regarding the role and status of women, I think I'll pass, because like I said, we clearly see the world through very different lenses.

Fortunately or unfortunately,😁 we actually *do* live in the same universe, one that's built on diversity, which is exactly what makes it beautiful, right? Yet, some people here—whether they realize it or not—🤷 are trying to turn all that wonderful variety into a bunch of narrow-minded lies and insults directed at anyone who disagrees.

Choosing to go to religious ed is a personal choice, and every single one of us has the right to decide if our kids attend those classes or not.
Personally, I couldn't care less about your reasons (or anyone else's) for keeping your kid out of religious ed; that’s your call, and I respect it... but that doesn't mean I'm going to sit quietly while you try to justify yourselves with blatant falsehoods.

And let's get one thing straight: sex itself isn't a sin according to the church, so don't teach your child the wrong things; the actual sin is the abuse of it.
As a parent, I highly doubt anyone is truly indifferent to when or with whom their child becomes intimate, or what their attitude toward it will be, but just like everything else, I'm not here to judge. So, wouldn't it be fair if "you" didn't judge me either?

Michelle Nelson4 said:So, let’s dive in and compare the content from Lesson 3 of the first-grade curriculum. I have the exact quotes right here—and if anyone needs to see the photos, just let me know and I can upload them!

Personal Hygiene Lesson: Hand Washing 101o Before meals, after playtime, and once they've finished their bathroom breaks.
Christmas Lesson: I’m heading out this evening...o Heading to church for Midnight Mass.
Easter lesson: This is when I celebrateIt looks like you might have sent that last message by mistake, or perhaps you were just testing the connection! I'm here whenever you're ready to dive into the discussion. What's on your mind? Jesus' resurrection... heading out to Mass in the morning.

Is handwashing more of an ancient tradition, or is it just one of those things we’re taught alongside how to behave in church? It makes you wonder if they're both just part of the same foundational upbringing.
I honestly wouldn't even bother addressing your other fabrications regarding what people with intellectual disabilities might wish for; they are simply too low for me to engage with.

Wait, hold on a second—which science textbook for first graders actually includes lessons on Christmas and Easter? Seriously, since when did we start mixing holiday traditions into the science curriculum?😁
Or maybe you just forgot to mention that those lessons are all about the seasons and our traditions? Like, they present Christmas and Easter in that exact same way we tell kids how people used to prep wood for the winter or get the fields ready for planting... you know, that whole cyclical, old-school survival vibe?

Wait, what kind of lies are you even talking about here? Seriously, what am I supposed to be lying about?

rowdypanther12 said:I honestly can't tell if you're playing dumb or if you really don't get what I'm saying, but either way, I'll try to explain 😂
In Catholic doctrine, a woman's role is centered on being a mother and a caregiver. That’s the aspect they celebrate and promote. It emphasizes being submissive to men, which extends to being submissive to God. Essentially, Catholic teaching supports a traditional view of roles within both the family and society.
It seems to me that women still can't become priests—unless I'm mistaken? Could a woman ever become the Pope? 🤔

And maybe I'm out of the loop on recent changes, but isn't homosexuality (meaning the practice of it) considered a sin according to Catholic teaching? My apologies if that's been revised lately 🙂

Honestly, I’m completely lost when it comes to you, because what you're rambling about here doesn't have anything to do with the church, actual believers, or any of the stuff we actually cover in religious studies class.
So, you’ve got these women showing up to church who aren't mothers and aren't caregivers, right? They're just... there. It makes you wonder, doesn't it? What exactly is their role in the community when they aren't tied down to the usual family duties we always see?
Honestly, you won't find any of that "submissive to men" nonsense inside the church—it just doesn't exist there. That whole dynamic is strictly an outside thing, reserved exclusively for people who don't have even the slightest connection to their faith.
I mean, come on, even the church can’t go against Jesus' own words, right? It’s like, how can they ignore the Golden Rule—you know, that whole "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" thing? It just doesn't add up.
I mean, if devout women don't mind that they can't become priests, then why on earth does it bother people who aren't even religious? It just doesn't add up to me, you know?
Look, let's be real here—it’s not like the Church actually puts the role of being a mother on a pedestal, right? To them, it’s all about the sanctity of the family unit as a whole, regardless of whether there are actually any kids running around in that house or not.

Look, there’s a massive difference between being homosexual and actually acting on it, and honestly, if someone can't wrap their head around that distinction, then they have absolutely no business dragging the Church or believers through the mud. Just because you don't get the nuance doesn't mean the Church is inherently attacking people, so why even bother with all that finger-pointing?
Honestly, everything laid out in the Catechism is pretty spot on, isn't it? It really would be worth sitting down and actually giving it a proper read, just so we aren't all wandering around living in some total delusion based on nothing but whatever random hearsay or "he said, she said" nonsense we picked up from someone else.😁

Tyler Ruiz502 said:That’s pretty much where my head is at, too. I wouldn't go as far as calling it a "handicap"—that feels a bit heavy-handed for something that isn't exactly life-or-death and can be picked up elsewhere without religious studies—but there is a certain value in knowing that Midnight Mass exists and that we have our own specific way of doing things. Sure, people go to Midnight Mass, and churches are packed. But we don't go, simply because we aren't part of that particular circle.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy using Reddit

Actually, I don't think "handicap" is too strong at all, because mentioning things like Easter in nature has nothing to do with modern religious education or the role of the Church today; it's strictly tied to the past, back when the church served as a school where our ancestors learned to read and write (if they wanted to), where they learned about agricultural cycles, or about the livestock that literally meant survival for them. A priest didn't just give a sermon; he was an advisor, a registrar, a doctor, a notary, and so on...
and, because of that, Easter doesn't carry the same weight now as it once did.
And by depriving kids of knowledge regarding their own heritage and the history of the land they live on (even just by omitting the mention of Easter), sorry, but to me, that desire to create an intellectual handicap for these kids is real.

rowdypanther12 said:"Going" and "heading over" aren't exactly synonyms

I'm not sure what you mean by "how"
The question is a bit confusing, especially with that smiley. Are you suggesting that women have equal standing within the Catholic Church?
Or is the official stance that same-sex marriage should be permitted?
You've got me a little lost here 🙂

No, there isn't, but textbooks use it all the time to refer to specific seasonal periods.
It's the same way a book tells you to get ready for winter by chopping wood, even though most kids nowadays have central heating and gas... you get what I mean.

Quentin Tarantino:

how exactly do you mean? I don't really follow the question, especially with that smiley face; are you suggesting the position of women in the Catholic Church is equal? Is the official stance that gay people should be allowed to marry? You're confusing me.🙂

Not to change the subject, but if the mods allow it, I would love to read
what the actual status of women is in the Catholic Church—please explain it to me, since you clearly know way more than I do, despite being a woman and a believer myself?

And what does marriage laws have to do with how the Church and believers treat gay people?
Sorry, I just don't get it...
By the way, maybe check out the legal requirements for marriage on the government website before judging believers and the Church.😁
https://www.usa.gov/marriage-licenses

Quentin Tarantino:

I mean, seriously, what are we even doing here? Is anyone actually paying attention to this? It’s like everyone just collectively decided to stop using their brains at the exact same time. Honestly, I'm just sitting here staring at the screen wondering if I'm the only one seeing how ridiculous this whole situation has become. Does anyone else feel that weird, nagging sense that we're all just circling the drain? Or am I just being overly dramatic again? Probably. But you have to admit, there's something incredibly absurd about the way things are unfolding right now, isn't there? kaže: So, I was thinking about what we should actually be feeding our eight-year-olds these days... you know, because apparently, just handing them a bag of gummy bears and calling it lunch isn't exactly "peak parenting," right? Seriously though, if you're looking to get their nutrition on track without turning every mealtime into a full-blown hostage negotiation, where do we even start? It’s kind of a minefield, isn't it? I honestly just want her to keep believing in Santa Claus, you know? I really don't want some teacher at Sunday school coming along and telling her he isn't real—especially when they’re simultaneously trying to convince her that God actually is. It just feels like such a weird contradiction, doesn't it? I just want to feel that genuine surge of pride and pure, unadulterated joy when I actually nail something, you know? Like, I want to sit back and really soak in the satisfaction of my own success—that hunger to learn something new and then that massive rush of adrenaline when I finally master it or build something from scratch. I don’t want to just shrug my shoulders and say I have God to thank for it; I want to actually own my wins and feel like I earned them through my own damn grit. Look, I just want them to actually realize what they’re capable of, you know? Like, I'm talking about finding that genuine, deep-seated internal drive instead of constantly hunting for some external pat on the back or a little extra nudge from someone else—for God's sake. When someone screws up, I don't want them just crawling to me begging for forgiveness or living in constant terror that they're gonna get hit with some massive punishment. I’m not looking for them to go through some performative penance just to clear their conscience. Honestly, if you mess up, just fix the damn thing—clean up the mess, glue what broke, own the mistake, or better yet, pivot and build something even better out of the wreckage. I want people to realize they actually have the right to fail; it’s part of being human, isn't it? There shouldn't be this paralyzing fear or shame that makes people want to sweep their mistakes under the rug just to avoid getting caught. An apology is fine, sure, but saying "I'm sorry" doesn't cut it if nothing actually changes. I want to see tangible, visible action. At the end of the day, I want someone who acts because they genuinely feel driven to make it right from the inside, not because they're just trying to avoid an external lecture or a slap on the wrist. I just don't want them growing up living in fear, constantly walking on eggshells or being paralyzed by this crushing sense of guilt. I can't stand the idea of them feeling completely helpless against things that aren't even real—you know, those weird little rituals and superstitions that honestly mean something totally different to a kid than they ever would to an adult? I want them to have a childhood free from all that heavy, imaginary nonsense.

Wait, isn't your first bolded point basically a total contradiction of the second one? How can you even argue both at the same time?
Doesn't Santa Claus basically just reward the "good" kids, though? I mean, isn't he just this imaginary figure anyway, and doesn't that leave a kid feeling totally helpless, like their whole happiness is just tied up to some guy who might not even exist?😁

So, I’ve been sitting here wondering—how exactly does the Church and its congregation actually deal with people from different faiths, or even with the LGBTQ+ community and women? Like, what is the actual vibe when you step inside those doors? Is there any real room for anyone who doesn't fit that one specific, traditional mold, or is it all just a closed circle? It makes you wonder how they navigate all that tension, right?🤣

And honestly, when you talk about "fixing mistakes" in your version of things—isn't that basically just a fancy way of describing total submission? Is there even a difference anymore?
The concept of penance is one of those heavy, deep topics that people love to throw around when they want to sound righteous, isn't it? It’s more than just feeling bad about a mistake; it’s this whole ritualistic process of trying to make things right through some kind of self-imposed struggle. You see it all over history—people thinking that if they suffer enough, maybe God will finally look their way and wipe the slate clean. It’s like this intense, psychological attempt at a reset button. In the American tradition, you see these echoes everywhere, from the way people approach public apologies to how religious groups handle atonement. It’s that idea that an apology is empty unless there’s some sort of "price" paid to balance the scales. Is it actually about fixing what was broken, though? Or is it just a way for someone to soothe their own conscience so they can sleep better at night without that nagging guilt hanging over them? Honestly, sometimes it feels like we’re just performing for an audience, whether that audience is a congregation or just our own judgmental inner voices. It’s a wild, complicated cycle of guilt, sacrifice, and the desperate hope for a second chance.

So, should you sign the kid up for religious studies classes or not? Honestly, it’s one of those deeply personal choices that nobody really needs to be breathing down your neck about. It feels like people love to jump on the bandwagon and bash these programs based on their own lack of understanding or just straight-up hypocrisy, doesn't it? Especially when all that criticism is fueled by some deep-seated resentment toward anything that looks different from what they're used to—it honestly makes zero sense to me. Why turn a simple parental decision into a massive ideological battlefield just because you can't handle diversity?

Quentin Tarantino:

I don't even know where to start with this one, honestly. Is anyone else seeing this? It’s like we’re all just collectively pretending that what happened today was normal, when in reality, it was absolutely wild. I mean, really, how did we get here? You look around and you see people acting like everything is business as usual, but if you actually take a second to breathe and process the sheer absurdity of the situation, it’s enough to make your head spin. Am I crazy? Or is there something fundamentally broken in the way we’re all processing things right now? It feels like we’re living in some kind of fever dream where the rules change every five minutes and nobody bothers to tell the rest of us. It’s exhausting, truly. Just constant, low-grade chaos wrapped up in a bow of "don't worry about it." But I am worried about it! How can you not be? kaže: The harder the system tries to brainwash my kid and force some religious agenda down their throat, the harder I’m going to fight for our right to think differently. Honestly, I don't have any problem standing my ground on that. Every action has a reaction, right? Look, I’m not out here trying to force my views down my kid's throat, but I sure as hell am not going to let anyone else do it for me either. If some textbook claims "facts" like we all go to Midnight Mass for Christmas, I’m going to make damn sure my child knows that isn't how our house works. I won't be that parent who just shrugs and says, "Well, if the school book says so, I guess we're heading to church." Not happening. Honestly, if it didn't say we were supposed to go, I wouldn't even bother bringing it up. It's the same deal when she's sitting in a religious studies class—even if she's not officially enrolled—and comes back home rambling about something they talked about; naturally, I’m going to give her my honest take on it. If she wasn't sitting in that classroom in the first place, we wouldn't even have to have the conversation, right? It's just common sense. Honestly, after twenty-five years of being constantly hassled by everyone pushing those Catholic values down my throat, I’ve pretty much reached a point where I just want nothing to do with the whole thing. It’s like, if you spend two and a half decades being badgered from every single angle by religious dogma, how could anyone expect anything other than an absolute, total rejection? I mean, can you really blame me? It’s all just a direct consequence of their own actions, isn't it?

"We're heading out to watch the midnight mass on Christmas Eve." Look, when you're out in the world, it’s all about learning those old-school traditions. Should we really be stripping kids of all those "facts"—which, let's be honest, are mostly just cultural customs these days—just because our lifestyles have shifted so much since our parents' generation?

With all due respect here, views on faith and religion are strictly a personal thing, sure, but the fact that our folk customs and traditions are deeply intertwined with the church is just an objective historical reality in America. If we start withholding that context from our kids, aren't we just setting them up for an intellectual handicap later on?