Posts by Daniel Chase13

wearyowl29 said:Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it does not demand its own way, it is not irritable...

Love is just love!👍

Exactly.

God—Jesus Christ Himself—is the very essence of Love and Truth.

That’s why He reveals the nature of sin to us out of pure love; He shows us the subtle traps set by Satan, those clever ways he tries to bind people spiritually and turn them into slaves to their own mistakes.

I just finished watching this Kennedy-esque video

https://www.facebook.com/duspara.elv...9132667063836/

Jessica Miller51 said:Nobody expects anything from you, except for you to stop selling smoke and mirrors....
Take care... 👋

Best regards.

Look, I'm not here to live up to anyone else's expectations or cater to what they want to hear. 👋

So, looks like Kennedy is planning to go live soon...

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?f...type=3&theater

Jessica Miller51 said:I don't expect to waste my time arguing against your attempts to debunk established facts... 👎

Honestly, I wasn't expecting anything from you to begin with. 👋

Charles Gonzalez19 said:<sigh>

Atheism is perhaps the greatest fallacy out there—but let's be clear: those atheists who genuinely believe in it and argue from a place of sincerity aren't being dishonest. They aren't liars; they are simply people who truly believe what they hold to be true.

Well, I finally managed to wrap my head around the announcement for the upcoming public lecture by Elvis Presley

Charles Gonzalez19 said:So, why on earth are you so aggressively hyping up and promoting this guy:
1) who you straight-up call a liar
2) who thinks you're basically a satanist (along with anyone else who actually knows Earth is a globe)

1. I don't label people as liars just because they sincerely believe in certain hypotheses—regardless of whether those ideas are actually true or if I personally agree with them.

For instance, things like atheism, abiogenesis, the Big Bang, or macroevolution—to me, these ideas just don't hold water. But the people who believe in them and present arguments for why they do? I don't by any means consider them liars. I'm not a Flat Earther myself, but it doesn't bother me at all if someone else believes in that and chooses to publicly promote their viewpoint.

If someone were treating you the way they treat Elvis Presley, I’d stand up for you regardless of what you believed. That's just how I was raised.
An atheist isn't my enemy, nor is a Flat Earther.

2. People can think whatever they want about me—whether it's Elvis Presley or anyone else.

Anyway, let’s get back to discussing Elvis Presley—after all, he’s the main topic here.

New Dusparin video:

https://www.facebook.com/duspara.elv...00005063086780

Jessica Miller51 said:You need to learn how to actually use Denagigija. Since you don't, you just end up looking clumsy while trying to spin lies to convince people. You're basically tripping over your own feet. You insult people in almost every other post simply because they’re telling the truth about a fraud. You're nuking your own credibility over nothing, all because you can't keep your aggression in check while defending your ego.👎

It's an insult and a lie wrapped into one. Even someone totally oblivious would have realized by now that this isn't the truth either.👎

🤦Is this really how you try to drum up business?... 🙄

And the worst part: reading your posts, I can see how obsessed you are with cannibalism. What is wrong with you? Why do you bring that up, read about it, and accuse forum members of supporting it in every second post?🤦

I'd suggest changing your public persona. There are people here who actually use their brains and saw through your clumsy attempts to hide behind someone else's mask a long time ago. You even make the exact same grammatical mistakes as Elvis Presley... 🤦 Instead of taking the high road and bowing out with dignity, you chose to insult them. You're using a deceptive tactic that isn't nearly as subtle as you think it is... 👎

🤦

Did anyone else catch that absolute nonsense she just dropped? It was completely unprovoked, too.

Now, regarding Elvis Presley—let me say this one more time, since apparently, it's such a hard concept to grasp:

I didn't start the thread about Elvis Presley, nor did it ever cross my mind to do so.

I am simply posting links related to threads that other members have already started.

Since the discussion about Elvis Presley is already live, I'm just providing links that pertain to it.

wearyowl29 said:Honestly, every single thing you post is just a glowing tribute to some self-important sheep, clearly defending them at every turn. It’s pretty obvious there’s some kind of affection—if not a full-blown crush—behind all this.

I remember back in elementary school, we learned that if you strike an anvil hard enough with a hammer, you get a spark.
The mental hammering going on in this thread right now is clearly coming from a place of deep bias and sheer stubbornness.

Keep having a blast...👍

🤦

Honestly, how is it even possible for someone with a healthy mind to walk away from a discussion like this with ideas centered around sexual perversions?

I wouldn't be shocked if those twisted takes were coming from some anxious teenager going through puberty who's completely lost in a porn addiction—but this? Good grief!

Where do these baseless, unprovoked outbursts even come from? They feel like they could only originate from a mind consumed by sexual deviance.

wearyowl29 said:Action and reaction.

Your obsession with that pompous guy is showing.
Just keep on loving him and defending his honor like a devoted partner.🙂

🤦

Let me try saying this one more time, since it seems to be such a struggle to grasp:

I didn't start the thread about Elvis Presley, nor did it even cross my mind to do so.
All I'm doing is posting links related to the topic that other members here already kicked off.

Where does this unprovoked, baseless hostility come from? Honestly, it feels like it could only stem from someone with some seriously warped fixations.

wearyowl29 said:Here we see a massive overreaction to some minor figure who’s clearly just throwing out nonsense to grab headlines. Honestly, writing about them with this much intensity feels like nothing more than a side effect of OCD.

Honestly, the only people posting with this kind of heated intensity are those who are obsessed with Elvis Presley—people who just can't handle seeing links that actually relate back to the main discussion topic.
It's textbook bias.

It’s actually quite interesting—people who know Elvis Presley personally, since they live in his neck of the woods, actually voted him into office as their local councilman.

Maybe, on a private level, Elvis Presley is someone people truly trust—which would explain why his neighbors chose him to be their representative at the polls.

Charles Gonzalez19 said:Look, it's not your fault. You aren't responsible for your constant stream of "unsubstantiated, brainless, biased, and straight-up sadistic rants" on the subject, even when people throw actual facts in your face.

Honestly, my conscience won't let me pin this on "unstable, deeply miserable people who need this kind of outlet just to get a momentary mental break."

Seriously, go see a therapist. And regardless of what Elvis Presley and those other Flat Earthers tell you, do not go drinking urine. Flat Earth health advice is dangerous as hell—it can literally kill you.

🤣 👍

Honestly, looking at how some people communicate here—especially with that refusal to actually connect the dots back to the main topic—it makes you wonder who really needs the professional guidance in this conversation.

To be fair, people who actually know Dawkins personally—since they grew up in his neighborhood—voted him into the local city council during the last elections.
It’s possible that, on a private level, Dawkins is someone people truly trust, which might explain why his neighbors backed him at the polls.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/local-election-coverage-highlights-90271/

https://www.nytimes.com/news/article/local-government-updates-20130701

Charles Gonzalez19 said:Seriously, even if you already realized all this was just fake news from some trashy tabloid or a bunch of Trump fanatics (or both), are you really still playing dumb?
And let's not forget how hypocritically you dodge any mention of the Eucharist. By definition, that’s actual cannibalism, but I guess as a Catholic, you're too embarrassed to admit that's a core part of your faith. Where does this, to quote you, insane urge to spread lies about other people come from? Is it just a way to distract everyone from your own massive shortcomings?

You spent all that time hyping up your idol Elvis Presley and his buddy Dave Murphy, who literally drinks and washes in his own urine. Now you're just being a coward, hiding behind fake stories about everyone else.

It isn't my fault that certain modern-day atheists shamelessly push this twisted ideology regarding the consumption of human flesh—including children and the deceased.

wearyowl29 said:Man, you must be head over heels for him...

🤣

That kind of statement is really just a product of a biased imagination.

Let me try saying this one more time—since it seems to be such a struggle to grasp and accept:

I didn't start the thread about Dawkins, nor did it ever cross my mind to do so.

Since the discussion about Dawkins is already underway, I'm simply adding his latest material and public appearances to the mix—leaving it up to everyone else to form their own opinions.

Hannah Alvarez2 said:Look at this guy, he's a total clown. You actually believe that when an altar boy rings that bell and the priest lifts up a tiny piece of unleavened bread, that little bit of bread suddenly becomes THE FLESH OF JESUS! 😲😲😲
Isn't that literally the definition of transmutation? 🙂
And then you just sit there staring at it, licking your lips, thinking, "Man, I love this so much I could just eat it all up, yum yum."🤦
That’s probably why they don't let you bite the host—so you don't hear your teeth cracking, right?😂
But here you are, lecturing me about Dawkins and some "morbid obsession with eating people."
Buddy, if you're a good Catholic, you're basically doing that once a week!🐔

So, let me ask you—do you actually find the ideas some modern atheists have about cannibalism—even involving children or the deceased—to be appealing?

Bryan King3 said:Reading from the Holy Gospel according to John: Whoever eats my body and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day. My body is true food, and my blood is true drink.

It is honestly mind-blowing how someone from Krscan—basically a Krscan-cannibal at this point—is the one throwing accusations of cannibalism at others!
A normal, rational person would never even entertain the idea of "eating human flesh and drinking blood."
But for a follower of Krscan, this isn't just an idea—it's been ingrained in them; it’s actually a core part of their identity and their entire belief system.

🤣

Don't act like you don't see what's happening. Stop playing dumb.

It’s pretty obvious who holds those dark, morbid convictions about consuming human flesh—whether we're talking about infants or the deceased.

There's a certain group of people who seem to share the same mindset as Richard Dawkins—they're obsessed with breaking every taboo and pushing the boundaries of what's acceptable regarding cannibalism.