Posts by mistypanther81

Let me rephrase what I posted on the other forum:

- I honestly doubt the Supreme Court of Austria would have handed down a ruling like this if Brexit hadn't happened—it’s that much of a catalyst for euroskepticism. And let's be real, there wouldn't even be a Brexit if it weren't for the migrant crisis. That crisis wouldn't exist if we weren't dealing with years of the Syrian drama—which has essentially become a playground for warring superpowers. Then again, that whole Syrian mess wouldn't be happening if it weren't for the pyromaniac policies of the USA in Africa and the Middle East.

- This brings me right back to my thesis from early 2012: "Syria as a catalyst for regional and global processes."

In that sense, Syria is effectively "choosing" the Austrian president, just as Syria "voted" for Brexit. Indirectly, Syria is determining elections and political decisions.

Simply put, we are witnessing the "Syrianization" of the Old Continent—and God help us, the entire planet.

bluerider63 said:There’s no way this decision was just some random whim. All those New Age nonsense trends are being bankrolled by none other than the CIA.

The problem is this sect doesn't define the antichrist as an individual, but rather as any "false religion"—which, conveniently, means everything except themselves. This kind of logic paves the way for the genocide and cultural erasure we see in the Middle East, simply because followers of this ideology become ethically numb to such atrocities. To make matters worse, they view that kind of brutal savagery as nothing more than "God's plan."

They’re extremists on an ideological level, plain and simple.

There’s really no need to dig any deeper into the reasoning behind this decision—it's pretty self-explanatory. This extremist cult spreads nothing but hate toward other traditional faiths, and their interpretations are frankly radical. Their ideology aligns perfectly with groups like the Islamic State.

Once again, I am fully backing the ruling from the US court.

What do the architects behind ISIS—the US administration, the Zionists, and those Wahhabi monarchies—all share? A deep, extreme hatred for humanity. ISIS is simply the visible manifestation of their hidden, inner misanthropy.

The US establishment, the Zionists, and the Wahhabis belong to the same civilizational circle—one soul, one faith.

Three eyes in a single head.

briskstag22 said:

Former US General and Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, Wesley Clark, didn't mince words in a recent CNN interview: “Our allies and friends created ISIS just to take out Hezbollah!” It’s pretty clear the Israeli state hasn't moved past its 2006 defeat. They know their real threat in the neighborhood is the Lebanese resistance movement, Hezbollah. "Look, our allies and friends funded the rise of ISIS," Clark said. "People in this region will tell you: if you want someone to fight to the death against Hezbollah, you aren't going to put up a promotional poster saying, 'Come to us, we'll build a better world!' No, you're going to hunt down fanatics and religious fundamentalists. They'll fight Hezbollah. It's like Frankenstein!" These comments from the former NATO commander are basically an echo of what Israeli officials have been saying for ages—that Israel's primary enemies are Syria, Iran, and Hezbollah, while groups like ISIS and Al-Qaeda aren't the true existential threat to their regime. "Tehran, Damascus, Beirut—those are the biggest dangers," says outgoing Israeli Ambassador to the USA, Michael Oren. Speaking to the Jerusalem Post and CNN, he noted that the bad guys backed by Iran are far worse for Israel than the ones Iran doesn't support. http://croative.net/?p=27860

So now the world is stuck with two Frankensteins—Al-Qaeda and ISIS—spreading everywhere. How do we stop them? That’s a question the Democratic architects in Washington, D.C. are going to have to answer. Republicans have been sounding the alarm for a long time about the failed policies of Hillary Clinton and Obama. By backing the Arab Spring and helping topple secular regimes across the Middle East, they essentially opened a Pandora's box. Out came the worst demons of radical Islam. And let's be real: you can't get rid of those demons with exorcisms or airstrikes. You need ground military interventions, which is exactly what the Republican-led Congress and Senate are calling for, while the Obama administration keeps digging its heels in, trying to fix everything through diplomacy and more air strikes. Islamists have already taken over Iraq, Syria, and Libya. Now they're knocking on Europe's door via Turkey, where thousands of Islamists are entering under the guise of refugees. Algeria is becoming just as unstable. Is it really just a matter of time before that country falls to ISIS too?

"Democrats are to blame, and the Republicans will make it all right". Hahahaha! Pure Republican nonsense—an incredibly dim-witted spin...🤦

- Both monsters are products of American administrations, regardless of whether you're looking at the so-called "Democrats" or "Republicans." In fact, the groundwork for ISIS was actually laid by the so-called "Republicans" when they teamed up with their Democratic partners on the Arabian Peninsula for that monumental "The Redirection. Together, they reached the "lucid realization" that Sunni extremists were the "lesser evil" compared to Shiites—who, from Iran to Hezbollah, are extremely hostile toward Israel—so they decided to "rein them in" while simultaneously courting Wahhabi partners to create a "new reality."

USA + Wahhabi monarchies + AIPAC = "Islamic State".