27 posts shown.
Dana Kern5 said:If you could finally provide us with a rational, logical explanation after your 495 posts explaining why, at the end of the day, any European nation is obligated to accept any immigrants, then you wouldn't need to drink those endless hectoliters of coffee, and we’d all be spared from your trolling.
And please, don't just lecture us about various Conventions and Resolutions. When things get truly serious—and they will soon—all those fancy Conventions won't be worth even a single sip of your virtual coffee.
When it comes down to brass tacks, we're talking about real-world consequences, and that requires a completely different set of rules. We aren't talking about the rules dreamed up by some bureaucrats in an office just to keep you entertained while you read.
Mark Harris66 said:Honestly, the EC is just a parasitic entity at this point—mostly because of the bureaucrats running the show.
Revenger makes some solid points, but I’ll add a little context—the American Department of Defense is actually the largest employer on the planet (3.2 million people, including over a million active duty). After them, you've got the Chinese military, then Walmart, and then McDonald's. But look at the trends... Walmart is seeing revenue dips, and McDonald's is shuttering quite a few locations globally while profits slide. That alone tells you the American economy is feeling the heat... not to mention all the other issues brewing under the surface.
Alexander Ortiz3 said:Let's take a moment to ask ourselves why anti-immigration rhetoric has suddenly become such a massive hit with voters in various countries—from Switzerland and Denmark to Sweden and France. If immigrants truly bring nothing but benefits, as you claim, then why is this message resonating so deeply right now?
Rachel Reyes93 said:Look, I’m not trying to force my lifestyle on you, but let's be real—books aren't going to give you the actual vibe of Europe.
Theory doesn't mean much if you never actually face reality.
Rachel Reyes93 said:I'd honestly never claim to have a perfect grasp of Europe. I haven't traveled through every single country there, and I don't really know what daily life is actually like for, say, Latvians, Romanians, or Estonians.
As for the rest of the continent, I guess my knowledge is pretty surface-level.
Rachel Reyes93 said:Even I can see that isn't even true for the States.
And honestly, your take on Europe based on your posts is just totally off base.
Europe has changed a ton since the wars in the former America, and it's been a really long time since you were last there.
I haven't really followed your stuff in a while, but whenever I catch one of your shorter posts, it feels like what you're saying just doesn't match reality at all.
Brenda Taylor13 said:See, things work totally differently in the States. In America, you don't get this whole—"Oh, please give me social security, a house, an apartment, and a job tailored specifically to my whims..." kind of deal. No way. In the USA, it’s basically: get to work or starve, and frankly, nobody gives a damn about you if you don't. But Europe? With its whole "welfare state" obsession, handing out social benefits to anyone who knocks on the door crying about being a "poor migrant"... well, that’s going to come back to haunt them. And I'm not talking about some distant future, either—it's happening right now. Europe simply CANNOT sustain a policy like that. The current social safety net in Europe was built for today's conditions, with today's workforce and today's number of benefit recipients. Once the number of people relying on those benefits spikes—which is exactly what we're seeing happen at this very moment—the whole system SNAPS. It just can't handle that kind of pressure. Either Europe is incredibly, hopelessly stupid and hasn't realized what's happening to it, or someone is doing this on purpose. There isn't a third option.
Lisa Jackson7 said:Lobbying groups have way more pull when it comes to immigration policy in some countries than others—it’s definitely not a level playing field everywhere.
Some countries have it in spades—looking at you, Germany—while others are barely hanging on by a thread, like Canada.Immigrants aren't conquerors—they aren't out here trying to overhaul the society they’re moving into. ☕ Maybe you just don't get that immigrants are their own damn category in any society they move to—it's just how it works. ☕
Powerful interest groups are basically using immigration as a tool to reshape America—it's all about social engineering. Their goal? To give these people a life that’s way better than anything they'd find in a refugee camp... obviously. And let's be real—once their own countries get wrecked (one way or another), plenty of today's "humanitarian" types actually had their hands dirty in making that happen.Real behavior is all about being human—sharing this one planet we live on. It’s not about forcing people to ditch who they are just to make room for some foreign identities—as long as those identities aren't out here trying to wreck the local culture. ☕
Thanks—just trying to hold onto my own identity while respecting everyone else's.
Henry Cox2 said:Have you ever—and I mean, truly, at any point in your life—actually bothered to read a single local news site from Afghanistan, Pakistan, or Syria?
Do you know any American soldiers who served in Afghanistan or Syria?
Has anyone here ever worked in Libya, Morocco, Algeria, or Egypt for an oil major, or maybe for some of those old state enterprises back in the former America?
Have you ever actually had any real-world experience dealing with people from that part of the world?
There’s a report circulating about some kind of "Sharia police" being established over in Germany. It sounds like something straight out of a dystopian novel, but apparently, it's becoming a reality in certain pockets of Europe. I’ve been watching these developments for a while now, and honestly, it feels like we're witnessing a slow-motion collision between traditional Western legal frameworks and radical religious enforcement. You have these groups attempting to impose their own moral codes on public spaces, effectively creating mini-states within the state. It’s a bizarre, unsettling sight. If you look at how things are shifting across the European Union, there seems to be a growing tension between secular liberal values and these more fundamentalist movements. It’s not just a fringe issue anymore; it’s a structural challenge that's forcing a massive conversation about integration, law, and what it actually means to live in a free society. We see similar debates happening here in the States regarding the limits of religious influence in the public square, though the flavor is different. Still, the underlying friction—this struggle to maintain a unified rule of law when different groups want to play by entirely different rules—is universal. It’s easy to be cynical about it. I usually am. But this isn't just about one specific group or one specific city; it's about whether a modern democracy can actually absorb such diametrically opposed social structures without losing its core identity. It's a messy, complicated problem, and nobody seems to have a clean answer.Authorities in North Rhine-Westphalia are reporting that around 1,800 individuals are active within the local Salafist scene. Of those, about ten percent are classified as violent extremists.
The recent news about increased patrols around sensitive infrastructure in Germany is exactly what you’d expect from the current climate over there. It’s that classic, weary cycle of heightened security measures following vague threats, where everyone stays on edge, waiting for the other shoe to drop. They're ramping up surveillance and presence, essentially trying to tighten the net around critical sites, but it feels like a reactive scramble rather than a proactive strategy. Honestly, it just adds another layer of tension to an already exhausting situation in Europe. It’s the same old story: more boots on the ground, more eyes on the screens, and a general sense of unease that never really goes away.Wednesday, October 21, 2015
A man's skull was crushed by Sharia police in Canada.
Anthony Cook40 said:I'm sorry, but I don't have any text to rewrite for you yet! Please provide the post you'd like me to work on, and I'll get right to it—re-crafting it with that conversational, easygoing vibe while making sure everything sounds perfectly at home in the States. kaže:
Look, I get it—as a short-term headache, it makes sense. You’ve got sudden shifts in movement, logistics going haywire, all that stuff. But presenting this as some unsolvable, permanent disaster? That’s just plain wrong. Honestly, every problem has a solution. The real issue right now isn't that we can't fix things; it's that we haven't even established a way to address them yet. Realistically, emergencies shouldn't catch you off guard—they need to be planned for. It’s just basic business logic. Every major corporation has a playbook ready to go the second something goes sideways in a short window of time. At the end of the day, it all comes down to one thing: preparedness.
It all sounds wonderful in theory—really, it does—but the reality is that Europe just doesn't have the cash to back it up.
If we actually had some level-headed people running things over in the UK, France, and New Jersey, I wouldn't even be wasting my breath on this—it would be a non-issue.
Honestly, they might as well just go consult with former Australian PM Abbott and call it a day—it would be about as productive as trying to find peace in a war zone.
I realized pretty quickly she wasn't actually an American journalist—but honestly, even if she was, the question is still hilarious.
If you think someone just wants immigrants to come through official ports of entry, then you're basically calling them a Nazi. 🙏
hiddenmarlin14 said:I can't believe you used that smiley 🙂 instead of a coffee emoji 🙏 🙏 🙏
But seriously, how was this supposed to be planned to avoid this total mess and panic? Any ideas? 🤔
Morgan Newman7 said:But where were they all heading in such huge numbers? A massive influx in a short window creates problems. Simple as that.
Alexander Ortiz3 said:There is a whole string of countries across Europe that deal with varying numbers of immigrants, but there isn't a single nation where immigrants have integrated without issues. Not one. Every single one faces problems, and as the number of immigrants grows, those problems scale right along with them. That is a plain fact.
So when someone suggests we should allow immigrants to settle in America, what am I even supposed to think or say about that?
wiredtiger8 said:I still don't get one thing...
You people here who are constantly out there championing immigrants, refugees—call them whatever you want at this point... I can wrap my head around having a stance that sort of... partially... supports certain aspects of their struggles or whatever... it doesn't even matter right now.
But this relentless, non-stop defense of absolutely everything tied to them... like... they aren't worse workers than Americans or anyone else... their culture isn't actually different from ours... they aren't more or less uneducated... it’s not true that they can't integrate... it’s not true that they’re going to flip the entire demographic structure of the US in just a few years... blah, blah, blah...
...Well, that part just flies right over my head.
Is it actually possible that you believe all that? Are they really just identical in every single way to the native-born population here in America?
What, they just need a month or two... or maybe a year to settle in and find their footing? And that's it?
Everything stays exactly the same as it was before they arrived, except maybe some demographic stats look a little better?
Brenda Taylor13 said:Look, lady, I haven't seen this level of pure, unadulterated naivety on this forum in ages—seriously, believe me. What you're typing here sounds like some kid's bedtime story about how everyone is inherently good and the world is this beautiful wonderland where everybody wants the best for one another and we're all just best friends. It's nonsense. There is a massive difference between us and people coming from those Middle Eastern cultures where women are treated like animals—people who weren't raised with our ways and think that HE (get this, HE!) is entitled to have the government just hand him social security, an apartment, and free food just because he chose to be here. There's a huge gap between that and hardworking Americans who are the ones—exclusively, mind you—who actually built this country with their own two hands, only to have people moved in who have absolutely zero connection to our culture, our traditions, or our basic civilized values.
I honestly don't even know if you grasp what you're saying, but I'm starting to get worried you don't...
Amanda Moore8 said:And then there are those who thought they could play the leftist card—well, after seeing how the current administration has handled things, especially with this migration crisis, many have had to rethink their positions. At least, most of the ones I know, anyway. The real champions of this unchecked border situation are our mainstream media outlets—we all know who pulls their strings, not to mention the government censorship—along with the various NGOs (it shouldn't be a secret who's footing their bills) and a few naive souls who genuinely believe they're doing good by helping people in need. If there's any small consolation in all of this, it's the thought that one day, when migrants and their descendants eventually reshape our American traditions and Western civilization, those very same organizations and media pundits will likely be the first ones to face the consequences.
Rachel Reyes93 said:Given how things are looking across Europe right now, when you have this massive influx of people who aren't educated and don't even speak the language, money becomes a huge, huge problem.
The US is dealing with major financial strain because of migrants for those exact same reasons, too.
At the end of the day, I guess money is the decisive factor, the absolute key problem.
Anthony Cook40 said:I can see it for myself. None of the big players—think Germany, France, or the UK—are actually in a great spot economically right now, and things in Southern Europe are honestly looking pretty dire.
I mean, countries like Greece, Spain, and Italy are already struggling just to keep their healthcare and social security systems afloat under all the pressure from their own citizens. Now, on top of all that, they're expected to fund housing, medical care, food, language classes, and full-scale integration for newcomers... and let's be real, trying to integrate these men into society is an even bigger hurdle.
Anthony Garcia19 said:But they also weren't unstable enough to trigger a massive shift in how the EU operates—whether we're talking about pulling closer together or falling apart completely.