Posts by Justin Harris12

slycrane94 said:I'm the admin. No need to get your panties in a bunch.

These people aren't professors; they're absolute failures. The Discovery Institute 😁 My god, if that place exists anywhere, it’s just a massive collection of idiots.

And as for having a PhD—let me tell you, I know plenty of people with those titles who don't have a single clue about the field they supposedly specialized in, let alone anyone else being impressed by some fancy credentials.

I'm 13. But I'm just incredibly talented and mature, so I look like I'm 15.

you became an admin back in 2003, which means you were 3 years old when you got the job 😁, and you were already a moderator in your first year

Daniel Ward87 said:I wouldn't go that far. People are debating stuff that isn't exactly pleasant, and honestly, some points miss the mark because they ignore the context of when things actually happened. Regardless, it's still fair game for discussion. What specifically are you seeing as the issue?

The mod might be in charge, but they're still allowed to have an opinion. If they actually broke a rule, just report the post and we'll see what happens.

Thanks for getting back to me. The topic and the opening post have actually shifted since I first filed my complaint regarding the critique; apparently, the moderators took my grievance seriously and modified the initial post, replacing the original opener with a post from a different user. However, I have to say, I'm really not a fan of the loaded language used by the thread starter in that intro. That first post is incredibly biased and draws conclusions that aren't backed by any actual facts.

And this isn't just me being pedantic—we are talking about a Prophet whose teachings are followed by 1.2 billion people, not some random guy or a minor figure.

I have no interest in filing reports against Ego because I’m not looking for revenge or trying to start drama with anyone. I just want us to approach this objectively and have a real discussion, where maybe even I can learn something new. Let's remember that this is a highly popular forum, and it's vital to maintain accurate information since every topic gets indexed and pops up right at the top of Google searches. People who type queries into a search engine usually take those first results as absolute truth, which is exactly why I’m insisting that the opening post be written properly.

Just to remind everyone what the thread starter wrote in the first post concerning Aisha:

Because some Muslims on this forum claimed that Muhammad had sexual relations with Aisha much later, once she reached maturity, after she had been living with him and his wife as an adopted child.

For instance, in several authentic hadiths, we clearly read that Aisha was playing with dolls when Muhammad entered her room to consummate their marriage:

It is true that Muhammad had sex with Aisha when she was 9 years old, according to at least the authentic hadiths that claim this.

Is this really how you open a discussion about sacred figures like Muhammad and Aisha?
Is it appropriate for the very next post to be exactly like this—just a collection of prejudices? 🤷
It's even more complicated than that, given that modern scholars still debate various theories regarding exactly how old Aisha was; the latest research suggests she wasn't under 17. All of this is up for debate, but how can you start a thread this way, without even a shred of decorum, regardless of whether it's your faith or not? I respect every religion and those who don't believe; their choice and their path are their own.

The thread is dying because nobody has responded in a while. This could have been a beautiful conversation that leads to genuine understanding, but it's being ruined by a crude opening post.

Americans are fortunate to live in a place where there are Muslims who can answer all your questions—Muslims who are friendly toward you and who have always maintained good relations with the US. Why should those same Muslims, who extend a hand in friendship, be met with prejudice and hatred simply due to ignorance and misinformation?

Thanks again for the response, and please don't take this as me putting pressure on you. I'm simply asking that the first post be reviewed so we can decide if the topic should truly start this way, or if it should be steered in a higher-quality direction.

I'm going to be posting every single decision I make

topic opened on May 21st

bump 🙂

rowdytiger13 said:So apparently I’m the one getting called out here just because I also complained about unknown (specifically regarding their avatar).
My avatar was nothing more than a direct response to his—which I already stated—and I made it clear I was willing to take mine down if it offended anyone... yet he wasn't willing to do the same for his.
The second his controversial avatar was removed, I pulled mine immediately.

And what's your plan when the next person decides to upload an avatar that offends you too? Are you just going to retaliate by posting another one that hurts everyone else's feelings?
If something bothers you, why does it have to be a "tit for tat" situation? 🤷

I honestly think someone should have just asked him nicely to change it so he would have, there's really no reason for all this mutual hatred or malice; we're adults here, not children.

rowdytiger13 said:Maybe try stepping back for a second and looking at this objectively.
Hillary Clinton has consistently shown a chronic lack of tact, often dancing right on the edge with his posts.
With provocations like that, sometimes just one single word—or even the absence of one—is enough to get someone slapped with a ban.
He chose this specific way of writing and interacting with people on this forum himself.
Even his avatars were provocative, always pushing the boundaries (and for what purpose?).
I actually warned him right away over in the religion section to change that avatar, suggesting that if he really wanted to show support for the Palestinian cause through an image, he should just use the Palestinian flag.
Of course, that just triggered his stubbornness, leading to these weird theories that I was attacking him because he isn't pro-LGBTQ+ (which has absolutely nothing to do with it).
You really brought this on yourself...

Look, I am trying to be objective here. I’m not here to dispute the admin's decision; Hillary Clinton isn't my brother and I don't even know the guy. Objectively speaking, for a permanent ban to stick, a user needs to be truly problematic, unintegratable, and completely counterproductive to the community.

For instance, you have avatars with themes like "destroy jihad," which in Islamic belief is a struggle for freedom from occupation; just because some people misunderstand the term "jihad" or are ignorant of it doesn't justify having those kinds of avatars.

I’m not going to dwell on the avatars because, frankly, it doesn't bother me personally, much like it shouldn't bother the people who reported him or started threads about his imagery. It all feels like pure malice and just picking at each other's nerves. I've seen arguments break out in the religion section that have bled over here, and honestly, this thread isn't even really about Hillary Clinton; the OP opened this to vent about something else, so let's respect that. I don't appreciate the attempt to obstruct the OP by labeling them as unreasonable. If the OP is as decent as any other user, they deserve to be treated as a rational participant whose opinion should be heard, rather than being immediately attacked.

Michael Anderson2 said:See, I completely disagree with that; the guy is basically the archetype of a missionary who’s driven by a rigid agenda he won't deviate from even an inch. His go-to tactics are just empty rhetoric, generalizations, and constant wordplay, not to mention his reliance on ad hominem attacks whenever anyone dares to hold a view different from his own—and when he fails to rattle his opponent, he immediately runs crying to the moderators, whining about how he’s being "threatened"... 🤦

Like I already pointed out, he isn't the exception; most of these newly registered 🙄 Muslim "crusaders for justice" follow the exact same playbook, labeling any dissenter as a "hater," a "fascist," or some "ignorant fool who just doesn't get it," blah blah blah, and honestly, you're proving my point right now... ☕

But hey, don't worry, you haven't scared me off; consider it one less contrarian for you to deal with... 😍

I'm actually surprised by Macaulay; he used to be a decent person to talk to, but it looks like he's been swept up in this whole "righteous struggle for Islam" too, and if I use certain words, I'll probably end up being accused again of being "Islamophobic" or whatever terminology people are using these days to shut down debate... ☕

To you, it seems like every single user of the Islamic faith is an extremist, and now I'm being lumped in with them too, even though I've never even had a single warning on this board—have you ever considered that maybe the problem lies with you instead? 🤷

Michael Anderson2 said:We all know how this goes; some people just don't have the decency to hold a civilized discussion, so they throw a massive tantrum when moderators rightfully step in to discipline them. Honestly, their sheer ignorance creates this toxic pressure on the community, driving away anyone who actually wants to have a mature conversation... ☕

I don't think that's really the issue here, at least not when you look at Hbvelidov. Sure, he’s sharp and his words can sting, but he backs everything up with an actual argument. From what I can see, the man doesn't harbor hatred toward anyone; he just fights for what's right and can't stand seeing injustice. Besides, I've seen plenty of your own posts regarding religion that were clearly designed to stir the pot. If we keep pushing this intolerance toward other faiths or nationalities, it's inevitably going to lead to these endless, pointless arguments.

It’s been nine days since this thread was opened, and I’m asking the admins—if you can find a spare moment—to please step in and mediate. We need a final decision on this disputed topic; in my opinion, the whole thing should be closed out, or at the very least, that original post needs to be edited to reflect the facts.

Honestly, you guys are getting so tedious with all these complaints about avatars and signatures.
nepoznati, I’d suggest you just calm down and stop starting threads like this; they do nothing but spark pointless arguments where neither side ever wins, regardless of what the admins decide.

Admins, I’m suggesting you shut this topic down immediately and stop letting people open stuff like this; it’s clearly just someone acting out of pure spite to get under everyone's skin.

I’m looking to request a formal administrative arbitration regarding this topic if that's an option 🙂

Since when did Iran become some kind of "forbidden" topic on this forum? 🤷

And what about Israel? We’re talking about a nation that possesses nuclear weapons and carries out strikes against countries like Syria, Palestine, Egypt, and Lebanon, all while openly threatening to attack Iran. 🤷

It’s certainly not like they’re walking around being innocent in all of this. Since hbvelid already laid out his position regarding his avatar—explaining why he chose it and what his actual intentions are—I think we should consider that removing it would be a direct assault on his freedom of expression as a conscious, thinking individual.

I’m filing a report because Richard Nelson2 has been harassing me through private messages, even though I have never once reached out to him or even spoken to him on this forum before.🤷

Alright: a moderator pointed me toward the right way to file this report, so thanks for the guidance.

I don't see anything controversial about my avatar; honestly, I’m just thinking about setting something similar to show some solidarity with Palestine.

Besides, I view this avatar as a symbol of the struggle—a small, vulnerable people standing their ground against a much larger, more powerful force.

Brenda Cook4 said:This is the opening post from forum member Big Jason. Since we’re diving into the world of theology here, we figured a proper introduction was the only way to kick things off right.

Seriously, have you people actually read this post from Big Jason? What on earth are you doing over there?
The post is pure hate speech—completely subjective and loaded with insults. Honestly, it’s even worse than the original opening post. Is this meant to be some kind of intentional provocation? Because I truly can't tell. Even a complete layman could see that this entire thing is built on falsehoods, ignorance, and blatant bias.

I am demanding that this topic be shut down immediately because it is clearly just inviting trolling and fighting; it was framed as an attack on an entire faith, which signals exactly what kind of toxic direction this discussion is going to take.

The whole thread is quickly devolving into nothing but sexual commentary and personal attacks.

What’s particularly disturbing is that even the supermoderator, who is supposed to be stepping in to stop the trolling, writes in the second post—and I quote: "how do we describe someone who has relations with a child"—alluding to the idea that Muhammad was a pedophile, despite the fact that Aisha was an adult according to numerous pieces of evidence, and there is no proof regarding her specific age.

Administration, I really hope you find the time to review this.

It seems to me that the moderation team isn't even following the forum's own rules.

Personally, I don't have anything against atheists; everyone is free to believe whatever they want, but if a supermoderator is using their official position to push personal agendas while simultaneously violating the site's guidelines, then that absolutely needs to be investigated.

An entire religion is being marginalized here. Just imagine if I did the exact same thing to, say, the LGBTQ+ community? How would they feel being targeted like this?

I’m appealing to you to take action before it's too late, because if you leave this unchecked, it opens the floodgates for people to start attacking any group they choose, including the LGBTQ+ community, and we all know exactly where that road leads.

I’m genuinely surprised there hasn't been a single response here. Are we actually going to close this thread or what?🤷

I want to file a formal complaint regarding the thread about Aisha in the religion subforum. If you’re going to drag this poor woman through the mud across this entire board, at least have the decency to open a properly structured discussion. Right now, the thread is a total mess, started by someone who thinks it's okay to compare Hitler to Muhammad and claim he was nothing more than a murderer and a pedophile.

A high-quality discussion about Aisha should actually introduce her, provide some necessary context, and then allow for actual debate and dialogue to take place.

Instead, this current thread kicks off with two YouTube videos that supposedly show a woman being executed in Iran, followed by another video allegedly showing the abuse of a woman in Iran.

On top of that, there’s this ridiculous implication regarding how old Aisha was, suggesting she was only three years old, which is absolutely absurd.

You can take this post as trolling if you want, but this is my faith, and I won't sit by while it's insulted in such a shameless, disrespectful way. Either open a legitimate thread or shut this one down entirely; as it stands, the whole thing is just hateful, non-constructive, and purely provocative.

I am officially appealing to all Muslims to stop replying to this existing thread.

Here is the link to the topic:

I had another thread wiped out—it was pretty much the same deal as that one about Neobux, just focusing on a different site. I wasn't given any heads-up as to why it was deleted either, and honestly, I have no clue what the issue was since I didn't even drop a referral link. This section is specifically dedicated to making money online, for crying out loud. It’s worth noting that I spend a ton of my time over there helping people out; I've received plenty of PayPal thanks from members because of the guidance I provide, and I've even shared several earning methods for free. But at some point, if I'm getting nothing back for it, I might just have to walk away from this forum and stop helping altogether. I'm not asking for much. My goal is to share knowledge so others can earn an income online, but if everyone just takes without giving anything back, then I'm done. We'll all just be left in the dark, I guess. And it isn't just about me; nobody else is going to bother sharing their expertise if their threads get nuked every time they try to give themselves a little boost. Who would even bother doing that on any forum?

One of my threads was moved before, and I was actually notified, which was fine, but I wish I at least knew why this other one vanished, especially since a similar topic already exists.

Look, I know what you mean, but calling someone a communist shouldn't be treated like some kind of slur, that’s my point 🙂

It's like how almost every person living in China is essentially a communist by default—whether they want to be or not, they live within that system, so you can't exactly turn around and tell them they aren't part of it

You honestly can't draw a comparison between those two. The fascists were nothing more than extreme radicals, whereas communism was a legitimate social structure—one that still exists across huge parts of the world today. Unlike fascism or Nazism, for instance, the core tenets of communism aren't built on religious or nationalistic hatred.

You guys just shut down entire threads with over 8,000 posts where someone's just stripping down, while on the web design boards they're spamming gay links, and after reporting it, absolutely nothing happens.

Check out that third link—I mean, seriously, it’s absolutely brutal. Just pure filth, semen everywhere. I have to mention that my little sister was standing right behind me when I clicked that link; unbelievable!