CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › goldenjackal6 › Posts

Posts by goldenjackal6

99 posts shown.

Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
James Miller2 said:That is a cult. 😉

A cult of what?

Lisa Jackson7 said:So now that you've ditched that whole scientism dogma, you're acting all offended like people are "pigeonholing" you by calling you a scientist.

Don't be ashamed of what you believe...

Look, it isn't about some "creed of scientism"—it's literally just the only way to actually pin down objective truth. Scientism is basically just worshipping science as a deity, which has nothing to do with what bluemason3 was getting at.

Actually, if you look closely, plenty of Christians have baked scientism right into their religion. You see it all the time where these "Christian scientists" claim they've "proven" something through science just to give their religious arguments a little extra punch.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
Yeah, I honestly have to remind him (David Vaughn75) to actually read what he's looking at every other time he posts. He needs to work on his reading comprehension.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
neonmarlin39 said:Do you have any idea how many testimonies there are about people being healed from terminal illnesses? 🤣


We also can't overlook the fact that this guy is a massive believer—he actually thinks he’s a direct descendant of Jesus himself.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
Lisa Jackson7 said:Yeah.

From my point of view—and I’m not trying to be rude, just stating my take—living an atheist lifestyle seems pretty pointless, depressing, and aimless.

I'm not offended—honestly, faith used to just be something I did out of habit back in the day... but now, I'm a true Christian believer.

Since you were just sharing your own perspective, I don't think anyone should take it personally.

Bummer. I was really hoping that comparison wasn't totally off the mark, but I guess my gut was right after all.
goldenjackal6 said:Look, being forced to follow some political power is a totally different ballgame than daydreaming about gods. Just because the law holds you accountable doesn't mean you've suddenly become a religious person.

You hit the nail on the head right there. You've perfectly captured that massive, recurring issue with religion: people start devaluing actual human lives just to feed their own fantasies. That kind of warped logic is exactly how you end up with things like the Inquisition.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
James Miller2 said:I believe those personal testimonies aren't bad since they encourage people to change.
Human beings rarely change (unless something is life-threatening).
And improving one's life is necessary for health and survival.

How would you explain it if, for example, a doctor told someone they had an incurable disease, and then that disease vanished after prayer and fasting?
You cannot simply dismiss that as fantasy or positive thinking.

There are specific conditions and miracles required for shrines; I am not particularly familiar with them, so I cannot comment.

Look, illness doesn't just vanish because you're praying and skipping meals; that's just straight-up nonsense. If anything, fasting—which is basically just starving yourself and cutting out the nutrients your metabolism needs to actually work—can make things way worse. The only real exceptions would be specific gastrointestinal issues.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
James Miller2 said:Yes, to heal. 👍

You probably have your own set of prejudices about how my life should look or who I should be. I don't hold it against you.

Boldano—yeah, I hate you enough to actually give you some advice on what to do next. 🤣
You clearly have no idea what hatred actually is. Goodbye.

I might have biases, but I don't let them run my life because I’m not some self-righteous zealot.

James Miller2 said:Yes, to heal. 👍

You probably have your own set of prejudices about how my life should look or who I should be. I don't hold it against you.

Boldano—yeah, I hate you enough to actually give you some advice on what to do next. 🤣
You clearly have no idea what hatred actually is. Goodbye.

"Go get treated" is such top-tier advice, isn't it? Totally hasn't been used as a massive insult since the dawn of time, right?

James Miller2 said:Yes, to heal. 👍

You probably have your own set of prejudices about how my life should look or who I should be. I don't hold it against you.

Boldano—yeah, I hate you enough to actually give you some advice on what to do next. 🤣
You clearly have no idea what hatred actually is. Goodbye.

Maybe I don't know how it works in practice since I don't feel hatred myself, but I can spot it in other people from a mile away.

Dismissing people as worthless or empty just because you don't get them—simply because they don't share your narrow-minded delusions—is a textbook example of arrogance and xenophobia. It's a huge red flag that something is fundamentally broken with you. No one with a shred of common sense would reach the conclusions you're drawing.

When was the last time you actually had sex?
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
James Miller2 said:If I were feeling emotionally charged, I would probably dive headfirst into your correspondence with total intensity.
If you intend to continue provoking me in this manner, expect nothing but silence. I will simply ignore you. There won't be any further depth to my response.

The way I see your argument is that, as a believer, I shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion of my own.
I shared my honest thoughts on the atheistic worldview. That doesn't mean I harbor any hatred toward you all.
Some atheists are out there writing things about us believers that are even worse than usual. It’s relentless. Yet, I don't recall any single believer—aside from perhaps myself—ever actually inviting that kind of vitriol.

Being a believer doesn't mean I have to sit there and take insults from others. It certainly doesn't mean I have to tolerate any kind of psychological abuse. There is no requirement in my faith to accept being mistreated.

Thanks for the "compliments."
My advice is simple. You need to heal yourself first. Fix your own wounds and tend to that broken soul of yours that's screaming for help. Only once you've done that should you even attempt to communicate with the rest of the world.
If you don't change your mindset, you'll just keep running into nothing but trouble. You’ll end up attracting all sorts of toxic people and messy situations. It happens.

Wait, I'm the one who needs "healing"? You're out here judging people you don't even know based on a single label like "atheism," acting like their lives are just meaningless, aimless, and depressing.

It's pretty obvious you've got a massive grudge against atheists; otherwise, you wouldn't be carrying around these kinds of biases.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
James Miller2 said:Just relax.

First, take a breath. Go back to your own post. Read it again. Analyze the impression you actually left. Then, connect the dots and explain exactly why my post hits just as hard as yours.

Your perception is one thing. Someone else's reality is quite another.

Which religion condemns those who disagree? 🤔

Faith doesn't actually accomplish anything. It is the people that get the work done.

What specifically turned you off from faith?
Science, people, or something else entirely?

Can you write it?

I am a traveler on the road. Constant motion defines my existence. I move through the landscape, observing the asphalt stretching toward the horizon. There is a certain stillness found in the transit itself. It is not about the destination. It is about the rhythm of the journey. says:
For most atheists out there, this just isn't true.

Atheists and theists—though if you ask me, we’re all believers in something—share a certain commonality. Earthly authority sits above all else.
For theists, there is a distinct advantage in being able to relativize and challenge that earthly power through absolute authority.

Atheists (for the most part) lack that recourse.

bluemason3 was once a believer and remains one at heart; he simply swapped faiths. Now he identifies as a positivist, a physicalist, a naturalist, a scientist... some sort of blend of those things.

When you speak of earthly authority, are you referring to the government, the Constitution, or the legal system?

From my perspective, an atheistic way of life appears meaningless, depressing, and aimless. This isn't an insult, just my perception.

Don't try to project your emotional meltdown onto me just to justify some cheap ad hominem attack. It’s a low-rent tactic, and frankly, it isn't working.

James Miller2 said:Just relax.

First, take a breath. Go back to your own post. Read it again. Analyze the impression you actually left. Then, connect the dots and explain exactly why my post hits just as hard as yours.

Your perception is one thing. Someone else's reality is quite another.

Which religion condemns those who disagree? 🤔

Faith doesn't actually accomplish anything. It is the people that get the work done.

What specifically turned you off from faith?
Science, people, or something else entirely?

Can you write it?

I am a traveler on the road. Constant motion defines my existence. I move through the landscape, observing the asphalt stretching toward the horizon. There is a certain stillness found in the transit itself. It is not about the destination. It is about the rhythm of the journey. says:
For most atheists out there, this just isn't true.

Atheists and theists—though if you ask me, we’re all believers in something—share a certain commonality. Earthly authority sits above all else.
For theists, there is a distinct advantage in being able to relativize and challenge that earthly power through absolute authority.

Atheists (for the most part) lack that recourse.

bluemason3 was once a believer and remains one at heart; he simply swapped faiths. Now he identifies as a positivist, a physicalist, a naturalist, a scientist... some sort of blend of those things.

When you speak of earthly authority, are you referring to the government, the Constitution, or the legal system?

From my perspective, an atheistic way of life appears meaningless, depressing, and aimless. This isn't an insult, just my perception.

People with actual faith act this way, and honestly, you just proved that point all over again with your own example:

James Miller2 said:Just relax.

First, take a breath. Go back to your own post. Read it again. Analyze the impression you actually left. Then, connect the dots and explain exactly why my post hits just as hard as yours.

Your perception is one thing. Someone else's reality is quite another.

Which religion condemns those who disagree? 🤔

Faith doesn't actually accomplish anything. It is the people that get the work done.

What specifically turned you off from faith?
Science, people, or something else entirely?

Can you write it?

I am a traveler on the road. Constant motion defines my existence. I move through the landscape, observing the asphalt stretching toward the horizon. There is a certain stillness found in the transit itself. It is not about the destination. It is about the rhythm of the journey. says:
For most atheists out there, this just isn't true.

Atheists and theists—though if you ask me, we’re all believers in something—share a certain commonality. Earthly authority sits above all else.
For theists, there is a distinct advantage in being able to relativize and challenge that earthly power through absolute authority.

Atheists (for the most part) lack that recourse.

bluemason3 was once a believer and remains one at heart; he simply swapped faiths. Now he identifies as a positivist, a physicalist, a naturalist, a scientist... some sort of blend of those things.

When you speak of earthly authority, are you referring to the government, the Constitution, or the legal system?

From my perspective, an atheistic way of life appears meaningless, depressing, and aimless. This isn't an insult, just my perception.

It’s all just pointless, depressing, and aimless, right? That's what you think. But seriously, look around. Do you actually see how massive this world is? Look at the sheer scale of society, the endless variety of people, and the infinite amount of opportunities out there. And yet, you honestly believe that billions of lives are just meaningless, depressed, and directionless simply because they don't subscribe to your weird, hyper-fixated belief in something that doesn't even exist? Give me a break.

I honestly can't even wrap my head around how arrogant and hypocritical you are. Seriously, you’re just a straight-up terrible, fundamentally rotten person.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
Lisa Jackson7 said:Most atheists don't see it that way.

Both atheists and theists (who, let's face it, are all just believers in something) deal with some kind of earthly authority above them.
The lucky thing for theists is they can push back against those earthly powers by leaning on an absolute authority.

Atheists mostly can't do that.

Thanks for the deep dive.

Were you ever a believer? Have you actually felt what you're writing about?

bluemason3 was a believer and still is, technically—he just swapped faiths... now he's a positivist, a physicalist, a naturalist, a scientist... some mashup of all that.

Look, being forced to follow some political power is a totally different ballgame than daydreaming about gods. Just because the law holds you accountable doesn't mean you've suddenly become a religious person.

Lisa Jackson7 said:Most atheists don't see it that way.

Both atheists and theists (who, let's face it, are all just believers in something) deal with some kind of earthly authority above them.
The lucky thing for theists is they can push back against those earthly powers by leaning on an absolute authority.

Atheists mostly can't do that.

Thanks for the deep dive.

Were you ever a believer? Have you actually felt what you're writing about?

bluemason3 was a believer and still is, technically—he just swapped faiths... now he's a positivist, a physicalist, a naturalist, a scientist... some mashup of all that.

You hit the nail on the head right there. You've perfectly captured that massive, recurring issue with religion: people start devaluing actual human lives just to feed their own fantasies. That kind of warped logic is exactly how you end up with things like the Inquisition.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
David Vaughn75 said:Every single religion out there operates on the idea that there's some kind of underlying purpose or reason why we're even here.
Sure, your physical body is just biology—conception, cells, all that jazz—but your spirit, or soul, or whatever you want to call it... that's supposed to come from some higher calling.

No religion on this planet claims that everything is just a massive, random accident.

It’s wild to think that even just 400 years ago, people were still walking around convinced the entire world was just one big flat pancake.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
James Miller2 said:Regarding morality, such conclusions can only be drawn on your own behalf, not on behalf of all mankind.
Without religious communities, man would struggle to find a sense of how to distinguish good from evil.

Most faiths preach peace, love, community, and forgiveness.
These are instructions for a happier life. Fantasy develops when a person refuses to engage with the world around them and stays trapped within the bubble of their own ego.

And I ask that people who have never practiced faith do not write about it. Passive observers should stay silent.

Sopdet, a believer has an authority above themselves. Someone watching and recording every thought and action.

An atheist has no one but themselves. They are "responsible" only to themselves.
That is a very dangerous territory for the development of the human spirit and soul.

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

Have you ever been a believer? Have you actually experienced what you are writing about?

Stories about seeing believers do non-religious things are nothing but old wives' tales.
You can find people like that on both "sides."

I am interested in your personal experience if you have ever been involved in this.
Then we might actually have a constructive conversation. You could present the facts that troubled you or things that didn't make sense to you.

The way you view faith is so lifeless, hollow, and purely factual.
It is all ideology, psychology, and philosophy.

If you lack the personal experience of feeling even a small amount of faith, you will never truly understand it; it will always remain within the realm of fantasy to you.

It is a different matter if you tried it and found it didn't work, or if too much remained unclear to you.
Otherwise, further discussion from my end is pointless. It would just be a waste of your energy and mine, and our precious time.

There goes that massive ego of yours again with the whole "you can't" routine. Honestly, how incredibly arrogant do you have to be to tell someone you don't even know what they can or can't do?

I can, I am, and I damn well will in the future, because I possess these data-input devices known as senses—specifically sight and hearing—which, when paired with my information processor known as the brain, give me the ability to draw logical conclusions from the world around me.

James Miller2 said:Regarding morality, such conclusions can only be drawn on your own behalf, not on behalf of all mankind.
Without religious communities, man would struggle to find a sense of how to distinguish good from evil.

Most faiths preach peace, love, community, and forgiveness.
These are instructions for a happier life. Fantasy develops when a person refuses to engage with the world around them and stays trapped within the bubble of their own ego.

And I ask that people who have never practiced faith do not write about it. Passive observers should stay silent.

Sopdet, a believer has an authority above themselves. Someone watching and recording every thought and action.

An atheist has no one but themselves. They are "responsible" only to themselves.
That is a very dangerous territory for the development of the human spirit and soul.

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

Have you ever been a believer? Have you actually experienced what you are writing about?

Stories about seeing believers do non-religious things are nothing but old wives' tales.
You can find people like that on both "sides."

I am interested in your personal experience if you have ever been involved in this.
Then we might actually have a constructive conversation. You could present the facts that troubled you or things that didn't make sense to you.

The way you view faith is so lifeless, hollow, and purely factual.
It is all ideology, psychology, and philosophy.

If you lack the personal experience of feeling even a small amount of faith, you will never truly understand it; it will always remain within the realm of fantasy to you.

It is a different matter if you tried it and found it didn't work, or if too much remained unclear to you.
Otherwise, further discussion from my end is pointless. It would just be a waste of your energy and mine, and our precious time.

And here’s another incredibly stupid and totally inaccurate mantra. Most of the evil in human history was actually committed by believers acting in the name of their own authority.
Religious groups don't actually help people distinguish right from wrong; they just force their own specific ideological version of what they want you to believe is good or bad.

James Miller2 said:Regarding morality, such conclusions can only be drawn on your own behalf, not on behalf of all mankind.
Without religious communities, man would struggle to find a sense of how to distinguish good from evil.

Most faiths preach peace, love, community, and forgiveness.
These are instructions for a happier life. Fantasy develops when a person refuses to engage with the world around them and stays trapped within the bubble of their own ego.

And I ask that people who have never practiced faith do not write about it. Passive observers should stay silent.

Sopdet, a believer has an authority above themselves. Someone watching and recording every thought and action.

An atheist has no one but themselves. They are "responsible" only to themselves.
That is a very dangerous territory for the development of the human spirit and soul.

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

Have you ever been a believer? Have you actually experienced what you are writing about?

Stories about seeing believers do non-religious things are nothing but old wives' tales.
You can find people like that on both "sides."

I am interested in your personal experience if you have ever been involved in this.
Then we might actually have a constructive conversation. You could present the facts that troubled you or things that didn't make sense to you.

The way you view faith is so lifeless, hollow, and purely factual.
It is all ideology, psychology, and philosophy.

If you lack the personal experience of feeling even a small amount of faith, you will never truly understand it; it will always remain within the realm of fantasy to you.

It is a different matter if you tried it and found it didn't work, or if too much remained unclear to you.
Otherwise, further discussion from my end is pointless. It would just be a waste of your energy and mine, and our precious time.

Yet another piece of nonsense. Religion preaches love and unity exclusively among its own kind, while simultaneously judging and persecuting anyone who thinks differently—which you just practically demonstrated with your next statement:

James Miller2 said:Regarding morality, such conclusions can only be drawn on your own behalf, not on behalf of all mankind.
Without religious communities, man would struggle to find a sense of how to distinguish good from evil.

Most faiths preach peace, love, community, and forgiveness.
These are instructions for a happier life. Fantasy develops when a person refuses to engage with the world around them and stays trapped within the bubble of their own ego.

And I ask that people who have never practiced faith do not write about it. Passive observers should stay silent.

Sopdet, a believer has an authority above themselves. Someone watching and recording every thought and action.

An atheist has no one but themselves. They are "responsible" only to themselves.
That is a very dangerous territory for the development of the human spirit and soul.

Thanks for the detailed explanation.

Have you ever been a believer? Have you actually experienced what you are writing about?

Stories about seeing believers do non-religious things are nothing but old wives' tales.
You can find people like that on both "sides."

I am interested in your personal experience if you have ever been involved in this.
Then we might actually have a constructive conversation. You could present the facts that troubled you or things that didn't make sense to you.

The way you view faith is so lifeless, hollow, and purely factual.
It is all ideology, psychology, and philosophy.

If you lack the personal experience of feeling even a small amount of faith, you will never truly understand it; it will always remain within the realm of fantasy to you.

It is a different matter if you tried it and found it didn't work, or if too much remained unclear to you.
Otherwise, further discussion from my end is pointless. It would just be a waste of your energy and mine, and our precious time.

Look, we all know how to practice believing; it's one of the most primitive cognitive processes in humans, present from birth. Little kids who don't know anything yet definitely know how to believe.

The problem is that a good portion of people, due to their own intellectual shortcomings or emotional baggage, never actually mature. They stay stuck in that primitive way of functioning well into adulthood, and when they run into more mature individuals who don't play along, they think they're somehow special or misunderstood.

It’s honestly hilarious watching believers act like faith is some unsolvable cosmic riddle. Like, man, it’s not that deep—faith is about as complex as breathing. We all know how to believe in something; the only difference is that some of us actually take the time to choose what we're putting our trust in.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
David Vaughn75 said:Food is basically the prerequisite that lets you actually *do* anything else in life.
The material world exists to serve the spiritual one.

Nobody is telling you that you can't enjoy material things; I don't see the issue there. 🤷 It's just that if you take a real good look around, the world is absolutely crawling with suffering, violence, despair, wars, hunger, and tragedy. Does that sound like a "good" state of affairs to you, or does it feel like something needs to change? If you think this current mess is fine, then hey, no problem.

All this suffering stems from the illusion that matter is going to bring you happiness. Spoiler alert: it won't. You've got billionaires, actors, pop stars—people who have everything the world has to offer—and they’re still miserable. A person gets exactly what they always wanted, and as soon as they grab it, they start eyeing something new. That's just how the material world works; it's a bottomless pit that can never be filled.
Wealthy nations have access to every resource on the planet, yet they still go to war and snatch resources from other countries.
People were born into this material existence because they wanted to rule, they wanted control, but it's all an illusion. True, absolute control belongs only to God, and once you finally realize that, that's when you actually experience freedom.

Man, why do you have such an intense, almost desperate need to be controlled by God?
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
James Miller2 said:Understanding what? A child cannot grasp the concept of morality without guidance. People need a compass in life. Without one, they are nothing.

A man without faith is a dangerous man. That is all I have to say regarding the rest of your comment.

Anything, really. But mostly just someone else's business.

James Miller2 said:Understanding what? A child cannot grasp the concept of morality without guidance. People need a compass in life. Without one, they are nothing.

A man without faith is a dangerous man. That is all I have to say regarding the rest of your comment.

Most adults—and yeah, I’m looking at you too—don't actually grasp what morality even is. So why on earth would you expect a kid to have it all figured out? At its core, morality is a pretty straightforward concept, but religious fanatics love to overcomplicate things and twist the logic just to justify their own ridiculous dogmas.

Look, even if you actually had the capacity to interpret biblical allegory properly—instead of clinging to those infantile fantasies about the existence of God—you’re still facing a massive wall: we are talking about values that are two thousand years old. It’s pretty obvious you haven't brushed up on your history, but civilization and our entire value system have shifted so drastically since then that most of those biblical messages are just straight-up irrelevant in the modern world. Then there's the bigger issue: the Bible was written in an era without the internet, back when information sharing was incredibly limited. It was penned by people living in a tiny little corner of the map. It’s like if someone from a small town in rural Alabama wrote a book about local customs and regional traditions, and then tried to force those specific Southern sensibilities on the entire planet as universal truth. That is exactly what the Bible is today: a way for one specific tribe to impose its niche sectarian morals onto a much broader population and demographic. That’s why believers—despite thinking they’re the gold standard for morality—are actually morally autistic in practice. They base their entire ethical framework on the words of a handful of people from a two-thousand-year-old Middle Eastern sect that has zero relevance to the modern age. So, yeah, it’s no wonder people call you narrow-minded. It’s hard not to be stuck in the past when you're trying to cling to Iron Age values in the middle of the Information Age.

James Miller2 said:Understanding what? A child cannot grasp the concept of morality without guidance. People need a compass in life. Without one, they are nothing.

A man without faith is a dangerous man. That is all I have to say regarding the rest of your comment.

It’s an interesting little fantasy, I guess. Especially since thousands of years of actual history have taught us that people driven by religious zealotry are pretty much the absolute worst part of humanity.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·
James Miller2 said:I say that is false.

Faith makes a person more of a moral being than an emotional one.

Look, true morality comes from actual understanding and empathy. Faith is basically the opposite of that—it doesn't make people better; it just makes them dogmatic. In the real world, that usually means they end up being less moral and way less tolerant because they're stuck clinging to the "morals" of a single ideology. It's such a narrow, small-minded way to look at the world.
Should we let go of our feelings? in Spirituality ·

David Vaughn75 said:Evagrius Ponticus basically argued that knowing God isn't some emotional high. He claimed that visions, voices, and all those religious "feelings" are actually just distractions from true realization. When people mistake an emotional rush for actual spiritual truth, they end up totally losing the rhythm of their inner life.

What's your take on this?

If emotions are like a river—this wild current just tossing us around left and right without any say in the matter—does that mean we aren't even in control of ourselves?
Maybe the whole point is supposed to be surrendering to God and relying solely on Him... but is that union with God meant to be quiet contemplation, a state of Nirvana, total nothingness, or just a massive explosion of feeling?

Just because emotions act as this built-in mechanism for spontaneous action doesn't mean you’ve lost your autonomy or that you "don't depend on yourself." Look, those feelings belong to you. Period. At the end of the day, how you actually handle them—how you process that surge of adrenaline or that sudden wave of anger—is entirely on you. It's all about how you manage your own internal compass.

Look, the whole idea isn't about just surrendering yourself to God. That’s a misunderstanding. The real point is that emotions and logic are constantly at odds with each other, like two different drivers fighting over the steering wheel of a car. You can't drive straight if you're constantly swerving because of emotional stress. You need that clarity. Real insight—true realization—comes from leaning on your head, not your heart. It’s about using reason as your primary tool to actually make sense of things.
lonestag15 said:Go ahead, keep obsessing over typos—because clearly, that’s what matters most in life—but maybe take it to someone else on this board. It just proves how much of a pedantic clown you are... and honestly, how out of the loop you are on anything spiritual. You just pull sentences out of context and act like some kind of psycho, digging through Google for ten minutes just so you can swoop in and cynically "correct" people with half-baked info... it's pathetic, really.

Just skip my posts from now on. After that whole "self-righteous believers" thread, I already got a pretty clear picture of what a joke you are... feel free to put on your little performance for some naive newbie who hasn't realized you're an open book yet. Anyone hanging around this forum long enough is going to see right through you...

You started replying to me again after that one thread, even though I told you to stop... and here I am, responding again... totally pointless. Fine, you've officially hit my ignore list. Respond to this however you want, and I'll give you the "win"... just leave me alone already...

I don't care about your opinion—you've already exposed yourself as a clown—and I don't need you reading my stuff... so just skip it. My posts aren't just for you, so just move on and comment on something else.

There. Write some big, dramatic post about your "complicated" personality if it makes you feel better, then just stay out of my business when I'm talking to other people.

People love to throw the "psychopath" label at me whenever they get worked up, but I think this is actually my first time being a total psycho for a good reason: I’m sitting here obsessively formatting my posts just so you guys can actually read them without getting a headache. Honestly? I'll take it. Respect.

lonestag15 said:Go ahead, keep obsessing over typos—because clearly, that’s what matters most in life—but maybe take it to someone else on this board. It just proves how much of a pedantic clown you are... and honestly, how out of the loop you are on anything spiritual. You just pull sentences out of context and act like some kind of psycho, digging through Google for ten minutes just so you can swoop in and cynically "correct" people with half-baked info... it's pathetic, really.

Just skip my posts from now on. After that whole "self-righteous believers" thread, I already got a pretty clear picture of what a joke you are... feel free to put on your little performance for some naive newbie who hasn't realized you're an open book yet. Anyone hanging around this forum long enough is going to see right through you...

You started replying to me again after that one thread, even though I told you to stop... and here I am, responding again... totally pointless. Fine, you've officially hit my ignore list. Respond to this however you want, and I'll give you the "win"... just leave me alone already...

I don't care about your opinion—you've already exposed yourself as a clown—and I don't need you reading my stuff... so just skip it. My posts aren't just for you, so just move on and comment on something else.

There. Write some big, dramatic post about your "complicated" personality if it makes you feel better, then just stay out of my business when I'm talking to other people.

Look, if certain topics or arguments are getting under your skin and triggering an emotional meltdown, that’s honestly not my problem. Maybe instead of coming at me, you should focus on doing some actual soul-searching and working on yourself. You really need to shake off that insecurity.

lonestag15 said:Go ahead, keep obsessing over typos—because clearly, that’s what matters most in life—but maybe take it to someone else on this board. It just proves how much of a pedantic clown you are... and honestly, how out of the loop you are on anything spiritual. You just pull sentences out of context and act like some kind of psycho, digging through Google for ten minutes just so you can swoop in and cynically "correct" people with half-baked info... it's pathetic, really.

Just skip my posts from now on. After that whole "self-righteous believers" thread, I already got a pretty clear picture of what a joke you are... feel free to put on your little performance for some naive newbie who hasn't realized you're an open book yet. Anyone hanging around this forum long enough is going to see right through you...

You started replying to me again after that one thread, even though I told you to stop... and here I am, responding again... totally pointless. Fine, you've officially hit my ignore list. Respond to this however you want, and I'll give you the "win"... just leave me alone already...

I don't care about your opinion—you've already exposed yourself as a clown—and I don't need you reading my stuff... so just skip it. My posts aren't just for you, so just move on and comment on something else.

There. Write some big, dramatic post about your "complicated" personality if it makes you feel better, then just stay out of my business when I'm talking to other people.

Look, I don't care what you want. This forum is an open floor, and I have every right to reply to whoever I feel like.
lonestag15 said:Can you actually believe this... seriously, all in one single post... first:

And then we get a real "mature" take on grammar... 😵

Way to go, master... truly a titan of logic... you’re basically tripping over your own feet within three sentences... and yeah, you're definitely "mature" when you pivot to nitpicking spelling. Honestly, man, you're probably the only person here who hasn't contributed a single shred of actual knowledge to the topic... just like how you don't contribute anything useful to any other thread you stumble into. Plus, you claim—totally lying, obviously—that you were at the "Tesla Mind from The Futur" exhibit, yet you couldn't have missed a six-foot tall Ganesh statue if you tried... give it a rest, man. Just fly away from this sub so the people who actually want to learn something instead of watching your little "intellectual" ego trip can breathe...

Seriously, stop embarrassing yourself. You're transparent and exhausting... go ahead, Google the word "transparent," then write a comment at your level like "transparency is a property of materials"... honestly, these comments are reaching levels of idiocy I didn't think possible...

It wasn't a comment on grammar, it was correcting an inaccuracy.

lonestag15 said:Can you actually believe this... seriously, all in one single post... first:

And then we get a real "mature" take on grammar... 😵

Way to go, master... truly a titan of logic... you’re basically tripping over your own feet within three sentences... and yeah, you're definitely "mature" when you pivot to nitpicking spelling. Honestly, man, you're probably the only person here who hasn't contributed a single shred of actual knowledge to the topic... just like how you don't contribute anything useful to any other thread you stumble into. Plus, you claim—totally lying, obviously—that you were at the "Tesla Mind from The Futur" exhibit, yet you couldn't have missed a six-foot tall Ganesh statue if you tried... give it a rest, man. Just fly away from this sub so the people who actually want to learn something instead of watching your little "intellectual" ego trip can breathe...

Seriously, stop embarrassing yourself. You're transparent and exhausting... go ahead, Google the word "transparent," then write a comment at your level like "transparency is a property of materials"... honestly, these comments are reaching levels of idiocy I didn't think possible...

I'll say it again: chanting about how I "don't know anything" isn't an argument, it's just a desperate attempt to attack the person instead of the point.

lonestag15 said:Can you actually believe this... seriously, all in one single post... first:

And then we get a real "mature" take on grammar... 😵

Way to go, master... truly a titan of logic... you’re basically tripping over your own feet within three sentences... and yeah, you're definitely "mature" when you pivot to nitpicking spelling. Honestly, man, you're probably the only person here who hasn't contributed a single shred of actual knowledge to the topic... just like how you don't contribute anything useful to any other thread you stumble into. Plus, you claim—totally lying, obviously—that you were at the "Tesla Mind from The Futur" exhibit, yet you couldn't have missed a six-foot tall Ganesh statue if you tried... give it a rest, man. Just fly away from this sub so the people who actually want to learn something instead of watching your little "intellectual" ego trip can breathe...

Seriously, stop embarrassing yourself. You're transparent and exhausting... go ahead, Google the word "transparent," then write a comment at your level like "transparency is a property of materials"... honestly, these comments are reaching levels of idiocy I didn't think possible...

You're spreading useless misinformation, and once you realize your own statements are wrong, you just brush it off with a "whatever, it doesn't matter" and try to claim I'm the one being embarrassed.

lonestag15 said:Can you actually believe this... seriously, all in one single post... first:

And then we get a real "mature" take on grammar... 😵

Way to go, master... truly a titan of logic... you’re basically tripping over your own feet within three sentences... and yeah, you're definitely "mature" when you pivot to nitpicking spelling. Honestly, man, you're probably the only person here who hasn't contributed a single shred of actual knowledge to the topic... just like how you don't contribute anything useful to any other thread you stumble into. Plus, you claim—totally lying, obviously—that you were at the "Tesla Mind from The Futur" exhibit, yet you couldn't have missed a six-foot tall Ganesh statue if you tried... give it a rest, man. Just fly away from this sub so the people who actually want to learn something instead of watching your little "intellectual" ego trip can breathe...

Seriously, stop embarrassing yourself. You're transparent and exhausting... go ahead, Google the word "transparent," then write a comment at your level like "transparency is a property of materials"... honestly, these comments are reaching levels of idiocy I didn't think possible...

Actually, I went twice—once with a buddy and once with my niece.

You probably either got confused or maybe just hallucinated, because you're out here spouting total nonsense about human biology, claiming the gland that triggers sleepiness is some kind of "Third Eye." Lol.
lonestag15 said:High dopamine levels drop the melatonin production in the pineal gland. And since melatonin is a derivative of serotonin...

Basically, dopamine handles that "feel good" vibe while simultaneously killing your need for sleep—which then wrecks your dopamine receptors. Those exact receptors and dopamine levels are what trigger psychosis... that was the whole point of the post...

And whether they're produced *exactly* inside it isn't even the main issue... because I said the pineal gland is basically synonymous with what's called the "Third Eye" in Hinduism, given that the gland looks like an eye in cross-section. This whole "opening your third eye" thing is way more complex than whatever you think you learned from ten minutes of Googling. Plus, the "Third Eye" isn't some physical object tucked away somewhere—it’s more like a functional position within the body...

It's all linked to dopamine, serotonin, and melatonin. Go ahead, study those interactions for another ten minutes if you want to be an even bigger Clown...

Besides, the guy above actually wrote exactly what he meant...

Then there's you, acting like you've got a PhD in psychology when you don't even know the basic terms—just cutting and pasting posts, lying (like saying you did 8 + 4 years of high school and then somehow graduated in 10 days, haha, what a "smart" Clown)... You grab "intelligence" from Google in the ten minutes it takes to craft a rebuttal, and then have the nerve to tell others to read more carefully...

In a real conversation, you wouldn't even know what to say... someone smarter would just absolutely shred your arguments...

The point is, you just proved you’re out here spewing nonsense that’s incredibly easy to fact-check.
lonestag15 said:High dopamine levels drop the melatonin production in the pineal gland. And since melatonin is a derivative of serotonin...

Basically, dopamine handles that "feel good" vibe while simultaneously killing your need for sleep—which then wrecks your dopamine receptors. Those exact receptors and dopamine levels are what trigger psychosis... that was the whole point of the post...

And whether they're produced *exactly* inside it isn't even the main issue... because I said the pineal gland is basically synonymous with what's called the "Third Eye" in Hinduism, given that the gland looks like an eye in cross-section. This whole "opening your third eye" thing is way more complex than whatever you think you learned from ten minutes of Googling. Plus, the "Third Eye" isn't some physical object tucked away somewhere—it’s more like a functional position within the body...

It's all linked to dopamine, serotonin, and melatonin. Go ahead, study those interactions for another ten minutes if you want to be an even bigger Clown...

Besides, the guy above actually wrote exactly what he meant...

Then there's you, acting like you've got a PhD in psychology when you don't even know the basic terms—just cutting and pasting posts, lying (like saying you did 8 + 4 years of high school and then somehow graduated in 10 days, haha, what a "smart" Clown)... You grab "intelligence" from Google in the ten minutes it takes to craft a rebuttal, and then have the nerve to tell others to read more carefully...

In a real conversation, you wouldn't even know what to say... someone smarter would just absolutely shred your arguments...

The Third Eye is just superstitious garbage.

lonestag15 said:High dopamine levels drop the melatonin production in the pineal gland. And since melatonin is a derivative of serotonin...

Basically, dopamine handles that "feel good" vibe while simultaneously killing your need for sleep—which then wrecks your dopamine receptors. Those exact receptors and dopamine levels are what trigger psychosis... that was the whole point of the post...

And whether they're produced *exactly* inside it isn't even the main issue... because I said the pineal gland is basically synonymous with what's called the "Third Eye" in Hinduism, given that the gland looks like an eye in cross-section. This whole "opening your third eye" thing is way more complex than whatever you think you learned from ten minutes of Googling. Plus, the "Third Eye" isn't some physical object tucked away somewhere—it’s more like a functional position within the body...

It's all linked to dopamine, serotonin, and melatonin. Go ahead, study those interactions for another ten minutes if you want to be an even bigger Clown...

Besides, the guy above actually wrote exactly what he meant...

Then there's you, acting like you've got a PhD in psychology when you don't even know the basic terms—just cutting and pasting posts, lying (like saying you did 8 + 4 years of high school and then somehow graduated in 10 days, haha, what a "smart" Clown)... You grab "intelligence" from Google in the ten minutes it takes to craft a rebuttal, and then have the nerve to tell others to read more carefully...

In a real conversation, you wouldn't even know what to say... someone smarter would just absolutely shred your arguments...

Yeah, and once again, let me walk you through how you're failing at basic reading comprehension:
In what context did I ever mention having 8+4 years of education? Think about it.
Graduating in 10 days? Where on earth did you get that from? Just think for a second.

Resorting to chanting about how I'm some unintelligent Clown is really just a reflection of how mature you are when it comes to actually making an argument:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...sagreement.svg

If you can't figure out the image: my actual points are sitting right there in the orange and pink sections.

lonestag15 said:High dopamine levels drop the melatonin production in the pineal gland. And since melatonin is a derivative of serotonin...

Basically, dopamine handles that "feel good" vibe while simultaneously killing your need for sleep—which then wrecks your dopamine receptors. Those exact receptors and dopamine levels are what trigger psychosis... that was the whole point of the post...

And whether they're produced *exactly* inside it isn't even the main issue... because I said the pineal gland is basically synonymous with what's called the "Third Eye" in Hinduism, given that the gland looks like an eye in cross-section. This whole "opening your third eye" thing is way more complex than whatever you think you learned from ten minutes of Googling. Plus, the "Third Eye" isn't some physical object tucked away somewhere—it’s more like a functional position within the body...

It's all linked to dopamine, serotonin, and melatonin. Go ahead, study those interactions for another ten minutes if you want to be an even bigger Clown...

Besides, the guy above actually wrote exactly what he meant...

Then there's you, acting like you've got a PhD in psychology when you don't even know the basic terms—just cutting and pasting posts, lying (like saying you did 8 + 4 years of high school and then somehow graduated in 10 days, haha, what a "smart" Clown)... You grab "intelligence" from Google in the ten minutes it takes to craft a rebuttal, and then have the nerve to tell others to read more carefully...

In a real conversation, you wouldn't even know what to say... someone smarter would just absolutely shred your arguments...

It's two separate words, genius.
lonestag15 said:Electrical engineer and an AutoCAD specialist...
So, I was looking into the technical programs over at the University of Cleveland—you know, that whole engineering scene... just thinking about how different things run compared to the math departments at places like NYU. It’s a trip...

So you’ve got all this electrical engineering expertise, but zero clue about Kundalini... now that's an interesting combo...

Remember when I told you in that one post you sounded like some English professor? And then you hit me with that whole "elementary school plus four years of high school doesn't exactly make you a professor" line... typical...

You realize you’ve used the phrase "delusions of grandeur" like ten different times now—and totally out of context, too—mixing up psychiatric terms with psychological ones... which basically proves you didn't even know what the term meant until two days ago. I mean, you literally just sent me a message about it like ten days back. You can't even get the terminology right before you just go copy-paste some random crap from the internet and call it "hallucinations of grandeur"... honestly...

You remember when I told that guy he was basically just projecting an image of God, right?
It doesn't exist because projection is just taking your own baggage and pinning it on someone else... so, honestly, when you claim that, you're really just describing yourself—the guy who’s supposedly an "expert in psychology" or whatever. Nobody can project an image of God...

So, you actually noticed that I typed "mAlEtonin" two days ago before I fixed it to "melatonin"... which pretty much confirms my theory—I didn't even know how to spell it myself, I was just Googling it on the fly...

So, you’re basically just a total disaster of a human being—a massive clown, really—who jumps into every single thread about spirituality despite having zero clue what you're actually talking about. Honestly, you've got less spiritual depth than my Pekingese... You don't know anything about religion, you don't grasp any actual form of spirituality, and you clearly don't practice a damn thing. You just hang around this forum to dump all that negativity you're clearly overflowing with...

Cut the crap—I'm seriously done with you and all this clowning around...

There was this statue of Ganesha and Vivekananda, plus a ton of stuff about old mythology—and right at the entrance, they had this whole section on the era when Tesla moved to town and his beef with Edison, along with all those technical inventions. By the exit, there was this interactive thing where you basically whack pigeons with bolts of electricity on a screen in front of you... We even got these little tablets around our necks so we could pick our own themes from the numbered exhibits...

Things were shifting around in that exhibit—stuff was being swapped out or maybe even pulled entirely. If you missed the section on Ganesha and Vivekananda, they might have already cleared it out by then... honestly though, I couldn't care less...

Don't bother commenting on any of my posts anymore—and I won't be bothering with yours either. Go find some other idiot to argue with if you really have nothing better to do with your life...

A couple of clowns...

Honestly, why even ask? What kind of connection could electrical engineering possibly have with Hindu mythology? It sounds like some wild late-night dorm room theory, right?

lonestag15 said:Electrical engineer and an AutoCAD specialist...
So, I was looking into the technical programs over at the University of Cleveland—you know, that whole engineering scene... just thinking about how different things run compared to the math departments at places like NYU. It’s a trip...

So you’ve got all this electrical engineering expertise, but zero clue about Kundalini... now that's an interesting combo...

Remember when I told you in that one post you sounded like some English professor? And then you hit me with that whole "elementary school plus four years of high school doesn't exactly make you a professor" line... typical...

You realize you’ve used the phrase "delusions of grandeur" like ten different times now—and totally out of context, too—mixing up psychiatric terms with psychological ones... which basically proves you didn't even know what the term meant until two days ago. I mean, you literally just sent me a message about it like ten days back. You can't even get the terminology right before you just go copy-paste some random crap from the internet and call it "hallucinations of grandeur"... honestly...

You remember when I told that guy he was basically just projecting an image of God, right?
It doesn't exist because projection is just taking your own baggage and pinning it on someone else... so, honestly, when you claim that, you're really just describing yourself—the guy who’s supposedly an "expert in psychology" or whatever. Nobody can project an image of God...

So, you actually noticed that I typed "mAlEtonin" two days ago before I fixed it to "melatonin"... which pretty much confirms my theory—I didn't even know how to spell it myself, I was just Googling it on the fly...

So, you’re basically just a total disaster of a human being—a massive clown, really—who jumps into every single thread about spirituality despite having zero clue what you're actually talking about. Honestly, you've got less spiritual depth than my Pekingese... You don't know anything about religion, you don't grasp any actual form of spirituality, and you clearly don't practice a damn thing. You just hang around this forum to dump all that negativity you're clearly overflowing with...

Cut the crap—I'm seriously done with you and all this clowning around...

There was this statue of Ganesha and Vivekananda, plus a ton of stuff about old mythology—and right at the entrance, they had this whole section on the era when Tesla moved to town and his beef with Edison, along with all those technical inventions. By the exit, there was this interactive thing where you basically whack pigeons with bolts of electricity on a screen in front of you... We even got these little tablets around our necks so we could pick our own themes from the numbered exhibits...

Things were shifting around in that exhibit—stuff was being swapped out or maybe even pulled entirely. If you missed the section on Ganesha and Vivekananda, they might have already cleared it out by then... honestly though, I couldn't care less...

Don't bother commenting on any of my posts anymore—and I won't be bothering with yours either. Go find some other idiot to argue with if you really have nothing better to do with your life...

A couple of clowns...

Top-tier.

lonestag15 said:Electrical engineer and an AutoCAD specialist...
So, I was looking into the technical programs over at the University of Cleveland—you know, that whole engineering scene... just thinking about how different things run compared to the math departments at places like NYU. It’s a trip...

So you’ve got all this electrical engineering expertise, but zero clue about Kundalini... now that's an interesting combo...

Remember when I told you in that one post you sounded like some English professor? And then you hit me with that whole "elementary school plus four years of high school doesn't exactly make you a professor" line... typical...

You realize you’ve used the phrase "delusions of grandeur" like ten different times now—and totally out of context, too—mixing up psychiatric terms with psychological ones... which basically proves you didn't even know what the term meant until two days ago. I mean, you literally just sent me a message about it like ten days back. You can't even get the terminology right before you just go copy-paste some random crap from the internet and call it "hallucinations of grandeur"... honestly...

You remember when I told that guy he was basically just projecting an image of God, right?
It doesn't exist because projection is just taking your own baggage and pinning it on someone else... so, honestly, when you claim that, you're really just describing yourself—the guy who’s supposedly an "expert in psychology" or whatever. Nobody can project an image of God...

So, you actually noticed that I typed "mAlEtonin" two days ago before I fixed it to "melatonin"... which pretty much confirms my theory—I didn't even know how to spell it myself, I was just Googling it on the fly...

So, you’re basically just a total disaster of a human being—a massive clown, really—who jumps into every single thread about spirituality despite having zero clue what you're actually talking about. Honestly, you've got less spiritual depth than my Pekingese... You don't know anything about religion, you don't grasp any actual form of spirituality, and you clearly don't practice a damn thing. You just hang around this forum to dump all that negativity you're clearly overflowing with...

Cut the crap—I'm seriously done with you and all this clowning around...

There was this statue of Ganesha and Vivekananda, plus a ton of stuff about old mythology—and right at the entrance, they had this whole section on the era when Tesla moved to town and his beef with Edison, along with all those technical inventions. By the exit, there was this interactive thing where you basically whack pigeons with bolts of electricity on a screen in front of you... We even got these little tablets around our necks so we could pick our own themes from the numbered exhibits...

Things were shifting around in that exhibit—stuff was being swapped out or maybe even pulled entirely. If you missed the section on Ganesha and Vivekananda, they might have already cleared it out by then... honestly though, I couldn't care less...

Don't bother commenting on any of my posts anymore—and I won't be bothering with yours either. Go find some other idiot to argue with if you really have nothing better to do with your life...

A couple of clowns...

You're tripping—you totally mashed two different exhibitions together into one.

lonestag15 said:Electrical engineer and an AutoCAD specialist...
So, I was looking into the technical programs over at the University of Cleveland—you know, that whole engineering scene... just thinking about how different things run compared to the math departments at places like NYU. It’s a trip...

So you’ve got all this electrical engineering expertise, but zero clue about Kundalini... now that's an interesting combo...

Remember when I told you in that one post you sounded like some English professor? And then you hit me with that whole "elementary school plus four years of high school doesn't exactly make you a professor" line... typical...

You realize you’ve used the phrase "delusions of grandeur" like ten different times now—and totally out of context, too—mixing up psychiatric terms with psychological ones... which basically proves you didn't even know what the term meant until two days ago. I mean, you literally just sent me a message about it like ten days back. You can't even get the terminology right before you just go copy-paste some random crap from the internet and call it "hallucinations of grandeur"... honestly...

You remember when I told that guy he was basically just projecting an image of God, right?
It doesn't exist because projection is just taking your own baggage and pinning it on someone else... so, honestly, when you claim that, you're really just describing yourself—the guy who’s supposedly an "expert in psychology" or whatever. Nobody can project an image of God...

So, you actually noticed that I typed "mAlEtonin" two days ago before I fixed it to "melatonin"... which pretty much confirms my theory—I didn't even know how to spell it myself, I was just Googling it on the fly...

So, you’re basically just a total disaster of a human being—a massive clown, really—who jumps into every single thread about spirituality despite having zero clue what you're actually talking about. Honestly, you've got less spiritual depth than my Pekingese... You don't know anything about religion, you don't grasp any actual form of spirituality, and you clearly don't practice a damn thing. You just hang around this forum to dump all that negativity you're clearly overflowing with...

Cut the crap—I'm seriously done with you and all this clowning around...

There was this statue of Ganesha and Vivekananda, plus a ton of stuff about old mythology—and right at the entrance, they had this whole section on the era when Tesla moved to town and his beef with Edison, along with all those technical inventions. By the exit, there was this interactive thing where you basically whack pigeons with bolts of electricity on a screen in front of you... We even got these little tablets around our necks so we could pick our own themes from the numbered exhibits...

Things were shifting around in that exhibit—stuff was being swapped out or maybe even pulled entirely. If you missed the section on Ganesha and Vivekananda, they might have already cleared it out by then... honestly though, I couldn't care less...

Don't bother commenting on any of my posts anymore—and I won't be bothering with yours either. Go find some other idiot to argue with if you really have nothing better to do with your life...

A couple of clowns...

Only someone who’s totally insecure and playing dishonest games would get this worked up over an argument.

lonestag15 said:Electrical engineer and an AutoCAD specialist...
So, I was looking into the technical programs over at the University of Cleveland—you know, that whole engineering scene... just thinking about how different things run compared to the math departments at places like NYU. It’s a trip...

So you’ve got all this electrical engineering expertise, but zero clue about Kundalini... now that's an interesting combo...

Remember when I told you in that one post you sounded like some English professor? And then you hit me with that whole "elementary school plus four years of high school doesn't exactly make you a professor" line... typical...

You realize you’ve used the phrase "delusions of grandeur" like ten different times now—and totally out of context, too—mixing up psychiatric terms with psychological ones... which basically proves you didn't even know what the term meant until two days ago. I mean, you literally just sent me a message about it like ten days back. You can't even get the terminology right before you just go copy-paste some random crap from the internet and call it "hallucinations of grandeur"... honestly...

You remember when I told that guy he was basically just projecting an image of God, right?
It doesn't exist because projection is just taking your own baggage and pinning it on someone else... so, honestly, when you claim that, you're really just describing yourself—the guy who’s supposedly an "expert in psychology" or whatever. Nobody can project an image of God...

So, you actually noticed that I typed "mAlEtonin" two days ago before I fixed it to "melatonin"... which pretty much confirms my theory—I didn't even know how to spell it myself, I was just Googling it on the fly...

So, you’re basically just a total disaster of a human being—a massive clown, really—who jumps into every single thread about spirituality despite having zero clue what you're actually talking about. Honestly, you've got less spiritual depth than my Pekingese... You don't know anything about religion, you don't grasp any actual form of spirituality, and you clearly don't practice a damn thing. You just hang around this forum to dump all that negativity you're clearly overflowing with...

Cut the crap—I'm seriously done with you and all this clowning around...

There was this statue of Ganesha and Vivekananda, plus a ton of stuff about old mythology—and right at the entrance, they had this whole section on the era when Tesla moved to town and his beef with Edison, along with all those technical inventions. By the exit, there was this interactive thing where you basically whack pigeons with bolts of electricity on a screen in front of you... We even got these little tablets around our necks so we could pick our own themes from the numbered exhibits...

Things were shifting around in that exhibit—stuff was being swapped out or maybe even pulled entirely. If you missed the section on Ganesha and Vivekananda, they might have already cleared it out by then... honestly though, I couldn't care less...

Don't bother commenting on any of my posts anymore—and I won't be bothering with yours either. Go find some other idiot to argue with if you really have nothing better to do with your life...

A couple of clowns...

All I can tell you is that you’re clearly struggling with basic reading comprehension, yet somehow you’re incredibly committed to staying ignorant.

Are you honestly still out here convinced that the pineal gland pumps out dopamine and serotonin?
lonestag15 said:Look, why don't you come back once you actually finish an electrical engineering degree and grasp what he was doing... then we can talk.

You're being incredibly rude—it's enough to drive anyone crazy. It’s impossible to have a decent debate with you because the second I state something I know for a fact, you just snap back that "every idiot" is twisting words... so, what, is that supposed to be directed at me or something?

That is such a trash argument.

Fun fact: I went through technical high school for electrical tech and then finished a degree in applied sciences that was packed with power engineering courses, so yeah, my understanding of electrical engineering is pretty damn solid.

So, what exactly are your credentials?

lonestag15 said:Look, why don't you come back once you actually finish an electrical engineering degree and grasp what he was doing... then we can talk.

You're being incredibly rude—it's enough to drive anyone crazy. It’s impossible to have a decent debate with you because the second I state something I know for a fact, you just snap back that "every idiot" is twisting words... so, what, is that supposed to be directed at me or something?

Most of what you think you know is just random guesswork and delusions.

Look, sometimes you can't be honest without coming off as a bit blunt.

lonestag15 said:Man, seriously... I've actually read his biographies... and I even went to that "Nikola Tesla mind from the future" exhibit in New York where they were explaining all these Hindu concepts and how he was connected to them. They had these huge statues of Ganesha and Swami Vivekananda—who, by the way, was famously close with Tesla...

I mean, for real, maybe just do a quick Google search before trying to hit me with a counter-argument...

I was at that exact exhibit, and there wasn't a single mention of Hinduism or any statues of gods anywhere in the building.