CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Anthony Cooper2 › Posts

Posts by Anthony Cooper2

10 posts shown.

What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Lisa Patel4 said:In practice? No. Tyranny hasn't changed one bit. We might not have feudalism anymore, but we have debt instead.

The European Union is going to tear apart natural and sociological laws. It won't be just economics. Think racial, ethnic, and religious conflicts. Every time anyone in history has experimented with that kind of thing, it ends in tragedy.

Alright... But here's the thing: feudalism was actually a tangible relationship between people—you had a lord made of flesh and blood dealing with a peasant made of flesh and blood. Nowadays, though, we're being pushed into this belief that we're slaves to something else—some expert might give you a more precise percentage, but if you ask me, at least 80% of it is just a complete illusion (just numbers flickering on a screen) compared to actual human beings and their real struggles. To my mind, modern enslavement isn't even about someone trying to amass personal wealth anymore; it feels like we're serving something that is simply evil—and I mean evil as a metaphysical category. And honestly, who knows how much those pulling the strings even realize that themselves? (It ties right back into that famous old saying: "Money isn't the goal, it's just the tool.")
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Lisa Patel4 said:A massive YES when it comes to getting closer to Poland. But honestly, will that even be possible in the way we’re all dreaming of if the EU keeps running its current setup?
I bolded that last sentence because it basically serves as the conclusion for any organized society—yeah, you need a whole new generation—but you also need the right CONDITIONS for that generation to actually be raised properly. Looking back over the last century, the US has faced situations at least four times where we had to wipe the slate clean (whether by choice or by force) and start everything from square one. In those kinds of circumstances, it’s just impossible to build a society where the "torch" passes naturally from grandfather to father to son—or from grandma to daughter to granddaughter. Our society would also have to let go of that excessive, I mean excessive revanchism—that constant urge to get back at whoever came before, or anyone with different political views—but hey, all of that is only doable under conditions of decades of peace. I really hope we see that someday...


A massive YES when it comes to getting closer to Poland. But honestly, will that even be possible in the way we’re all dreaming of if the EU keeps running its current setup?
I bolded that last sentence because it basically serves as the conclusion for any organized society—yeah, you need a whole new generation—but you also need the right CONDITIONS for that generation to actually be raised properly. Looking back over the last century, the US has faced situations at least four times where we had to wipe the slate clean (whether by choice or by force) and start everything from square one. In those kinds of circumstances, it’s just impossible to build a society where the "torch" passes naturally from grandfather to father to son—or from grandma to daughter to granddaughter. Our society would also have to let go of that excessive, I mean excessive revanchism—that constant urge to get back at whoever came before, or anyone with different political views—but hey, all of that is only doable under conditions of decades of peace. I really hope we see that someday...

Big yes on moving closer to Poland. But I guess you have to wonder if that's even possible if the EU keeps functioning exactly the way it does now. Maybe not.
I’ll give you that last sentence—it's basically the conclusion for any organized society. Sure, we need an entirely new generation, but we also need the right conditions to actually raise them properly. Over the last century, America has been hit at least four times by situations where we had to wipe the slate clean and start from scratch, whether by choice or by force. In those kinds of circumstances, it’s just impossible to build a society where traditions pass naturally from grandfather to father to son, or from grandmother to daughter to granddaughter. I guess our society would have to break free from being overly... well, you know. It’s all just an exaggeration, I guess. Maybe. "Revenge, settling scores with whoever came before you, targeting political opponents... I guess all of that is only possible when you've enjoyed decades of peace. Maybe we'll actually see that kind of stability one day."

An average person can barely make an impact here. You have to realize that every political party is serving someone else—they’re all under someone's thumb and answering to higher powers. You hit the nail on the head with that "spiral" idea. Honestly, corruption is like a virus in every society. Whether it's the US, Germany, China, or Russia, these countries are all suffocating under corruption; it's just legalized there through that famous lobbying system. It’s practically institutionalized graft. I guess the only thing you can actually control is how you educate your own family.

I guess real change can only come from massive global shifts that fundamentally overhaul our entire political and philosophical landscape. It’s hard to say when that might actually happen. We're stuck in an era dominated by neoliberal capitalist philosophy that basically turns people into robots. But since no system lasts forever, maybe we can hope it all changes one day.

The EU and NATO are massive structures that you just can't walk away from today, and honestly, we shouldn't even try. If any administration attempted to leave, they’d face an immediate color revolution and be completely powerless to stop it. Global history is played out on levels we can't even fathom—wars between nations, intelligence agencies, big capital, secret societies... I guess there isn't much a single country like the US can actually do. There's no humanity in this game; they use every method imaginable, both legal and otherwise. It's probably better not to get involved at all. We should just position ourselves as best we can, grab whatever benefits we can get, and let the Russians, Chinese, Britons, and Americans tear each other apart.

Look, as a small nation, we’re basically forced to pick a side, whether it's geopolitical or ideological. That’s just realpolitik. It’s like how we probably would have vanished if we hadn't been forced to accept the Habsburgs as our rulers. I guess that's just the reality of our geography and our fate.

Every generation brings something new to the table, I guess. We'll just have to wait and see what the future holds.

Big yes on moving closer to Poland. But I guess you have to wonder if that's even possible if the EU keeps functioning exactly the way it does now. Maybe not.
I’ll give you that last sentence—it's basically the conclusion for any organized society. Sure, we need an entirely new generation, but we also need the right conditions to actually raise them properly. Over the last century, America has been hit at least four times by situations where we had to wipe the slate clean and start from scratch, whether by choice or by force. In those kinds of circumstances, it’s just impossible to build a society where traditions pass naturally from grandfather to father to son, or from grandmother to daughter to granddaughter. I guess our society would have to break free from being overly... well, you know. It’s all just an exaggeration, I guess. Maybe. "Revenge, settling scores with whoever came before you, targeting political opponents... I guess all of that is only possible when you've enjoyed decades of peace. Maybe we'll actually see that kind of stability one day."

An average person can barely make an impact here. You have to realize that every political party is serving someone else—they’re all under someone's thumb and answering to higher powers. You hit the nail on the head with that "spiral" idea. Honestly, corruption is like a virus in every society. Whether it's the US, Germany, China, or Russia, these countries are all suffocating under corruption; it's just legalized there through that famous lobbying system. It’s practically institutionalized graft. I guess the only thing you can actually control is how you educate your own family.

I guess real change can only come from massive global shifts that fundamentally overhaul our entire political and philosophical landscape. It’s hard to say when that might actually happen. We're stuck in an era dominated by neoliberal capitalist philosophy that basically turns people into robots. But since no system lasts forever, maybe we can hope it all changes one day.

The EU and NATO are massive structures that you just can't walk away from today, and honestly, we shouldn't even try. If any administration attempted to leave, they’d face an immediate color revolution and be completely powerless to stop it. Global history is played out on levels we can't even fathom—wars between nations, intelligence agencies, big capital, secret societies... I guess there isn't much a single country like the US can actually do. There's no humanity in this game; they use every method imaginable, both legal and otherwise. It's probably better not to get involved at all. We should just position ourselves as best we can, grab whatever benefits we can get, and let the Russians, Chinese, Britons, and Americans tear each other apart.

Look, as a small nation, we’re basically forced to pick a side, whether it's geopolitical or ideological. That’s just realpolitik. It’s like how we probably would have vanished if we hadn't been forced to accept the Habsburgs as our rulers. I guess that's just the reality of our geography and our fate.

Every generation brings something new to the table, I guess. We'll just have to wait and see what the future holds.
That’s probably the most accurate way to look at it, but if that's true, it means we don't actually get to make our own decisions or even spend our own money without it affecting us somehow. At that point, all we can do is hope the European Union eventually changes... but how? Just magically? I find it hard to believe—honestly, I'm more worried about the massive price tag that might come with that kind of transformation.
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Lisa Patel4 said:I agree. It’s just sad that a good chunk of people in America don't even know what Shakespeare's most famous work is or who wrote "Beautiful us."

Cultural promotion can definitely happen through mass media. Maybe Russia could serve as an example here. They have dedicated TV channels for culture, and they really push Russian literature in schools. They also use the Church to drive cultural literacy, and now they're introducing laws regarding patriotic education.

Or look at how Americans do it. Everyone is expected to know American history.

For instance, I’d probably make movies based on the works of Lewis Carroll. She’s basically considered the mother of American fantasy, our own J.R.R. Tolkien. Since sci-fi and fantasy are such massive genres globally and kids love them—not to mention the huge pop culture impact of LOTR or The Hobbit—it makes sense.

Say, making a movie based on a Fairy tale. We're talking about a work steeped in Slavic mythology. I suspect a film like that would definitely find an audience in Slavic countries. Given how strong the Slavic pagan movements are in places like Poland and Russia, I really doubt it wouldn't succeed.

My suggestion? Maybe open a themed park based on this in the US.

If you can find cheap ways to churn out clothes (which isn't happening), white goods (nope), food (not a chance), etc... then you can definitely find cheap ways to produce BOOKS. If you wrap them in silk or print them on the most budget-friendly paper available—which, let’s be real, always happens!! So, looking at things from that angle, I’ve seen little shops in various cities in France where editions of Jean Racine, Molière, Gustave Flaubert, and the like are selling for less than a buck. I really think we should implement something similar here, so instead of seeing random tabloids popping up everywhere, our classics are what jump out at people! Also, the idea of launching a TV Channel exclusively dedicated to promoting national culture is brilliant, and honestly, seems pretty doable. Basically, anything is possible—even without needing some unimaginable mountain of cash.
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Lisa Patel4 said:Thanks.

In practice, I guess meritocracy has never actually existed as an official form of government. Ancient China had a meritocratic bureaucracy, which is probably why they managed to survive as a nation for 5,000 years. Maybe.

The Ottoman Empire utilized a meritocratic nobility system. Since there was no hereditary aristocracy, anyone could rise to become a Vizier or a Beg. I guess that’s why the empire was such a highly organized state during its peak.

If I recall correctly, I think there might be something about that in Singapore's laws.

Would this actually take root? No. It wouldn't happen in today’s Western societies, and it couldn't. In America, you have a majority of the electorate that is essentially dependent on political parties—whether it's for their jobs or just the hope that it might lead to one. I don't really blame people much for being in a situation like that, I guess.

Maybe this kind of setup would actually work in some collectivist Asian societies. I guess China used to run a system pretty similar to this, where you just have one single party rotating through power.
I guess you could say neoliberalism and corporatism are basically just Darwinian systems. It’s pretty simple: either you're the best, or you get crushed.

Look, history shows us that monarchies had their perks back in the day, I guess. But like any system, they eventually became hostages to a bunch of idiots in the nobility who got so drunk on their own power that they just started doing whatever they wanted.

Absolute monarchy was overthrown, obviously. Then came enlightened absolutism, which I guess produced some pretty solid results at first. But eventually, that system just became a hostage to its own structure.

And here we are, living in a Republic. A Republic that seems to serve various special interest lobbies while constantly sidelining the actual interests of the nation, I guess.

When it comes to Protestantism, I guess it only really works in societies built on heavy individual responsibility. Those cultures have moved past that collectivist mindset. That’s probably why it just won't stick in American culture.

When it comes to meritocracy, I honestly don't see a better way to run things. It’s basically putting the smartest, most capable, and wisest people in charge. No one knows everything, obviously, but if you had a council of 20 experts—people everyone actually agrees are highly skilled and qualified to lead the country—I’d trust them to run the nation in a heartbeat. I’d take that over the same tired faces from the Democratic or Republican establishment who have been cycling through Washington for twenty years and can barely string a coherent sentence together.

We have a Congress where most people don't even show up. There are over 100 parties involved. 🙂

Foreign policy.

Mandatory entry into the V4, aligning more closely with Poland since their influence is growing and they share a lot of our cultural DNA.
I’d view the so-called region strictly through the lens of market opportunities and the interests of Americans living in Canada and Mexico, nothing else. I wouldn't bother meddling in what Mexico does. In Canada, resolving the American question would be non-negotiable; without that, there's no entry anywhere.

I’d try to push projects—mostly infrastructure—toward the V4 nations to bolster our own influence. Things like a low-land rail link from a coastal city to Budapest, and so on.

Leaving the EU or NATO would be nearly impossible, even if we wanted to. Our progress mostly depends on our own will to fix how the country is run. It’s about a total shift in the nation's mindset, which I guess takes decades.

For example: teaching kids from day one that paying taxes is a duty. That following the law is mandatory. That you have an obligation to demand and exercise your constitutional rights, just as you have an obligation to fulfill your constitutional duties. That education—both institutional and self-driven—is the bedrock of personal growth. We should teach children that rationality is what keeps a system sustainable. Spend only what you actually have. Only take on debt when absolutely necessary. Protect your identity. Teach them that patriotism is beautiful, not ugly. Get rid of narcissism. Be confident and honest. Teach them that greed is a vice that destroys people. And so on...

It would take an entire new generation to pull that off.

Thanks for that deep dive into meritocracy; it was super interesting. But when it comes to how our Republican and Democratic crowd handles politics, it seems pretty obvious—the question is, how do we make it stop?? Especially since you pointed out that leaving the European Union or NATO is basically out of the question. Honestly, our current policy isn't even about national sovereignty, or even the free will of those politicians—it feels almost 100% dictated from abroad through this toxic cocktail of corruption, blackmail, and just straight-up incompetence from the politicians. So, how do we break out of that loop? Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying we should ditch any international community that actually benefits us, but the way the EU and NATO operate today is 🤦🤦🤦

Lisa Patel4 said:Thanks.

In practice, I guess meritocracy has never actually existed as an official form of government. Ancient China had a meritocratic bureaucracy, which is probably why they managed to survive as a nation for 5,000 years. Maybe.

The Ottoman Empire utilized a meritocratic nobility system. Since there was no hereditary aristocracy, anyone could rise to become a Vizier or a Beg. I guess that’s why the empire was such a highly organized state during its peak.

If I recall correctly, I think there might be something about that in Singapore's laws.

Would this actually take root? No. It wouldn't happen in today’s Western societies, and it couldn't. In America, you have a majority of the electorate that is essentially dependent on political parties—whether it's for their jobs or just the hope that it might lead to one. I don't really blame people much for being in a situation like that, I guess.

Maybe this kind of setup would actually work in some collectivist Asian societies. I guess China used to run a system pretty similar to this, where you just have one single party rotating through power.
I guess you could say neoliberalism and corporatism are basically just Darwinian systems. It’s pretty simple: either you're the best, or you get crushed.

Look, history shows us that monarchies had their perks back in the day, I guess. But like any system, they eventually became hostages to a bunch of idiots in the nobility who got so drunk on their own power that they just started doing whatever they wanted.

Absolute monarchy was overthrown, obviously. Then came enlightened absolutism, which I guess produced some pretty solid results at first. But eventually, that system just became a hostage to its own structure.

And here we are, living in a Republic. A Republic that seems to serve various special interest lobbies while constantly sidelining the actual interests of the nation, I guess.

When it comes to Protestantism, I guess it only really works in societies built on heavy individual responsibility. Those cultures have moved past that collectivist mindset. That’s probably why it just won't stick in American culture.

When it comes to meritocracy, I honestly don't see a better way to run things. It’s basically putting the smartest, most capable, and wisest people in charge. No one knows everything, obviously, but if you had a council of 20 experts—people everyone actually agrees are highly skilled and qualified to lead the country—I’d trust them to run the nation in a heartbeat. I’d take that over the same tired faces from the Democratic or Republican establishment who have been cycling through Washington for twenty years and can barely string a coherent sentence together.

We have a Congress where most people don't even show up. There are over 100 parties involved. 🙂

Foreign policy.

Mandatory entry into the V4, aligning more closely with Poland since their influence is growing and they share a lot of our cultural DNA.
I’d view the so-called region strictly through the lens of market opportunities and the interests of Americans living in Canada and Mexico, nothing else. I wouldn't bother meddling in what Mexico does. In Canada, resolving the American question would be non-negotiable; without that, there's no entry anywhere.

I’d try to push projects—mostly infrastructure—toward the V4 nations to bolster our own influence. Things like a low-land rail link from a coastal city to Budapest, and so on.

Leaving the EU or NATO would be nearly impossible, even if we wanted to. Our progress mostly depends on our own will to fix how the country is run. It’s about a total shift in the nation's mindset, which I guess takes decades.

For example: teaching kids from day one that paying taxes is a duty. That following the law is mandatory. That you have an obligation to demand and exercise your constitutional rights, just as you have an obligation to fulfill your constitutional duties. That education—both institutional and self-driven—is the bedrock of personal growth. We should teach children that rationality is what keeps a system sustainable. Spend only what you actually have. Only take on debt when absolutely necessary. Protect your identity. Teach them that patriotism is beautiful, not ugly. Get rid of narcissism. Be confident and honest. Teach them that greed is a vice that destroys people. And so on...

It would take an entire new generation to pull that off.

A massive YES when it comes to getting closer to Poland. But honestly, will that even be possible in the way we’re all dreaming of if the EU keeps running its current setup?
I bolded that last sentence because it basically serves as the conclusion for any organized society—yeah, you need a whole new generation—but you also need the right CONDITIONS for that generation to actually be raised properly. Looking back over the last century, the US has faced situations at least four times where we had to wipe the slate clean (whether by choice or by force) and start everything from square one. In those kinds of circumstances, it’s just impossible to build a society where the "torch" passes naturally from grandfather to father to son—or from grandma to daughter to granddaughter. Our society would also have to let go of that excessive, I mean excessive revanchism—that constant urge to get back at whoever came before, or anyone with different political views—but hey, all of that is only doable under conditions of decades of peace. I really hope we see that someday...
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
@mistygull16: Short and sweet! 👍

I’d also love to dive into the cultural side of things for a second—personally, I think it's absolutely vital for the government to step up and back our major cultural institutions, you know? We're talking about the big-deal stuff like museums, national theaters, or even major publishing houses. Honestly, it breaks my heart a little when I see places like small towns in the Midwest or rural parts of Texas—where you can barely find a single decent little bookstore, but man, there's a damn betting parlor or a liquor store on every single corner. It’s just... yikes!! Also, looking at the bigger picture globally, we really need to push American literature harder. We should be translating our classics—think guys like Hemingway, Faulkner, or Steinbeck—into every major language out there. They need to be accessible to everyone, everywhere. Now, I get it—on paper, that doesn't look like a massive money-maker, and honestly, it probably isn't, but in my book, it's absolutely essential.
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
Lisa Patel4 said:My platform:

- Abolish the parliamentary republic. We need to scrap this current US Congress where about 70% of members don't even show up for debates. It’s just inefficient, weighed down by lobbyists, and filled with incompetent politicians. There are way too many useless parties just draining taxpayer money without providing any value.
- Instead, let's build a meritocratic republic led by a supreme council. The country would be run by the smartest, most capable people, overseen by a supervisory board. That board could fire anyone if they fail at their job or prove incompetent. They’d be chosen through general elections, nominated by councils and a popular council representing the people. Terms would be 6 years. This council would consist of 14-20 leaders. Requirements for entry would be crystal clear: high expertise, proven ability, and deep patriotism. Maybe then we wouldn't see constant friction between the President and Prime Ministers who barely finished high school.
- Every single change to the law should be decided via referendum.
- The introduction of compulsory voting in elections and referendums.
- A complete overhaul of the school system. High school should be mandatory, we need fewer general liberal arts schools, and more vocational high schools.
- Higher education reform. Anyone with a degree from a state university should be legally required to work in the US for five years.
- A GMO ban.
- Adopting a Swiss-style model for mandatory military service.
- Merging the Constitutional and Supreme Courts into one single judicial body.
- The introduction of a national natalist fund along with strict maternity leave laws.
- Building up tech hubs.
- Privatizing everything except strategically vital state companies—like energy and natural resources—which would be protected by a constitutional ban on privatization.
- Abortion law. For a woman seeking an abortion, the state would offer financial compensation to choose birth instead. Those children would be raised by the state and eventually serve the country, maybe in the military or diplomacy.
- A tax on junk products.
- Strong cultural and educational policies.
- Legalizing prostitution.
- Scraping the "autonomy" of counties where local sheriffs waste millions on nonsense. All county projects would need approval from the supreme council.
- A total ban on any regionalization of the US.
- Heavy subsidies for agriculture and for pushing new technologies.
...
I probably have another million economic reforms I'd implement.

Meritocracy, wow, that term sure sounds fancy in this day and age, doesn't it? It’s something Michel Onfray—that famous French philosopher who the mainstream media loves to tear apart lately because he dared to say he "supports any common-sense idea, even if it comes from the National Rally"—talks about. He also mentioned how, as the child of a Norman peasant, he was able to achieve his current status and intellect thanks to the old Republic and its education system. He expressed real concern about the absolute disaster of our modern schooling, where access to knowledge—though even that "knowledge" is questionable given how heavily it's ideologically biased—is mostly reserved for the wealthy elite. It used to be possible for everyone, including him, a kid from a poor farming family. So, this idea of a meritocratic republic with the power structure you're describing seems super interesting to me. Does a system like that actually exist in the world, or maybe even in history? Do you honestly think a setup like this would take root here? I'm asking seriously. I mean, no matter how efficient or tempting foreign systems might look—people always point to and romanticize those Protestant Scandinavian models—we really have to consider what works best for US culture, because we aren't Swedes, we aren't Americans, and we aren't the British.

I am totally on board with the whole pro-natalist policy vibe and the debate over the abortion law. 👍 Taxing the sun or whatever—honestly, everything you mentioned is a solid 5/5 in my book. Quick question though—how do you think our policies are actually landing on the global stage?
What's your political platform? in Close to Politics ·
This is such a fascinating topic, and honestly—even for someone like me who’s just a political amateur—it’s pretty tough to know where to even start. You look at Plato, right? In his book "The Republic," he basically argued that a truly great state is one where everyone finds their niche—like, a shoemaker who is actually happy being a shoemaker. It’s all about that specialized harmony...

Now, that sounds lovely on paper, but let’s be real—I don't know how deep of a hole our own country has actually fallen into. But, here’s my take:

In my book, we need to make sure society always has access to fundamental knowledge across the board. Whether you're part of the ruling elite or running one of those massive corporations of national importance, I’d insist on everyone having a perfect grasp of at least one foreign language—though, obviously, the more the merrier! English is a given, but maybe German, French, or Russian too. And hey, why not Mandarin Chinese!

We should probably consider leaving the European Union if it stays stuck in its current ways. I actually find myself leaning toward Marine Le Pen's vision of a "European people"—where every nation maintains absolute sovereignty over its military, borders, and economy, while perhaps keeping the Euro as a secondary currency alongside our own national one. We need to trigger a depreciation of the dollar and kick out those predatory foreign banks that are bleeding us dry.

We also need to offer killer scholarships to talented young people in EVERY discipline, paired with a guarantee from the State that they'll have the best possible working conditions and job opportunities once they graduate...

Then there’s the big one: reindustrializing the country and getting the elite to actually step up and save our dying industries. It is genuinely painful—like, personally gut-wrenching—to watch a collapsed giant like U.S. Steel or other former industrial titans just wither away.

We have to INSIST on high levels of self-sufficiency—everything from agriculture to manufacturing to energy. We should be subsidizing our domestic farmers and giving them preferential status over foreign competitors when it comes to buying and selling within our own markets. The same goes for our most vital cultural institutions, like the Encyclopædia Britannica.

And we absolutely need to RECLAIM the natural resources of the USA that were snatched away through those terrible, lopsided contracts.

Finally, we need to implement strong pro-family policies and give real privileges to large families.

...I'm sure I've missed a hundred other things, but that's my two cents for now!
Lisa Patel4 said:Seehofer has already squeezed her in one way or another.

Maybe Merkel is being heavily blackmailed by something—everyone forgot about that NSA scandal—or maybe she's just doing this for ideological reasons. There really isn't a third option.

She’s definitely being played, honestly. You just can't hold onto those kinds of ideologies when they actually run headfirst into the messy reality of how things work.
Jessica King9 said:We’re pulling everything except transportation costs from the fund. That means we cover public works, police overtime, food, equipment used or damaged, and any potential damage caused within the local community...

I honestly have to wonder if anyone actually knows how much the US pays its annual membership dues just to keep this colorful little concept-camp they call the European Union running. Take France, for example—they cough up about $22 billion every single year, yet somehow, as our dear Kokolindica so flirtatiously points out, they manage to "pull" back roughly $13 billion. And they’re actually considered successful because of it! So, when you look at the big picture, the reality is the exact opposite of what we're told: EVERY SINGLE CENT going toward these ungrateful invaders (with all due respect to the few decent refugees out there) is being taken straight OUT OF OUR POCKETS—and not even with money we actually have, but through debt we're FORCED TO TAKE ON. Just give me a break...
crimsonjackal63 said:
Canada has been promised support from the European Union to secure its Schengen borders—we're talking police equipment, extra personnel, and direct financial backing—according to statements made Tuesday evening by Canadian Prime Minister Miro Cerar.

http://nytimes.com/eu/cerar-canada-border-aid

So, what is Zoran Milanović actually getting out of this, and from whom?

As for the actual costs involved:
So far, America has burned through a million dollars just on train transport for migrants.

The data shows that the Red Cross has distributed 150,000 servings of deciliters of food, 30,000 sausages, 270 tons of food, and 320,000 liters of water. Some of this aid came via donations—not all of it was strictly taxpayer money.

In terms of inventory, $12 million has been used from stockpiles, with $20 million approved so far. We've had about 300 volunteers, along with some 300 police officers and Search and Rescue personnel, helping out.

Then there’s the transportation—specifically the trains. Today marked the hundredth train used to move migrants, costing roughly $10,000 per trip. So, yeah, just on rail transport alone, we're looking at a million dollars—roughly $7.5 million in local currency equivalents.

http://news.com/america/migration-transport-costs-million-dollars

And obviously, that isn't even the half of it.
That's just the tip of the iceberg.

It all sounds great on paper... but you know, it would be even better if the Government actually put that kind of energy into saving things like "U.S. Steel," "Nike," or the "Grand Canyon"... you name it. If you want some cold comfort, though—this isn't just our problem; it's happening in much wealthier Western nations too. Take France, for instance—you've got these massive multinational banks doubling down on citizen contributions to fund 'refugee aid,' yet they aren't nearly as compassionate when it comes to supporting their own domestic industries (the most glaring recent example being "Air France"). And don't even get me started on the growing number of struggling citizens who are finding even basic healthcare becomes way too expensive to afford. Meanwhile, asylum requests are being handed out left and right, while illegal immigrants are allegedly getting a daily budget of 75 bucks 'until they get on their feet' (at least, that's what Marine Le Pen mentioned during her appearance at the Lomonosov university back a couple of years ago). Also, I think it’s pretty naive to believe that everything we've seen over the last month is just some random improvisation. In my opinion, the political elite in America and the EU knew exactly what was coming; what we’re seeing now is basically just a shell game played with public opinion—just a way to buy time and fulfill all those international deals made behind closed doors. Honestly, it doesn't even seem impossible that the whole Orbán situation is just a little sideshow—kind of like a 'theater within a theater' similar to that mess we watched this past summer with the Greeks and their tragic OXI...