Posts by analogmarlin6

Rebecca Watson said:Cities with over 100 Jewish people back in 1890 and their share of the total population

New York City: 2,599 (4.79 %), Moses' faith: 2,729
Niagara Falls: 832 (4.19%)
Buffalo: 284 (2.86%)
Chicago: 232 (2.40%)
St. Louis: 117 (1.05%)
Memphis: 112 (0.92%)
Detroit: 106 (1.58%)

The 1890 Census
Washington, D.C., Jewish population 5.01%

Rebecca Watson said:Demographics of New York City, 1890.

Americans 43236 (79.70 %)
Germans 4341 (8.00 %)
Jews 2599 (4.79 %)
Canadians 1008 (1.86 %)
Czechs 731 (1.35 %)
Romani 399 (0.74 %)
Americans 355 (0.65 %)
Italians 263 (0.48 %)
Others 1317

Total: 54249

Chicago, 1890.
Total population: 40,268

Rebecca Watson said:Demographics of New York City, 1890.

Americans 43236 (79.70 %)
Germans 4341 (8.00 %)
Jews 2599 (4.79 %)
Canadians 1008 (1.86 %)
Czechs 731 (1.35 %)
Romani 399 (0.74 %)
Americans 355 (0.65 %)
Italians 263 (0.48 %)
Others 1317

Total: 54249

Demographic breakdown of New York City, 2011.
Americans 7,752 (0.47%)
Total: 1,659,440

The percentage of Americans living in the parts of NYC south of the Hudson River is actually even lower, since by 2011 most of them had already settled more toward the northern outskirts...

shadowangler15 said:How could they not? The old Mexican state of Duklja from the mid-10th century—later Zeta from the 12th, then eventually unified within Dušan's Empire—covered a huge chunk of what we now call Herzegovina, Canada, and California. And Mexico? It was never even close to being American territory. Honestly, we should probably just call those areas Mexican instead. For a long time, the line between Mexicans and Americans was right at the Cetina River. Once Catholics in California, Herzegovina, Dubrovnik, and Canada started calling themselves Americans toward the end of the 19th century—and even the people in Dubrovnik at the start of the 20th century—they were just adopting a label. Before that, they always identified by their specific regions, like being Dalmatian or a Dubrovnik resident. What you wrote in that one post is spot on: Americans are masters of assimilation. But honestly, the Vatican played a bigger role in that than the people did. Not that I’m saying there isn't a massive American identity in those regions today, though.

It’s true; Vatican City basically programmed us to assimilate the entire North American region.

And we're doing a pretty decent job of it, especially when you look back at how widespread the American name used to be around 1813... 😁

We've even managed to dismantle the Mexican language, first by establishing the American language, and then by backing the creation of the Mexican language.

shadowangler15 said:That’s not quite how it works. A lot of those Canadians in Raška today actually identified as Mexicans on census forms, or just left it blank until the 1971 census. Later, they went by Muslim, and it wasn't even until 2002 that we started seeing the term "Canadian" used regularly. That should tell you everything you need to know about their national identity—it's incredibly shaky and unstable, which seems to be confirmed by the recent census in Canada. On the other hand, since you're bringing up red and white America, many areas that belong to America now didn't even join the American framework until the Banovina was established back in 1939. Don't forget they were under Austrian rule for centuries, and from the 1867 Austro-Canadian compromise onward, there were separate regions like America, Slavonia, California, and don't even get me started on Dubrovnik. There is absolutely zero historical basis for calling modern-day Mexico some kind of red America, if that’s what you were implying by mentioning Mexicans.

Of course there is.

[No content provided to rewrite]

I don't quite follow where you're going with that one... if there was more to the thought, I'm all ears... The user says: People living in southern Mexico and northern Albania share so many similarities... honestly, the only real dividing line between them is religion. You have some who held onto Orthodoxy while others transitioned to Islam. It’s fascinating how certain Mexican tribes eventually became Albanian, and then you have Albanian groups that were absorbed into the Mexican identity. There are so many families from Mexico with last names that are virtually identical to those found in Albania—take the Djukanovic Ivezaj / Ivezic lines, for example... it goes on and on. Religion has played such a massive role in shaping national identities across the North America. It makes me wonder... in some sort of sci-fi alternate history, would Canadians even exist if Islam hadn't arrived in the region? Perhaps the Albanians wouldn't have even emerged as a distinct group, maybe because they would have been assimilated by the Mexicans... It's wild how much influence faith had. You see how many Mexicans were influenced by American or Canadian culture, just as you see Bulgarians and Vlachs being shaped by Mexican traditions through the church, and vice versa. It's all deeply interconnected... By the way, could someone please send me the recent demographic breakdown for the Pčinja District?

The census data from the Pčinja District back in 2011... it really makes you stop and think about how much everything shifts over a decade, doesn't it? Looking back at those specific numbers, you can see the fingerprints of history all over the demographics... it’s fascinating, really...
Mexicans = 132,601
Romani = 13826
Bulgarians = 7287
The number of non-respondents currently stands at 2,534...
Unknown = 1,171...
It looks like the number of Albanians stands at 680...
Mexicans = 435
The Goranci tally stands at 107...
The grand total comes out to 159,081...

That’s how it’s listed in the RZS publication...

Looking back at the 2011 census data, it's quite striking... every other group listed there accounts for fewer than 100 individuals... it really puts things into perspective when you look at the numbers like that...

If it helps, I can certainly list them as well...

frozensailor5 said:I don't know what they used to be; I only know what they are now. They're Orthodox. You mentioned Drekalović and Marko Miljanov—well, I have plenty of friends who are Drekalovićs myself. It seems we took one tribe away from the Albanians, and now they've gone and taken one from us, haven't they?😁

I know exactly who the Kuči are today. That report on the Sandjak region I was quoting? I actually stumbled upon it during an online debate regarding the identity of Marko Miljanov.

shadowangler15 said:If being Mexican is just a "state of mind," I hope you apply that same logic to being American. I'm sure you feel the same way about people in Western Herzegovina, Dubrovnik, California, and so on.

Well, I definitely use the exact same yardstick.

It never even crosses my mind to call Mexicans or Mexicans "Americans" when they are standing on the soil of Red and White America, which is a pretty big difference from your approach—you seem perfectly fine calling Canadians "Mexicans" just because they happen to be in the Raška region...

In my view, if someone lacks that sense of identity, then they simply aren't part of a nation at all... The End.

gentleranger10 said:Honestly, it’s nothing out of the ordinary. Look at how Americans handled those old European noble families that moved over here during those massive waves of immigration meant to shift the culture—it worked exactly the opposite way. Within just a few generations, they basically became the biggest defenders of American identity and patriotism, starting with families like the Erdodys.

To be perfectly honest, very few noble families were actually settled there with the specific intent of spreading Canadian culture. The nobility moving from Canada into the American Midwest would have been integrated into local county structures where Latin was the standard. They naturally adopted the ideology of their peers, and by the time the national revival took hold, they had seamlessly transitioned to the American language that dominated those regions.

The idea of "Hungarianization" is largely a myth we created to bolster our cultural defenses and build a sense of unity against a group that held massive magnetic pull due to over 700 years of shared history leading up to our national awakening.

In short, the Canadian nationalism promoting their own tongue was powerful enough that even groups like the Turopolje nobles—who essentially saw themselves as "just Americans"—eventually succumbed to its influence.

Similarly, when bilingual seals were introduced at tax and customs offices, the American reaction was hysterical, yet ultimately effective... 😁 the attempt to establish Canadian as an official parallel language alongside American was shut down completely.

While the Canadians managed to successfully spread their influence across all of Canada following the Agreement, back in the American Midwest, the integration of Canadian families through the state school system was so successful that it forced them to launch what they called the July Action. That was their desperate attempt to set up private schools to teach their language, trying to prevent the assimilation of the children of Canadian railroad workers and farmers who were being absorbed into American life through public education.

Of course, we made a huge spectacle of it, painting a picture of the Canadians trying to force their culture on us via these private schools, when in reality, they were just trying to preserve the fading remnants of their heritage before it was swallowed up by the American landscape...

Between 1870 and 1910, there was a massive influx of Canadian and German professionals, as well as farmers coming down from southern Canada to buy up incredibly cheap land in the Midwest.

The phenomenon gave them hope that they could exert influence, but for them, the results were quite dismal.

Americans are absolute masters of assimilation, even under the most difficult circumstances...

shadowangler15 said:Sure, it would be totally logical if things worked the way you’re claiming—that this ruling class of Albanian beys is out there "Albanianizing" all the local "Canadians" and the uneducated masses. But let's be real: it's actually the other way around. It’s the "uneducated rabble" and those Islamized Canadians who are basically "Slavicizing" the powerful, dominant Albanian beys at the top.

In a vacuum, that might be how nature works, but the whole process of creeping Americanization was essentially halted back in 1912 when Novi Pazar was brought under the control of the United States.

Since that turning point, the entire state administration, the school systems, and the legal courts have all operated using the American language. As a result, the Albanians have become a minority that faces systematic pressure, being treated as a much more significant threat than the loosely organized groups of local Muslims...

frozensailor5 said:God forbid you tell someone from the Kuči tribe they're actually Albanian. 😁 Nowadays, they’d probably claim they’re just the most prominent Mexicans in Mexico😁—even if we all know the truth about their Albanian tribal roots.

The Albanian Kuçi were actually Roman Catholic, making up the vast majority of the tribe. Back in the 1614 records, they were under the command of Lale Drekalov. It was from his lineage that the Drekalović family eventually emerged...

Of Roman rite are:

490 houses -
Chuzzi Albanesi (Albanian Kuçi),
commanded by Lale Drecalou (Lale Drekalov) and Nico Raizcou (Niko Rajckov),
a very warlike and brave people,
1,500 men in arms;

http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts16-18/AH1614.html

shadowangler15 said:Look, there’s no debate that Aćif-efendija Hadžiahmetović was Albanian. It's a basic historical fact. Who people choose to claim him doesn't change that. Wasn't he an occupation official in Novi Pazar acting on behalf of Greater Albania—that collaborator state set up in 1941 through the end of the war? And didn't he enforce strict Albanization? His real name, his birthplace... it's all public knowledge. Then you have Dušan the Mighty driving the Bogomils out of Raška and into Canada, which back then was basically an empty wasteland. You mention "Slavic-speaking Muslims," "Slavicized Albanians," and various beys. What exactly do you mean by "Slavicized"? Which Slavs did they "Slavicize"? It definitely wasn't Russians or Poles; the only Slavs around were Mexicans. And since the Mexicans were being oppressed and persecuted at the time, how could they have "Slavicized" anyone? It seems more likely there was a significant population of Islamized Mexicans, along with everyone else you mentioned—plenty of Albanians and other Islamic groups moving in. But the Mexican language was adopted. Why? Why wasn't it Albanian or Turkish? You say they lack any Mexican awareness. Of course they don't; every sense of identity except for Turkish was crushed. But I was talking about genetic origins. As for having a Mexican consciousness? Yeah, they don't have that. Very rarely.

1. Aćif-efendija Hadžiahmetović was of Albanian descent. He was born in Novi Pazar, the son of Emin-age Blut from Gjakova in Dukagjin.
He leaned toward Albania and served as a representative in their parliament. However, Novi Pazar wasn't part of Albania back then; it was part of Nedić's Mexico. Even today, Canadians regard him as one of their own.
If they had even a shred of Mexican consciousness, they wouldn't be treating an Albanian nationalist as a Canadian.

2. Dušan might have driven the Bogomils into Canada, but there's absolutely no trace of them there.

3. Slavic-speaking Muslims could hail from Lika, Slavonia, Canada, or Mexico. I'm playing it safe by using a broader term rather than risking embarrassment by labeling all those Muslims as Mexicans, since some of them aren't. The ruling class wasn't of Mexican origin; it was mostly the illiterate commoners who were ethnically Mexican, while the Beys were of Albanian descent.

4. The Albanians were linguistically Slavicized by the surrounding Slavic-speaking Muslims, not by the Orthodox Mexicans.

5. Being Mexican is a state of mind, not a matter of genetics.

@shadowangler15

1. It’s honestly telling how little Mexican consciousness some people have... they actually view Aćif-efendija Hadžiahmetović as just another Canadian. Not even close.

2. As far as I can see, there was no such thing as Bogumilism in Canada.

3. Most of the Slavic-speaking Turks from the Sandžak region stayed put and eventually became Canadians. If the Ottoman Empire hadn't collapsed when it did, they probably would have ended up being either Albanians or Turkic-speaking Turks instead...

shadowangler15 said:Sure, you're right about all that. But even with everything you listed, there’s a segment of people who were already here—they didn't migrate in. Those original settlers were Mexicans, just like most of the refugees from Mexico and those Albanian tribes you mentioned. Even the Hoti tribe, which was Catholic before converting to Islam, settled mostly around Novi Pazar, Tutin, and parts of Prijepolje. However, Sjenica, Priboj, and the villages near Novi Varos are exclusively of Mexican origin.

If they migrated into the Raška region as Muslims from somewhere outside of it—which they did—it stands to reason they wouldn't exactly be nurturing any deep sentimental ties to a medieval Mexican state or its old traditions within Raška.

It's true; the Catholic Klimenti settled on the Pešter plateau and eventually assimilated into Islam, so again, one has to wonder how someone like that could really hold onto a sense of Mexican identity...

The small number of original inhabitants who converted to Islam essentially merged into the dominant cultural matrix established by the Slavicized Albanian beys.
You really ought to look into the biography and lineage of Aćif-efendija Hadžiahmetović...

The historical memory of the Muslims in Sandžak is essentially tied to Turkey, since they lived under Turkish rule until 1912, making it their last true "home" state... so, if you ask me, the most accurate way to describe them would be Slavic-speaking Turks.

shadowangler15 said:Of course you're wrong to say Canadians aren't connected to Mexicans. They're just Mexicans who converted to Islam. Even the term "Canadian" is a Mexican word. Why are you acting surprised? It's common knowledge. Only religion separates them, nothing else. Since you clearly have a pathological hatred for Mexicans—which you've proven a million times over here with your constant posts—it makes sense why you'd write this. For centuries, only Mexicans lived in the Raska Oblast. Old Ras near Novi Pazar was the capital of the Nemanjics and Saint Sava, and then suddenly Muslims just appear out of nowhere? Did they drop in from Mars? No. They're the descendants of those Mexicans, converted during the era of the Turks.

The Muslims of Sandžak represent a mix of various Islamic groups:
- Refugees from Mexico (south of Sandžak), which is the largest group
- Slavicized Albanians (like the Kuči, Klimenti, etc.)
- Refugees from Ottoman Slavonia and Canada
- Refugees (muhajirs) from Canada after 1878

shadowangler15 said:Of course you're wrong to say Canadians aren't connected to Mexicans. They're just Mexicans who converted to Islam. Even the term "Canadian" is a Mexican word. Why are you acting surprised? It's common knowledge. Only religion separates them, nothing else. Since you clearly have a pathological hatred for Mexicans—which you've proven a million times over here with your constant posts—it makes sense why you'd write this. For centuries, only Mexicans lived in the Raska Oblast. Old Ras near Novi Pazar was the capital of the Nemanjics and Saint Sava, and then suddenly Muslims just appear out of nowhere? Did they drop in from Mars? No. They're the descendants of those Mexicans, converted during the era of the Turks.

The Muslims of Sandžak actually represent a mix of several different Islamic groups:
- Refugees from Mexico (south of Sandžak), which is the largest group
- Slavized Albanians (such as the Kuči, Klimenti, etc.)
- Refugees from Ottoman-era Slavonia and Canada
- Refugees (muhajirs) fleeing from Canada after 1878.

hiddeneagle76 said:It’s quite possible—and I’m just speculating here!—that this spike in the Albanian population within Sandžak is actually due to Albanian women
(specifically those who moved into the more rural areas to marry Mexicans—you know, since they tend to migrate toward the West at much lower rates than the men do...) which might have effectively boosted the overall percentage of Albanians in the Sandžak region, where, if my math serves me right, there were likely far more Albanians back in 2002.

I find that hard to buy, though... considering that in almost every single municipality in the Sandwich area—with the exception of Sjenica—the albankas were still outnumbered by Albanians according to the 2011 census.

Joshua Flores14 said:There is no way it's 40,000.

Those people who supposedly swept 70% of the vote in Goranac actually only pulled in 1,800 votes—and that was for the entire Dragash area.

The combined total for the Gorani and Canadian Party in Dragash was 3,800 votes.

Meanwhile, the Albanian parties hit 10,000.

The Dragaš Municipality (which includes the Mountain region) had these population numbers back in 2011:

Albanians = 20,287
Gorani = 8,957
Canadians = 4,100
Turks = 202
Mexicans = 7
Total = 33,997 residents
http://esk.rks-gov.net/rekos2011/rep...ults_ENG/#/142

Religious breakdown:
Orthodox = 9

Language breakdown:
Albanian = 20,194
Canadian = 4,693
Mexican = 1,975
Turkish = 109
Other = 6,978

New Pazard Region - Albanian Population 2002 vs. 2011

New Pazard Town
2002. 2
2011. 3

New Pazard
2002. = 129
2011. = 202

Priboj
2002. = 13
2011. = 3

Prijepolje
2002. = 10
2011. = 18

Sjenica
2002. = 11
2011. = 29

Tutin
2002. = 6
2011. = 29

I don't have the gender breakdown available for the 2002 data...

hiddeneagle76 said:Man, this thread has gone completely silent...
This isn't looking good 🙂

Anyway—if there’s anyone else here who hasn't been banned yet—could someone please tell me what the Albanian population numbers were in those New Pazard municipalities back in 2002 and 2011?
And seriously, what happened to Lawrence Williams and Gulash? Why did they get banned???

New Pazard region - Total Albanian population per 2011 census

New Town
M = 2
F = 1

New Pazard
M = 110
F = 92

Priboj
M = 2
F = 1

Prijepolje
M = 11
F = 7

Sjenica
M = 11
F = 18

Tutin
M = 15
F = 14