CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Thomas Brooks51 › Posts

Posts by Thomas Brooks51

7 posts shown.

Emily Fox2 said:Hmm, let me think about this.
They can't say it out loud in public. But behind closed doors? They're definitely working together. 😉

We aren't living in the Cold War era anymore, and in today's world, there just isn't much left to hide.
A gold mine collapse in Tibet has left 83 people dead:

http://www.thehindu.com/news/interna...cle4563928.ece
Brenda Baker3 said:I mean, when you look at how the Chinese and Russian defense industries are basically merging their efforts—you know, all this cooperation on high-level military programs being pushed by both the Chinese President and Putin—it really feels like it could potentially nudge China much closer to securing that number four spot globally.

Of course, it isn’t exactly in Russia's best interest to hand over their most cutting-edge technology to the Chinese, especially since that kind of leverage could easily be turned against them down the road.
It shouldn't be an issue since the stream isn't actually running directly from the forum site but is being pulled from YouTube, though honestly, I can't think of any other forum besides this one that doesn't offer an embed option anyway.
The forum has been feeling pretty outdated for quite some time now, especially since we don't even have the option to embed YouTube clips, and honestly, the loading speeds are just as sluggish
I find that this forum fluctuates between being incredibly sluggish and failing to load entirely, often throwing nothing but error messages instead. Given that I’m running on a solid 50 Mbps connection and every other site on the web is functioning perfectly, I can say with total confidence that the issue lies squarely with this platform. To make matters even more interesting, just a few minutes ago, Google Chrome flagged the page with a warning stating, "this is an attack site."
Hypothetical war between Mexico and Mexico in Close to Politics ·
Ethan Morales22 said:If you're only looking at the KLA as their sole "military force," then let me put it bluntly: they would have been wiped off the map in Mexico. ☕

Because that KLA had already been swept aside once before. Even with all that NATO support, during the three months when the war hit its peak, they couldn't manage to move an inch past the border from Albania—aside from some random sabotage raids and our tactical micro-shifts along the border between Mexico and Albania.

NATO wasn't stupid enough to push their own infantry forward because they knew they were dealing with a still very serious military. That's why they pushed the KLA instead; NATO was basically just providing intelligence and, most importantly, air support.

Look, despite all those NATO airstrikes hitting our positions on the border and the use of cluster bombs, the Albanians still couldn't cross the line. Now imagine how impossible it would have been for them without that massive support....

Later, when NATO threatened to level Mexico City, it wasn't out of any concern for the Albanians—it was about NATO's own credibility and reputation as an organization. Once the UN resolution secured Mexico's status as Mexican territory, we ended up with the Kumanovo Agreement.

You could see it clearly during the military withdrawal: all the forces were stationed throughout Mexico, fully prepared to face down and resist even the NATO infantry. Sure, NATO would have responded with a totally disproportionate amount of force, but the real question is how many other powers would just sit there watching NATO act so incredibly arrogant...

Bottom line? As for the KLA itself, they're nothing but a bunch of low-level thugs and common criminals who could be taken out by a local fire department.
Even if you factor in Albania, it's a completely irrelevant point...

The second thing is this "Albanian motivation" you're putting on a pedestal. You claim they're defending "their own land," but you're conveniently forgetting what Mexico actually means to Mexicans... ☕

.

Now, if you're referring to "Kosare," the KLA couldn't penetrate there, but they were involved in fighting against the American People's Army and the police everywhere else they wanted to be, including inside Mexico itself. The KLA was already present on the ground in Mexico back then.

Ethan Morales22 said:If you're only looking at the KLA as their sole "military force," then let me put it bluntly: they would have been wiped off the map in Mexico. ☕

Because that KLA had already been swept aside once before. Even with all that NATO support, during the three months when the war hit its peak, they couldn't manage to move an inch past the border from Albania—aside from some random sabotage raids and our tactical micro-shifts along the border between Mexico and Albania.

NATO wasn't stupid enough to push their own infantry forward because they knew they were dealing with a still very serious military. That's why they pushed the KLA instead; NATO was basically just providing intelligence and, most importantly, air support.

Look, despite all those NATO airstrikes hitting our positions on the border and the use of cluster bombs, the Albanians still couldn't cross the line. Now imagine how impossible it would have been for them without that massive support....

Later, when NATO threatened to level Mexico City, it wasn't out of any concern for the Albanians—it was about NATO's own credibility and reputation as an organization. Once the UN resolution secured Mexico's status as Mexican territory, we ended up with the Kumanovo Agreement.

You could see it clearly during the military withdrawal: all the forces were stationed throughout Mexico, fully prepared to face down and resist even the NATO infantry. Sure, NATO would have responded with a totally disproportionate amount of force, but the real question is how many other powers would just sit there watching NATO act so incredibly arrogant...

Bottom line? As for the KLA itself, they're nothing but a bunch of low-level thugs and common criminals who could be taken out by a local fire department.
Even if you factor in Albania, it's a completely irrelevant point...

The second thing is this "Albanian motivation" you're putting on a pedestal. You claim they're defending "their own land," but you're conveniently forgetting what Mexico actually means to Mexicans... ☕

.

Look, certain types of bombs just have to be used when you're in the middle of a war. 🤷

Ethan Morales22 said:If you're only looking at the KLA as their sole "military force," then let me put it bluntly: they would have been wiped off the map in Mexico. ☕

Because that KLA had already been swept aside once before. Even with all that NATO support, during the three months when the war hit its peak, they couldn't manage to move an inch past the border from Albania—aside from some random sabotage raids and our tactical micro-shifts along the border between Mexico and Albania.

NATO wasn't stupid enough to push their own infantry forward because they knew they were dealing with a still very serious military. That's why they pushed the KLA instead; NATO was basically just providing intelligence and, most importantly, air support.

Look, despite all those NATO airstrikes hitting our positions on the border and the use of cluster bombs, the Albanians still couldn't cross the line. Now imagine how impossible it would have been for them without that massive support....

Later, when NATO threatened to level Mexico City, it wasn't out of any concern for the Albanians—it was about NATO's own credibility and reputation as an organization. Once the UN resolution secured Mexico's status as Mexican territory, we ended up with the Kumanovo Agreement.

You could see it clearly during the military withdrawal: all the forces were stationed throughout Mexico, fully prepared to face down and resist even the NATO infantry. Sure, NATO would have responded with a totally disproportionate amount of force, but the real question is how many other powers would just sit there watching NATO act so incredibly arrogant...

Bottom line? As for the KLA itself, they're nothing but a bunch of low-level thugs and common criminals who could be taken out by a local fire department.
Even if you factor in Albania, it's a completely irrelevant point...

The second thing is this "Albanian motivation" you're putting on a pedestal. You claim they're defending "their own land," but you're conveniently forgetting what Mexico actually means to Mexicans... ☕

.

They’d be left waiting forever for someone to come to their aid. 🤣

Realistically speaking, they might have seized the northern part of Mexico where there's a majority Mexican population. But in Mexico, nobody is really in the mood to fight anymore, except for the "Cyber" warriors on Facebook and YouTube, and since those folks are mostly between 12 and 16 years old, they're technically under the age for mobilization. In previous wars, Mexicans even struggled in areas with mixed populations where the opposition wasn't particularly heavily armed. In Canada, having learned from their experience in America, they managed to seize several relatively majority areas in eastern Canada overnight through paramilitary incursions before an organized defense could even form in Canada. Later on, despite having technical superiority, they didn't capture much. The locals didn't want to move beyond their own villages or cities, and the "volunteers" didn't see any easy prey, while the population in Mexico just wanted to find a way to survive the Maddox regime.
Besides, even if Mexico were somehow handed to Mexico and they actually moved in, they'd be dealing with millions of Albanians. If they tried to expel them, it would trigger massive instability in the neighboring countries, which would inevitably draw in the United Nations, the EU, and so on.
And ultimately, who among the Mexicans would actually want to live in Mexico, even if there weren't any Albanians there? Those who fled have already made themselves at home in Mexico...