CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › mistyskipper71 › Posts

Posts by mistyskipper71

4 posts shown.

bluemason3 said:Sorry, I couldn't think of a title that really captures this, so feel free to edit 😬

This might lean toward pedagogy, but since we don't have a dedicated sub-forum for it here, I'll just drop it in.

Research suggests that IQ scores actually trend upward over time. I won't get bogged down in the specifics of what an IQ test measures or how much it relies on education levels. It’s enough to note that tests are scaled so that 100 remains the average; essentially, today’s average score would have been considered above average decades ago.

On the flip side, there seems to be a noticeable dip in student quality over the last few generations. I'm not citing specific studies for this—or at least, I haven't read them lately—but rather relying on the general consensus among university professors. This isn't just limited to one school or even one country; it seems to be a widespread sentiment across the West. Of course, it's hard to say if this perception is truly objective (subjective biases are common), and if anyone has data to disprove this, I'm all ears. For now, let's just treat it as a working hypothesis. The same might apply to K-12, though I don't have firsthand insight there.

A few possibilities come to mind:

- Failed attempts at large-scale educational reforms, similar to the shifts seen in European systems.

- A higher standard of living leading to more "entitlement" and, consequently, less drive.

- A shift in how we process information following the rise of the internet and computers, where
a - the educational system failed to adapt its methods and criteria to these new realities
or
b - certain cognitive skills have actually suffered due to overexposure to digital tools.

- Excessive liberalization regarding students, who often receive more rights than their experience allows them to use constructively, leaving faculty with very little room to maneuver.

- Increased social pressure to pursue higher education, pushing a larger percentage of people into universities without any genuine interest in the field or actual market demand.

- A lack of motivation or perspective stemming from some other unknown factor.

Those are just some quick thoughts I had while typing this out. Maybe I'll think of something else later.

Do you have other theories on what might be causing this, or perhaps evidence suggesting that the initial premise is flawed?

Also, does anyone know what the situation looks like in non-Western education systems? Just speculating, but it wouldn't surprise me if rising nations like China and India are seeing the exact opposite trend, given that education is becoming more accessible while economic pressure remains intense.

I pretty much agree with everything you wrote, but I’d highlight these four points specifically. As a college student, I see examples of this all the time. I assume you have plenty of your own, so I won't list them, but if you really want them, I can.

One thing I’d add is how incredibly hard it is for some people to accept that they just aren't cut out for certain majors. It gets absurd. You see someone with average—or even slightly below average—intelligence finish high school and decide *not* to go to college because they realize it might be too tough. Meanwhile, someone significantly below average thinks they can handle it and enrolls anyway (mostly because they aren't self-aware enough to know their limits). For instance, there’s a guy at my university who failed his entire freshman year twice. Even though he clearly tried, he eventually switched to a slightly—and I mean slightly—easier major, and now he's starting his third attempt at year one.

bluemason3 said:Sorry, I couldn't think of a title that really captures this, so feel free to edit 😬

This might lean toward pedagogy, but since we don't have a dedicated sub-forum for it here, I'll just drop it in.

Research suggests that IQ scores actually trend upward over time. I won't get bogged down in the specifics of what an IQ test measures or how much it relies on education levels. It’s enough to note that tests are scaled so that 100 remains the average; essentially, today’s average score would have been considered above average decades ago.

On the flip side, there seems to be a noticeable dip in student quality over the last few generations. I'm not citing specific studies for this—or at least, I haven't read them lately—but rather relying on the general consensus among university professors. This isn't just limited to one school or even one country; it seems to be a widespread sentiment across the West. Of course, it's hard to say if this perception is truly objective (subjective biases are common), and if anyone has data to disprove this, I'm all ears. For now, let's just treat it as a working hypothesis. The same might apply to K-12, though I don't have firsthand insight there.

A few possibilities come to mind:

- Failed attempts at large-scale educational reforms, similar to the shifts seen in European systems.

- A higher standard of living leading to more "entitlement" and, consequently, less drive.

- A shift in how we process information following the rise of the internet and computers, where
a - the educational system failed to adapt its methods and criteria to these new realities
or
b - certain cognitive skills have actually suffered due to overexposure to digital tools.

- Excessive liberalization regarding students, who often receive more rights than their experience allows them to use constructively, leaving faculty with very little room to maneuver.

- Increased social pressure to pursue higher education, pushing a larger percentage of people into universities without any genuine interest in the field or actual market demand.

- A lack of motivation or perspective stemming from some other unknown factor.

Those are just some quick thoughts I had while typing this out. Maybe I'll think of something else later.

Do you have other theories on what might be causing this, or perhaps evidence suggesting that the initial premise is flawed?

Also, does anyone know what the situation looks like in non-Western education systems? Just speculating, but it wouldn't surprise me if rising nations like China and India are seeing the exact opposite trend, given that education is becoming more accessible while economic pressure remains intense.

I don't have many connections outside of the US and neighboring countries, except for one friend studying in Syria (he was born there, just so we aren't confused thinking he's just an exchange student). I don't know if you'd consider them a "non-Western" society. Regardless, the situation there (at least before the war) was similar to ours; most people just enroll in college because it's what you do. So, I don't have much useful to add.
Senegal Presidential Elections in World ·
Over the last few weeks, we've been watching the elections unfold in Senegal, which is actually one of the most stable nations in Africa.
The incumbent, Wade, lost out to his former head of government, Salla. Some people might not realize that the outgoing president, Wade, is likely the most highly educated leader in any country—the guy holds two doctorates. That’s pretty incredible considering he’s from such a volatile region. On the flip side, his critics have constantly hammered him for corruption and nepotism, though even Sall had to deal with a money laundering scandal back in the day.
How do you think Salla winning will shift the political landscape in Senegal? I’m not holding my breath here... it feels like this guy owes everything he’s achieved to the previous president rather than his own actual talent.

Also, if anyone can explain why the media is acting like Wade's loss is this massive triumph for democracy? It's frustrating, because Wade was the one who actually brought something resembling democracy to Senegal... even if his predecessors did a decent job laying the groundwork for the stability required to make democracy work in the first place.
Non-US Movies in Movies ·
mellowstag17 said:You make it sound way too simple. People just prefer watching American movies over anything from Europe, mostly because the marketing is better. Everything looks flashier and more exciting when they slap a title like Terminator or maybe Armageddon on the poster instead of some European flick. And honestly, another big reason is that European films tend to attract more attractive and intelligent people—kind of like you and me. 😍 Meanwhile, the less refined crowd sticks to American stuff...

Haha, I’m with you on both counts 😉. Yeah, a catchy name and massive ad campaigns really do work wonders, unfortunately. I just can't wrap my head around people who systematically ignore European or Asian cinema without ever having seen a single thing. Even more baffling are the people who flip on the TV and pick some trashy American movie with cheap CGI and acting so bad an amateur would be embarrassed, especially when they could easily put on a decent foreign film with a similar theme... there are plenty out there.

P.S. I'm looking at the Best Foreign Language Film nominees for 2009 and 2010 right now—out of ten films, it's ten dramas (maybe two have elements of another genre).
Non-US Movies in Movies ·
Hey there!
I started this thread for two reasons. First, I want to figure out why non-US movies get such little airtime. Outside of English-speaking countries, they barely ever show up on TV—if they show up at all, it’s usually some random flick after midnight. Look, I get it, the US produces a massive amount of content, but other film industries are killing it too. Take China, Russia, or even Spain, for example. There’s a whole library of old Italian horror and epic cinema out there—and sure, maybe not everything is a masterpiece, but most of them still beat the junk we see on TV daily. And don't even get me started on Indian films across all those different genres. Is it just pure laziness from the networks, picking whatever is easiest to license? Or maybe they’re scared of "controversial" stuff? It makes me wonder why you can't find a single Soviet war movie on our channels lately, or why the one South Korean film that’s even slightly anti-American, the Taegukgi Voyn, is nowhere to be found...
The second thing is this: whenever they *do* decide to air something non-American, it’s almost always some heavy drama about struggling in a place like the Middle East or the North America, or some depressing look at modern life in the European Union. Why is it so rare to see foreign thrillers, horror, epics, action flicks, and stuff like that?