Posts by Eric Fowler19

Selling a kids' clothing BUNDLE, sizes 98/104 - $50, willing to sell pieces separately too

Zara jeans and a Spiderman t-shirt size 98/104
Puma leather sneakers, size 27
H&M rubber rain boots, size 27
Diechmann olive green boots, size 28, but realistically fits like a 27

http://public.fotki.com/maza2/

BOYS' CLOTHING BUNDLE size 98/104

H&M jeans, Spiderman t-shirt, Nike leather sneakers size 7, Gap rubber rain boots size 7, and Dietrich olive green boots size 8—practically a size 7

PICK UP ONLY $50, shipping included

http://ebay.com/

BOYS' CLOTHING BUNDLE, size 98/104

Includes ZARA jeans, a Spiderman t-shirt, Nike leather sneakers (size 27), Gap rubber boots (size 27), and Dietrich olive green boots (size 28, fits more like a 27)

CASH ONLY $50, shipping included

http://public.fotki.com/maza2/

BOYS' CLOTHING BUNDLE, sizes 98/104

Zara jeans, Spiderman t-shirt, Puma leather sneakers size 27, H&M rubber boots size 27, and Dick's Sporting Goods olive green boots size 28—practically a 27

PICKUP ONLY $50, shipping available via Printful

http://public.fotki.com/maza2/

This weekend only: HUGE BUNDLE for boys, size 98/104

Gap jeans, Spiderman t-shirt, Nike leather sneakers size 9, H&M rubber boots size 9, and some olive green boots from Famous Footwear size 10—honestly fits like a 9

ONLY $50, shipping included

http://public.fotki.com/maza2/

LOOKING TO BUY if anyone has
TURTLE POWER TRACKSUIT BOTTOMS SIZE 4T
from Kroger

Full outfit bundle for boys $50 shipping included size 98 and shoes size 9

Zara jeans and a Marvel shirt, size 98
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/zara-traperice-i-sp/
Puma sneakers, size 9
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/zimske...10-155939.html
H&M rubber boots, size 9
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/zimske...10-160356.html
Carter's boots, size 9
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/zimske...10-160425.html

Selling boys' clothes, sizes 98/104
Items available:
Fall clothing bundle, sizes 3-4 years
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/lot-3-4-godine/

Walmart Marvel tracksuit, size 98/104
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/kik-spiderman-treni/

Zara jeans size 98 and a Gap Marvel shirt, size 4
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/zara-traperice-i-sp/

H&M Sport tracksuit, size 98/104
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/hm-sport-trenirka-v/

Winter boots, snow boots, and Puma sneakers, sizes 27-28
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/zimske-obua/

Selling boy's clothes, sizes 98/104.
Items available:
Fall clothing lot, ages 3-4.
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/lot-3-4-godine/

Walmart Spiderman sweatpants, size 98/104.
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/kik-spiderman-treni/

H&M jeans size 98 and Spiderman shirt size 4.
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/zara-traperice-i-sp/

H&M sport sweatpants, size 98/104.
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/hm-sport-trenirka-v/

Winter boots, heavy boots, and Puma sneakers, sizes 27-28.
http://public.fotki.com/maza2/zimske-obua/

Jesse Sanchez90 said:Wait, so you guys never even received a formal warning before they went straight to enforcement?

No.
We paid the debt. Account is unlocked now. Just waiting on the refund from the damn IRS.

I think she filed her objection with a notary public. "..she wrote an objection, dammit.." The objection was actually drafted and sent back on August 23, 2013, yet she didn't show up here until October 8th.
It goes back to what I said earlier: she's completely in the dark. Even if she had gone to a lawyer, the result would be the same.
If the objection is solid, the court will issue an order to stay the enforcement—expect that to take about six months—plus there'll be a cost of $33 that she’ll have to cover. I'm pretty sure she didn't pull her tax clearance or file a motion to waive court costs. So, my only advice to her is to pay those $33 RIGHT NOW (it looks like she can only file that motion when she submits the objection). Otherwise, she'll get a notice for additional $33 fees, pushing the total cost up to $67. Oh, I forgot to mention: the law prohibiting certain fee charges doesn't apply to court proceedings.

if you're talking about my situation, that was August 22, 2011 not 2013
never got a single summons from the court, and two years have passed since then.
It's confirmed, damn it, that the objection was sent to the court, but someone obviously screwed up somewhere between the office and the courthouse.

John Clark6 said:Now, my dear lady, you can finally rest easy! In my opinion, Hanžeković really should have forwarded that appeal over to JB—whether they actually did or not, well, neither of us truly knows, I suppose. But look, there are specific legal remedies designed for exactly these kinds of situations, and I don't mean just filing an objection, an appeal, or more back-and-forth paperwork—even if you are absolutely in the right. There are much stronger options out there. So, I wasn't just being dramatic when I suggested finding a lawyer right away!

You totally missed my point.
The timely objection was sent to the notary back in 2011, along with the payment receipt for the broadcaster. My only mistake was not notifying Hanžeković at that time.
I just sent a formal complaint via email today—2013—to Hanžeković, the broadcaster, and the notary all at once, since the debt was actually settled in 2011.
Well-known people have influence with Hanžeković, so we’re going to try to resolve this directly.😁
We'll just pay a portion of the collection fees, definitely not the final judgment costs.
They promised the account would be unblocked.

vividraven26 said:Honestly, you should have just sent it to JB so they could pass it along to Hanžeković and call it a day. Look, I get it, there's a mountain of paperwork and it's a total headache to parse through, but you can just read it a few times until it clicks. Based on those papers (the first set), you're on the hook for the bill, the interest and the portion for JB. With the interest, most people just pay a ballpark figure because let's face it, not everyone is a math whiz, and then HRT will just mail you a corrected invoice later if you underpaid.
Back in the day, you could just settle the debt and notify JB without worrying about their fees, but they've totally covered their backsides now; they're claiming they'll freeze the whole enforcement process unless you pay everything . (I've been in both situations 😁). If you ask me, you missed a step here.

I contacted the service provider and filed a formal complaint with JB, but I didn't reach out to Hanžeković.
I sent them an email and I'm waiting to hear back. If necessary, I'll just pay the seizure costs directly.

vividraven26 said:But wait, did you guys actually send over the payment slips to Baker McKenzie right after you settled things—you know, covering the principal, the interest, and their specific fees—because isn't that exactly what it said on that first notice they sent you?

See, part of those costs listed are stuff you definitely owe Baker McKenzie for, because they didn't just do all that work for fun, right? They were forced into it because you guys didn't settle up when CNN sent out those initial warnings.

I sent it over to the network, but now I realize I should have sent it directly to the receiver's legal representative. That’s obviously Scalia. 🙂
It’s written that way on purpose. They want to make sure nobody knows exactly who to report this to. And what about that notary who's partnered up with Scalia?
I sent him a formal complaint about their lack of cooperation.
What kind of global scum are we dealing with here?
I’m filing an objection tomorrow. Everyone gets one.🙂

Daniel Martinez9 said:No, no, no, no, no. Once again... no, no, no, no, no, no, no. (Check John Clark6's post)

Look at the date on the front page showing when it was filed. That’s the official date and year. People mess up the year all the time. The front page needs to have a stamp with the date next to or above the "FILED" notation.
YOU MUST FILE AN OBJECTION
If it was filed before July 5th, 2011, you’re still stuck with some attorney and public notary fees (though not all of them). I wrote up a guide for filing objections here.
If it was filed after that, just write one sentence stating the debt was already paid, contest the entire collection order, and attach a copy of the payment receipt.
The only thing I'm unsure about is if it was filed exactly on July 5th, 2011. Maybe someone more experienced who dealt with that can chime in.

The collection proposal doesn't have a date; instead, it says CNN is seeking the debt $83 plus interest up to June 28, 2011, and includes an extract from the accounting books dated June 28.
We paid on July 5, 2011, and the collection order was written on July 15.
The collection order was sent on August 18, 2011, and picked up at the post office on August 22, 2011.

Objection written on August 23, 2011, and sent via certified mail.
Finally found the documents and the postal receipt at home.
In the objection, we state we paid, include a copy of the payment, and I'll argue that I can only pay the interest from June 23 to July 5, and that we shouldn't have to pay the collection costs.
I am requesting that the collection proceedings be stayed.

Never received a call from the court. Tomorrow I'm emailing them the objection with scanned copies of everything, demanding they stay the collection.
I'm also going to demand proof that they forwarded the objection to the court.
Is there any chance they will stay the collection? Or should I ask for the payment info, pay it, and then sue the court for a counter-claim?
Has anyone actually succeeded with this?

John Clark6 said:Let's go over this for the hundredth time—it really all comes down to when the public notary actually received the proposal, not just when you guys got notified, especially when we're talking about whether payments were made on time... I mean, if you haven't changed your registered address, or if that address doesn't even match where you're actually living right now, then everything just ends up posted on the court's bulletin board. So, any guesses as to which scenario would actually lead the Federal Reserve to unfreeze an account?

I just checked. The public notary issued the debt collection order on July 15th, while CNN provided the ledger extract back on June 28th.
The payment was made on July 5th, 2011.

John Clark6 said:Let's go over this for the hundredth time—it really all comes down to when the public notary actually received the proposal, not just when you guys got notified, especially when we're talking about whether payments were made on time... I mean, if you haven't changed your registered address, or if that address doesn't even match where you're actually living right now, then everything just ends up posted on the court's bulletin board. So, any guesses as to which scenario would actually lead the Federal Reserve to unfreeze an account?

We filed the seizure motion and signed the objection right on schedule.
Shouldn't we have received a summons from the court by now?

My husband just got hit with an enforcement order and a collection notice all in one envelope from Baker McKenzie.
He picked up the notice on August 22, 2011, but the bill was actually already paid back on July 6, 2011.
We filed a formal objection and attached the proof of payment, yet here we are two years later still dealing with an enforcement action.
I’ve searched the entire house and found the postal receipt proving we sent it via certified mail, but I can't find the actual return receipt anywhere—dammit. I was positive it had been mailed back to us.

We never received any official notification that the enforcement order was finalized, but they’ve already frozen his account, probably to cover their own legal fees.
Tomorrow he’s heading to the Federal Reserve with copies of the payment, our previous objection, and the postal receipt.
Should we try calling Baker McKenzie or CNN? We tried calling before but couldn't get a soul on the line.
Can we argue that he never received a legally binding final decision?
Under what specific circumstances will the Federal Reserve unfreeze the account?

Raymond Bishop41 said:Were you perhaps talking about Hypo Real Estate Inc.? Does anyone here know anything about these thieves? If anyone has info, please reach out. Shady brokers, working alongside crooked American lawyers and notaries, along with what were then the top Austrian execs, ruined my family and about 20 others just like us. We had it the worst—some of us were paying our installments religiously until that "bank" collapsed and everyone ended up in jail (except for those crook middlemen). We thought everything was totally legitimate, but 👎 Basically, it's been six years of lawsuits, foreclosures, and public auctions for the full amount of the loans and leases, because they refuse to acknowledge the payments we already made. They're being represented by a big law firm in Chicago. Financially and morally, they've destroyed us. Our court system seems completely blind to this kind of fraud; legally speaking, we're powerless. The lawyers have bled us dry, and we can't even afford to keep fighting these court cases. We're going to lose everything, even though we actually paid off the loan.

Were you paying the brokers, who clearly weren't passing the money to the bank, or were you paying the bank directly?
Do you have proof of payment?
I ask because a friend of mine took out a loan from an Austrian bank, using property on the coast as collateral.

vividhawk87 said:Bringing this back up...
Look, it’s been a week now, and I’ve had a killing headache for the last three days!!!!
Since I wear glasses, could this be eye pressure? It hurts right behind my eyes, mostly on the left side. Two days ago, while I was changing the baby, my left eye just went blurry—I couldn't see a thing. For about five minutes, I was screaming at my husband to turn the light on and check my eye (it was late at night), because it felt like my eye was drifting, though he said everything looked fine. My vision would clear up if I focused on something close by. Then it just stopped. Has anyone else dealt with this?
It hasn't happened again, but the headache won't quit. Sometimes it's so bad I can't sleep.... should I take Tylenol?

You can take Tylenol or Advil.
I wear glasses too, and whenever the heatwave hits, my head starts pounding.
Did you have a C-section or a vaginal birth? After a C-section, you can get headaches from the spinal anesthesia.
Regardless of how you gave birth, I had a one-sided headache behind my eye for a few days last week. Might be eye pressure combined with the heatwave.
If it doesn't go away, go to the doctor....