CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › wearyhawk273 › Posts

Posts by wearyhawk273

21 posts shown.

I was sitting in my living room last night, scrolling through the schedules for the upcoming season, and I realized something that’s been bothering me for a few years now. There is this massive, almost overwhelming buildup to the very first weekend of the season. Every major outlet, every pundit on TV, and every social media account starts acting like the opening fixtures are the most monumental events in human history.

Don't get me wrong; I love the sport. I love the anticipation of a new campaign. There’s a specific kind of electricity in the air when you realize the long wait is finally over. But lately, it feels like the "Opening Weekend" has become a brand in itself, rather than just the start of a long, grueling marathon. We treat these first few matches like they are the championship deciders, or like the entire trajectory of the season is decided by who wins on day one. It’s a lot of pressure to put on the players, and honestly, it feels a bit performative to the fans.

I remember back in my early twenties, going to matches felt much more... organic? It wasn't about the "narrative" or the "clash of titans" headlines. It was just about showing up, grabbing a pint, and seeing if the team could actually hold their own. Now, it feels like every single matchup is framed through this lens of historical significance or "statement wins." If a defending champion plays a mid-table side in the first round, the media acts like it's a collision of galaxies. If the underdog pulls an upset in week one, the "changing of the guard" headlines are out within minutes.

It makes me wonder if we’ve lost the ability to appreciate the grind. A season isn't won or lost in those first eighty minutes of the opening fixture. It’s won in the mud in mid-winter, in the tactical adjustments made in month four, and in the physical resilience shown when everyone is exhausted in the final stretch. By over-hyping the start, are we actually devaluing the actual work that happens throughout the rest of the year?

I also find the "predictive" nature of the hype cycle exhausting. You see these massive previews where people are already crowning winners or predicting collapses based on a single summer signing or a minor injury. It feels like we're trying to write the ending of a book before we've even finished the first chapter. It creates this artificial tension that often leads to massive disappointment when the actual reality of the season—which is usually much more chaotic and less linear than the pundits suggest—sets in.

I've noticed a trend where the "big" games are so heavily promoted that the smaller, more tactical battles get completely ignored. We focus on the heavyweights clashing at the start, but we miss the subtle shifts in power that happen in the middle of the season. I personally find much more joy in seeing a team find their rhythm in November than I do in watching a highly-anticipated opening blowout where the result feels almost scripted by the hype.

I want to know what you guys think. Do you actually enjoy the massive buildup and the "big event" feel of the opening weekend, or do you find the media's obsession with the season's start to be a bit much? Does the hype make you more excited to watch, or does it just make the eventual reality feel like a letdown?
I was watching some old highlights last night, just scrolling through some classic matchups, and it got me thinking about the sheer volatility of a competitive season. We often talk about "contenders" and "rebuilders" like they are fixed categories, like different species of animals, but the reality feels so much more fluid and, honestly, a bit more frustrating to follow.

There is this specific feeling you get when watching a team that seems to be on the verge of something great—you can see the talent, you can see the momentum building, and you can see the individual pieces starting to click—but then the reality of the calendar hits you. You look at the standings, you look at the date, and suddenly that "potential" feels like it's slipping through your fingers. It’s that weird limbo where you aren't quite a powerhouse yet, but you're too good to be considered a complete bottom-feeder either.

I’ve always found the concept of the "trade deadline" to be one of the most psychologically taxing parts of being a fan. It’s the ultimate moment of truth. For some teams, it’s a moment of celebration where you finally pull the trigger on that piece you’ve been eyeing to complete the puzzle. But for so many others, it’s a moment of profound uncertainty. Do you hold onto your assets in the hope that a sudden surge of momentum will change your fate? Or do you dismantle the roster, sell off the pieces, and admit that this year simply isn't the one?

It feels almost cruel. You can have a night where everything goes right—the bats are hot, the timing is perfect, and everything seems to be falling into place—and it feels like you're ascending. But then, the math catches up to you. A losing streak here, a sudden drought in power hitting there, and suddenly the math says you're out of the race. It makes you wonder if "momentum" is even a real thing, or if it's just a narrative we construct to make sense of the inevitable ebb and flow of a long season.

I remember a few years back, I was rooting for a team that had this incredible young core. Every single night, I’d tell myself, "This is the year, they're finally turning the corner." We’d have these explosive games where the energy was electric, and I'd be convinced we were headed for a deep run. And then, almost overnight, the window just slammed shut. They didn't get worse; they just didn't get better fast enough. It’s that gap between talent and timing that kills so many seasons.

It also makes me think about how we value players. We see a kid come in and absolutely tear it up for a few days, and we immediately start projecting them as the next superstar. We build entire fanbases around the "promise" of a single player. But how much of that is actual skill, and how much is just a temporary peak in a very long, very bumpy development curve? Watching a young player have a massive night can be intoxicating, but it can also be a trap for fans who want to believe the rebuilding phase is over.

I'm curious to hear what you all think about the philosophy of "staying the course." When you see a team that has a lot of upside but is clearly struggling to stay relevant in the standings, do you prefer the aggressive move to "win now," or do you think there's more value in being patient and letting the young talent mature, even if it means a losing season?
Operation Pedophilia in Close to Politics ·
George Morgan3 said:But let’s be real—it was actually the priests who were the scientists and the architects behind almost all the scientific theories that modern atheists now swear by... everything from the Big Bang to evolution...

signature
Operation Pedophilia in Close to Politics ·
Hannah White2 said:This whole pedophilia mess is basically the final nail in the coffin for the KC, and honestly, I don't see anything redeeming about that organization anymore.
Whenever I'm flipping through some documentary, it's wild how the word "Scientist" is treated with such reverence—it's like they’re trying to recapture that old-school authority priests used to carry back in the day.

😂

Man, how many times have we heard about these "final" collapses already? It's becoming a tired routine...
We all know which one was supposedly the first, yet here we are, facing what's claimed to be the last...🤷
Operation Pedophilia in Close to Politics ·
George Morgan3 said:I don't get why this whole topic keeps circling back to the church and priests...

Look, your average pedophile is usually just some married guy—well, divorced now, I suppose—who has his own kids and works as a psychologist most of the time. They’re either related to the victim or they're someone close to the family circle... I mean, sure, you'll find pedophiles among priests, but you'll find them among IT programmers too, definitely among air traffic controllers, politicians, even war heroes... it's everywhere if you look...

Među svećenicima sigurno ima pedofila, među IT programerima sigurno, kontrolorima leta definitivno, političarima, herojima NOBa...

signature
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
goldengull3 said:They have grasped it. 🙂 I can't speak for Americans, but the Italians will manage; if anything, they'll come out stronger. Italians have no interest in impoverished markets where people don't have the cash to spend on style. Take this, for instance—a classic example of their approach:

A small car, further refined by a high-end design house, priced nearly double what a standard model would cost... and yet, they always find someone willing to pay.

The fundamental issue here in America—we haven't even bothered to decide what our actual strengths are.

I mean, the Americans will figure it out eventually... they're adaptable... it's practically baked into their DNA. And if you're using the Italians as your benchmark, well, they might be the perfect example... those guys are pure salesmen; they'll sell you the design, the dream, and everything else under the sun 🙂
All jokes aside, I completely agree with your point.

Because if we don't even know what we're good at by now, then...🤷
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
goldengull3 said:The Mayor of Trieste, Goran Milić, recently dropped a statement that was nothing short of brilliant. It went something like this: The Chinese? They aren't a threat to us. Once they actually build up some real wealth, they'll be flocking to Italy just to shop for designer shoes.

That is simply the nature of global capitalism. Even if Italy were facing a thousand different crises, they would find a way to navigate them successfully; they have already realized that their best moves happen on the world stage.

Decent fashion footwear.
Small, punchy little cars.

You’ll end up waiting six months just to get your hands on that pearl white Ford Model T, only to pay full price for the privilege. $40You don't want it? Fine. Drive a Chevrolet or a Nissan instead; there will always be another buyer waiting for that Ford. And trust me, they always show up.

Nobody alive can truly predict what kind of fallout globalization is going to leave behind in 5, 15, or 50 years. There's no doubt there's already a massive number of Chinese people out there who are wealthier than even the most comfortable Italian middle class. Are they coming over specifically for the shoes? Maybe. Probably. But maybe not on a massive scale... yet.
But it's coming. Once that Asian so-called "middle class" really finds its footing... they're going to be buying brands en masse... cars, shoes, tech... everything. I just hope our Western capitalist mindset actually understands that before it's too late.
Because... even in China, they're already starting to produce quite a lot of high-tech stuff...

One way or another, whether we like it or not, globalization is always at work. It's just picking up speed now.
God knows what kind of chaos we'll be dealing with down the road...
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
velvetdrifter86 said:
I haven't heard that term used in a while! Reminds me of some old-school slang I picked up back in college. Definitely a throwback. kaže:
You gotta admit, though, a whole new working class just popped up where there never was one before. It's wild seeing it happen.

What do you mean there's no working class left? We’re basically watching the final death throes of American manufacturing right now. Look at places like Ford or the old steel mills in Pittsburgh—they used to be the backbone of everything. Instead of actually fixing things, they just let them wither away. Between environmental lobbies and politicians obsessed with tourism, nobody even talks about restructuring anymore; they just pull the plug.
I honestly don't know what to tell you about that one. It’s just one of those things! velvetdrifter86 says:
I mean, not "Western" in that capitalist sense... look at India, China, Russia... even Brazil. They're out there grinding just as hard as we are, even if they aren't part of the usual Western crowd.
Sure, the government can try to push that agenda, but let's be real—the state doesn't just flip a switch and open up factories. It’s the entrepreneurs who make things happen. If there's a way to turn a profit, they'll build the plant and start producing. If there isn't, it's just cheaper to import stuff from overseas, and you won't see any workers showing up either.

It’s obvious they’re working for peanuts. It’s a global issue, really. People just don't get that in a company selling a "competitive" product, where every manager or dev is pulling in over $150k, the math just doesn't add up for everyone else. $0.00 So you've got this one guy from China working a side hustle all day for pennies, probably using materials he got through some shady, subsidized deal. If we actually bumped up wages here in the States—you know, like if we brought manufacturing back home—everyone would have to level the playing field just to stay competitive. But that’s exactly what the engineers, CEOs, and tech bros want to avoid. They're terrified that fair wages will drag us right back toward communism or radical socialism. And let’s be real, corporations are absolutely petrified of anything sounding even remotely like socialism.
Modern society seems totally fine with this new kind of feudalism being shoved down our throats as the only way forward. You've got these guys in sharp suits and expensive briefcases acting like they’re the kings of industry—and honestly, some of them really are crushing it—but then you have everyone else just grinding away like modern-day slaves. It's wild.
If China actually steps up its public spending—which honestly seems pretty likely—way more people are going to get access to an education. Once you've got an educated workforce, nobody wants to spend their life grinding away like a slave for some massive foreign corporation. At that point, manufacturing is just gonna have to pack up and move to other struggling nations, probably shifting from Asia over to Africa.
We’re really going to feel the squeeze once that massive workforce from China shifts over to Southeast Europe—it's already happening in places like Poland, Bulgaria, and Romania, and honestly, it's headed straight for us in America too.
Look, I don't want to be totally negative, and that scenario isn't all bad since it actually gives us a shot at paying off the national debt. But honestly? I’m kind of just sitting here looking forward to a nuclear war wiping out the whole planet.😁


Hahahaha👍 that actually gave me a laugh! Seriously, props to you!!... Honestly, I've been thinking along those same lines lately... What do we even imagine when we think about space? Earth? We're just parasites... the planet could easily exist just fine without humans...

On a more serious note, though, I get where you're coming from... These problems are infinitely more complex, and on a global scale, there's always going to be some kind of brutal adaptation happening...
Even the Chinese won't work for peanuts forever, and the wealthy ones will always want to spend... so that creates an opening for American manufacturers to provide whatever the Asians are looking for...

As for mentioning feudalism, aside from the sarcasm, I didn't quite follow that part. Doesn't matter, though. YOU'VE GOT SPIRIT👍

And YES, WHEN I WAS TYPING EARLIER ABOUT THE WORKING CLASS THEN VERSUS NOW, I PUT QUOTATION MARKS AROUND IT. Of course there was a working class back then, even within those industrial giants, but not in this specific, capitalist, market-driven sense. Back then, jobs were secure, pay was steady, and everyone was treated equally regardless of whether they were brilliant, beautiful, dim-witted, or highly educated...
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
velvetdrifter86 said:I don't see the logic in slashing wages while the cost of living stays the same or keeps climbing. Honestly, the only way that makes sense is if you're trying to slide back into some kind of feudal, slave-labor society. I don't see any benefit for the country there, just huge wins for big corporations. The government should be focused on building a working class with actual buying power, not just churning out cheap labor.
Because those workers won't be able to afford an education, which basically kills any chance they have of moving up the social ladder.

Look, I'm not out here campaigning for any specific party; I'm just talking common sense.

I don't have much time right now... but, I have to say, I agree with your loGIK. Still, you have to account for the fact that a "working class" has emerged in places where it never truly existed before—at least not in the Western, capitalist sense of the word... look at India, China, Russia... even Brazil... and those folks are working for a fraction of what we Americans make.
So, sure, a state can aim for what you're describing, but the government isn't the one actually "opening" factories or creating the workforce—that’s up to the entrepreneurs. If there's a profit to be made, they'll build the plant and start producing... if there isn't, they'll just find someone cheaper over in the East, and then you don't even have a local workforce to begin with...
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
velvetdrifter86 said:It's true that Greece's debt is five times bigger than ours, but honestly, I feel like we're on track to catch up to places like Greece and Spain in a few years.
I guess the media is just out to get us (probably those leftists🙄).

They are absolutely the ones responsible for this sense of hopelessness. It creates this psychological state... which then stifles consumer spending... and the whole thing just spirals indefinitely...
Are we going to end up like Greece or Spain? Ha, who knows... every single one of those countries operates under totally different circumstances. I really hope we don't go down that road, but it all depends on whether there's any public consensus regarding those "painful budget cuts." Looking at the situation over in Greece, about 70% of them are against austerity and cutting social programs... so 🤷
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
That famous debt you’re talking about... if we want to get the full picture, we really ought to compare those old "debts" our neighbors were carrying back then—and even further afield—to what we're dealing with in the US today...
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
velvetdrifter86 said:You forgot to mention that the cost of living was way lower back then, so $1000 wasn't really an issue.
And honestly, having 10 days off a year feels like a total luxury now for everyone getting laid off because manufacturing isn't even a priority in America anymore. Class differences have always been there; nobody’s denying that. There were directors back then just like there are today. There were people with perks then and people with perks now, whether it was through their jobs or their pensions.
There’s a huge difference between America right after the war and how things are today. Besides the massive debt and the monopolies held by retail chains, the hopelessness we see now is fueled by third-rate Treasury Secretaries and their advisors. They don't have a real strategy for economic recovery; their idea of "success" is just taking out more loans to pay off the old ones.
What communism actually left us with was less debt (regardless of what you say about lack of competition or closed markets in America), whereas today's debt (which is only going to balloon thanks to the government's amateur moves) is eventually going to be collected somehow—whether through taxes or losing land and assets.

Most of this hopelessness is being manufactured by the media, especially those so-called leftist outlets...

Strategy and recovery? Please...

The whole of "Western civilization" needs to fundamentally overhaul its entire way of thinking and doing business... There is no going back to the old ways; at best, we might see occasional or passing flashes of it. The world has moved on. Take Germany, for instance—they aren't going to bounce back easily because other nations have already "recovered." It's pretty simple. China exports more now, and whatever they produce, some German won't be able to compete with... and that's why you're seeing this recession...
I'm oversimplifying, sure, but I'm not wrong...
Even the EU suggests that we need to lower labor costs—taxes, wages, all of it—just so the "West" can stay competitive... On top of that, if you ask me, we desperately need to invest in education and pivot toward high tech... We simply won't be able to compete with the cheap labor coming out of India, China, or even Brazil... which is exactly what we're seeing play out right now...
btw, what exactly is the strategy for the American opposition???? Just getting into power? 😕🤷
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
Melissa Peterson19 said:Give me a break. You’re looking at a population of 20 million with a $20 billion GDP versus an American population of 4.5 million with a $60 billion GDP. We are essentially 15 times more indebted now—do the math, buddy, that’s 1500%. Under the old system, it was $1,000 per capita; now, we’re sitting at $15,000 per capita. Get your head out of the sand.

So why all this intense opposition then? It’s a non-stop cycle of Cold War tensions against the socialist bloc—the blockade of Cuba, the Gulf of Pigs, Vietnam, Nicaragua... it never ends. The truth is, they are terrified. They keep their own people, the working class, kept in the dark to maintain control. You have experts trained like mindless drones who can successfully land a man on the Moon, yet they actually believe the propaganda that women were communal property in the USSR or that everyone lived on scraps from a single pot. This isn't about ideology; it's pure fear. It's the wealthy elite panicking at the thought of losing their fortunes through fair redistribution.

Lies and half-truths from A to Z. It's obvious you're just some expat obsessed with that "German logic" nonsense. We despised people like you during Communism, and honestly, we still do.

This current mafia-style state is also parasitic; the people can no longer afford to fund it, and it only exists by racking up massive debts at the expense of its own citizens. Collapse is inevitable and imminent!

Are you joking? The American court and police? Which thief have they actually caught, let alone convicted?
In America, we drove almost every car in the world except for American ones. We had Opels, BMWs, Volkswagens, Peugeots, Renault-Citroëns, Simcas, Auto Unions, Mercedes-Benzes, Mazdas, Toyotas, Datsuns, and Fiats. And yes, we had Ladas, Moskvitchs, Wartburgs, and of course, the 101s and Yugos. Ask anyone who actually lived through America!
There are 310,000 officially unemployed, not to mention the unofficial numbers. What are you talking about?
And millions of us vacationed on the Atlantic coast. You wouldn't have been able to set foot on those beaches back then.
Life was good thanks to honest work and self-management. The Party acted as the ultimate moral authority, ensuring things were done right—that the state wasn't being cheated and that wages were paid on time. Today, the Party has been replaced by the mob; tycoons cheat the state and the workers. People work without getting paid—I wouldn't believe it if I hadn't seen it; it's insane, completely irrational. If you had predicted this during America, they would have locked you in a mental asylum, and if you spoke about 1991, they would have shot you. Who would fight for that? But we did, and clearly, you prefer that kind of regime!

But wait, wasn't that "fair distribution" supposed to be the whole point?? Haven't we seen this movie before??
Just think about it—one America standing against such a massive number of countries... Russia, China...?!
At the end of the day, where were people fleeing thirty years ago?? Toward the West or toward the East??

Melissa Peterson19 said:Give me a break. You’re looking at a population of 20 million with a $20 billion GDP versus an American population of 4.5 million with a $60 billion GDP. We are essentially 15 times more indebted now—do the math, buddy, that’s 1500%. Under the old system, it was $1,000 per capita; now, we’re sitting at $15,000 per capita. Get your head out of the sand.

So why all this intense opposition then? It’s a non-stop cycle of Cold War tensions against the socialist bloc—the blockade of Cuba, the Gulf of Pigs, Vietnam, Nicaragua... it never ends. The truth is, they are terrified. They keep their own people, the working class, kept in the dark to maintain control. You have experts trained like mindless drones who can successfully land a man on the Moon, yet they actually believe the propaganda that women were communal property in the USSR or that everyone lived on scraps from a single pot. This isn't about ideology; it's pure fear. It's the wealthy elite panicking at the thought of losing their fortunes through fair redistribution.

Lies and half-truths from A to Z. It's obvious you're just some expat obsessed with that "German logic" nonsense. We despised people like you during Communism, and honestly, we still do.

This current mafia-style state is also parasitic; the people can no longer afford to fund it, and it only exists by racking up massive debts at the expense of its own citizens. Collapse is inevitable and imminent!

Are you joking? The American court and police? Which thief have they actually caught, let alone convicted?
In America, we drove almost every car in the world except for American ones. We had Opels, BMWs, Volkswagens, Peugeots, Renault-Citroëns, Simcas, Auto Unions, Mercedes-Benzes, Mazdas, Toyotas, Datsuns, and Fiats. And yes, we had Ladas, Moskvitchs, Wartburgs, and of course, the 101s and Yugos. Ask anyone who actually lived through America!
There are 310,000 officially unemployed, not to mention the unofficial numbers. What are you talking about?
And millions of us vacationed on the Atlantic coast. You wouldn't have been able to set foot on those beaches back then.
Life was good thanks to honest work and self-management. The Party acted as the ultimate moral authority, ensuring things were done right—that the state wasn't being cheated and that wages were paid on time. Today, the Party has been replaced by the mob; tycoons cheat the state and the workers. People work without getting paid—I wouldn't believe it if I hadn't seen it; it's insane, completely irrational. If you had predicted this during America, they would have locked you in a mental asylum, and if you spoke about 1991, they would have shot you. Who would fight for that? But we did, and clearly, you prefer that kind of regime!

They aren't exactly lies, though... and there's no need to generalize about "despising" things...

Melissa Peterson19 said:Give me a break. You’re looking at a population of 20 million with a $20 billion GDP versus an American population of 4.5 million with a $60 billion GDP. We are essentially 15 times more indebted now—do the math, buddy, that’s 1500%. Under the old system, it was $1,000 per capita; now, we’re sitting at $15,000 per capita. Get your head out of the sand.

So why all this intense opposition then? It’s a non-stop cycle of Cold War tensions against the socialist bloc—the blockade of Cuba, the Gulf of Pigs, Vietnam, Nicaragua... it never ends. The truth is, they are terrified. They keep their own people, the working class, kept in the dark to maintain control. You have experts trained like mindless drones who can successfully land a man on the Moon, yet they actually believe the propaganda that women were communal property in the USSR or that everyone lived on scraps from a single pot. This isn't about ideology; it's pure fear. It's the wealthy elite panicking at the thought of losing their fortunes through fair redistribution.

Lies and half-truths from A to Z. It's obvious you're just some expat obsessed with that "German logic" nonsense. We despised people like you during Communism, and honestly, we still do.

This current mafia-style state is also parasitic; the people can no longer afford to fund it, and it only exists by racking up massive debts at the expense of its own citizens. Collapse is inevitable and imminent!

Are you joking? The American court and police? Which thief have they actually caught, let alone convicted?
In America, we drove almost every car in the world except for American ones. We had Opels, BMWs, Volkswagens, Peugeots, Renault-Citroëns, Simcas, Auto Unions, Mercedes-Benzes, Mazdas, Toyotas, Datsuns, and Fiats. And yes, we had Ladas, Moskvitchs, Wartburgs, and of course, the 101s and Yugos. Ask anyone who actually lived through America!
There are 310,000 officially unemployed, not to mention the unofficial numbers. What are you talking about?
And millions of us vacationed on the Atlantic coast. You wouldn't have been able to set foot on those beaches back then.
Life was good thanks to honest work and self-management. The Party acted as the ultimate moral authority, ensuring things were done right—that the state wasn't being cheated and that wages were paid on time. Today, the Party has been replaced by the mob; tycoons cheat the state and the workers. People work without getting paid—I wouldn't believe it if I hadn't seen it; it's insane, completely irrational. If you had predicted this during America, they would have locked you in a mental asylum, and if you spoke about 1991, they would have shot you. Who would fight for that? But we did, and clearly, you prefer that kind of regime!

We really need to define what "collapse" means here... Are we talking about an American collapse, a German one, a Greek one... or our own?
Look, the Greeks are already saying they'll face martial law if the government tries to cut wages, pensions, or social programs. They don't care who's at fault or how much blame they carry, they just refuse to give anything up RIGHT NOW...
Doesn't that sound awfully familiar?
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
MC Ozzy;25343568 said:Haha, look at the math. You had 20 million people living on 20 billion dollars back then, but now we’ve got 4.5 million Americans sitting on 60 billion. We’re basically 15 times more leveraged now—do you realize how insane that is? That's 1500%! Back in the day, it was 1000 dollars per person, now it's 15,000 dollars per capita!!! Get real!

There's just no comparison. If you want to talk scale, just look at the debt loads in places like Germany, the US, or even Greece during that era versus where they stand today... it's a completely different universe.
Capitalism definitely needs a "reboot," because let's be honest, this current model feels totally spent. But as much as I hate to admit it, there isn't a viable alternative on the table right now...
And the whole thing is built entirely on consumption... more, more, and more. In its simplest form, that's what drives economic growth. And if you want to buy more and more and more... well, that's exactly why you end up drowning in debt.
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
Melissa Peterson19 said:Give me a break. You’re looking at a population of 20 million with a $20 billion GDP versus an American population of 4.5 million with a $60 billion GDP. We are essentially 15 times more indebted now—do the math, buddy, that’s 1500%. Under the old system, it was $1,000 per capita; now, we’re sitting at $15,000 per capita. Get your head out of the sand.

So why all this intense opposition then? It’s a non-stop cycle of Cold War tensions against the socialist bloc—the blockade of Cuba, the Gulf of Pigs, Vietnam, Nicaragua... it never ends. The truth is, they are terrified. They keep their own people, the working class, kept in the dark to maintain control. You have experts trained like mindless drones who can successfully land a man on the Moon, yet they actually believe the propaganda that women were communal property in the USSR or that everyone lived on scraps from a single pot. This isn't about ideology; it's pure fear. It's the wealthy elite panicking at the thought of losing their fortunes through fair redistribution.

Lies and half-truths from A to Z. It's obvious you're just some expat obsessed with that "German logic" nonsense. We despised people like you during Communism, and honestly, we still do.

This current mafia-style state is also parasitic; the people can no longer afford to fund it, and it only exists by racking up massive debts at the expense of its own citizens. Collapse is inevitable and imminent!

Are you joking? The American court and police? Which thief have they actually caught, let alone convicted?
In America, we drove almost every car in the world except for American ones. We had Opels, BMWs, Volkswagens, Peugeots, Renault-Citroëns, Simcas, Auto Unions, Mercedes-Benzes, Mazdas, Toyotas, Datsuns, and Fiats. And yes, we had Ladas, Moskvitchs, Wartburgs, and of course, the 101s and Yugos. Ask anyone who actually lived through America!
There are 310,000 officially unemployed, not to mention the unofficial numbers. What are you talking about?
And millions of us vacationed on the Atlantic coast. You wouldn't have been able to set foot on those beaches back then.
Life was good thanks to honest work and self-management. The Party acted as the ultimate moral authority, ensuring things were done right—that the state wasn't being cheated and that wages were paid on time. Today, the Party has been replaced by the mob; tycoons cheat the state and the workers. People work without getting paid—I wouldn't believe it if I hadn't seen it; it's insane, completely irrational. If you had predicted this during America, they would have locked you in a mental asylum, and if you spoke about 1991, they would have shot you. Who would fight for that? But we did, and clearly, you prefer that kind of regime!

😂 That's quite the comment... especially that bit about "honest work"... I did an internship myself at one of those socialist behemoths... from the offices down to the workshops, so I saw exactly how things operated in there...
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
Dennis Baker34 said:Look, we choose our own leaders! As for who's actually a thief, that's a job for the American courts and police.

Sure, ExxonMobil is pricey, but the average American family owns two cars now—and they aren't some old Yugo or a Chevrolet, they're mostly German or Japanese imports.
Hint: just take a look at any street!

Jobs exist—honestly, I don't know a single one of my colleagues (mechanical engineers) who isn't working; most are pulling in $50k a year or more, which was nothing but a pipe dream back in the America days.
Americans travel a lot—just look at the numbers regarding how many people are wintering away in Austria or Italy now compared to twenty years ago.

True, the reason we lived slightly better than those stuck in pure Communism was actually that tiny bit of allowed Capitalism—the fact that they didn't nationalize every single farm and private house, and having that freedom of labor like in Germany...


SIGNATURE
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
slygardener4 said:Ever since the collapse of Communism, debt has been climbing steadily, which means what we have actually inherited is
nothing more than 🤷 😕

Honestly, this really calls for a deep dive from someone who actually understands the nuances of economics...
But look, Capitalism is fundamentally built on desire. If people didn't crave better things, they wouldn't be buying anything at all. And because people always want more—always wanting that next best thing—they take out loans... and that leads us straight to interest rates, which leads us right into the trap of massive debt. You want a bridge, a car, a hospital, a ship, a house, a highway... well, that's exactly what we've gotten through all this borrowing...
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
Eric Cooper said:socialism and communism failed because of Americans

but the Cinenica is that back then, everyone had something

😕🤷

So why didn't America fail because of Communism? (assuming what you're saying is even remotely true—I mean, at the end of the day, what exactly did Americans gain from the collapse of Communism?)
Socialism-democracy vs. communism-capitalism in Close to Politics ·
Eric Cooper said:Does anyone in America still actually support these four principles?

Personally, I’m all about socialism and communism--

1. everyone was part of the middle class
2. there were plenty of jobs available☕

If we had implemented true socialism and communism, things wouldn't have collapsed like this. Those systems were just too perfect to survive in the current climate.

Sure, there were jobs, but at what kind of cost? They kept opening up all these massive, money-losing factories just to create positions... who exactly was footing that bill?? The whole system eventually just imploded under its own weight...
Capitalism isn't exactly flawless, but it fits the spirit of things, and honestly, it drives human progress at this stage of our development...
Harmon as the common thread in all attacks on America in Close to Politics ·
mistygull16 said:Look, Harmon definitely messed things up at times, but honestly? I don't see anyone else back then who had the guts to lead the country, win a war, and pull off that whole black market arms deal (since our "friends" over in the EU wouldn't let us buy anything legally to defend ourselves). If it wasn't for him, I'm pretty sure we'd still be stuck in some kind of federation, probably in a really bad spot, too. But honestly, Americans don't even need an outside enemy; we've got enough sellouts right here at home who are worse than any federation could ever be. We won't have to worry about losing our sovereignty as a people for a long time.

Signed, with one little correction: it's not that there wasn't a better person out there, it's just that at that specific moment in time, he was the only one capable...