Philosophy of Freedom
in Close to Politics ·
The idea that you need a "prelude" to freedom is total nonsense. It’s basically saying we need personal stupidity to achieve personal liberty, or social ignorance to secure individual freedom within a society.
Look, if I actually understand the consequences of my actions, I’m going to choose the path that’s right—simply because it’ll either make my life better or, at the very least, cause the least amount of harm. But, if I decide to chase some fleeting pleasure even though I know it’s going to screw me over, then I’m not actually in control—I’m just a slave to that impulse. I'm not free.
And honestly, the same logic applies to society acting as a single organism.
It’s almost a paradox: the more a person truly understands the world and themselves, the more they make the "correct" choices, which arguably makes them less "free" in the traditional sense. We like to tell ourselves that freedom is found in the *way* we go about completing a task, but the truth is, the more someone knows, the more easily they can identify the absolute best way to do it.
Look, if I actually understand the consequences of my actions, I’m going to choose the path that’s right—simply because it’ll either make my life better or, at the very least, cause the least amount of harm. But, if I decide to chase some fleeting pleasure even though I know it’s going to screw me over, then I’m not actually in control—I’m just a slave to that impulse. I'm not free.
And honestly, the same logic applies to society acting as a single organism.
It’s almost a paradox: the more a person truly understands the world and themselves, the more they make the "correct" choices, which arguably makes them less "free" in the traditional sense. We like to tell ourselves that freedom is found in the *way* we go about completing a task, but the truth is, the more someone knows, the more easily they can identify the absolute best way to do it.