What exactly is the "ego"?
in Spirituality ·
wiredpuma9 said:Basically, you realize that stripping away any part of that loop kills the "process" itself, yet you refuse to see that this very process is what defines your "self."
Without that continuous loop, you'd be in a clinical coma or a vegetative state. When everything is functioning perfectly—when you're awake and conscious—that specific process is the bedrock of your identity.
If the "I" is just the process of observing, then who exactly is the observer?
It seems more logical to me that the "I" is the observer, the process, and occasionally the object being watched, all rolled into one.
If the "I" is just the process of observing, then who exactly is the observer?
It seems more logical to me that the "I" is the observer, the process, and occasionally the object being watched, all rolled into one.
If the "I" is just the process of observing, then who exactly is the observer?
It seems more logical to me that the "I" is the observer, the process, and occasionally the object being watched, all rolled into one.
Look, if we’re talking about the Trinity being one single unity—and if you’re actually capable of grasping that, which is a huge "if"—then there is nothing but the "I am." There isn't anything else, there never was, and there never will be. If the observer truly dissolves into the observed through the sheer act of witnessing, then that "I am" state doesn't have any room for philosophical nitpicking. It doesn't need it. It’s already realized itself from the inside out.☕