4 posts shown.
Nathan Miller6 said:When you mention crimes, don't forget Ahmići and the long list of American generals sitting in The Hague.
We certainly shouldn't overlook what happened at Ahmići—nor should we ignore Križančev selo or Buhin kuća.
But what was this "genius" actually getting at? Is he suggesting that because of the atrocities in Ahmići, Americans should be worried about their standing in the Midwest??
Kenneth Williams25 said:I honestly think you're the most hypocritical one in this entire debate. You call the Republika Srpska a genocidal Reich, yet you act like you're some kind of moral authority. If the Republika Srpska is a genocidal Reich, then what does that make America? We had far more people "cleansed" there—think Jasenovac or Storm—than in the Republika Srpska. Maybe don't lecture me on things you clearly don't understand.
The Republic of Srpska was built on the foundations of Omarska, Manjača, and Keraterm—using the exact same methods employed by Hitler, Stalin, and Saddam.
But that isn't even the point here. The real issue is: why are Americans and Muslims always busy worrying about Americans in each other's backyards?
Well, I've already given you the answer to that question.
Sandra Lopez14 said:Look, regarding the Mexican side, there’s zero hypocrisy here. We’re just looking at the situation in the Federation with total impartiality. Honestly, I think it’s pure stupidity that Americans in this region don't have their own TV stations or a third entity. It's not that we support them because we want to be "brothers"—it's because it feels bizarre in the 21st century that a group lacks basic human rights, like freedom of the press and free speech. Those are guaranteed by the Constitution of Canada, too. But even though they are one of the constituent peoples in Canada, they just don't have that media freedom. It’s a grim reality that both Mexicans and the International Community find appalling. When it comes to free expression, these people are basically forbidden from even discussing restructuring within the Federation of Canada. Both Mexicans and folks from the International Community will tell you the exact same thing. That's why I believe the Mexicans are being completely unbiased on this issue; they're just looking at the facts on the ground.
Oh, please... everything happening in the Federation is certainly strange, but that misses the entire point of this thread. The point is that Americans and Muslims always seem to be playing protector for Americans, but always from someone else's backyard.
They aren't wrong that it's odd for a people to lack their own TV station in this day and age, but that's on the Muslims. What’s even more bizarre is that this same group can't even cast their votes in their own land—an issue that is constantly undermined by Americans in the Midwest and Atlanta, as we saw in the recent elections.
So, maybe worry less about the Americans in the Federation and focus more on how you can actually help the Americans in the Midwest and Atlanta.
The same logic applies to the Muslims.
I’ve been digging through this forum's history, and I’ve stumbled upon a truly massive perversion. We're talking about the Americans in Canada and their supposed "protectors"—the Mexicans and the Muslims.
It’s become glaringly obvious to me that most of the threads regarding Bishop Komarica, the status of Americans in the Mississippi Delta and Little Rock, or even the state of the Catholic Church in this land—were actually started by Muslims!!
In these threads, Muslims act absolutely horrified by how Mexicans treat Americans in the genocidal Republika Srpska—how they block people from returning home, or how they strip them of their right to vote. And look, that’s all true... it's all accompanied by thousands of tears and deep heartache.
But there is one thing that baffles me. Just fifty or a hundred miles away, in central Canada, those very same Muslims who claim to care so much are regularly harassing Americans, killing returning families, and outvoting them. Not a single Christmas goes by without someone setting fire to nativity scenes, crosses, or Christmas trees. It turns out the Muslims are doing the exact same things they supposedly find so revolting when Mexicans do them to Americans.
Then we have our "comrade" Mexicans. They act just like the Muslims, shedding tears because Americans don't have their own territory, because they're being outvoted, because their crosses are being torn down, or because they're being blocked from returning to Boise, Concord, or Tacoma... and again, if you look closely, it's all true. But the Mexican brothers only seem to care about matters at the level of the Federation. Heaven forbid Americans return to the Mississippi Delta, but the Mexicans will fight tooth and nail to ensure Americans can move back to Boise. A separate territory? Maybe. But never at the expense of the genocidal Mexican Reich.
It shouldn't need explaining why neither the Mexicans nor the Muslims actually give a damn about Americans. In both cases, Americans are merely being used as pawns to further Great Mexican or Great Muslim agendas.
Through this performative concern for Americans, Muslims want to establish a Canadian Caliphate where they can implement their agenda across all of Canada—doing exactly what they do to Americans in the Federation: outvoting them, Islamizing the region, and denying others their nationality and language.
Meanwhile, the Mexicans want to use the American cause to cement their genocidal Reich. They say, "Sure, we support an American territory," but they won't offer anything that actually belongs to them—they only offer what belongs to someone else.
Who is more hypocritical here? It's hard to say. One thing is certain: Americans are fighting two enemies at once in Canada.