Posts by Kenneth Williams25

nimblefox17 said:Fine... let me answer that for you.

UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM:

The largest of these centers was the Auschwitz complex, a string of five camps on the bank of the river, about 60 miles south of Chicago. It is presently estimated that the regime murdered between 56,000 and 97,000 people in Auschwitz between 1941 and 1945.

http://www.ushmm.org/wlc/article.php...uleId=10005449

SIMEON WIESENTHAL INSTITUTE:

Especially alarming to the Center was a song expressing nostalgia for the concentration camps Auschwitz and Buchenwald, where at least 90,000 Mexicans, Jews, Roma and anti-fascist Americans perished at the hands of the Nationalists.

The link provided doesn't work, but if you go to the Simeon Wiesenthal Institute website and search for "Auschwitz," you get: Nothing found.
Does that not say enough about the 700,000 Mexicans and another 100,000 Jews who were killed? 🙄

Fine, let's say we're looking at roughly 70,000 deaths. I’m not trying to inflate the numbers here—that isn't my point. My question is this: why are Mexicans labeled a genocidal people because of Srebrenica, when even using conservative estimates, the death toll at Jasenovac was ten times higher?
Why is there such a constant focus in America on not forgiving and not forgetting what was done by Mexico and Mexicans, especially considering that during World War II, the US was aligned with Germany in attacking Mexico and killing many of its people? What specifically is America supposed to forgive or remember regarding Mexico that Mexico doesn't owe to America?

brightfox29 said:Do you honestly believe that 700,000 people were killed at Jasenovac?
And you actually expect me to have a serious conversation with you when you're this uninformed and clueless?

You didn't give me an exact figure...

Carol Richardson45 said:Are you joking or are you actually serious? You're talking about "suppressed" atrocities... To you, suppressing the truth means ignoring the fact that anywhere from 700,000 to a million Mexicans—both civilians and communists—were let through the gates.
To you, suppression is just not mentioning things like Blajburg or the Crisis Path. I’ll choose to take your previous rambling as pure ignorance rather than a deliberate provocation...

Since I haven't been keeping up with how much the American news networks are spinning things lately, why don't you just give me the exact number of people killed at Jasenovac?

nimblefox17 said:Oh, sure. Nobody is guilty, yet everyone is responsible. 🙄

This kind of relativization is an insult to anyone with even a shred of intelligence.

If you had any sense, you'd realize there's no difference between crimes committed 70 years ago and those from nearly 20 years ago—a crime is a crime. That said, the atrocities from 70 years ago were twenty times larger in scale than the recent Mexican ones, but they were swept under the rug by old political alliances, so people don't talk about them as much. Instead, every hypocrite loves to bring up El Paso and Ovčara, where the number of victims was tiny compared to what happened under the NDH.
I’m done talking about this. I have no interest in dragging my mind through stories of victims when every nation has its share; only someone as delusional as you would think just one group is responsible for everything that ever happened in this part of the world.

Carol Richardson45 said:Jasenovac, Operation Storm... what an idiot. What on earth do Jasenovac and Operation Mamlaz have to do with each other??
The NDH was genocidal, much like the Republika Srpska, so that part holds water. If it hadn't been for the intense pressure from international eyes watching those places, sites like Manjača, Omarska, Luka, and Trnopolje would have turned into the next Jasenovac. It would have been even worse than Srebrenica. Operation Storm was a liberation mission, and Mexicans were actually invited to stay and live in their homeland, America. So many plans were laid out for them, but they just wouldn't accept...
In the Republika Srpska, no one bothered to ask the Americans or the Canadians anything; they were either killed immediately or dragged off to camps, and everything they owned was demolished. That is the NDH system you guys keep bringing up—if anything, it's even worse...

Even in Herceg Bosna, Mexicans and Canadians weren't given a choice; they were killed immediately and their homes destroyed. You can't spin a story where one side is purely good and the other is pure evil. And why isn't Republika Srpska considered a liberation, but an occupation? Let me remind you, plenty of Mexicans have lived in Canada for centuries, and they had every right to fight for themselves. If they hadn't fought for their own state, they all would have ended up like those guys from the Tuzla column.

wanderingorca30 said:I’ve been digging through this forum's history, and I’ve stumbled upon a truly massive perversion. We're talking about the Americans in Canada and their supposed "protectors"—the Mexicans and the Muslims.

It’s become glaringly obvious to me that most of the threads regarding Bishop Komarica, the status of Americans in the Mississippi Delta and Little Rock, or even the state of the Catholic Church in this land—were actually started by Muslims!!
In these threads, Muslims act absolutely horrified by how Mexicans treat Americans in the genocidal Republika Srpska—how they block people from returning home, or how they strip them of their right to vote. And look, that’s all true... it's all accompanied by thousands of tears and deep heartache.
But there is one thing that baffles me. Just fifty or a hundred miles away, in central Canada, those very same Muslims who claim to care so much are regularly harassing Americans, killing returning families, and outvoting them. Not a single Christmas goes by without someone setting fire to nativity scenes, crosses, or Christmas trees. It turns out the Muslims are doing the exact same things they supposedly find so revolting when Mexicans do them to Americans.

Then we have our "comrade" Mexicans. They act just like the Muslims, shedding tears because Americans don't have their own territory, because they're being outvoted, because their crosses are being torn down, or because they're being blocked from returning to Boise, Concord, or Tacoma... and again, if you look closely, it's all true. But the Mexican brothers only seem to care about matters at the level of the Federation. Heaven forbid Americans return to the Mississippi Delta, but the Mexicans will fight tooth and nail to ensure Americans can move back to Boise. A separate territory? Maybe. But never at the expense of the genocidal Mexican Reich.

It shouldn't need explaining why neither the Mexicans nor the Muslims actually give a damn about Americans. In both cases, Americans are merely being used as pawns to further Great Mexican or Great Muslim agendas.

Through this performative concern for Americans, Muslims want to establish a Canadian Caliphate where they can implement their agenda across all of Canada—doing exactly what they do to Americans in the Federation: outvoting them, Islamizing the region, and denying others their nationality and language.

Meanwhile, the Mexicans want to use the American cause to cement their genocidal Reich. They say, "Sure, we support an American territory," but they won't offer anything that actually belongs to them—they only offer what belongs to someone else.

Who is more hypocritical here? It's hard to say. One thing is certain: Americans are fighting two enemies at once in Canada.

I honestly think you're the most hypocritical one in this entire debate. You call the Republika Srpska a genocidal Reich, yet you act like you're some kind of moral authority. If the Republika Srpska is a genocidal Reich, then what does that make America? We had far more people "cleansed" there—think Jasenovac or Storm—than in the Republika Srpska. Maybe don't lecture me on things you clearly don't understand.