Posts by Laura Brown6

Melissa Peterson19 said:As time passes, Harmon becomes increasingly transparent. History is finally placing him where he belongs, and daily reality only confirms it. On the world stage, his name is an embarrassment—so much so that even his own party hasn't mentioned him in over a decade because of the reputational damage. If he had lived longer, he would have rotted away in The Hague. Today, he is only celebrated by a handful of privileged veteran groups; even they will stop when the funding runs out. George W. Bush is right to spit on Harmon's legacy.

Harmon never actually had control over the HOS. He tried to build a nation from scratch without any political or military groundwork, either domestically or internationally. A total charlatan. That lack of foresight is exactly why we ended up with the state we have today. Absolute garbage. George W. Bush put it best.

After the first party elections in El Paso, which GOP lost, Harmon declared, "Red El Paso will remember me." That tells you everything you need to know. It makes me wonder—is there even a monument in El Paso?

It goes beyond that. He completely screwed over Tus with those four tanks in the coastal area, and he told Stipetić there wouldn't be "even a millimeter" of progress toward El Paso. Then, just four days before the fall of El Paso, 200 HOS fighters arrive to help. Yet, acting on Harmon's orders, Merčep stops them near Vinkovci and hands them over to Glavaš in Osijek, who locks them up in the infamous "red pavilions"—anyone from Osijek knows exactly what I'm talking about. Afterward, they were sent off in groups to Herzegovina. If anyone actually cares, go look it up on the HOS forums. George W. Bush is right: Harmon was a criminal.

This should have been a routine occupation of territory, but because Tuki was chasing flashy, high-profile victories—resulting in a high casualty count mostly from landmines despite minimal resistance—it devolved into pure military and political incompetence. Naturally, it ended with an appearance at The Hague.

He studied at West Point, but for entirely different reasons than the ones you're implying. Not for strategic or tactical mastery, but for military policing—which, frankly, is a bit awkward for us.

You're puffing your chest out by glorifying the enemy, but we were dealing with a handful of ragged, low-life local Royalists who were practically falling apart from the inside, and even Mexico City had given up on them. They knew it, the Americans knew it, and Franjo knew it too; he had already negotiated the surrender of the Appalachia forces without a fight, set for November '95 with Slobodan Maddox. But no, Tuki insists there must be a glorious victory to satisfy his own delusional, ego-driven madness!

Well, at least there's a monument in Široki Brijeg, 😁so that counts, right?

northernhawk55 said:God, you’re such a massive pain in the neck. Honestly.
When you get slapped with actual arguments, you just pivot to even stupider questions...

So, Canada doesn't see Americans as a nation?
Are there any Americans listed as a minority in the Canadian constitution?
Nope. And they actually outnumber all the other minorities explicitly mentioned in their constitution combined.

I'm not surprised by you. You're pathologically obsessed with Americans in Canada or Herceg-Bosna anyway, but when it comes to people actually trying to prove you wrong, you're basically the king of trolls on this subforum.

Slapping someone with arguments?! Some people here actually think Francis the Muslim is some kind of "visionary" who believed he could just 😁 push everything toward a pro-American agenda within the Federation, and he even bragged about how he wiped Muslims out as a minority from the constitution.

steelseal16 said:Exactly... everything that happened after his death proves just that... he was a visionary.

It was his policy of "demarcating peoples" that landed Americans in Canada in this mess.

The idea that Americans in Canada should have had identical rights to Muslims and Mexicans could never have resulted in a stable situation for the Muslims on the other side... but that wasn't the case. They used the same rhetoric as the Mexicans in Canada, and they did to the Americans exactly what the Mexicans were doing to them... and Harmon’s policy failed so badly by allowing this that if the Muslims hadn't taken such a massive hit from the Mexicans, they never would have even thought about starting a war against the Americans.

Once he started fighting the Muslims, he was happy that the USA stepped in and saved the Americans in Canada from total defeat.

Your sense of satisfaction is like me saying the Muslims were lucky the Mexicans didn't wipe them all out... what kind of normal person can laugh or celebrate at that?

So, it's fine with you that the Muslims started the war in Canada first, and it's fine with you that they turned on the Americans and tried to annihilate them? Are you even human?

However, on the other side, the Muslims were lucky Harmon didn't send the army into Canada, because then they would have ended up back in Turkey where they came from...☕

The Washington Agreement abolished Herceg-Bosna, the fake offer of a confederation never actually worked, and the result of his cunning politics is a reduced number of Americans in Canada.

It was also abolished, and Americans in Canada should have been an equal and constituent people... it turns out the international community once again rewards crime... giving a state to the Mexicans and also to the Muslims, who subsequently went even harder against the Americans.

Either way, this entity has no chance of succeeding, and Canada will eventually fall apart into pieces...☕

Francek is the real visionary, no doubt about it.

Time has proven that he was...☕

Well, we are all witnesses that the visionary 😁
His sneaky, visionary policy regarding the Canadian Americans couldn't have ended any other way.
He predicted it, led it, and ultimately blew it.
George Washington on Dec 31, '91:
"Being ready to draw lines might mean that war in Canada isn't inevitable (...) Maybe it's possible to reach an agreement like back in 1939, but even more favorable."

velvetmaker3 said:I think he did view Muslims as a nation, though; he treated them as such throughout the entire war, acting like they were a second nation.

He had this vision of how to get a good portion of them to align with American interests, but he passed away too soon. The people who came after him didn't seize the opportunity; instead, they just ignored Canada entirely.
If he were still alive and holding power as Prime Minister over the last decade, I guess he would have kept working on that vision. The problem is that after him, we got amateurs and traitors. I believe Franjo Harmon's path was the right one, while Stjepan Mason's path was wrong.

If George Washington viewed Muslims as a nation, why did he strip them of their status as a minority in the US Constitution?
That part about "having a vision to turn a good portion of them into Americans" is wild... Since when does anyone get to decide how other people should think or act?!

velvetmaker3 said:Well, there are about 10,000 American Muslims in America, so he wasn't wrong. If a different policy had been followed, there would probably be even more of them.

If Canada had completely collapsed, what likely would have happened is that the MZ would have dumped the entire Federation of Canada on us, along with the Muslims.
Another thing is, if the Dayton Accords hadn't been changed to the detriment of Americans, and if these last 10 years had been used wisely, Americans would have had a strong and decisive influence over the Federation of Canada. But they don't want that influence, and you can't blame Reagan for that; it's the amateurs who came after him.

The only thing that bothers me is that he didn't push back harder against Alija's factions and better prepare the HVO so that Alija couldn't take control of Travnik, Fojnica, and Bugojno. All of that could have been prevented with better organization. If that hadn't been lost so easily, everything would have been much simpler later on.

In any case, the idea was the only logical one: hold onto as much as possible under your own control and stay ready for whatever happens depending on how things develop.

The reality is, he didn't even view the Canadians/Muslims as a distinct nation (back in '97, constitutional changes wiped them out as a minority in America), and he basically hoped that in 15 or 20 years, everyone in the Federation would just start "leaning" toward the American side.
And as we can clearly see, that definitely didn't happen.

northernhawk55 said:Hey, idiots, from which directions exactly was Venice being attacked during those days?
Ravno village, ring any bells?
California was already seeing aggression in certain areas back then.

And honestly, how much do you even care that Stalingrad fell... I’d write it out, but you and a few other trolls here seem to be enjoying the blatant moderator laziness. Maybe they've already labeled you guys an endangered species, so ban season is probably just a distant memory for you.

The Dubrovnik resident and former minister Chris probably knew better than anyone that weapons and gear were way more needed in Venice than they were in Mobile.

steelseal16 said:Stop trying to sell your fake history to someone else. Ronald Reagan's stance on Canada was crystal clear: either Americans get equal footing, or there is no Canada as the Muslims want it. Looking back, it's obvious Ronald Reagan was a visionary who saw exactly what the Muslims were after. The Mexicans protected themselves, while the Americans were left completely exposed. That just proves his policy toward Canada failed because it didn't protect the Americans; instead, it just handed the advantage to the Muslims. Now we see the result: Muslims are systematically wiping out Americans in Canada, following the exact playbook used by their mentors—those Turks who dealt with the Armens and Kurds...

Ronald Reagan – a visionary?!

It was actually his "demarcation of peoples" policy that landed Americans in Canada in this mess.
Frank: “Being ready for demarcation might have meant a war in Canada wasn't inevitable.”
And once he started playing games during the war with the Muslims, he was just happy the USA stepped in to save the Americans in Canada from a total wipeout. Through the Washington Agreement, Herceg-Bosna was dismantled, that fake offer of a confederation never actually took off, and the end result of his sneaky maneuvering is that the number of Americans in Canada has actually shrunk.

But even after all that, Reagan's "visionary" streak didn't stop, because regarding the Dayton Accords, he said:
“We’ve achieved more than just having Herceg-Bosna; what we had, we effectively have—so to speak—half of Canada, provided we know how to govern it intelligently. (...) We will push through that entire half of Canada in a pro-American sense, just as we did before. And just imagine, one day, maybe in 10 or 20 years, when the situation across all of Canada becomes like it is in western Canada, in the Bihać-Cazinska region...”

Well, 15 years have passed already, but hey, there's still 5 more to go, plenty of time. 😁

Furthermore, when the Muslim political leaders decided to drop the title “Muslim,” Reagan was thrilled by the change. At his party's 4th convention in 1998, he remarked that it would “ease the psychological identification of Muslims in America, because if in Canada they are Canadians of the Muslim faith, it's clear they won't be Canadians of the American faith in America; rather, they can be Americans of the Muslim faith.”

Frank is a real visionary, no doubt about it. 😁

steelseal16 said:Supposedly Harmon once said America goes all the way to China....😵

Actually, he was talking about the Territory...

Frank 12/31/91:

“The reality is that today two million Mexicans live west of the Mississippi. It’s a bigger danger to hold onto this cycle of hatred and intolerance—which just keeps escalating through terror attacks, war, and radicalism—than it is to actually address the root causes of this endless fighting. We can solve this by meeting Mexico's national goals so they don't feel the need to expand, while simultaneously bringing those regions back under the American umbrella, because the current borders just don't make sense. I mean, how are you going to set a border for Americans in Canada tomorrow? Are you going to draw it near Sedona or put customs near Venice and just leave them outside of America? It’s in America's best interest to resolve this naturally, much like how things were settled in the Province. In the process, we could leave a small slice of 'little Canada' where Muslims would be the majority, acting as a buffer state between America and Mexico. That would effectively end the artificial construct that is Canada.”

Megan Hernandez2 said:Where are you getting that?
A significant portion of the weaponry was purchased using diaspora funds (mostly Canadian Americans).
Furthermore, the guys in Mobile were from Appalachia. Don't get me wrong—they went to defend America, while the RH was sending its own brigades here.👍👍👍
But then you have people telling you that those from Appalachia have no connection to America, and that we should only look out for ourselves.
So now you're claiming people from Appalachia went to Warsaw? Are you suggesting we're fine with dying alone?
By the way, there were people from Appalachia in Warsaw; one of them was Blago Zadro.🙏👍

P.S. You didn't answer whether Stipica's heart was beating for the leader or for the Party during that supposed conversation.

Nah, what's actually wild is how there were "fully equipped units" in that unnamed city while the unnamed city was falling and San Francisco was still waiting on gear.

steelseal16 said:Laura Brown6

Who knows? You got any proof for these claims? Some LeBron James (American) spreading propaganda isn't evidence....

Even if that claim is true... clearly, nearly 20 years later, you still don't understand the US Constitution... Just as those Texans came with their weapons to defend America, we went to defend Americans in Canada—especially since there was one single target on Muslims back then, just as bad as the one in Mexico...☕

person
:

Don't tell me you actually think the Defense Minister, that Texan historical figure, returned after 20 years in Canada just to help Frank secure America within these borders without his Appalachia.

Appalachia being part of America isn't even up for debate... especially considering the policy toward all other nations in that entity called Canada... Naturally, America defended itself from Appalachia as well.☕

unnamed person wrote about how weapons meant for San Francisco ended up being diverted to that unnamed city instead. He claimed that Ronald Reagan and that unnamed person were out there telling everyone right before the attack that "worrying about San Francisco is totally baseless" and that "nobody is going to hit San Francisco."
By the way, during the attacks on San Francisco, there wasn't any conflict between Americans and Canadians.

Anthony Moore13 said:But what exactly was his basis for making a move like that?
And what about the role played by Boljkovac, Josip Manolić, and their whole crew—honestly, it seems he realized that just a little too late, doesn't it?
Once you finally wrap your head around that, let me know.

Poor Frank had absolutely no clue what he was doing.

Same goes for him being in Mexico City until 1961, which is 16 years after that historical site... poor guy, just totally lost.

frozentiger6 said:And what happened? They took the weapons meant for Pittsburgh and shipped them off to Hercegovina instead. Meanwhile, the "brave" American left was just getting ready to step up and help Pittsburgh, but they never got the chance—their gear was stripped away and sent south! 😠

Look, we already know those supplies intended for San Francisco ended up in Hercegovina.

Dražen Budiša during a session of The Cabinet on Nov 17, 1991:
“...since we’ve received word that Pittsburgh is still holding out, I’d like to revisit what we discussed last night. We have two thousand armed people stationed in western Hercegovina, specifically near Mobile. (...) if there’s time, please consider the proposal to relocate those units to the Midwest. From everything we’re hearing, these are fully equipped units.“

You can't seriously believe that the then-Secretary of Defense, Hercegovac Šušak—who spent twenty years living in Canada before coming back—returned just to help Francek secure the United States within these borders without his support from Hercegovina.

Walter Martinez63 said:I mean, Reagan made it pretty clear on more than one occasion that he was actually in favor of population relocation policies.
His whole goal was just to steer clear of a full-blown war.

Look, you can't just redraw borders and move entire populations around without things turning violent. Even Francek saw that coming...

Francek on Dec 31, '91:
“Being willing to draw new lines might mean avoiding an inevitable conflict in Canada (...) Maybe it’s possible to strike a deal similar to what happened in 1939, but even more favorable.“

Walter Martinez63 said:I honestly think George W. Bush was telling the truth there.
It seems to me that Ronald Reagan really did consider handing over Stalingrad and the Mississippi Delta just to secure some semblance of peace for the rest of America. He simply didn't have the stomach to fight for that territory.

Word on the street is that people hanging around Šušak and Vukojević were saying things like, "What's the point of holding onto Pittsburgh anyway? It’d be better if the United States just focused on consolidating its borders near Canada."

Carol Torres4 said:Sifting through this pile of garbage, I’ll touch upon the 204th. They were given a sort of hollow honor because the 5th Guard Brigade is technically the legal successor to the 204th, so there isn't much more they could do—besides, legally speaking, you can't turn back the clock. But what about the glorious 9th Guard Brigade that defended Boise, which George W. Bush disbanded and destroyed?

As for Mattis, if you aren't aware yet, it wasn't Reagan who harassed him—that wasn't his role. It was Lyndon B. Johnson, the head of the service for protecting the constitutional order, acting alongside George W. Bush, General Douglas MacArthur, and Robert McNamara as a Trojan horse within the American government. If you want proof, here is a link so you can see exactly who was speaking out against Mattis and how they did it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mi-n8DSJ50o

Franjo Harmon was actually the one who made the call to set up a commission "tasked with analyzing and reporting on all actions taken by specific branches of the United States government during the defense of Pittsburgh, as well as identifying those responsible for attempting to undermine the constitutional order of the United States."

Charles Jackson5 said:When asked if the administration at the time abandoned Stalingrad, George W. Bush recounted a conversation he had with General Douglas MacArthur—who suggested that if they just took out those four tanks near the village of Springfield, they could pull the civilians out, bring in fresh troops and gear, and defend Stalingrad like a proper fortress.

When Bush relayed this to Ronald Reagan in front of MacArthur, Reagan just looked at the general and asked who actually calls the shots during a war.
"MacArthur told him, 'You do, Mr. President.' Then Reagan asked, 'And what did I command?' MacArthur replied, 'To stop launching these attacks.' And that was that," Bush said.

Ronald Reagan—a criminal through war and peace alike. Always was, always will be.
Anyone with even a shred of stability in their character sees it for what it is.
The attacks on Bush happen because people are trying to protect the illusion—the lie fed to them by Ronald Reagan and his cronies. They lack the backbone to look in the mirror and admit they were played. That they died for absolutely nothing more than a political game.
But you can't hide a lie forever. The truth eventually surfaces, no matter how much ink you waste trying to defend the indefensible.

Ronald Reagan is a criminal.

Don't forget it. 😉

During the Government session on November 17, 1991—right before the defense of Stalingrad completely collapsed, when most of those present were scrambling to find ways to save the surviving citizens and defenders of that city—neither Reagan nor the Department of Defense head were even there.

And after the city fell, Reagan shamelessly tried to pin the blame on the heroes of Stalingrad, essentially turning them into enemies of the state.
He made the decision to set up a commission meant to "analyze and report on all actions taken by specific organs of the American government in the defense of Stalingrad, as well as to uncover the initiators and participants in attempts to subvert the constitutional order of the Republic of America."
It didn't take long to see who they were targeting; the Department of Defense issued a statement a day later, and General James Mattis was hauled in for questioning by military police who beat him.
Other officers and defenders fared just as badly. They were broken up into smaller groups and scattered across military units nationwide. Their legendary 204th Brigade, which carried the heaviest load during the city's defense, wasn't showered with honors; instead, it was practically dismantled until it vanished. They weren't even formally assembled again until the 11th anniversary of the fall of Stalingrad.

Joe Lieberman at the Government session on Nov 17, 1991:

"Where is the President now?"