CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Jeffrey Rivera2 › Posts

Posts by Jeffrey Rivera2

5 posts shown.

Women are villains, men are saints in Psychology ·
Excuse me? Most men tend to deal with their problems through alcohol and physical confrontation before they ever consider any other solution.
Women are villains, men are saints in Psychology ·
Morgan Cook10 said:Don't go like that... p**** is incredibly powerful. Granted, it works best when it's paired with a great body.😁 For what it's worth... what man has ever achieved anything significant using just his dick?

I missed this part.😁So why doesn't a man's junk require an attractive body surrounding it? Hair matters, sure, but breasts and a good physique are clearly the two most important factors.
Women are villains, men are saints in Psychology ·
Rachel Stewart36 said:It’s funny how everyone loves debating "rights" and "freedoms"—as if they’re some universal guarantee—while totally ignoring the fact that these things are basically just nominal labels. Honestly? It’s more accurate to call them privileges, since whether you actually get to use them depends on a massive pile of external factors. Treating "freedom of choice" as a default setting for everyone is just delusional. Freedom is really just the flip side of power, and we all know how power actually gets handed out in a stratified society. You can talk about feminism all day, but unless you start from "how things should be," talking about "how things actually are" makes the whole effort feel pretty much futile. Feminism—just like any other theoretical construct—can't just ignore the reality of human nature and its built-in drive toward hierarchy.

It seems animals have more rights than people.
Women are villains, men are saints in Psychology ·
Drew Lee7 said:Oh, wow, looks like someone's making clones now. 😉

Since we're in the psychology section, I assume you've at least heard of projection. It's this fascinating little trick where the human brain convinces itself that it isn't responsible for anything, so it just points the finger at someone else instead. Yeah. Exactly.

You think you're funny.
copperharbor172 said:Why bother with a book? Honestly, just look at the statements made by those famous feminist leaders from the 60s until now. Or better yet, just check their marital status—that’ll tell you everything you need to know. They're either lesbians or have never even been close to a guy, which makes their whole perspective pretty irrelevant. Feminism is basically like the political parties here in the States... Their platform is always something like, "We're going to create jobs and hire 200,000 new people over the next five years."

The reality? Unemployment hits record highs, and the economy ends up looted and completely gutted.

At that point, you can just let someone like Sanders tell you, "How can you judge us when you don't understand the nuances? Just read our manifesto and then you'll see."

Look, ladies, no offense, but I've dealt with way too many irritating, rude, and aggressive feminists who seem to be fueled entirely by pure hatred for men. Even when you listen to the speeches and watch the behavior of the "great" award-winning activists, it doesn't change the vibe. I don't think I need any literature to explain it to me; I've experienced the whole thing firsthand.😉

P.S

And please, don't go thinking you "fought" for women's rights. You didn't. You got them from the men you were asking for help in the first place, backed by massive lobbying efforts after tens of millions of men died in the World Wars. I'm not saying I'm not glad you have most of the same rights as men—you definitely do, and that's what matters—but let's be real: you aren't quite as "tough" as you pretend to be. If men had been forced to lie in freezing water from birth until death, things would look a lot different...☕

Wait a second, we "fought" for this? Bullshit. Women aren't actually that powerful, because if they were, they would be much more influential.
Women are villains, men are saints in Psychology ·
Drew Lee7 said:Quentin Tarantino:
boldwalker12 I can't even begin to process what they just said. Seriously? Is anyone actually buying this? It’s like people just stop thinking the second they open their mouths. Honestly, how does someone even come up with this kind of nonsense?
Man, I could've saved myself all that wasted effort if I’d just read this a second sooner. I can't believe I have to deal with this again. Honestly, does anyone else feel like we’re just circling the drain here? Every time someone brings up these "traditional values" arguments, it feels like a step backward. We've been talking about how patriarchy is a social system in which the role of the male as the primary authority figure is central to social organization, and where fathers hold authority over women, but people still act like it's some kind of lost utopia. It isn't. It's just outdated. Why are we even entertaining these regressive ideas in a modern society? It’s like watching a slow-motion train wreck. We should be pushing for progress, not clinging to old-school power structures that clearly don't serve everyone. Does anyone actually think things were better when one group held all the cards? I highly doubt it.
Come on, don't stoop that low. So what if he was out chasing skirts? What does that have to do with the actual points he's making? Should I start digging up everyone else's dirty laundry and dragging their private lives into this? Would that be any fun? I don't think so.

Look, if you aren't actually reading what I write, then you really have no business commenting on it. You’re basically admitting you haven't even read my posts, yet you still feel this desperate need to come at me? Honestly, I'm sorry for whatever happened in your life that made you this bitter, but sorry, babe—that's not on me. 🤷 I didn't screw you over. Seriously. ☕

Look, you’re wasting your breath. It’s like trying to say good morning to someone who’s stone-deaf. Honestly, the motivation behind most feminists—and I use that term loosely—is purely personal. That’s exactly why they get so aggressive and why they always act like they're being victimized. I’m with you on pretty much everything, except for the whole divorce situation. That is a massive, incredibly messy issue. There isn't a perfect solution out there, period. At best, you're just looking for the least terrible option available. Is there discrimination involved? Sure, in a way. But I don't think the courts are out to get anyone intentionally; it feels more like they're just taking the path of least resistance. It’s a complicated mess, but regarding everything else? Yeah, you hit the nail on the head.

Let’s be real here... most women act completely un-feminist. And that’s exactly what drives feminists absolutely insane. They go off on these massive rants, blaming thousands of years of tradition like those women are just mindless robots without a single thought of their own. As if they aren't capable of using their own heads—no matter how smart or cunning those heads might actually be.

So, you're actually trying to tell me that there's zero choice left for women today? Give me a break. How "free" he really is—that's a whole different ballgame, and honestly, I think it's more of a philosophical debate than anything else. But seriously, what exactly am I missing here? In what way do women lack choice in this day and age?

Then explain to me why we are constantly hearing about being "threatened" when we aren't the ones in danger—it is clearly you who are.