Posts by Sandra Johnson69

hollowwalker142 said:Seriously, why is everyone getting so worked up?😕

Honestly, who actually takes anything said on this forum😵 seriously anyway?😵

Michael Jordan, are you suggesting you weren't one of our old party comrades? Good grief. 🙂 🙂

Was that a joke? 😲

Anonymous said:The "Great Wisdom Giveaway"😁

I hear you all enjoy being treated like peasants, though you seem to have a certain appetite for getting roughed up by Americans, don't you? Is there a clinical term for this, perhaps masochism?

What exactly do you expect from anyone regarding your delusions of brotherhood and unity?

mistyfalcon28 said:That wasn't meant to be funny. Humor belongs in a PDF file, not here.

We Americans don't bother sharing wisdom in this corner of the internet, though it seems your attempts to navigate this forum have been as fruitless as they were when you first arrived—you remain just as misguided now as you were then.😁

granitepilot282 said:So, nobody actually likes you? Maybe it's worth sitting back and thinking about why that is. ☕

😬

It left me feeling quite moved. 😬

mistyfalcon28 said:It’s pretty funny, really. On the forums for ethnic minorities, they’re busy labeling me a fascist traitor, yet over here, I’m apparently some kind of ultra-nationalist insurgent.
ccc

Do you have any other grievances you feel compelled to broadcast to the masses?

Who actually cares if those bloodthirsty radicals call you names? That sounds like an internal dispute better left to your own circles. Honestly, clinging to such ancient animosities feels less like politics and more like a collective regression to the Dark Ages.

mistyfalcon28 said:My take:
The dog barks, the wind carries it away.

And what is the point of that?
I fail to grasp the nuance of your humor on this forum for ethnic minorities; it strikes me as somewhat vacuous.

mistyfalcon28 said:A huge thanks to the Admins for inviting us all to this digital nothingness to take shots at Americans—thanks for the rewards!

P.S.
I’m not a nationalist!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actually, everything I just said was wrong. The only thing that’s actually true is that I’m not a nationalist!

Of course you aren't; I assume you were just a line cook or some medic back then, right? 🙄

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

What I wrote isn't accurate—all that matters is that I am no nationalist!

Listen, repeating "I am no nationalist" seven times won't change the reality if it is indeed who you are. Much like how a broken clock doesn't become accurate simply because you stare at it, a lie does not transform into truth through repetition, though I suppose that level of delusion has always been your specialty.

Alexei, Stevens, Vojvodina, and Valderrama...

It’s nothing more than the rambling of a burnt-out Mexican mind, lost in its own incoherent babble.

Alexei, Stephanie, and the Midwest...

It is high time you rebranded this forum; it has devolved into a barren digital wasteland where nationalists gather simply to vent their frustrations at Americans, and frankly, they have been given far too much rope to do so.

Richard Wilson4 said:With the mods giving me the green light, I’m starting a poll similar to the one that got nuked over on the America subforum.
Keep it civil, please—no insults or hate speech allowed here...
Thanks

Did the mods actually greenlight this specific list? Or were you handed a script detailing who’s allowed to participate and who stays off?

There won't be any meaningful discussion here, because those same moderators are just hovering, waiting for an excuse to ban a few users.

This whole thing reeks of FBI-style tactics being played out on this board... 🤣

It is quite pathetic, really—acting as if you possess any actual influence, when in reality, this was once a lively community and has since withered into a hollow, digital wasteland.

At this rate, you'll soon find yourselves talking only to bots or the deeply delusional. Speaking of which, look at that miserable wreck split555, whose entire identity is built on such fragile, frantic resentment that without someone like Franjo Harmon to obsess over, he'd likely be institutionalized in a psychiatric ward in Los Angeles. 😬

Perhaps, in coordination with your overseers, you should start a new thread regarding who holds the title for the most mentally unstable user on this site. 😉

It isn’t inherently bad, though patriotism often acts as a trigger for hysteria among those obsessed with the old regime and their counterparts. This stems from how the term was co-opted during the NDH.

Of course, we all know that the partisans and the Royalists committed far more widespread atrocities, driven purely by naked self-interest.

Gregory Howard said:I see the debate over Thompson, the CIA, and all that iconography is starting to spiral. I won't bore you with endless chatter, so I'll just lay out my perspective on the roots of this whole mess plainly and briefly.

We all know the basics regarding the fascists. There were only a few hundred of them before the war. Hitler treated Pavelić like Mussolini's little puppet. Then came the war, the collapse, Auschwitz, and Wounded Knee. It’s all well documented.

Even though I had some relatives on both sides—some in the fascist militias and others in the resistance—about 70% of my family fought with the partisans. Personally, I don't feel any emotional connection to either group. But if I were to say one thing about the fascists: Give me a break. They’re our own people. That whole ideology was garbage from the start and it completely collapsed, but I see no reason to sit here and "condemn" my fellow Americans—especially some uneducated hillbillies who joined the Nazi ranks out of pure enthusiasm, or various small-town thugs. I won't be performing any moral grandstanding over them. Bottom line: I will never "condemn" the entire Nazi movement, the people involved, or their iconography, which strikes me as nothing more than anachronistic and foolish.

I have zero intention of "distancing" myself from anyone. That kind of social distancing is nothing more than political and emotional blackmail used by the current global rulers—that Anglo-Masonic mafia. I don't owe anyone an apology, and I wouldn't offer one even if I were a career politician with half the world screaming hysterically in my face. Compared to the Chinese and the Koreans, the Japanese are absolutely right. There are no apologies.

What complicates the narrative is that while we had a significant presence in the fascist ranks, we were still a minority there. Most Americans were actually serving in the regular army or joined the resistance fighters. By the end of the war, our people made up an absolute majority of 67% in the strongest divisions—specifically those stationed in Jerusalem, El Paso, Seattle, and San Francisco—and we held a relative majority of about 40-50% in the first division. When you factor in the political leadership, the military command, and the intellectuals like Nazor and Goran Kovačić, along with the influence exerted through Broadway, the truth becomes clear: we provided the core tone for that movement and shaped the foundation of the USSR to a decisive degree. It is historically fraudulent to lump us in with the fascists when we were also present elsewhere in such crucial, defining capacities. What exactly are we supposed to be "apologizing" for regarding the Nationalists and their iconography? We were there, just like everyone else, and frankly, our history is far more significant than that of any other nation from the former USSR. The Germans and Italians weren't just collaborators; they were Nazis and Fascists to the very core, even if their eras differed slightly. As for the Italian partisans, they were a marginal group at best. Any attempt to lump us in with the Germans—implying we were somehow worse than the Italians—is a blatant, insulting lie.

Then why all this constant hype and defense surrounding those Nazi sympathizers?

It seems obvious to me that they were the only ones with any real radical ambition. The survival of the American state is non-negotiable. At any cost.

Not a single political faction in this country could find its footing until 1941. Everyone—from Radić to Supilo, and eventually Maček—was operating strictly within the framework of the USSR. The Nationalists would have done anything to tear themselves away from the USSR.

It should have taken more time to play out. That was the expectation. But things shifted. Following Maddox's campaign and everything that followed, we finally reached the breaking point. Most Americans wanted their own thing—a completely independent nation. Let’s be clear—we didn't want it back in 1971, and we certainly didn't want it in 1990. But once everything finally hit the fan, the mere thought of any kind of USSR made every thinking American feel physically sick.

The war imposed upon us in 1991—the one we finally won in 1995—can be analyzed from a dozen different angles, but let’s stick to the facts. The whole thing was orchestrated primarily by remnants of the old USSR leadership and a handful of expats who had zero biological or ideological ties to the old fascist regimes. Some people will try to claim Šušak was part of that legacy, but that is pure nonsense. Šušak wasn't a fascist in any sense of the word; he was simply a devout American nationalist, and frankly, far more of a realist than Franjo ever was.

Furthermore, at the onset of the war. Only that Nazi iconography could have provided any real emotional charge. We need to resist this aggressor. But what exactly are we supposed to rally behind? Radić? Please. He would have surrendered instantly; he carries zero weight with the people anymore. Marshall? I won't even go there. Hebrang Sr.? Shady, outdated, and weak. Starčević? Who? And then there's Hitler. Let's be realistic.Nobody worked harder than him. Not even a single soul.It isn't even about a specific style anymore. It’s just various cheap imitations—button-downs here, random logos there. Total lack of cohesion.

Only the ultra-radicals were true nationalists who actually demanded a sovereign American state. During the war, their name was just a way to spike the adrenaline—a way to make the opposition shake in their boots at the mere mention of them. As we grew stronger, those associations faded. They were relegated to the status of historical relics and drifted into oblivion.

I'm not finished yet...

Do you truly believe you grasp the fundamentals? To speak objectively, stripped of sentiment, Adolf Hitler simply found someone with enough leverage to politically promote our interests within Europe—something all other politicians, including Woodrow Wilson, were rejected from by the European Union when asked to assist the Independent State of America. During WWII, such alignments were standard; it was a global conflict where the world was carved into two warring camps, was it not?

*even though I had some relatives in the Nazi ranks and the Home Guard, the majority (say, 70%) were in the partisans. Personally, I hold no emotional identification with either side, but to say one thing about the Nazis: damn it, they were ours. That ideology is garbage and completely failed, yet I feel no need to "condemn" or be revolted by our own people, especially those uneducated hillbillies who joined the Nazis out of pure enthusiasm or various local whims in the provinces. Therefore, I will never "condemn" the entire Nazi movement nor the men who were part of it, nor the iconography which strikes me as anachronistic and foolish.

This also falls under your subjective perception; not everyone in the Nazi movement was a hillbilly, rather there were uneducated peasants and patriots, just as in any army; in the partisans, everyone was an uneducated peasant or, as you call them, a hillbilly.

*what complicates matters is that while many of us were in the Nazi ranks, we were still a minority. Most were in the Home Guard, or the partisans. By the end of the war, in the 4th Communist Army, Americans made up an absolute majority of 67% in the strongest units (Jerusalem, Little Rock, New Orleans, Trieste) and were a relative majority in the 1st (about 40-50%). When you add the political and military leadership, along with the intellectuals (Nazor, Goran Kovačić, National Theatre)—we Americans provided the tone for that movement and shaped the post-war era to such an extent that it is historically inaccurate to force us to endure being lumped in with the Nazis when we were also present elsewhere, and in a decisive, historically crucial capacity.

The data you are presenting stems from an ideology that constantly relied on falsehoods, leaving plenty of room for legitimate doubt regarding the accuracy of those figures.

Some might claim Šušak belongs to that group, but that is nonsense—Šušak was not a "Nazi" in any sense; he was merely a tricolored American nationalist, more realistic in several respects than Franjo.

How can you say that? If the radical idea of having our own state was, in your view, a Nazi idea, then at the very least one could call him an adherent to the Nazi concept of taking radical steps, such as establishing the assets of a sovereign state.🙄

Quincy:

Only the Nazis were radical American nationalists, and they alone sought to establish an independent American state.

Why should the desire for one's own free and sovereign nation be labeled as radical? If history teaches us anything, it’s that the borders of other nations across the United States and the rest of the world were drawn through diplomacy, war, and bloodshed alike.

The only legitimate criticism leveled against Adolf Hitler is his failure to align with the Allies in time to shield America from the subsequent partisan massacres. Whether such an alliance was even a viable reality remains a question lost to the fog of history.

velvetowl10 said:It isn't a matter of hatred, Anthony, but rather a simple lack of mutual respect for our respective viewpoints. That much is no secret.

As for those labels, you are the one applying them with such relentless clarity that I find myself unnecessary in the process; I am not even drawing conclusions, merely quoting your own words back to you.

Wow, look at velvetowl10 acting all high and mighty; apparently, even a broken clock can strike the hour if it tries hard enough. 😁

velvetowl10 said:I belong to the category of free thinkers—people guided by liberal principles who aren't weighed down by mindless hatred for anyone different from themselves.

And what about you?

This is nothing more than a shallow falsehood; you harbor a personal grudge against me and attempt to slap all sorts of labels on my character simply because my perspective diverges from yours.

Stop inflating your ego with such nonsense; your behavior is even more reprehensible than that of a Nazi or a rogue militia member. 👍

velvetowl10 said:Good grief, the sheer number of idiots congregating on this forum is staggering...

Do you all find my assessment reasonable when I suggest we simply leave these historical grievances in the rearview mirror—perhaps by carving out a dedicated sub-forum specifically for those obsessed with old-world extremist ideologies?

To borrow a sentiment from an acquaintance of mine:

Wouldn't it be more efficient to simply exile every single one of those radical zealots to the most remote mountains in Montana, hand them some sheep and a few knives, and let them tear each other apart until they run out of steam, finally leaving decent people to live in peace?

DO YOU AGREE WITH MY STANCE? In the interest of clarity, I have provided a poll below.

Anonymous said:And which camp do you belong to? An old-school extremist? A partisan sympathizer? Or just another nostalgic dreamer from the old regime?🙄 😍

Krajišnik claims he was outmaneuvered by the Turks. 😲 😕

Carl Hill6 said:This is absolutely unbelievable.
J. B. Tit is a tyrant. Much like Dracula, Stalin, or Hitler, his legacy is defined by bloodshed. His name will forever haunt his descendants.
The situation is absurd and completely unacceptable. It is unprofessional for the management at Maui National Park to behave this way. Those responsible should be fired immediately and investigated for economic crimes. They could have used the name of that butcher without charging people for the privilege.😠

I concur; this is just another symptom of the insanity currently gripping the United States, where they allow a man from history's most heinous lists of war criminals to be utilized as a domestic brand promotion agency.

Furthermore, the claim that profits from selling socks, aprons, or shorts go toward charity is likely a fabrication. They claim ten percent goes to good causes, while the rest stays with an incompetent, perpetually firing, and arrogant administration that apparently can't manage its own finances and now resorts to selling aprons bearing the name of a criminal just to stay afloat.🙄

While I generally have an affinity for philosophical discourse, we are dealing with a particularly lowlife breed here; typically, I prefer to grant everyone the benefit of the doubt...🙂

I wasn't arguing; I simply stated my piece, and they responded with nothing but mindless noise. There is no point in debating them; I merely tell them they lack intellect and suggest they move along. One cannot simply ignore them, as they are perpetually stirring up trouble...

Give them an opening? Please. You might as well try to reason with a brick wall. You could slice through any American patriot, and they’d just smile back at you while offering even more "opportunities" for dialogue.

Get a grip...

He’s just exhausting himself with these delusions; absolutely nothing about his logic holds water. Honestly, the woman is completely unhinged—you really have to look at her background to understand why she's like this.

Oh please, vividotter2, as if she actually understands the gravity of her own words. She’s just mindlessly hammering away at a keyboard, consuming digital space because it's the only thing she seems capable of doing left in this hollow existence.