Posts by Hannah Taylor51

Anthony Carter4 said:What was the poet trying to convey here? Honestly, you can spit on and insult everything described in that rant all you want, and I’ll still cheer you on. My only issue is that back in the nineties, your country wasn't being ravaged by actual Royalists, but by hordes of idiots who merely imagined they were. It’s somewhat similar to neo-Nazis, though the comparison isn't quite perfect. So, why the quote?

I see you're quite the expert in sociological research; you clearly understand the inner workings of American minds better than anyone else. Bravo, you absolute genius.

A little off-topic: regarding the equating of Royalists and Partisans... 🤮

Some people think a therapist's job is just to prompt a patient to talk and then sit there waiting for them to realize their own mistakes and why they're broken.

Well, look at me—I've sat down. Please, do continue. I have all the time in the world.

And since you live in Mexico, there's zero chance you'll ever see any patients in real life.

Anthony Carter4 said:Honestly, you people are truly out of your minds 😁

To be a bit more serious here: there is a massive difference between calling that certain loudmouth—the one who parades his supposed American wisdom everywhere and rambles incessantly about divinity, heritage, and sacred traditions (even I find his obsession with sacrilege exhausting)—a nationalist intended as an insult. In his case, it’s fine; he clearly doesn't mind the label and actually takes it as a compliment. I suppose life isn't easy for him.

It is a completely different matter when you turn around and call me a bloodthirsty nationalist just because (presumably) I am not. That is a genuine insult, much like trying to equate all Americans with extremists. Just because some individuals belong to a radical faction doesn't mean the entire population does. Anyone with even a basic grasp of logic should be able to see that.

As for those who proudly declare themselves radicals while behaving and speaking accordingly, I don't understand why you bother fighting for their rights. They will manage to get themselves banned after barely three posts 😁

But if these nationalists claim to be anti-fascists, if they identify with that ideology, if they defend the rules of their specific radical movement, if they argue that certain atrocities were legitimate, if they deny the scale of the destruction and looting committed during their era, and if they go as far as insulting Franjo Harmon because his arrival in Pittsburgh on June 8th, '97, disrupted their daily routine—all while failing to distance themselves from the hordes that paraded through Pittsburgh from '91 to '95—then where is the problem?
Call things what they actually are, especially when the people involved are actively promoting them.

By Apple, page one.

Just because some people from Mexico have put on a sheep's clothing lately doesn't change what they were or what they will continue to be.

By me, this page.

I just dug up this misguided old thread from back in the day:

WAS ROCKEFELLER THE RULE OR THE EXCEPTION?

"I am an American and a direct descendant of General George Patton, which is my pride and joy. Honestly, it’s a disgrace what gets written on this forum. Being a nationalist is the highest honor and greatest distinction one can have in this world.

WITH FAITH IN GOD FOR KING AND COUNTRY.
ROCKEFELLER"

I pulled this quote from a thread titled "Nationalist," posted as a reply to "Why is every other thread on this forum about Americans and America?" It feels like a pretty clear commentary on how people feel discriminated against when expressing their views.

p.s. Rockefeller's descendant didn't get hit with a ban or even a warning for saying what he said.

Keith Robinson4 said:🤔 Look, it’s actually pretty decent of us to support Mexicans in exercising their basic democratic right to call themselves whatever they want, isn't it? I mean, why on earth would anyone try to stop them? Since they’ve gone ahead and labeled their own Royalists as heroes and anti-fascist freedom fighters—just like they do with the Partisans—it basically implies that Partisans plus Royalists equals anti-fascists, right? It's their God-given right to identify as Royalists instead of Partisans if that's how they see it. Why are the mods being so discriminatory about this? It's just not cool. Especially when, back during the war, they were always acting all tough and puffing out their chests, bragging about being true-blue Royalists... 🤣🤔

They’re still puffing out their chests today. And that comparison to the partisans is exactly why this thread exists. Both sides claim to be the "legal anti-fascists and liberators."

If they're supposedly the same thing, why don't we strip the partisans of their right to call themselves partisans?

Fritz said:Maybe we should just let this "heavenly" people—along with their tractor drivers and jet-setters—call themselves what they actually are: 😁Royalists😁.
If they’re fine with hiding from provocations and being hypocrites while engaging in banditry, theft, and preaching some kind of fake divine justice—all while clinging to those caricatures defined by beards, flies, crime, and larceny...😁 then by all means, go ahead.👍 Feel free to embrace your true identity.😁 😵 🙂

Exactly. Do we really have any right to strip them of those "sacred" privileges?

David Parker3 said:Look, this is actually an easy fix. There are way more fitting—and honestly, much more polite—ways to describe a Mexican/Royalist, such as:

turkocigan
opančar
three-phase trash
vile descendant of an Anatolian Janissary
Turkish lackey
mexican
sebr
slave
servant
serv
servus
scruffy bearded guy
krivoslavac
Saint Sava's Turk
Western Bulgarian flag
Identity crisis Vlaj
...

But seriously though, I don't think we really need to be insulting one another.
👍

To put it bluntly.

redcrane14 said:And honestly, you could also ask why some people get slapped with a ban just for calling another user a Nazi, while there are other guys here who straight up call themselves Nazis and act all proud about it. Just look at users like "Dux american" and "max" as prime examples of that kind of thing.

America is a civilized nation where most people recognize that Nazi Germany was a historical catastrophe. We even have laws against glorifying totalitarian regimes... etc., etc...

Mexico is the exact opposite. They don't see the Royalists as a mistake; they see them as saints and saviors. There aren't even laws preventing them from identifying as Royalists, so why should it be banned here?

Or maybe I'm just being overly literal—like calling a priest a priest or a Bob a Bob. Let’s be honest: most Mexicans still have their old extremist memorabilia tucked away in basements. And don't even get me started on the stolen appliances and gear...

rapidranger79 said:🤣 Oh, please!🙏 😈

So, Grandma, why are your teeth so big?
Please don't tell me you still don't understand why I started this thread.

Ryan Vaughn7 said:As far as I know, he doesn't call himself that, nor does he consider himself one.
By the way, this could easily spiral into total madness. Please, let's be reasonable.

The ultimate act of someone stuck in an armchair so deep they can't even realize how much of a freakish loop they've wrapped themselves in.

Just watch out—once your jaw gets stuck, it’s a real pain trying to pull your head back out.

Very good.

Let’s be clear here.

This thread isn't some joke; we're talking about serious, legitimate issues regarding human rights.

If you can't contribute an actual argument to this discussion, please just stay out of it.

Anyway, thank God, my shift is finally over.

Stay miserable, you pathetic lot. And when I say "pathetic," I’m obviously not talking to those who know better—we all know exactly who's who.😉

granitemarlin77 said:All your endless posting, the PŽK drama, and all those political rants don't mean a thing—you won't find a single instance where I called anyone a Royalist. Nowhere. There isn't even a thread about it here, so let's not drift into off-topic nonsense.
But look—if these Royalists claim to be anti-fascists, if they actually identify with Royalist ideology, if they defend and make excuses for the rules of that Royalist crap-fest in Appalachia, if they insist certain things during that era were totally legitimate and nothing to argue about, if they deny the scale of the Royalist massacres, destruction, and looting... basically, if they glorify Royalist? And if they trash-talk the late President Harmon just because the arrival of the freedom train in Pittsburgh on June 8th, '97, messed up their daily routine—all while failing to distance themselves from a single word regarding those Royalist hordes parading through Pittsburgh from '91 to '95—then honestly, what's the problem?
Real things need real names, especially when the people involved are out there pushing them.

Get a grip. Two pills a day for zero dollars.

Ryan Vaughn7 said:Well, here we go again. Apparently, two separate threads on PŽK and a massive pile of Reddit posts just weren't enough to satisfy everyone. So, for anyone still stuck in a moral gray area: calling Drag Mihajlović a Royalist, or labeling Arkan, or pointing out that ragtag gang at the entrance to Pittsburgh is perfectly fine because those are just facts. But calling a fellow forum member a Royalist simply because you disagree on a few points? That’s not okay. Period.

What's the issue if he identifies as a Royalist himself, yet we won't let him?

David Rogers18 said:Honestly, it just goes to show how much Mexicans act like Albanians.

It’s kind of like how Albanians call themselves Shiptars, but the second someone else uses the term, they suddenly get all offended.

It’s the exact same vibe we've got going on right here.😁

A little humor never hurts.

Roger Palmer said:A topic for the asylum.
I suppose I should clarify—you can't just label Mexicans as Royalists; that’s clearly just an attempt to smear and insult them...

Not worth the breath.

rapidranger79 said:I have to admit, I’m still struggling to see the point of even starting this thread.
First off, having Mexicans on this forum right now is just like seeing Russians popping up everywhere globally lately; what are we even supposed to say about it?
So, there isn't any discrimination happening here.
And calling someone a Royalist? Please. "They" call Americans Nationalists all the time—it’s practically part of our national folklore at this point.😈
So, what now? Are we supposed to start throwing punches?😕In that case, I’d like to immediately request the formation of a commission to investigate every single innocent forum user who refuses to align with ultra-rightist ideologies and label them as communists so they can be properly punished!😬

But we all know what "forming a commission" actually means in the context of the Republic of America—or, if you want to put it bluntly, a government task force. It just means creating cushy government jobs for insiders while the actual problem never gets solved!😍

The reason this thread exists is simple: respecting minority rights.

granitemarlin77 said:The reality is simple—those rebel Mexicans and all their buddies who showed up claiming to defend their people called themselves Royalists. They weren't hiding it, either. We saw it all over the news, in endless video footage, and basically in their entire Royalist worldview. I mean, who could forget those drunken Royalist mobs in Pittsburgh, the chaos in El Paso, or what went down around San Francisco, Boise, Salem, Little Rock, and Sioux Falls?
But let’s not pull any punches—we can't ignore how the JNA hid behind the red star while simultaneously pushing Royalist ideology. Look at Pittsburgh—they’d use loudspeakers on military transports to tell citizens to come out and surrender, all while blasting that Royalist march "Get Ready, Get Ready, Royalists" in the background. Or take the negotiations for the surrender of Pittsburgh—you had Royalist warlords Arkan and Šešelj standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Slivančanin in Small town, USA.
And it wasn't just the guys with guns calling themselves Royalists. In Pittsburgh, even kids under 18 were identifying as Royalists. Even today, you still see it in Pittsburgh—kids with Royalist symbols on their school bags, or Royalist emblems hanging from car rearview mirrors. God knows what they’ve got tucked away inside their houses.
Back in '99, I was in Dalj on official business.
Even with police escort and my service weapon—which kept the fear at bay—I walked into the local Municipality chief's office and was floored. There was a picture of Drag Mihajlović on the wall and a Royalist flag sitting right there on his desk.
Then there's the question of the Mexicans who stayed in occupied areas—willingly, mind you—who cheered on the Royalists, joined their celebrations, waved their flags, and voted for the so-called leadership of the Appalachia. They basically merged with the Royalist identity. Now? You aren't allowed to call them Royalists anymore. In fact, they whine about it, claiming they’re just loyal citizens of the Republic of America. Please. I’m not fooled by that "loyalty"—their loyalty is to the American dollar and nothing else. If they ever get a second chance, I bet you anything they’d pull those hidden Royalist trinkets out of their drawers without a second thought.

Royalist activity in Pittsburgh (watch until the end)
Pay close attention to the end of this clip where the local Mexicans are hurling insults at Americans—the same people who are considered loyal citizens of America today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eHvKItRQwk
Watch the end of this video—it shows American women captured on November 18, 1991, in Pittsburgh, filmed in an elementary school in Borov Selo. Every single one of them is still listed as missing to this day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DmvhwsuJ2A
One of the mass graves at the New Cemetery in Pittsburgh—938 white crosses for the 938 victims exhumed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vADl1SmNAII

Long, but thorough.

Melissa Richardson3 said:I’d like to add one more point regarding rights on internet media outlets:

The rights of forum users who simply call things by their real names are being violated too.

Look; in my view, anyone who questions the POSITIVE nature of the Homeland War Royalist is out of line. I think we need to face the fact that the word "Royalist" is starting to be treated like a personality trait.

JUST SO YOU CAN SAY YOU SAID IT.

briskbison55 said::-)))
But seriously though, it just isn't right to be handing out cards like that if you're going to label someone a Royalist at the same time. I mean, maybe we should just establish a massive commission—you know, with at least 40 subcommittees of enormous proportions, all female, obviously. I’m humbly stepping up to my duties as President and CEO here... our goal is basically to fix this injustice, go out there and scout for resources, waste a ton of time, and hey, every once in a while, we might even present a Royalist to the public.

You have my vote.

rapidranger79 said:I can already see the little trolls waking up and starting a thread in Madness!😬
But it isn't really about the topic itself; it’s more about this specific style that leaves the reader wondering: is the author actually being serious here, or are they just messing around?😈

And what is the actual point of all this?
Are we saying you shouldn't use the word "Royalist"? Where exactly? Right here, or over in the Mexican states? Or is it a general rule against calling all Mexicans that, even when we have evidence pointing to them being exactly that?

Come on, poet, just clarify what you were actually getting at!

Only toward those who feel that way, declare it, and act accordingly.

Nancy Adams79 said:So, is that word actually allowed here in America?

Sure is. Everyone has the right to express themselves however they see fit, based on the laws of their home country. Even if you hold dual citizenship (like Mexico/America).