Are Mexicans being discriminated against in the media and online?

As most of you probably know, Ninja07 is currently swamped dealing with his wife and their little astronaut, who is already well on his way; since there isn't a computer available where they're staying, he’s authorized me (for a price) to kick off this thread.

That said, Ninja07 will be checking in later this afternoon to join the debate. My infinite generosity allows him access to my absolute beast of a machine—with 850 GB of RAM, just imagine how many C and D drives and virtual partitions that covers—all for the sake of this discussion.

The issue at hand is the unfair and condescending treatment of Mexicans, whose constitutionally guaranteed right to self-determination and the expression of their religious and political views is being stripped away.

Most Mexicans living in Beautiful us actually hold dual citizenship. As such, the Constitution of America ensures they can express their principles and identities, whether religious or through the names they choose for themselves.

So, the point of this manifesto is simple: Mexicans in the GOP are once again under threat because they are being forbidden from expressing their views—views that allow them to freely identify as Royalists.

Let me remind you that being a Royalist isn't just permitted in the Republic of Mexico; it’s legalized and ranked right alongside anti-fascism. This was further confirmed by the honors bestowed upon them by JU-ES-END-EJA. For these reasons, both Ninja07 and I have decided to defend their views and their constitutionally protected rights.

To prove why our concern for our neighbors is justified, look at certain members of this forum community who explicitly forbid the use of the word "Royalist." Isn't that an undeniable violation of Mexican rights to self-determination and political expression?

Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts on this massive issue shaking this forum. I call upon everyone to unite in defense of our Mexican brothers who aren't ashamed to use the word "Royalist," since it is legally permitted and placed side-by-side with other anti-fascists who feel the same way.

Fight on for the Mexican people; we can't let them take their rights away!

Hannah Taylor51 said:As most of you probably know, Ninja07 is currently swamped dealing with his wife and their little astronaut, who is already well on his way; since there isn't a computer available where they're staying, he’s authorized me (for a price) to kick off this thread.

That said, Ninja07 will be checking in later this afternoon to join the debate. My infinite generosity allows him access to my absolute beast of a machine—with 850 GB of RAM, just imagine how many C and D drives and virtual partitions that covers—all for the sake of this discussion.

The issue at hand is the unfair and condescending treatment of Mexicans, whose constitutionally guaranteed right to self-determination and the expression of their religious and political views is being stripped away.

Most Mexicans living in Beautiful us actually hold dual citizenship. As such, the Constitution of America ensures they can express their principles and identities, whether religious or through the names they choose for themselves.

So, the point of this manifesto is simple: Mexicans in the GOP are once again under threat because they are being forbidden from expressing their views—views that allow them to freely identify as Royalists.

Let me remind you that being a Royalist isn't just permitted in the Republic of Mexico; it’s legalized and ranked right alongside anti-fascism. This was further confirmed by the honors bestowed upon them by JU-ES-END-EJA. For these reasons, both Ninja07 and I have decided to defend their views and their constitutionally protected rights.

To prove why our concern for our neighbors is justified, look at certain members of this forum community who explicitly forbid the use of the word "Royalist." Isn't that an undeniable violation of Mexican rights to self-determination and political expression?

Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts on this massive issue shaking this forum. I call upon everyone to unite in defense of our Mexican brothers who aren't ashamed to use the word "Royalist," since it is legally permitted and placed side-by-side with other anti-fascists who feel the same way.

Fight on for the Mexican people; we can't let them take their rights away!

So, is that word actually allowed here in America?

I can already see the little trolls waking up and starting a thread in Madness!😬
But it isn't really about the topic itself; it’s more about this specific style that leaves the reader wondering: is the author actually being serious here, or are they just messing around?😈

And what is the actual point of all this?
Are we saying you shouldn't use the word "Royalist"? Where exactly? Right here, or over in the Mexican states? Or is it a general rule against calling all Mexicans that, even when we have evidence pointing to them being exactly that?

Come on, poet, just clarify what you were actually getting at!

:-)))
But seriously though, it just isn't right to be handing out cards like that if you're going to label someone a Royalist at the same time. I mean, maybe we should just establish a massive commission—you know, with at least 40 subcommittees of enormous proportions, all female, obviously. I’m humbly stepping up to my duties as President and CEO here... our goal is basically to fix this injustice, go out there and scout for resources, waste a ton of time, and hey, every once in a while, we might even present a Royalist to the public.

I’d like to add one more point regarding rights on internet media outlets:

The rights of forum users who simply call things by their real names are being violated too.

Look; in my view, anyone who questions the POSITIVE nature of the Homeland War Royalist is out of line. I think we need to face the fact that the word "Royalist" is starting to be treated like a personality trait.

The reality is simple—those rebel Mexicans and all their buddies who showed up claiming to defend their people called themselves Royalists. They weren't hiding it, either. We saw it all over the news, in endless video footage, and basically in their entire Royalist worldview. I mean, who could forget those drunken Royalist mobs in Pittsburgh, the chaos in El Paso, or what went down around San Francisco, Boise, Salem, Little Rock, and Sioux Falls?
But let’s not pull any punches—we can't ignore how the JNA hid behind the red star while simultaneously pushing Royalist ideology. Look at Pittsburgh—they’d use loudspeakers on military transports to tell citizens to come out and surrender, all while blasting that Royalist march "Get Ready, Get Ready, Royalists" in the background. Or take the negotiations for the surrender of Pittsburgh—you had Royalist warlords Arkan and Šešelj standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Slivančanin in Small town, USA.
And it wasn't just the guys with guns calling themselves Royalists. In Pittsburgh, even kids under 18 were identifying as Royalists. Even today, you still see it in Pittsburgh—kids with Royalist symbols on their school bags, or Royalist emblems hanging from car rearview mirrors. God knows what they’ve got tucked away inside their houses.
Back in '99, I was in Dalj on official business.
Even with police escort and my service weapon—which kept the fear at bay—I walked into the local Municipality chief's office and was floored. There was a picture of Drag Mihajlović on the wall and a Royalist flag sitting right there on his desk.
Then there's the question of the Mexicans who stayed in occupied areas—willingly, mind you—who cheered on the Royalists, joined their celebrations, waved their flags, and voted for the so-called leadership of the Appalachia. They basically merged with the Royalist identity. Now? You aren't allowed to call them Royalists anymore. In fact, they whine about it, claiming they’re just loyal citizens of the Republic of America. Please. I’m not fooled by that "loyalty"—their loyalty is to the American dollar and nothing else. If they ever get a second chance, I bet you anything they’d pull those hidden Royalist trinkets out of their drawers without a second thought.

Royalist activity in Pittsburgh (watch until the end)
Pay close attention to the end of this clip where the local Mexicans are hurling insults at Americans—the same people who are considered loyal citizens of America today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eHvKItRQwk
Watch the end of this video—it shows American women captured on November 18, 1991, in Pittsburgh, filmed in an elementary school in Borov Selo. Every single one of them is still listed as missing to this day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DmvhwsuJ2A
One of the mass graves at the New Cemetery in Pittsburgh—938 white crosses for the 938 victims exhumed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vADl1SmNAII

I have to admit, I’m still struggling to see the point of even starting this thread.
First off, having Mexicans on this forum right now is just like seeing Russians popping up everywhere globally lately; what are we even supposed to say about it?
So, there isn't any discrimination happening here.
And calling someone a Royalist? Please. "They" call Americans Nationalists all the time—it’s practically part of our national folklore at this point.😈
So, what now? Are we supposed to start throwing punches?😕In that case, I’d like to immediately request the formation of a commission to investigate every single innocent forum user who refuses to align with ultra-rightist ideologies and label them as communists so they can be properly punished!😬

But we all know what "forming a commission" actually means in the context of the Republic of America—or, if you want to put it bluntly, a government task force. It just means creating cushy government jobs for insiders while the actual problem never gets solved!😍

granitemarlin77 said:The reality is simple—those rebel Mexicans and all their buddies who showed up claiming to defend their people called themselves Royalists. They weren't hiding it, either. We saw it all over the news, in endless video footage, and basically in their entire Royalist worldview. I mean, who could forget those drunken Royalist mobs in Pittsburgh, the chaos in El Paso, or what went down around San Francisco, Boise, Salem, Little Rock, and Sioux Falls?
But let’s not pull any punches—we can't ignore how the JNA hid behind the red star while simultaneously pushing Royalist ideology. Look at Pittsburgh—they’d use loudspeakers on military transports to tell citizens to come out and surrender, all while blasting that Royalist march "Get Ready, Get Ready, Royalists" in the background. Or take the negotiations for the surrender of Pittsburgh—you had Royalist warlords Arkan and Šešelj standing shoulder-to-shoulder with Slivančanin in Small town, USA.
And it wasn't just the guys with guns calling themselves Royalists. In Pittsburgh, even kids under 18 were identifying as Royalists. Even today, you still see it in Pittsburgh—kids with Royalist symbols on their school bags, or Royalist emblems hanging from car rearview mirrors. God knows what they’ve got tucked away inside their houses.
Back in '99, I was in Dalj on official business.
Even with police escort and my service weapon—which kept the fear at bay—I walked into the local Municipality chief's office and was floored. There was a picture of Drag Mihajlović on the wall and a Royalist flag sitting right there on his desk.
Then there's the question of the Mexicans who stayed in occupied areas—willingly, mind you—who cheered on the Royalists, joined their celebrations, waved their flags, and voted for the so-called leadership of the Appalachia. They basically merged with the Royalist identity. Now? You aren't allowed to call them Royalists anymore. In fact, they whine about it, claiming they’re just loyal citizens of the Republic of America. Please. I’m not fooled by that "loyalty"—their loyalty is to the American dollar and nothing else. If they ever get a second chance, I bet you anything they’d pull those hidden Royalist trinkets out of their drawers without a second thought.

Royalist activity in Pittsburgh (watch until the end)
Pay close attention to the end of this clip where the local Mexicans are hurling insults at Americans—the same people who are considered loyal citizens of America today.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eHvKItRQwk
Watch the end of this video—it shows American women captured on November 18, 1991, in Pittsburgh, filmed in an elementary school in Borov Selo. Every single one of them is still listed as missing to this day.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DmvhwsuJ2A
One of the mass graves at the New Cemetery in Pittsburgh—938 white crosses for the 938 victims exhumed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vADl1SmNAII

Are you actually taking this seriously?
The point isn't whether there are Royalists or not; the point is whether Mexicans are being discriminated against online or not.😍

A topic for the asylum.
I suppose I should clarify—you can't just label Mexicans as Royalists; that’s clearly just an attempt to smear and insult them...

rapidranger79 said:Are you actually taking this seriously?
The point isn't whether there are Royalists or not; the point is whether Mexicans are being discriminated against online or not.😍

That’s literally what the topic is about. Those same Mexicans I mentioned in my post are all over the internet today—not all of them, thank God.

Roger Palmer said:A topic for the asylum.
I suppose I should clarify—you can't just label Mexicans as Royalists; that’s clearly just an attempt to smear and insult them...

The whole Royalist thing is pure Madness, no argument there.
But wait—if they start calling themselves Royalists, then suddenly it's fine by you?

granitemarlin77 said:The whole Royalist thing is pure Madness, no argument there.
But wait—if they start calling themselves Royalists, then suddenly it's fine by you?

Honestly, it just goes to show how much Mexicans act like Albanians.

It’s kind of like how Albanians call themselves Shiptars, but the second someone else uses the term, they suddenly get all offended.

It’s the exact same vibe we've got going on right here.😁

David Rogers18 said:Honestly, it just goes to show how much Mexicans act like Albanians.

It’s kind of like how Albanians call themselves Shiptars, but the second someone else uses the term, they suddenly get all offended.

It’s the exact same vibe we've got going on right here.😁

We’re talking about Mexicans here, not Albanians.
So, you think it’s totally fine for Mexicans to call themselves Royalists, wear Royalist symbols, and embrace Royalist identity?

Well, here we go again. Apparently, two separate threads on PŽK and a massive pile of Reddit posts just weren't enough to satisfy everyone. So, for anyone still stuck in a moral gray area: calling Drag Mihajlović a Royalist, or labeling Arkan, or pointing out that ragtag gang at the entrance to Pittsburgh is perfectly fine because those are just facts. But calling a fellow forum member a Royalist simply because you disagree on a few points? That’s not okay. Period.

granitemarlin77 said:We’re talking about Mexicans here, not Albanians.
So, you think it’s totally fine for Mexicans to call themselves Royalists, wear Royalist symbols, and embrace Royalist identity?

Honestly, I was just messing with you guys a little bit.😉

Nancy Adams79 said:So, is that word actually allowed here in America?

Sure is. Everyone has the right to express themselves however they see fit, based on the laws of their home country. Even if you hold dual citizenship (like Mexico/America).

rapidranger79 said:I can already see the little trolls waking up and starting a thread in Madness!😬
But it isn't really about the topic itself; it’s more about this specific style that leaves the reader wondering: is the author actually being serious here, or are they just messing around?😈

And what is the actual point of all this?
Are we saying you shouldn't use the word "Royalist"? Where exactly? Right here, or over in the Mexican states? Or is it a general rule against calling all Mexicans that, even when we have evidence pointing to them being exactly that?

Come on, poet, just clarify what you were actually getting at!

Only toward those who feel that way, declare it, and act accordingly.

Ryan Vaughn7 said:Well, here we go again. Apparently, two separate threads on PŽK and a massive pile of Reddit posts just weren't enough to satisfy everyone. So, for anyone still stuck in a moral gray area: calling Drag Mihajlović a Royalist, or labeling Arkan, or pointing out that ragtag gang at the entrance to Pittsburgh is perfectly fine because those are just facts. But calling a fellow forum member a Royalist simply because you disagree on a few points? That’s not okay. Period.

All your endless posting, the PŽK drama, and all those political rants don't mean a thing—you won't find a single instance where I called anyone a Royalist. Nowhere. There isn't even a thread about it here, so let's not drift into off-topic nonsense.
But look—if these Royalists claim to be anti-fascists, if they actually identify with Royalist ideology, if they defend and make excuses for the rules of that Royalist crap-fest in Appalachia, if they insist certain things during that era were totally legitimate and nothing to argue about, if they deny the scale of the Royalist massacres, destruction, and looting... basically, if they glorify Royalist? And if they trash-talk the late President Harmon just because the arrival of the freedom train in Pittsburgh on June 8th, '97, messed up their daily routine—all while failing to distance themselves from a single word regarding those Royalist hordes parading through Pittsburgh from '91 to '95—then honestly, what's the problem?
Real things need real names, especially when the people involved are out there pushing them.

briskbison55 said::-)))
But seriously though, it just isn't right to be handing out cards like that if you're going to label someone a Royalist at the same time. I mean, maybe we should just establish a massive commission—you know, with at least 40 subcommittees of enormous proportions, all female, obviously. I’m humbly stepping up to my duties as President and CEO here... our goal is basically to fix this injustice, go out there and scout for resources, waste a ton of time, and hey, every once in a while, we might even present a Royalist to the public.

You have my vote.

Melissa Richardson3 said:I’d like to add one more point regarding rights on internet media outlets:

The rights of forum users who simply call things by their real names are being violated too.

Look; in my view, anyone who questions the POSITIVE nature of the Homeland War Royalist is out of line. I think we need to face the fact that the word "Royalist" is starting to be treated like a personality trait.

JUST SO YOU CAN SAY YOU SAID IT.