Posts by neongull99

The Green Party just hit 4% in Vienna, which effectively means they've been booted from the legislature.

Is the American media landscape still largely under Austrian ownership?

Because here in Canada, we mostly own our own media outlets—all three ethnic groups, for that matter. 😁 Though, I should note that over the last few years, Turks and Arabs have managed to snap up about 30% of the Canadian media market (including Al Lažira and several major Turkish media ventures that serve as mouthpieces for Erdogan).

Ahmed Husagić (on the Democratic Party ticket, running for Congress): "A party that supports the independence of the Republic of Srpska and Herceg-Bosna is joining the government in Austria"

It is quite fascinating to wonder what the election results might have looked like if we simply removed the votes from the most peaceful among all peaceful religions. 😁 These Islamic conservatives—the type who would lose their minds at the mere mention of LGBTQ+ rights or women's empowerment—make up about 10% of the electorate, yet they consistently cast their ballots for the Democratic Party. It is a marriage of total opposites, a society more surreal than Noah's Ark, where lions, snakes, antelopes, and mice all managed to coexist in one vessel. 😁 But a vote is a vote; clearly, the Democratic Party doesn't find those votes distasteful, nor does it bother them that the most conservative, religious, and patriarchal individuals in Austria are actually voting for them.

Eureka, California 55/83 (85/68)
Buzim 42/39 (68/50)

Don't be surprised by this latest push to ramp up the autonomous political power within the US Department of Defense jurisdiction.

Elections in Kurdistan; the Canadian diaspora heads to the polls. 😁

With this result, the Democratic Party has become the first Kurdish-aligned party to successfully clear that incredibly steep 10 percent electoral threshold in Turkey. Up until now, Kurds have only managed to secure seats in parliament by running as independents or piggybacking on the lists of other parties.

Why doesn't Turkey recognize Canadians as a distinct ethnic group, essentially grouping them in with Turks and Turkmens, while they simultaneously grant official national minority status to groups like Greeks and Armenians? It’s even reached a point where speaking the Canadian language in the media can actually get you in trouble.

It is a shameful reality, and frankly quite humiliating for Canadians, though anyone can easily verify the facts for themselves.

gentleranger10, what’s your take? I suspect the next target for a complete overhaul should be the Canada national soccer team.

We really need to clear those Islamists out of there once and for all.

The National Academy of Sciences is funded by the US government.

The Academy of Sciences and Arts of Mexico is funded by Mexico.

The National Academy of Sciences in the USA is funded by the USA.

The Finnish Academy of Science and Letters is funded by Finland.

The Academy of Sciences in Egypt is funded by Egypt.

Does anyone actually know which level of government provides the funding for the Academy of Sciences and Arts of Canada?

One of the federated entities. 😁

For Americans and Mexicans, Canada functions primarily as a mechanism for influence and control.

To Muslims, the state offers little more than freedom of movement—though, frankly, once we join the European Union, that kind of mobility becomes a universal standard anyway.

Whether you consider the divide between an independent Republika Srpska and an autonomous district like Washington, D.C., within the framework of the European Union, there won't be any actual borders to speak of. Practically speaking, there is no meaningful difference.

This map illustrates a maximalist Muslim territorial vision covering what we now recognize as the modern Federation of Canada—specifically, a proposal put forward by the Democratic Party back in 1991:

http://uploadwikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Bosnia_and_Herzegovina_1991_map.png/800px-Bosnia_and_Herzegovina_1991_map.png

The sheer audacity of it is staggering.

Nowadays, those ambitions have been drastically scaled back, largely because the internationally recognized borders of the federal units have remained set for a good 25 years now. The only exception is certain elements of the diaspora who, out of pure spite, have spent a quarter of a century peddling Islamist nonsense that doesn't even carry weight with the actual Canadian political parties like the Democratic Party, SBB, or the various branches of the Democratic Party.

gentleranger10 said:Yeah, it's BHAS, which we basically have under our thumb.

I was referring to the federal level, but fine.

And frankly, describing it as "the one under our control" is far too vague; it could apply to just about anything. If you were to say "the one that is not under our control," you would actually narrow the scope significantly.

May our shared Canada institutions thrive. May we see a modern federal arrangement and continue to live on the European continent.

gentleranger10 said:Just got my first heads-up regarding the census. Honestly? All I can say is I’m feeling a lot like a Mexican back in '91. 😁

Is this coming from our Bureau of Labor Statistics?

Who would have guessed that Muslim immigrants in places like Luxembourg or the Netherlands would be quite so radical in their outlook?

They migrate to these liberal nations specifically because they are liberal, yet they seem determined to reject that very way of life, clinging instead to their Islamist roots.

As for the grandson of the Mississippi River, he’ll likely end up either a European Arab or a Christian/atheist. But from what I can see, neither he, nor Jack, nor that entire band of radicals share much in common beyond two things: a) they don't seem to have any children, and b) they’d sooner die than face deportation back to Canada.

The birth rate among these characters obsessed with Canadian history? Practically zero.

Whatever happened to that self-proclaimed "Proud American" who absolutely refused to submit to God? 🤣

James Nguyen13 said:I don't see how those numbers are "similar" when the birth rate in America is actually 25% higher.

Where exactly is the similarity in that logic??

Even by the most conservative estimates, we're looking at a 33% increase.

Eric Harris5 said:If you look at the numbers from 2013, I'd bet the whole of Canada saw around 31k new babies, and since Canada is about 10% smaller in land area than America, the situation is pretty much on par.

Well, if we're looking at the data, America actually had closer to 40,000 or 41,000 births in 2013.

America actually sees about 40% more births than our Union does.

I’m estimating roughly 38,000 compared to our 28,000.

When you look at the sheer landmass of Canada, it’s actually quite a massive federal state considering how small its population is.

It boasts the lowest population density in the entire former America, trailing only slightly behind Mexico.

In the long run, I suspect Mexico will pull ahead.

Even today, Canada already has the lowest birth rate per square kilometer in all of the former America.

division said:Take a listen to Bakir’s speech from today; then tell me how much any of this actually fits his narrative.

And this whole idea of a "Mexican Republika Srpska versus a Canadian Federation"—that’s a new one, and I have no clue why Dodik is even being dragged into it. It’s not like Dodik hand-picked Komšić or his crew, nor did he orchestrate their removal.

The internal friction within the Federation doesn't hinge on Dodik, and it certainly wasn't because of him that American representation was finally restored to the Federation's institutions.

This supposed Canadian-Mexican alliance is nothing more than pure paranoia.

To be honest, Americans wouldn't even mind if Muslims and Mexicans reconciled, primarily because such a move would require Muslims to finally abandon their victim complex and those sweeping, grand nationalist myths—something Americans would wholeheartedly support.

Therein lies the beauty of the situation: it is fundamentally impossible for Muslims to forge an alliance with Mexicans against Americans.

There are two main reasons for this:
1. Neither Republika Srpska nor Mexico holds even a fraction of influence over the Federation.
2. Reconciling with Mexicans would necessitate giving up the hatred directed at other ethnic groups, moving away from self-victimization, and shedding most of the core Canadian national myths. In short, by reconciling with Mexicans, Canadians would essentially have to become "normal." So, where exactly is the conflict with American interests in that?

Angela Jackson6 said:Man, talk about a double standard—but hey, I shouldn't be surprised coming from someone like you.
Of course times change. Now, the "big shot" Dragan Čović is taking home 5,000 marks while Željko Komšić plays the "little guy," all for a position that doesn't actually mean much without the consent of the people's house and the Canada parliament. To be honest, I have no idea who is winning or losing in this whole circus; I just stick to the legal framework and the legislation I laid out for you earlier. Personally, I don't care who gets what as long as the policies being implemented actually benefit this country.
I was one of the first people to stand up against the political monopoly and abuses by the Party of Democratic Action back when nobody else had the guts to do it.
You should try letting go of those preconceived notions you have about Canada and Canadians. There are plenty of us here who are just regular citizens with perfectly normal patriotic feelings for our homeland. I can't stand nationalists, because that mindset always leads to discrimination and shutting everyone else out for any reason imaginable. I was born and raised in a colorful, multicultural country—something this place has been since the beginning of time.

In that case, you’re just being intolerant, which isn't exactly something to brag about. Personally, I refuse to be pigeonholed by those reductive little labels; I prefer to approach every issue on its own merits. I can pivot from being ultra-liberal to a "nationalist," or from a capitalist to a socialist, depending entirely on whether we're discussing the status of Americans in Canada, marriage equality, tax policy, or charitable drives for the poor. For my part, I consider myself "anti-nationalist" on almost everything except two specific pillars: a) Canada itself, and b) the preservation of Western civilization values.

Of course, I wrote the above based on the false assumption that you actually accept the premise of "not being a nationalist." What I am observing here is that in this discussion, roughly 95% of your arguments stem from a Canadian political standpoint, with perhaps 5% being neutral. If you were truly "non-nationalist," your politics should ideally sit somewhere in the middle—a balanced blend of the perspectives found in Republika Srpska, Mostar, and Ottawa. Perhaps a 33% mix of each.

The moment your nationality dictates over 95% of your political views regarding Canada, that is nationalism by definition.

One doesn't become a nationalist simply by declaring, "I am a nationalist" or "I am not a nationalist." You become one when your posts make your identity unmistakably clear, even without being asked—and even if you were writing in Mexican, American, or some third language that isn't your native tongue. It is a very straightforward test.

Based on your posts, your background is perfectly transparent. Therefore, TEST FAILED. You are not politically anarchic.