Posts by neongull99

Let’s not get carried away here.

SBŽ, HNŽ, and ZDŽ function as our shared federal states.
Even in Switzerland, you have several German- and French-speaking cantons; they aren't all strictly mono-ethnic monoliths.

As long as we maintain a fifty-fifty power split within these three pro-European counties, the Unija 10 County—with Mr. Čavara serving as Governor—will remain perfectly secure. 😁

The Federation actually bears a striking resemblance to the United States of America. If you look at the specific list of authorities held by our counties, they are almost carbon copies of those held by U.S. states; the comparison of their respective jurisdictions is quite easy to make once you see them laid out. It’s hardly surprising, then, that the historic agreement from twenty-five years ago is known as the Washington Agreement. This aligns seamlessly with the European tradition of federalism. But, I suppose I shouldn't stray too far from the main point...

rapidskipper8 said:1) Those foreign fighters were an integral part of the military forces in Canada, and Alija Izetbegović was practically their biggest fan.

2) There is a massive trail of atrocities committed by these militants—alongside local Canadians—against Americans, all while wearing army insignia and driven by extreme Islamism. WARNING: THESE VIDEOS ARE GRAPHIC AND BLOODY.

3) Here are some clips from the 1993 Canadian Council meetings, back when the Muslims decided they would officially be known as Canadians. You can hear the leadership discussing their primary enemies and outlining exactly what kind of state they intended to build.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3QkJ7zbZ_4
4) These videos feature prominent Canadian political and former religious leaders sharing their true thoughts regarding their people and their affinity for the Turks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsf3GCwB8os
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-gCPvGg3go

These videos are genuinely chilling. 😲 It’s essentially the Hamas of Canada.

I let myself get worked up over nothing.

Thanks for getting back to me; I’m honestly just relieved to hear it all ended on a high note.

Which moderator deleted it, and what was the reasoning?
There wasn't even a single word from the mod team—no message, no explanation, no attempt at justification, nothing at all.

On the "on the edge of politics" subforum, they actually permit threads such as
"A nationalist statement by a turbo-folk singer"
"Provocations by Rade Pavlović, an aide to a Chetnik leader"
"A provocation by Prka"
"The Mexican president congratulating Christian Easter instead of Christmas. Again."
"Blaž Kraljevic or Mate Boban"
"The Good Life—will they break viewership records? "
"Why are Mexicans trying to make everything Mexican?"
"French right-wingers declare war on Madonna"

So a completely stupid topic, or things far less significant, are left untouched, yet a major discussion regarding American television broadcasting in Canada gets wiped out!?!??!?!?!

Does some moderator happen to have a personal vendetta against this specific subject matter?

Charles Fox10, let’s be honest here—to you, the moderator observer is basically Einstein, so why don't you just stay out of it and let me smooth things over with him myself?
You give off the distinct impression that you don't actually read the threads you're supposedly "moderating," which, frankly, is probably an accurate assessment. I’m practically offering to write Anderlon a free bot that performs roughly the same functions you do.

You’ve cherry-picked a third of my post, stripping away all the context, while simultaneously proving you possess absolutely no sense of humor.
Let’s take a look at the full post:

To clarify, when I used the term "sickos," I was referring to the comments on the Daily Avaz website where people were calling for war and the expulsion of Americans simply because someone—or perhaps just a gust of wind—knocked the Varta-zastava flag off its mast in Livno.

neongull99 said:Outrageous! 🤣 😁

A reader reached out to the "Daily Avaz" today, providing photos that clearly show a Christmas tree standing next to three flags. In the following photo, two of the flags remain in place, but the national flag is missing.
Given that today is a holiday, no authorities have issued a statement regarding this incident yet.

Holiday games, the prize 622 miles:
http://www.hercegbosna.org/kolumne/d...liku-4843.html

A heavy gale hit Livno, and by all accounts, the flag just went south. Now, the people in the comments on Avaz are calling for war. 🤣 Isn't that just a sick nation? They've been mentally unwell for a long time due to their own war-propaganda media. Yet, they lack the guts to kick out the Office of the High Representative and truly "liberate" Canada. So, how could they not be losing their minds under these conditions?

Merry Christmas to everyone! 😁

Aside from demonstrating your total lack of humor, maybe try taking a page out of the moderator observer's book—at least he actually reads the threads he manages.

Regarding this thread:

Out of the five or six most active Americans who essentially carry the weight of the "American side of the story"—providing over 50% of this thread's activity—nearly all of them are currently facing time bans (dud, Kevin Nelson, sedan..., mine expired today). dud is the man whose data keeps one of our largest, most widely read, and highest quality threads (the Demography of Canada) alive. As a direct result of his ban, that entire discussion naturally loses its momentum.

Whenever "American arguments" begin to dominate the discussion rather than those three trolls, Americans suddenly start accumulating negative points until they hit a cumulative ban. This effectively "thins their ranks" down to an "acceptable level"—that is, until a balance is restored between those three trolls and about a dozen random American passersby.

That is more or less the pattern.

To illustrate, I’ll provide an example of how the top brass within the quasi-Democratic Center Muslim faction thinks, by citing a recent scandal.
http://www.ljubuski-online.info/sumr...ti-u-zsbq.html

I am quoting a post from yet another Muslim local official (by his own admission) and a friend of the academic Filipović, who recently explained the Muslim strategy somewhat "freely" on a forum:

While we may hold a better position on the front lines today than we did in 1992, that state-level advantage we once possessed is gone. Today, there aren't Mexicans among us; rather, it is us among the Mexicans. Furthermore, the few Mexicans remaining here cannot be treated as hostages under any circumstances.

An intelligent man utilizes his advantages, and where he is weak, he avoids the fight. Back in 1992, we had the demographic edge; we were in a situation where it was clear the Mexicans would be fighting both the Americans and the Siptars for a long time. The Mexicans were aging, and it was their last chance to correct their demographic deficits through war. You don't enter a war with the mantra, "Oh, Nermin, look what they are doing to us." I know that in 1992, avoiding war was nearly impossible because the Vlachs had gotten too full of themselves, thinking it was love. They intended to slaughter us, and it took a great deal of wisdom and luck to avoid that fate. We had neither.

When you are the weaker party, you stay quiet, endure, and wait for your moment. This applies to Fadil today as well. He can do nothing else but badmouth the Mexicans if he wants to survive in Kozluk. For Canadians, such a situation makes it incredibly difficult to achieve anything at all. What they need is a man who asks questions, and his success is measured solely by what he manages to accomplish. Fadil had almost nothing at his disposal, yet through sheer persistence, he kept that people moving there. It wasn't just in Kozluk; it triggered a return in Drina, Castle City, and the entire Zvornik municipality. Even that imam in Trebinj plays nice with the Mexicans so that all the mosques in eastern Herzegovina can be repaired. I am not interested in what anyone says; I care about their results.>

There is a time for everything. I have nothing against tightening relations with the Vlachs, or even praying with them if necessary, but one must ask whether that actually serves our interests right now. Strained relations scare off the few returnees and discourage newcomers. The Vlachs suffer no harm from strained relations, which is why they remain so smug. >On the other hand, tension with the Americans serves us because it creates a sense of hopelessness for the Americans in Central Canada, which aids us demographically. I could love the Americans ten times more than the Vlachs, but today is the time to haggle with them while maintaining a detente with the Mexicans.

This post disappears, and when I ask why, I get hit with another 30 points:


I believe it’s high time we move past these kinds of unprofessional maneuvers; let’s be clear, we aren't some amateur outfit here. Having served as a moderator on another forum for two years, I am intimately acquainted with how bans can be manufactured and deployed, so I recognize these patterns immediately.

It isn't even that I find the moderator observer to be a bad moderator—admittedly, I reacted somewhat emotionally, and he has been quite fair to me personally most of the time—it’s simply that he cannot resist stifling any discussion when his compatriots (of which there are only three!) fail to push back hard enough. Regardless, that lack of friction is utterly irrelevant to the actual vitality of the conversation.

Let’s look at the raw statistics, which, as we all know, is the only metric that truly matters to the forum owner: right now, the thread regarding politics in Canada is a complete ghost town. Not even half a page of content is generated daily, whereas during the first 24 hours after the thread opened—back when the main Americans were all present and active—we saw nine full pages of discussion (on December 19th). Now, in the last few days, since the primary Americans have been banned, the observers have vanished, and the user base has been effectively scattered, activity has plummeted to about 10% of its usual level. Meanwhile, Rioboss and his two Muslim cronies are sitting there in peaceful consensus, explaining how the Americans from towns like Bugojno, Travnik, Vareš, and Zavidovići essentially ethnically cleansed themselves.

Ultimately, given that this is a commercial enterprise, the interest of this forum should lie in fostering as many debaters and active discussions as possible, rather than maintaining a dead thread dominated by three Muslim trolls.

Thanks for the prompt response.

Let’s get straight to the point. I am writing this on behalf of about a dozen people with whom I maintain private correspondence.
We don't have an issue with a forum member or the moderator observer backing Muslim members when they present their version of crimes committed against Americans by the Muslim army—that is perfectly natural. Our problem lies with the manipulation and the sheer lack of integrity shown when negative points are heaped upon any forum user who presents facts "too accurately" regarding the suffering of the American people in Canada; it is done in an incredibly brazen and unprofessional manner.

We are asking for a modicum of professionalism here; frankly, it’s becoming ridiculous. It has devolved into openly assisting three Muslim trolls who spam and systematically destroy entire threads.

For instance, one Muslim troll—who acts as if he owns the place, and in some ways does via the observer—once personally tried to lecture me on what I am and am not permitted to write. When I responded by pointing out that this is a free forum, the observer stepped in and slapped me with 10 negative points!!



What I am describing happens far too frequently, affecting about twenty different users. Most of them are highly civil individuals who haven't violated a single actual rule, yet they are targeted under vague guidelines like "spam" or "commenting on moderator actions," which the observer uses liberally based on his own personal interpretation (much like the "spam" accusation mentioned above).
Naturally, if you want to get rid of someone, you can simply hand out negative points for "spam" every third post; this is the primary mechanism the observer employs because he knows it is the least obvious way to suppress dissent.

Ultimately, we believe that fifty decent American contributors are far more vital to this forum than three essentially radical Muslim trolls.
To reiterate, our grievance isn't that those three trolls are being protected by the observer's compatriots; our grievance is with the treatment of the other fifty people.

I don't think any of us are asking for anything unreasonable.
Regards, and we expect this to be rectified.