Posts by Sam Wood4

I’ve been noticing a pattern lately where every major organization—whether it’s a sports franchise, a massive tech company, or even local government—suddenly decides they need to "re-evaluate their engagement strategies." It always follows the same script. They admit they haven't been listening, promise a new era of communication, and then everything goes back to being completely one-sided a month later.

It honestly feels like a way to pacify people when they know they've messed up. I remember back when my local club tried this; they set up these fancy digital feedback loops and community boards, but it felt like shouting into a void. They wanted the "input" so they could check a box, not because they actually intended to change how things were run. It’s frustrating when the people who are most invested in something feel like they're being treated as mere data points rather than actual stakeholders.

Do you guys think these big "outreach initiatives" are ever genuine, or is it just a PR tactic to keep us from complaining?

eto 😎

Anthony Bailey said:This essentially answers the core question of the thread...
contaminated food is a reality, just as contaminated people are.

I am absolutely certain about one thing: I never eat food prepared by a homosexual!
I stay cautious, obviously. It is dangerous to ingest food saturated with that kind of "tolerant love."😁 😲 👎

I.L. said:"Oh, "distinguished" gentleman!"😁

Open the first page of the Bible... or even page 100 or 552... just read it.

It states everywhere—this specific man was born to these specific parents.

A woman is merely an application... a PC card. A man provides and creates another human being through the woman, treating her as his own property and a sub-program.

Hmm... let's not get lost in the weeds... you certainly own a Bible, don't you?🙂

And I shouldn't forget:

Hans Christian Andersen's fables are still better than those Masonic ones!🙂

🙂 🙂

That is precisely the crux of the matter.

A man creates and a man gives birth.

Some people insist on twisting clear facts of human history. Some refuse to accept the truth, so they attempt to dilute and obscure it using their own versions of human "intellect."
Essentially, these people want to claim that when a tiny human being enters the world through a woman, she somehow holds MORE "rights" over him. They argue she possesses him more because she carried him in her womb for nine months.
😲 :eek

That exact trick is frequently used during divorces. When custody is awarded to the mother, the father ends up paying astronomical amounts in child support, only to see his children once a week for maybe twenty minutes.😲

Where is the honesty there? Where is the justice? Where are the rights of the father?😠

Must we really continue to debate this?

A child is nothing more or less than its mother, just as it is nothing more or less than its father.

strider2 said:The Jewish deception is claiming women have a uterus, when in reality, they don't—men are the ones who possess them...😁 😁
Mr. Lukić, your intellect is simply too vast for this world. This is comparable to when you asserted that the Earth was flat. 😁 🙂

Why don't you just point out exactly where the Wall is so openly placed that everyone can see it? You know, don't be so subtle... you wouldn't want to make things too easy for them. 😁

Hey strider, what did studying economics do to your brain? 🙂

You're making too many blunders, and your ego is swelling even faster. 😢

You are actually a perfect example of the "how to instruct Gentiles" method... truly authentic by their standards!! 😁

rambi said:me!i!i!i- says:
Believe me, you don't want to look at the physical differences. If we did, every woman would be in Washington and every man would be working in a coal mine.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sam Wood4 says:

And just like that, the country goes to hell!

_____________________

Where is it now?

Just take a look at your REAL homeland, where it is...> Israel, bloody Israel!

Everything is perfectly clear!!

It’s there, where women join the military and men have become mere hollow shells. It's there, where "feminine influence" is held up as the highest value... 😁
...there, where black magic politics reigns supreme, and where the primary enemy of mankind resides...

A nation devoid of masculinity, a nation of idolaters and false religion!

Rebels against God, outcasts, thugs, "bankers," hypocrites, thieves, and liars... to put it bluntly > THE MOST GREEDY PLUNDERERS OF MATERIAL WEALTH BELONGING TO OTHER NATIONS !!

-me! said:Trust me when I say you don't want to look at the physical differences. If we went by those standards, every woman would be running for office and every man would be working in a coal mine.😛

And just like that, the country falls apart.
😢

-me! said:It isn't about sex, and it is clearly something you have absolutely no clue about.😛

And what could you possibly know?
Please, just don't start...

I have read your posts in the 'Religion' section...!

Regardless, you certainly enjoy hearing yourself talk.🙂 😁

Rebecca Miller2 said:Take the supposed "equality" of women as an example. Is "having rights" truly synonymous with "equality"? From my perspective on linguistics and logic—it certainly is not.

To clarify: do women possess all legal rights? They do.

However, based on how feminists and the Wall utilize the term "equality"—through their endless soapbox lectures and political maneuvering—it suggests they aren't actually seeking *that* kind of equality.

So, what exactly is it they want?

Or are they simply using "equality" as a mask to demand some form of superiority?

Rebecca Miller2, this is a great topic! 🙂

It is the ultimate stumbling block for those radical feminists.😁
And even for these self-proclaimed "philosophers" of ours... 😛 😁

Furthermore, regarding this famous "equality" for women, there was no answer provided. What specific fundamental rights have been stripped from women? Or which rights do women lack?

Actually, a much better question would be: what type of woman is being promoted by this granting of "rights"? And what is the end result—do we get some sort of android, a masculine figure that is neither male nor female?

But naturally, the fight for these "rights" wasn't started by women; it was started by the Wall!

Any decent, humble, and helpful woman finds the very concept of "emancipation" repulsive.

Solaris said:I couldn't care less about who is more capable. Let X and Y compete.

It is vital, Solaris: truly vital.
Your premise is flawed from the very start.

Capable, perhaps... but compared to what?

If men and women possess equal capabilities, then what was the purpose behind their creation by God? He created both man and woman for a reason. Is it simply to perform the exact same tasks?

If we look strictly at the physical aspects, where exactly do the differences lie? Heh, hey...

Everyone deserves to stand at the exact same starting line.
That is what we call formal equality.

Perhaps we should just stop calling it "equality" and start calling it "sameness."

And what exactly have we gained?

That which does not apply. 😛