Sanctions on Russia
in War in Ukraine ·
Arthur Watson4 said:Drafting up a list of enemies just like Sheldon
😂
I just hope they can push out updates fast enough, 24/7...
454 posts shown.
Arthur Watson4 said:Drafting up a list of enemies just like Sheldon
George Robinson43 said:Here is some insight from Russian sources:
Poll: A whopping 71% of Russians believe they will win in Ukraine, with a massive majority backing the war.
Yesterday, Gallup released data from a study regarding the perception of the Russian "special military operation in Ukraine":
- The vast majority of Russians trust the Russian military (84%). In fact, one out of ten (10%) does not. Furthermore, 70% of Russian citizens surveyed believe there is a high probability that the military operation will be a success for the Russian troops.
- 71% of Russians support the decision to carry out the "special military operation" in Ukraine. One in five people (21%) quite strongly opposes the military action, while 8% remain unsure.
It is clear that the people stand behind the war. We need to push for even tougher sanctions.
William Gonzalez3 said:Honestly, this frantic race between organizations and institutions to purge anything remotely connected to Russia feels about as intelligent as renaming French fries to "Freedom Fries"—just one of those mindless interventions we've seen from Americans before.
The last thing I read was that restaurants are even pulling Russian salad from their menus.
And yeah, I think it's starting to feel more like hysterical Russophobia than actual economic sanctions.
Anthony Hill5 said:This is 100% propaganda. Is it not entirely implausible that those whose entire occupation is spitting on everything Western would choose to spend their fortunes buying property in Western nations?
jadetinker85 said:Yeah... zero effort being put into lowering the tension.
Nicholas Watson said:But haven't you been complaining about the state of this forum nonstop?
Joshua Myers432 said:The smartest move would actually be to declare neutrality and rush an amendment into their constitution stating they will never join NATO.😁
What kind of nonsense is this "EU troops" idea?🙏
Steven Bennett5 said:From what we can see, the Russians have definitely achieved their strategic goals so far:
They've effectively pushed Ukraine away from any consideration of joining NATO or even the EU for a long time.
The fighting is happening on Ukrainian soil.
The forces prepared for the assault—maybe around 150,000 to 170,000 soldiers—simply aren't enough to "conquer" a nation of this size. But clearly, that isn't the goal here.
The aim is to squeeze Kyiv, to pressure that comedian and his boxer buddy to back down and save their people and their country.
The goal is to get Ukraine—either this current administration or likely whoever follows—to sign an unconditional agreement to remain militarily neutral.
You don't actually need to "occupy" all of Ukraine to achieve any of that!
Secondly, nobody really has reliable intel from the ground right now, which, unlike American or Western interventions in places like Iraq or Syria, is a relatively new factor.
It would be naive to fall for the nonsense on our mainstream news outlets claiming the operation is failing just because it’s only day three.
Operations like this aren't planned to last only three or four weeks.
Even in Chechnya (the second war, which the Russians won), it didn't wrap up in five or six days...
The Russians probably haven't even deployed their second or third waves of assault forces yet.
Will they actually march into the center of Kyiv and hold it under siege? Honestly, who knows.
As for casualties, of course there are losses on both sides. This is a war, not a ballet recital!
A 2-3% loss rate in an offensive operation of this scale is practically expected—if you assume there are 150,000 Russian troops involved, you can do the math yourselves.
Back home, during Storm, we had over 120 dead. Just near Turin by Karlovac, we lost about 10 people to mortars during the first attempt at a breakthrough. And generally speaking, those 120 or so people were killed by an enemy that often wasn't even putting up a decisive defense! They were mostly retreating.
Now, try putting that into the context of this current offensive operation!
Dennis Davis8 said:Petro Poroshenko stands there in front of a CNN camera acting like some kind of legendary hero—it’s honestly a joke. Just a total soap opera.
---
If you look at the secret Jewish agenda laid out in The New York Times, the whole goal becomes crystal clear: they’re trying to establish a second Jewish state, which explains why the political chaos in Ukraine is spiraling the way it is. Basically, there's this push to reclaim an ancient homeland. They've got full backing from the US, with Victoria Nuland pulling the strings from within the State Department. The US is essentially telling Vladimir Putin to back off and just let Russia maintain its historical ties with that people—ties that lead straight to modern-day Israel. Even Obama basically went on the record admitting that the regime change in Ukraine was orchestrated; Yanukovych was forced out under intense pressure from the CIA, the CIA, and Israel just to clear a path for the Jewish billionaire Petro Poroshenko. According to the reports, Jewish money and military hardware are flooding through Ukraine while the local Ukrainian Christians—the non-Jews—get slaughtered and wiped out, all while their property gets snatched up by Jewish oligarchs. Everything else? It's just theater for the masses who don't know any better.
https://hamdocamo.wordpress.com/2016...-ne-zna-nista/
Keith Morgan10 said:Look, they’re going to end up as subjects one way or another. It’s just something nobody wants to admit out loud.
America paid in blood to avoid being subservient, yet today, that freedom mostly exists on paper.
I can somewhat understand the perspective of a smaller nation like ours, I guess... what can a country of just a few million really do? But Ukraine? If a nation of 40 million had the guts and the sense, they could be a major player on the world stage.
But it seems like they've always preferred being under someone else's thumb. So, they'll probably end up as subjects regardless—whether it's to the Russians or the Americans.
vividtiger72 said:They’ll probably aim for some sort of autonomy for the Donbas, but Crimea? Not a chance.
But honestly, do you really think there's any way they can ever get Crimea back?
Joseph Clark95 said:If you look at how things played out in Syria and then compare it to what’s happening in Ukraine, it becomes painfully obvious what "the West" actually means when they talk about "democracy."
The constant stream of propaganda and fake news being pumped into the airwaves—and the endless denials that follow—isn't just noise. It's a calculated media war designed to shape public opinion and justify their colonial ambitions.
Between the staged scenes on Snake Island, the convoys of charred remains coming out of the Azov region, and the actual reality on the ground...
Ukraine is doing everything in its power to drag the whole of Europe into this conflict, but more importantly, they want to pull the neutral Ukrainian population along with them.
To pull that off, they need civilian casualties. They need those classic propaganda pamphlets—think of the chemical attack narratives used in Syria—and an army of internet trolls to flood the web with lies.
Putin’s biggest challenge here is resolving this crisis without sacrificing neutral Ukrainians and actually returning Ukraine to the Ukrainians.
It’s a localized conflict that is costing the Russians lives, but if this turns into a full-scale confrontation, we’re looking at a massive restructuring of borders—maybe even a literal takeover of Ukraine, depending on how many Ukrainians decide to side with Russia.
And predictably, the usual script from Ukraine: "We’ll retake Crimea, we’ll liberate Donbas, we’ll defend Kyiv."
Crimea is Russia, Donbas is Russia. Let's just keep watching...