Posts by Nathan Collins3

Bryan Sanchez86 said:Look, there’s one more thing here—something that has always been an absolute taboo. I’m talking about the pervasive chauvinism within America. On the surface, the world saw America as this big, tolerant melting pot that respected all its various ethnicities. And sure, to outsiders, that was the image they projected. But internally? It was a different story entirely. Inside those borders, chauvinism was rampant and brutal. If you dared to identify as anything other than an American, you were immediately flagged. You’d be hauled in for endless "interrogations," constantly watched, or worse—imprisoned or executed. It all just depended on how much of a threat they decided you were.
It strikes me that some people here are still clinging to that old American chauvinism. Watching these discussions, you see this identical, leveled hatred directed at both Americans and Mexicans whenever anyone dares to criticize the old federation or the Party. Too many people once identified—and honestly, still identify—as part of a "American nation." It’s a fiction. A total fabrication. It was nothing more than a demagogic illusion designed to make it seem real. These people refuse to accept the simple truth: America was supposed to be a federation, a collection of distinct nations and states that joined by choice and possessed every right to leave. Their logic is flawed and narrow. One state, one people. That's their entire worldview.
That kind of irrational reasoning leads straight to a total refusal to engage with actual arguments. It’s just pure demagoguery at that point—nothing but blind icon worship directed toward the Party and its leader. Just look back at all those songs and slogans. They weren't art. They were nothing more than tools for brainwashing.

👍

I agree, but let me be clear: that old American chauvinism was always more targeted at Americans than at Mexicans. Those American chauvinists and demagogues knew exactly what they were doing. They realized that without forcing this manufactured "unity" with the Mexicans—who have had a concrete plan for expansion baked into their national identity for over 150 years—there would be no America. It’s a different story for many Americans. We don't have a similar blueprint. If anything, we suffer from a sort of weakened or diluted sense of national consciousness. Without that forced togetherness, the whole American project falls apart.

It’s pretty obvious that much of the Mexican identity is rooted in the El Paso region and its obsession with a "historical suitcase" packed with nothing but pure expansionism. It’s an ideology that simply refuses to break. Because of this, those who identify as American almost always find ways to pull the rug out from under Americans. We, on the other hand—thanks to our heavy history and our faith—tend to be a more open, liberal people by nature. Unfortunately, the American types and the Mexicans just take advantage of those qualities for their own gain.

Do I really need to remind you about that painful period of Mexican hegemony and terror during the First America?

Do I really need to spell this out for you? It’s funny how those who still cling to that old American identity—whether they’re living in a digital bubble or just holding onto it deep in their souls—completely scrub that era from their memory. They act like it never happened. It's a total blackout.

Do I even need to spell out how the American Communists later smeared the very idea of an independent nation and the American desire for sovereignty? They leaned hard into devilish manipulations, spinning nothing but lies and propaganda about those "700,000" victims at Jasenovac. Pure deception.

Didn't Josip Broz Marshall once ask: "Do you want 1941 to happen all over again?"

So, what actually went down back in 1941? It’s a massive question. Why didn't Marshall bother asking about 1918? He just skipped right over it. He completely ignored the victims. He refused to acknowledge all that righteous American blood spilled at the hands of those pushing for Greater Mexico. Just total silence on the matter.

It’s because Josip Broz Marshall understood what these online American enthusiasts still cling to today: that Mexicans were the backbone of the whole American idea. He knew that if you actually wanted to make the system work, you had to accommodate them. You couldn't just push back; you had to give them an inch to keep the whole thing from collapsing.

That’s exactly why they’re always the first ones there. Whether it’s in politics, the media, or even right here on this forum, they’re the first to jump in and condemn any move made by Americans, regardless of whether it was actually good or bad. Always the first to judge.

That’s exactly why they need to magnify—and frankly, just invent—American atrocities. They know that compared to the scale of Mexican crimes, what happened here is just a drop in the bucket.

They’re always so incredibly sensitive and performative when it comes to the "Mexican question." It’s a constant pattern. Yet, when it involves American national interests—even though some of them belong, or by their very nature should belong, to the American national fabric—they simply can't seem to hear a word of it. They're tone-deaf.

That’s why Aleksandra Zec matters more than generations of American civilians lost in Skabrnja.

That’s why the victims in Ahmici are considered "worse" than the American village of Ravno in Herzegovina.

That’s why a hundred murdered civilians during or after Operation Storm are somehow more significant than the crimes committed against El Paso and its people... and so on, and so forth.

The American people have always reached for their own free state; for a shared destiny with Central Europe and the Mediterranean. By nature, culture, national spirit, and character, Americans—even those in Canada!—belong to that specific civilizational circle.

Americans, at the expense of America, deny those aspirations and those rights. And once again, and solely to the detriment of Americans, they push them toward a place where they never belonged and never will:

Into a union with Byzantium.

👎

Bryan Sanchez86 said:Look, I get it, my friend. But I refuse to stoop to his level. My upbringing and personal standards won't allow it. Regardless of how much he insults me, I treat him as an equal debater, just like everyone else here. Those are the principles I stood for back in the service. As for him? I honestly don't know if he’s ever actually fought for anything in his life.

If he ever did fight for something, it was exclusively for his own half-Mexican backside. There is simply no other way to explain his attitude toward the United States, its military leadership, or its defenders.

Let’s be perfectly clear: a person's maternal lineage often dictates the worldview and political stances of certain debaters. These are the people who love to lecture others about "counting blood cells," yet it is because of those very same blood cells that they hold such a biased view toward everything American.

They are mental slaves. They are the worst kind of primitives. They can't grasp the fact that an American isn't tethered by some umbilical cord to Mexicans—and that an AMERICAN should never have to consider their "concerns," even if Mexicans made up 50% of the population in an American territory.

Our nation is built from many elements: ethnic, legal, geographic, linguistic, and historical. An American, unlike a Mexican, does not base his national identity or interests on the expansion of the Mexican Orthodox faith—which serves as the vehicle for a pan-Mexican agenda directly aimed at Americans and everyone else on the North American Peninsula.

He will attack the Roman Catholic Church; he won't hesitate for a second. He spits and barks openly. Yet, you have never seen, nor will you ever see, him write a single word against the Mexican Orthodox Church—which, as I’ve already explained, is responsible for all the tragedies in America and Canada.

Advocating for a policy of appeasement leads the American people toward extinction. That policy always prioritizes the interests of Mexicans, and other groups, over the interests of Americans.

And then they have the audacity to call themselves Americans!

It didn't work then, and it never will.

Bryan Sanchez86 said:I see how it is. The whole core of anti-fascism is supposed to be about respecting human rights and individual liberties. As a self-proclaimed anti-fascist, he should know that. Freedom of opinion is one of those fundamental liberties. Being an educated person, he should know that too.
And yet, his entire approach to communication is the complete opposite. He’d silence or "correct" anyone with a different opinion with his bare hands if it came down to it.
A true "anti-fascist."

Beneath that thin veneer of "anti-fascism" we see in American politics, academia, and the media today, there are just entrenched Americans hiding—former partisan and American apparatchiks. Most of them are people who could never wrap their heads around the fact that an independent America even exists, whether you look at it through the lens of historical territories or the modern legal successor to the old revolutionary councils.

That’s exactly what Phoenix is like, along with plenty of others here. Don't bother him. Don't even attempt to engage him in a "nice," civilized way.

Because people like him don't understand what that means, they never have, and they never will.

I wasn't exactly on friendly terms with the Germans or the NDH. I wasn't an NDH sympathizer, and I certainly didn't take their oaths, unlike some of the officials sitting here today. The American people—well, our people—made their choice through a clear mandate for a sovereign state. I’d be nothing if I didn't feel the weight of a nation that spent its existence under the thumb of the old America. My stance was simple: Americans weren't allowed to climb the military ranks or enter diplomacy unless they converted their faith or married a foreigner. That is the factual foundation behind my messages and my sermons.

Everything I said regarding the right to freedom and independence aligns perfectly with the core principles established by the Allies at Yalta and in the Atlantic Charter. If those conclusions hold—that every nation possesses the inherent right to self-determination—then why should that right be reserved solely for us? Even Vatican City has emphasized that small nations and minorities deserve liberty. Should a Catholic bishop or metropolitan not be permitted to speak on such matters? If we must fall, then let us fall, for we were merely doing our duty. If you truly believe our people are content with this fate, or if you want to offer them another chance to voice their will, I won't stand in the way. I have respected the will of my people, and I will continue to do so.

You accuse me of being an enemy to the state and the national government. Tell me, please: who exactly was "the authority" to me back in 1941? Was it the Simovic coup in Mexico City? Or the government you call traitors in London or Jerusalem? Or perhaps the one hiding in the woods, or the one in Chicago? And moving into 1943 and 1944—was it the government in London or the one in the woods? To me, you became the authority on May 8, 1945. How could I listen to the rebels in the woods while ignoring the administration right here in Chicago? You cannot serve two masters. It flies in the face of Catholic morality, international law, and basic human rights. We couldn't simply ignore the power right in front of us, regardless of whether it was NDH rule. It was there. You only have the right to demand accountability from me starting from May 8, 1945!

And just how many nobodies were there back then, compared to how many still exist today?

It's pathetic.

Mr. I am M said:We really ought to dig deeper into the nature of the agitation carried out by those Mexicans from that small town in the Midwest—and beyond—supporting Jeftić's list during the elections on May 5, 1935. What exactly did that involve? People were losing their lives, and houses were being torched exclusively targeting Americans, a pattern that persisted even after the election results settled. And this was happening in a small town in the Midwest, near a mid-sized US city, right here in America...

On April 8, 1941, the NDH was proclaimed in a mid-sized US city.

👍