Nicole Castillo11 said:Interesting turn of events. Can we get more on these nomads and their value system? What kind of people are we talking about here? Like those from Zahir by Paul Coelho? 🙂
The other alternative would be Nazism, which is equally alluring. But then comes that awkward question of who will stay smart and maintain a "pure race" when everyone else grows old...
The dilemma is actually quite pathetic; it highlights how impossible idealism truly is. 😢
Still, we cling to our tiny scrap of an imaginary "Brave New World"—our idealism, our philosophy, our madness.
Isn't that a bit nihilistic?
Not as long as there's hope in that tiny scrap. It’s nihilistic to believe everything at a buffet is equally good, but we all know that isn't true. We can try to comfort ourselves with poor choices, terrified by the fact that things could always be better or much worse.
I’m not sure about Coelho—I was thinking more along the lines of the Tuareg or the Gypsies; wanderers without a homeland, though I suppose there's that romanticized notion of them rejecting materialism and everything superfluous...
We can afford to talk big about cosmopolitanism because we’ve supposedly "evolved" past mere materialism. It's easy to preach. But take some laborer dying of thirst in the brutal heat of Dubai—someone without plumbing or any basic amenities—who is out there building the infrastructure for some glittering metropolis. He doesn't give a damn about cosmopolitanism; if anything, he might be slightly more concerned with nationalism. He belongs to a "superior race" without which he wouldn't be so miserable—or rather, without whom those wealthy cosmopolitans couldn't be so pathetic. Honestly, I'm embarrassed by us. The cosmopolitan community of global philosophers... yeah, right. Proletarians of all countries, unite!🤮