Posts by Linda Harris44

So, Ethan Brooks59 is straight up breaking Rule 3 here—you know, the one about personal attacks—by targeting the user Pravi Život.

Ethan Brooks59 said:Basically, you're just some pathetic guy who can't decide if he's got a crushed-up Kit Kat or a vagina between his legs. Just figure it out and deal with the sadness already.
🤦🤦🙄

Anyway, I won't ramble too much, let's stick to the point.
Quoting our mod Nick:

The usual rules apply: no insults, no doxxing, no trolling, no spamming...

Ethan Brooks59’s signature calls other users ignorant and malicious, which is basically just a giant middle finger designed to bait people into an argument.
Is that kind of signature actually allowed under the rules?

Hey there.
I was wondering—is it actually allowed to have a sentence in your signature that basically insults other people on the forum?
Specifically, I’m looking at this user's signature here:

Also, since the user that this person was targeting got banned—and their "inappropriate" signature (which was the whole reason for the ban) was wiped out—I’d really appreciate it if someone could take a look at my question and give me an answer...

Thanks in advance, cheers.

Well, here we go again... looks like this thread is just turning into another dumping ground where monty-zg can vent all his bitterness, pour out his frustrations, and just take cheap shots at everyone else on the board. It’s pretty obvious from a mile away—he's been relentlessly picking on certain users for absolutely no reason, and honestly, he's been doing it for months now.
When does this even end????

Ethan Brooks59, zecopas, Roger Cooper91, Biljka112—they’ve been straight-up nuking the alternative medicine threads for months now... It’s pathetic. These users show up with zero clue about how holistic stuff actually works, and whatever they drop in the comments has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand. They aren't even here to talk; they just swoop in specifically to trash the people who are actually trying to have a meaningful discussion. There isn't a single real argument to be found because, again, they don't know anything... it's just constant ad hominem attacks.
It was actually because of Ethan Brooks59 that the cancer treatment thread had to be shut down entirely. 👎
We really need to put an end to this kind of disrespect and start handing out actual consequences for it.

briskbison55 said:Man, you can just head off in the wrong direction and then you're stuck, unable to help yourself, and you end up finishing things in the most foolish way possible. So go ahead, keep searching, stay skeptical, question and re-question everything... but why on earth is it such a massive problem for some of you to actually share the results of those studies with others? Instead, your whole argument just boils down to "we believe this," or "just try it for seven days and you'll see," or my personal favorite line from skeptics who reject actual science—"go educate yourself on Google."

Just deal with your own huge cognitive dissonance regarding eating meat and stop ruining the thread. ☕

Come on now, you might as well just call me stupid directly. 😁

Here’s yet another perfect example of how briskbison55 loves to stir the pot—twisting people's words just to get a rise out of everyone. ☕

Sam Alvarez4 said:An Elizabeth Jackson article?

What are the "WHO" and the French cancer research agency (IARC) saying? You click the link, and suddenly it's all New World Order dot com! 😵
There isn't a peep from the WHO or IARC. 🤣

edit.
I've never actually written on that PDF. I just read. Because some things catch my eye...
But when I see stuff about the New World Order and other nonsense, I honestly just want to ban you all collectively!

If you actually bothered to read closely, you'd see I wasn't even referencing that article on the New World Order site. I was looking at the link describing some guy's experience curing his prostate cancer with raw food, which prompted Biljka112 to reply to Elizabeth Jackson in his usual way—which is basically just trolling.

As for that New World Order article, it’s easy enough to just Google the original WHO report, and voilà—you'll realize those "evil" NWO authors didn't lie or twist a single thing. They're just stating:
According to the report, eating 50 grams of processed meat—roughly two slices of bacon—every day bumps up your cancer risk by a whopping 18 percent!

In the original it says:
Even though smoking is in the same category as processed meat (Group 1 carcinogen), the magnitude or level of risk associated with smoking is considerably higher (e.g., for lung cancer about 20 fold or 2000% increased risk) from those associated with processed meat – an analysis of data from 10 studies, cited in the IARC report showed an 18 percent increased risk in colorectal cancer per 50g processed meat increase per day.

😉

I'm done here. Whoever needs to find it can find it. It's out there for everyone to see.

bluecyclist64 said:Look, I honestly couldn't care less whether Pero Pero ends up sabotaging himself through sheer ignorance or a closed mind.
What bothers me is when some young, inexperienced kid reads the kind of nonsense being recommended here and completely wrecks their life because of it. That little guy, Ivo Ivić, needs to be able to hold down a job and pay his taxes to the government so that I actually have some money to live on when I reach retirement—you follow?

If little Ivo Ivić follows the bad advice of some prominent poster on your sub-forum—thinking people can actually survive without eating anything at all—then he’ll end up broken, and there won't be any funds left for my pension. You get what I'm saying?

Actually, why am I even doing this— you follow? 🤦

EDIT: And one more thing. Elizabeth Jackson has a signature that is an outright lie, and it shouldn't be allowed:

What we call matter is actually energy, whose vibration has been lowered so that it becomes perceptible to the senses. Matter does not exist. Albert Einstein

This is just further evidence of the extent to which your sub-forum spreads lies and misinformation. This is why it should be much more strictly moderated, instead of driving away BAT kolo and replacing them with vidoviti Milan.

What does Elizabeth Jackson's signature have to do with this thread? ☕ You guys are really grasping at straws here.

briskbison55 said:I mean, you can find plenty of internet "testimonies" out there. But I guess... is the entire scientific community, down to the very last family doctor, actually in league with some Illuminati group controlling the WHO? I ask because, well, I just don't see how any doctor sees a way for a cure like this to work based on actual facts. Dietary advice is one thing, but claims like these... they seem pretty strange, at least to me. I'm not saying it's impossible—the human body is a miracle in its own right, I really believe that—but maybe we shouldn't go overboard. If there weren't skeptics, there wouldn't be any progress, right? If people didn't ask questions, where would we even be today?

Just admit that out of pure ignorance, you didn't even know raw cacao was a thing.
After you commented on the raw food thread about how raw cacao doesn't exist, Elizabeth Jackson was kind enough to fill you in and explain that it does, to which you cleverly didn't respond at all, and now you're bringing up that cacao again on purpose. 🥱

Well, I figured it was probably better to just ignore it for a bunch of reasons, and this is one of them. As you can see, there are all sorts of opinions floating around the web; it’s funny how some people think their side is the only one that matters, while everything else is just trolling or an insult.

It’s just not true to say that absolutely zero doctors see how possible it is to heal through a raw food or plant-based diet—not to mention you're also trying to deny that living on plants is even doable in the first place... Look, there have already been articles published over on the raw food sites about Dr. Gart Davis and his whole approach to plant-based living as both a lifestyle and a way to actually recover from illness, so I'm not going to bother dropping links here. Honestly, though, there's really no point in arguing with you...

Look, it’s not even about being a lifelong skeptic or constantly digging around and second-guessing everything... that's not the point. People who live on raw food—those vegans—they aren't really playing the skeptic game anymore, mostly because thanks to... Based on my own lived experience... People on a diet like this... they just know. They can feel when it's the real deal. You haven't even been doing the raw food thing for a week, let alone several years or... Thirty years... man, where does the time actually go? It feels like just yesterday we were dealing with all that old chaos, and now here we are... three decades later. Life moves way too fast... Look, it’s pretty obvious why you’re such a skeptic—and honestly, it doesn't matter if I drop an infinite mountain of articles, solid arguments, or real-life stories right in front of you... nothing is ever going to be enough. You aren't even here to actually learn anything new or engage with the topic... you're just here to shut everything down and troll... typical...

Look, you really need to deal with that massive cognitive dissonance you've got going on regarding eating meat and just stop derailing the thread... it's getting old. ☕

briskbison55 said:Honestly, it's just laziness. There isn't a single post like that here. People just warn you when you try to label something as raw food that actually has about as much in common with raw food as roasted peanuts do (or in this case, cocoa).

Not a single post like that? Then what the hell is this?
Right after Elizabeth Jackson's article about the guy who cured cancer...
Biljka112 replied

And then it just keeps going in that same tone—just constant pushback, trolling, and zero constructive posts from Biljka112. After Elizabeth Jackson's article regarding curing things through raw food
Biljka112 commented

Just admit that because of your own ignorance, you didn't even realize raw cocoa was a thing.
After you commented on the raw food thread claiming raw cocoa doesn't exist, Elizabeth Jackson was kind enough to actually inform you and explain that it does... and you suspiciously had nothing to say to that. Now, here you are, bringing up that cocoa again on purpose.🥱

I’ve been following this raw food thread for a few years now. Back in the day, the vibe here was actually great—just a massive dump of useful tips and deep dives from people who had already made the jump to raw food. I even started sneaking a bunch of those delicious recipes into my regular diet...
Lately, though, I’ve been avoiding the whole thread because it’s become totally toxic. It’s pretty obvious that most of the regulars who used to post have gone quiet, and honestly, there aren't even many newcomers showing up anymore.

It used to be this sanctuary where people on a standard American diet would come looking for guidance on how to transition to raw food. You had folks like Elizabeth Jackson, Marec, and more recently Jason Grant, just dropping knowledge and sharing their life experiences because they genuinely wanted to help. It was all about mutual support, staying positive, and cheering each other on.

Given the atmosphere here lately, I’m not surprised the newbies stay away. You can’t even post a simple raw recipe or share some good news about recovering through raw food without some troll jumping in immediately to belittle everything you wrote and argue for the sake of arguing. It happens constantly... especially after almost every single one of Elizabeth Jackson's posts regarding actual positive stories from people living the raw lifestyle. It’s just exhausting, and frankly, I don't have the energy to keep reading it.

briskbison55 has basically nuked the thread, especially with Carol Lopez23 being allowed to moderate so poorly—it's completely ruined the Alternative scene here. I really hope they follow through with bringing on a third moderator, but they absolutely need to pick someone from the Alternative circles.