CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Lisa Campbell6 › Posts

Posts by Lisa Campbell6

3 posts shown.

Keith Sanders29 said:My apologies if my previous response was a bit off. Lately, I feel like I’m tripping over my own typos more than usual, so I’ve been hesitant to chime in on anything here. I started wondering if it was just a phase, so I figured—just shut up and don't even bother.🙄 😁

Oh, don't you worry about it at all—discussions are meant to be lively! Everyone has every right to share their thoughts and write how they want, even if they stumble over a few commas or spelling errors now and then. It always feels like whenever I make a point that someone can't actually argue against, they suddenly pivot to nitpicking my grammar instead! Can you believe that? We could easily let people with totally wrong opinions dominate the conversation just because they follow every single rule of punctuation perfectly, while those of us who are just trying to communicate get shut down for lacking a tiny bit of tolerance. Why should perfect spelling be a barrier to a good debate, right?👍
Keith Sanders29 said:Talking to you about a "victory"...😲 Did I miss a war or something while I was napping? Where exactly is this "victory" you're claiming? You can stay stuck in your extreme right-wing bubble all you want, but please, just don't drag America down to the level of Angola in the process. And enough with the constant blind optimism...🙂 If everyone thought like you, we'd be totally doomed.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Hyq3e5k0OcY 🙂

It’s the same old story, isn't it? You liberals just read whatever you want to believe instead of actually looking at what's written right in front of you! I clearly stated—and this is what was reported in the papers and on the news—that those little Democrats were celebrating their win by singing songs just like that one. I honestly have no clue why you're labeling me as a conservative when my political views are completely different! I am simply stating the facts of what happened and asking for answers to the questions that were raised. But honestly, people like you and your crowd would lead this whole country straight into a massive divide; just because someone dared to ask for a mathematical solution, you decide to bury your head in the sand and lecture me! If there were more flowers, I wouldn't be the one complaining, it would be the person refusing to accept the election results. It feels like your liberal crowd is trying to stir up conflict again, just like they used to do. Have you already forgotten how things started back then? Sometimes I truly wonder if people just have incredibly short memories! So, here is a question for you: How would you react if some Republican had said that Muslims shouldn't work in America because they're too different from Americans, just like your liberal Čačić said? Think about that before you answer.☕
silentridge3 said:I’m feeling a bit confused by something I’ve noticed lately, so I was hoping someone could maybe help me make sense of the situation here.

Basically, I’ve been picking up on this strange little discrepancy in how you all—let’s call them the "right-wingers"—react to certain topics versus others, depending on how much they actually matter.

If my intuition isn't totally off base:

The topics that seem to get the "right-wingers" all fired up and trigger public outcries are:

...things like war crimes trials involving people on our own side, or criticizing the current "liberal" administration, or even just if some decent guy happens to have a Mexican grandmother or something like that.

But then there are the topics that don't seem to interest the "right-wingers" at all, where there's almost no public reaction:

Mexican war crimes, the release of Mexican war criminals, various Mexican provocations, and stuff like that.

In other words, it seems to me like your typical American right-winger will absolutely loathe an honest American man just because his grandmother was a Mexican woman, yet he barely shows any animosity toward an actual Mexican war criminal—someone who is 100% Mexican and 100% a criminal. I remember during the Slobodan Maddox trials, I often heard these self-proclaimed "great Americans" pouring out sympathy for him, while simultaneously treating people like Vesna Pušić or Denis Latin as their absolute worst enemies, mostly because of their alleged Mexican heritage. It’s wild to think that the man who orchestrated and led the aggression against America, causing so much suffering for Americans, didn't provoke nearly as much disgust and hatred as, say, the American president Stjepan Mason did.

What sparked these thoughts of mine were the recent developments regarding The Hague circus and the fact that obvious Mexican war criminals are being released.

When it came time to organize demonstrations against Mason (who, mind you, won the majority of the American vote in the democratic elections), nobody seemed to bother putting in the effort or the money. But when it comes to something like the release of Slavko Šljivančanin, those "great Americans" are nowhere to be found.

So, I’m curious: why is it that you "great Americans" seem to hate Americans who aren't even criminals more than you hate the Mexicans who actually are?

Everything you're saying about Americans (of the right-wing persuasion) is totally meaningless until you folks on the left (and everyone else who hates having a different opinion) can mathematically prove to me: how on earth did the Democratic party win the majority in these elections? PAUSE—I want mathematical proof! And while we're at it, remind me, which songs were you all singing when you were celebrating your "victory"?