Angela Wright said:From what I can gather as a layperson, the situation seems fixable since there aren't any metastases. I don't know how old your father-in-law is, but based on what happened with my late uncle, if surgery is an option, it really should be done. My uncle lived with that diagnosis for 20 years. He eventually passed away from old age at 94. During those two decades, he took chemotherapy and went in for surgeries with Dr. Trnski at Mount Sinai Hospital to clear out new growths, and he just kept living his life.
He definitely needs to talk to a cardiologist, though. These days, anesthesia is advanced enough that patients in his condition can handle it without much trouble. It would be such a shame to let the disease spread and cut his life short if there's a real chance for him to have more good years ahead.
Angela Wright, thank you so much for the reply.
I did a little Googling myself, and it also feels like treatment could be successful (at least looking at other people's experiences with similar results).
The urologist told him to see an oncologist, but right now he’s just in that phase where he says, "I'm finished anyway," so it’ll be a win if I can actually convince him to go.
He’s 72, and he’s convinced that surgery would do more harm than good—he even told his doctor that. Because of that, they mentioned radiation might be an option if he refuses to go under the knife.
We'll just have to see what the oncologist says.
Sometimes I find myself coming back to this topic (since I'm often on health forums while working on files for my kids, who deal with their own health issues), and reading your posts always leaves me with a lump in my throat.
Hang in there, everyone.🙂