wiredseal7 said:The odds just went up—maybe to about 1%.
At least until someone can explain how one single pipeline—where ExxonMobil could only ship half capacity under those regulations—is somehow better than having two running at full tilt.
You think there's any chance it was actually the Americans who blew them up?
Why would anyone sabotage just one line of Nord Stream 2, a pipeline that hasn't even been cleared for operation and won't be?🤔
If the Americans were behind this, they wouldn't have stopped at one; they would have wiped out both lines to ensure nothing could ever run again.🤔 On the other hand, if the Russians did it, leaving one line intact actually makes strategic sense. Why? Because if gas starts flowing through that single remaining pipe, the West ends up violating its own sanctions just to keep the lights on. It's a masterstroke.
So why blow up Nord Stream 1, both pipes?
Nord Stream 1 wasn't under sanctions, and it was the Russian Federation itself that choked off the supply in the first place.
Russia's whole game plan was to use the Nord Stream 1 shutdown to put massive pressure on the European Union, specifically targeting Germany.
But look at the reality before the sabotage happened: the Russian plan wasn't working. Gas deliveries to Germany were continuing, and storage facilities were being filled up. At that point, cutting off Nord Stream 1 wasn't even making much of a dent.
Hypothesis 1: The Americans sabotaged the pipelines.
In this scenario, they hit both lines of Nord Stream 1—the very tool Russia was using to manipulate the market by tapering supplies before eventually shutting it down entirely. Then, they hit only one line of Nord Stream 2, which is the specific line Russia desperately wants to use (and the USA has always fought against).
Hypothesis 2: The Russians sabotaged the pipelines.
They destroy Nord Stream 1, a line whose flow they had already reduced and then completely halted, rendering it useless to them now. Meanwhile, they only destroy one line of Nord Stream 2—the one they are hell-bent on utilizing. This leaves them perfectly positioned to negotiate; they can always ship gas through that one remaining pipe if the West hits a shortage or if public pressure becomes too intense to ignore.
🤔🤔
Best regards,