Tyler Jackson5 said:You don't get it—people can't even ask what the difference is between groups without being labeled an "agent" immediately. The very people who were being attacked and called out are back in the stands today. When we go to Turkey, everyone begs for a truce just to keep the numbers even. But when we head to the Czech Republic, there’s no truce because one side outnumbers the other twenty to one. And if you ask the front office who they're actually at war with, or why the older guys who started all this aren't leading the charge instead of sending kids to fight their battles, you get nothing. So, my friend, you're never going to get honest answers to a lot of questions.
The fundamental issue here is that everything happens online. In these digital spaces, identities are rarely known, and having a real identity is crucial for any serious discussion. It dictates how much weight people give to your words and how much credibility you actually have. Unfortunately, a huge amount of insults, lies, and weird interpretations stem from debates that basically boil down to anonymous people shouting at each other.
It isn't true that people are automatically branded as agents just for asking questions, but some people definitely act like that, and it's hard to disprove. Otherwise, terms like "agents" or "mercenaries" (specifically regarding BBB) are just colloquial ways to describe the crew that used to follow Mamić's lead even when they shouldn't have. It’s an undeniable fact that the club provided financial backing to people who went against the majority—those who opposed Mamić. The club has even admitted this in certain instances, and it was clearly visible in various donation reports and similar documentation.
Regarding Turkey... you're talking nonsense and wondering why the admin is giving you a hard time (and while I'm against banning people, I'm definitely in favor of locking threads). Nobody was begging for a truce. Instead, certain people decided long before that trip to Turkey to suggest a way of interacting that wouldn't trigger constant infighting. The basic rule was that anyone working against the majority or Mamić shouldn't interfere with the group's activities in any way. If they want to go to games, they can go, but they stay out of the North Stand and out of the away section.
Establishing that kind of relationship is incredibly difficult, especially after internal conflicts—as we saw in Belgium and a few other times—but sometimes, it actually works.
The situation in the Czech Republic is simple if you actually care to understand it. BBB stays in the away section, and those tickets belong to BBB and other Dinamo fans. Pretending to be clueless about why a specific group wasn't allowed on the stand is just unnecessary. If a problematic group had entered the away section, the match wouldn't have finished, regardless of who ended up getting beat up. In Plzeň, nobody was attacking anyone, nor was there a massive group of 20x more people looking for a fight; things just escalated in front of the stands over ticket issues. BBB ended up short on a portion of the tickets because of people who worked against them, so it wasn't acceptable for those same people to sit in the BBB section. Neither the home club nor Dinamo could find a solution for this, so those people were essentially pushed out and had to go their own way.
As for your claim that you won't get answers from leadership about who they are fighting with—again, you're missing the point. If you had shown up to the stands, or even just stood outside and talked to the people you actually need to talk to, you would have gotten an answer. But as usual, you play the fool on a forum and expect a profound response.
If someone acts against the group, the assumption is that they will eventually clash with it. You can call it a war (though today's situation is nowhere near an actual war), a battle, or whatever you want, but it’s a reality, regardless of who is clashing.
A lot of things could have been fixed or brought back to a normal level a long time ago. But certain moves—like stealing banners, starting that fan club back in 2013 just to spite everyone with the help of the front office, or parading around with those fighter clubs and other recent nonsense—were blocked by people whose egos simply won't let them step aside.
Every single time there was an attempt to take a step forward, some self-proclaimed "legend" of the stands would show up and, backed by people within the organization, make life miserable for the group. What the last few years have shown is that because of a few individuals constantly sucking up to Mamić, they screwed over both the people who followed suit and those who stayed loyal to their friends and the group instead. It just kept cycling through month after month, from one mess to the next, until we hit a point where some people can never come back to the stands or see any kind of normalization.
I don't write much because it tends to drain my time and my nerves, but I’m always open to a real conversation, face-to-face, with whoever needs it. Honestly, it would be better if we talked about this in person. Looking at your post, it seems like you've picked up a lot of wrong info and you're trying to frame rhetorical questions as absolute facts, but I don't think that's going to work. Mainly because it feels like you have a grudge against the current people in the stands; you don't feel like part of us, so you'd rather fight the whole crowd than accept how things actually are right now.
If I'm wrong, then show up to the stands, get involved, and actually work to change things for the better. You aren't going to accomplish anything through a forum, and you certainly won't heal your frustrations and complexes that way—just like I can't change the minds of the internet clowns (BBB, idiots, whatever...) even with a hundred solid arguments and quality posts. I guess when it doesn't work, it just doesn't work...
Until the next post...